Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Examples of synthetic simple scenes (in anaglyph 3-D). Each visual stimulus in.
Advertisements

From: What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: Seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):1. doi: /8.4.1.
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):24. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(7):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Estimating the Binocular Visual Field of Glaucoma Patients With an Adjustment for Ocular Dominance Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;57(7):
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(6):10. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Color signals in the primary visual cortex of marmosets
From: Why the long face? The importance of vertical image structure for biological “barcodes” underlying face recognition Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):25.
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Bayesian inference for psychometric functions
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(13):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Visual detection of symmetry of 3D shapes
From: ERP P1-N1 changes associated with Vernier perceptual learning and its location specificity and transfer Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):19. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The natural statistics of blur
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
Figure Legend: From: Key characteristics of specular stereo
From: Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain:
From: Visual speed sensitivity in the drum corps color guard
From: How the unstable eye sees a stable and moving world
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):22. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(6):4. doi: /4.6.4 Figure Legend:
From: Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
Figure Legend: statistical inference
From: Maximum likelihood difference scales represent perceptual magnitudes and predict appearance matches Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):1. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(1):1. doi: /8.1.1 Figure Legend:
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Figure Legend: From: Dynamics of oculomotor direction discrimination
From: A new analytical method for characterizing nonlinear visual processes with stimuli of arbitrary distribution: Theory and applications Journal of.
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Inhibition of saccade and vergence eye movements in 3D space
From: Rat performance on visual detection task modeled with divisive normalization and adaptive decision thresholds Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
From: The perceptual basis of common photographic practice
Figure Legend: From: Binocular combination of luminance profiles
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(12):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Objects predict fixations better than early saliency
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Analysis of human vergence dynamics
From: Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: Cause and effect
From: Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images
Sergei Gepshtein, Martin S. Banks  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

From: The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi:10.1167/11.8.11 Figure Legend: The zone of comfort in different units. (A) Comfort zone plotted in diopters. This is the same as Figure 17. The abscissa is the distance of the vergence stimulus and the ordinate is the viewing distance, which corresponds to the focal stimulus. The black diagonal line represents natural viewing (demand line). The red and blue lines represent estimates from our data of the far and near boundaries of the comfort zone, respectively. The parameters for lines are m near = 1.035, T near = −0.626, m far = 1.129, and T far = 0.442 (Equation 7). The dashed horizontal lines represent typical viewing distances for mobile devices, desktop displays, television, and cinema. (B) Comfort zone plotted in meters. The abscissa and ordinate are the distance of the vergence stimulus and the viewing distance (i.e., the focal stimulus), respectively. The abscissa and ordinate are plotted on log scales. The black diagonal line again represents the natural viewing line. The red and blue lines again represent the boundaries of the comfort zone. The dashed horizontal lines represent typical viewing distances for the same devices as in the previous panel. (C) Comfort zone plotted as on-screen disparity in meters as a function of viewing distance in meters. The abscissa is plotted on a log scale. The horizontal line represents the screen (where the disparity is zero). Positive disparities are crossed, specifying a stimulus nearer than the screen. Negative disparities have been adjusted upward slightly at long distance to reflect the fact that most viewers cannot diverge the eyes more than 1° beyond parallel; specifically, we set the maximum uncrossed disparity so that divergence would not exceed 0.85°. The vertical dashed lines represent distances for the same devices as before. The smaller plot in the upper left of this panel is a magnified view of the results at short distances; the dashed lines represent typical viewing distances for mobile devices and desktop displays. (D) Comfort zone plotted as disparity in degrees as a function of viewing distance in meters. The abscissa is plotted on a log scale. The break in the far boundary is a consequence of the adjustment described in (C). The vertical dashed lines represent distances for the same devices as before. Date of download: 10/19/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.