Transport Control Protocol

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSCI-1680 Transport Layer II Based partly on lecture notes by David Mazières, Phil Levis, John Jannotti Rodrigo Fonseca.
Advertisements

1 Computer Networks: A Systems Approach, 5e Larry L. Peterson and Bruce S. Davie Chapter 5 End-to-End Protocols Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights.
COT 4600 Operating Systems Fall 2009 Dan C. Marinescu Office: HEC 439 B Office hours: Tu-Th 3:00-4:00 PM.
Slide Set 13: TCP. In this set.... TCP Connection Termination TCP State Transition Diagram Flow Control How does TCP control its sliding window ?
CS 6401 Transport Control Protocol Outline TCP objectives revisited TCP basics New algorithms for RTO calculation.
Computer Networks Chapter 5: End-to-End Protocols
1 Chapter 5 End-to-End Protocols Outline 5.1 UDP 5.2 TCP 5.3 Remote Procedure Call.
1 Computer Networks: A Systems Approach, 5e Larry L. Peterson and Bruce S. Davie Chapter 5 End-to-End Protocols Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights.
8. Transport Protocol and UDP 8.1 Transport protocol : End-to-end protocol –IP: Host to host packet delivery –Transport: Process to process communication.
CSS432: End-to-End Protocols 1 CSS432 End-to-End Protocols Textbook Ch5.1 – 5.2 Professor: Munehiro Fukuda.
Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP)
Provides a reliable unicast end-to-end byte stream over an unreliable internetwork.
1 Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP) Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control Adaptive Timeout.
6-May-154/598N: Computer Networks End-to-End Protocols Underlying best-effort network –drop messages –re-orders messages –delivers duplicate copies of.
CSE Computer Networks Prof. Aaron Striegel Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Notre Dame Lecture 14 – February 23, 2010.
TCP 4/15/2017.
Fundamentals of Computer Networks ECE 478/578 Lecture #21: TCP Window Mechanism Instructor: Loukas Lazos Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
CSE 124 Networked Services Fall 2009 B. S. Manoj, Ph.D 10/20/20091CSE 124 Networked Services Fall 2009 Some.
Spring 2003CS 4611 Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP) Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control Adaptive Timeout.
TCP. Learning objectives Reliable Transport in TCP TCP flow and Congestion Control.
Spring 2002CS 4611 Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP) Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control Adaptive Timeout.
TCP : Transmission Control Protocol Computer Network System Sirak Kaewjamnong.
1 Internet Engineering University of ilam Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi Transport Layer.
TCP1 Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP2 Outline Transmission Control Protocol.
1 Introduction to Computer Networks University of ilam Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi Transport Layer.
CSE Computer Networks Prof. Aaron Striegel Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Notre Dame Lecture 14 – February 23, 2010.
Spring 2010CS 3321 Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP) Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control Adaptive Timeout.
1 Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP) Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control Adaptive Timeout.
Spring 2008CPE Computer Networks1 Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP) Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control.
1 End-to-End Protocols User Datagram Protocol (UDP) Transmission Control Protocol(TCP)
1 Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP) Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control Adaptive Timeout.
Ilam University Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi 1 Transport Layer.
EE 122: Transport Protocols Kevin Lai October 16, 2002.
1 End-to-End Protocols UDP TCP –Connection Establishment/Termination –Sliding Window Revisited –Flow Control –Congestion Control –Adaptive Timeout.
3. END-TO-END PROTOCOLS (PART 1) Rocky K. C. Chang Department of Computing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 22 March
Univ. of TehranIntroduction to Computer Network1 An Introduction Computer Networks An Introduction to Computer Networks University of Tehran Dept. of EE.
Advanced Computer Networks
3. END-TO-END PROTOCOLS (PART 2) Rocky K. C. Chang Department of Computing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 22 March
TCP - Part II.
Chapter 5 TCP Sequence Numbers & TCP Transmission Control
5. End-to-end protocols (part 1)
TCP Protocol Slides originally from Williamson at Calgary
Chapter 5 TCP Sliding Window
ECE544: Communication Networks-II Spring 2010
Internet routing Problem: Route from any node to any other node
CSS432 End-to-End Protocols Textbook Ch5.1 – 5.2
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
TCP Overview Connection-oriented Byte-stream Full duplex
Transport Control Protocol
CSS432 End-to-End Protocols Textbook Ch5.1 – 5.2
5. End-to-end protocols (part 2)
Lecture 18 – More TCP & Congestion Control
Reliable Byte-Stream (TCP)
Ilam University Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi
Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Part II Neil Tang 11/21/2008
State Transition Diagram
If both sources send full windows, we may get congestion collapse
Advanced Computer Networks
CSS432 End-to-End Protocols Textbook Ch5.1 – 5.2
TCP - Part I Relates to Lab 5. First module on TCP which covers packet format, data transfer, and connection management.
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
CSS432 UDP and TCP Textbook Ch5.1 – 5.2
Transport Protocols: TCP Segments, Flow control and Connection Setup
Introduction to Computer Networks
Introduction to Computer Networks
Chapter 5 TCP Sliding Window
Introduction to Computer Networks
Lecture 21 and 22 5/29/2019.
Transport Protocols: TCP Segments, Flow control and Connection Setup
Presentation transcript:

Transport Control Protocol Outline TCP objectives revisited TCP basics New algorithms for RTO calculation CS 640

TCP Overview TCP is the most widely used Internet protocol Web, Peer-to-peer, FTP, telnet, … A two way, reliable, byte stream oriented end-to-end protocol Includes flow and congestion control Closely tied to the Internet Protocol (IP) A focus of intense study for many years Our goal is to understand the RENO version of TCP RENO is most widely used TCP today RFC 2001 (now expired) RENO mainly specifies mechanisms for dealing with congestion CS 640

TCP Features Connection-oriented Byte-stream Reliable data transfer app writes bytes TCP sends segments app reads bytes Reliable data transfer Full duplex Flow control: keep sender from overrunning receiver Congestion control: keep sender from overrunning network Application process W rite bytes TCP Send buffer Segment T ransmit segments Read Receive buffer … CS 640

Segment Format CS 640

Segment Format (cont) Each connection identified with 4-tuple: (SrcPort, SrcIPAddr, DsrPort, DstIPAddr) Sliding window + flow control acknowledgment, SequenceNum, AdvertisedWinow Flags SYN, FIN, RESET, PUSH, URG, ACK Checksum is the same as UDP pseudo header + TCP header + data Sender Data (SequenceNum) Acknowledgment + AdvertisedWindow Receiver CS 640

Sequence Numbers 32 bit sequence numbers Wrap around supported TCP breaks byte stream from application into packets (limited by Max. Segment Size) Each byte in the data stream is considered Each packet has a sequence number Initial number selected at connection time Subsequent numbers indicate first data byte number in packet ACK’s indicate next byte expected CS 640

Sequence Number Wrap Around Bandwidth Time Until Wrap Around T1 (1.5 Mbps) 6.4 hours Ethernet (10 Mbps) 57 minutes T3 (45 Mbps) 13 minutes FDDI (100 Mbps) 6 minutes STS-3 (155 Mbps) 4 minutes STS-12 (622 Mbps) 55 seconds STS-24 (1.2 Gbps) 28 seconds Protect against this by adding a 32-bit timestamp to TCP header CS 640

Connection Establishment Active participant Passive participant (client) (server) SYN, SequenceNum = x y , 1 SYN + ACK, SequenceNum = x + Acknowledgment = ACK, Acknowledgment = y + 1 CS 640

Connection Termination Active participant Passive participant (server) (client) FIN, SequenceNum = x x + 1 Acknowledgment = y FIN, SequenceNum= Acknowledgment = y + 1 CS 640

State Transition Diagram CLOSED LISTEN SYN_RCVD SYN_SENT ESTABLISHED CLOSE_WAIT LAST_ACK CLOSING TIME_WAIT FIN_WAIT_2 FIN_WAIT_1 Passive open Close Send/ SYN SYN/SYN + ACK SYN + ACK/ACK ACK /FIN FIN/ACK ACK + FIN/ACK Timeout after two segment lifetimes Active open /SYN CS 640

Reliability in TCP Checksum used to detect bit level errors Sequence numbers used to detect sequencing errors Duplicates are ignored Reordered packets are reordered (or dropped) Lost packets are retransmitted Timeouts used to detect lost packets Requires RTO calculation Requires sender to maintain data until it is ACKed CS 640

Sliding Window Revisited Sending application LastByteWritten TCP LastByteSent LastByteAcked Receiving application LastByteRead LastByteRcvd NextByteExpected Sending side LastByteAcked < = LastByteSent LastByteSent < = LastByteWritten buffer bytes between LastByteAcked and LastByteWritten Receiving side LastByteRead < NextByteExpected NextByteExpected < = LastByteRcvd +1 buffer bytes between NextByteRead and LastByteRcvd CS 640

Flow Control in TCP Send buffer size: MaxSendBuffer Receive buffer size: MaxRcvBuffer Receiving side LastByteRcvd - LastByteRead < = MaxRcvBuffer AdvertisedWindow = MaxRcvBuffer - (LastByteRcvd - LastByteRead) Sending side LastByteSent - LastByteAcked < = AdvertisedWindow EffectiveWindow = AdvertisedWindow - (LastByteSent - LastByteAcked) LastByteWritten - LastByteAcked < = MaxSendBuffer block sender if (LastByteWritten - LastByteAcked) + y > MaxSenderBuffer Always send ACK in response to arriving data segment Persist sending one byte seg. when AdvertisedWindow = 0 CS 640

Keeping the Pipe Full 16-bit AdvertisedWindow controls amount of pipelining Assume RTT of 100ms Add scaling factor extension to header to enable larger windows Bandwidth Delay x Bandwidth Product T1 (1.5 Mbps) 18KB Ethernet (10 Mbps) 122KB T3 (45 Mbps) 549KB FDDI (100 Mbps) 1.2MB OC-3 (155 Mbps) 1.8MB OC-12 (622 Mbps) 7.4MB OC-24 (1.2 Gbps) 14.8MB CS 640

Making TCP More Efficient Delayed acknowledgements Delay for about 200ms Try to piggyback ACKs with data Acknowledge every other packet Many instances in transmission sequence which require an ACK Don’t forget Nagle’s algorithm Can be switched off CS 640

Karn/Partridge Algorithm for RTO Sender Receiver Sender Receiver Original transmission Original transmission TT TT ACK Retransmission SampleR SampleR Retransmission ACK Two degenerate cases with timeouts and RTT measurements Solution: Do not sample RTT when retransmitting After each retransmission, set next RTO to be double the value of the last Exponential backoff is well known control theory method Loss is most likely caused by congestion so be careful CS 640

Jacobson/ Karels Algorithm In late ’80s, Internet was suffering from congestion collapse New Calculations for average RTT – Jacobson ’88 Variance is not considered when setting timeout value If variance is small, we could set RTO = EstRTT If variance is large, we may need to set RTO > 2 x EstRTT New algorithm calculates both variance and mean for RTT Diff = sampleRTT - EstRTT EstRTT = EstRTT + ( d x Diff) Dev = Dev + d ( |Diff| - Dev) Initially settings for EstRTT and Dev will be given to you where d is a factor between 0 and 1 typical value is 0.125 CS 640

Jacobson/ Karels contd. TimeOut = m x EstRTT + f x Dev where m = 1 and f = 4 When variance is small, TimeOut is close to EstRTT When variance is large Dev dominates the calculation Another benefit of this mechanism is that it is very efficient to implement in code (does not require floating point) Notes algorithm only as good as granularity of clock (500ms on Unix) accurate timeout mechanism important to congestion control (later) These issues have been studied and dealt with in new RFC’s for RTO calculation. TCP RENO uses Jacobson/Karels CS 640