Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Advertisements

Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Damped C-Band structures for ELI_NP proposal D. Alesini (LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy) CERN, 18 July 2012.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Development of Dielectric PETS Chunguang Jing and Wei Gai ANL and Euclid CLIC workshop 2013.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
X-Band Deflectors Development at SLAC
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
FERMI LINAC O VERVIEW The 1.5 GeV 50 Hz Upgrade July 2013 C. Serpico.
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors LCWS, Arlington, Texas, October 22 th -26 th, 2012Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Overview of the CLIC main beam injectors.
Optimisation of single bunch linacs for possible FEL upgrades Alexej Grudiev, CERN 6/02/2014 CLIC14 workshop.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
WP8-HGA High Gradient Acceleration M. Biagini (INFN-LNF) WP8 coordinator Tiara Kickoff Meeting, CERN, Feb , 2011.
CLIC developments Xband FEL linac introduction W. Wuensch Xband technology.
Interface between TAC SR and SASE FEL Possibility for testing CLIC structure Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Towards a full C-band multi-bunch/high rep. rate/high gradient injector linac D. Alesini (LNF-INFN, Frascti, Italy) With the contribution of: A. Bacci,
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
X-band Based FEL proposal
1 st TIARA Steering Committee A. Gallo – INFN Frascati deputy of TIARA WP8 leader STATUS OF TIARA WP8.
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
–11.03 Hawaii Multi bunch acceleration on LUCX system Ⅰ. LUCX project Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
CALIFES A proposed electron beam test facility at CERN
Multi-stage pulse compressor
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
New test structures for CLIC (RF design)
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Optimisation of single bunch linac for FERMI upgrade
NC Accelerator Structures
Preliminary injector linac design
on behalf of the HCP_AF team
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
Developments on Proposed
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
Electric Field Amplitude (MV/m)
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
CLIC source update CLIC main beam injectors reminder
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
High Charge Low Emittance RF Gun for SuperKEKB
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Presentation transcript:

Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects In the framework of the upgrade of the SPARC_LAB facility at INFN-LNF (EuSPARC proposal) and of the EuPRAXIA@SPARC_LAB design study, it is foreseen an high gradient LINAC. One of the most suitable option is to realize it in X-Band. A preliminary design study of the accelerating structures and power distribution system has been performed. It is based on short travelling wave (TW) accelerating structures operating on the 2π/3 mode and feed by klystron and pulse compressor systems. The main parameters of the structures and LINAC are presented with the basic RF LINAC layout. EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects In the framework of the Horizon 2020, a Design Study called EuPRAXIA (“European Plasma Research Accelerator with eXcellence In Applications“), has been funded to bring together for the first time novel acceleration schemes, based for instance on plasmas, modern lasers, the latest correction/feedback technologies and large-scale user areas (INFRADEV-1-2014). Such a research infrastructure would achieve the required quantum leap in accelerator technology towards more compact and more cost-effective accelerators, opening new horizons for applications and research. In this scenario the SPARC_LAB upgrade, named EuSPARC, is one of the possible candidates to host EuPRAXIA@SPARC_LAB. High brightness photo-injectors are fundamental for the successful development of plasma-based accelerators whereas external injection schemes are considered, i.e. particle beam driven and laser driven plasma wakefield accelerators (PWFA and LWFA, respectively), since the ultimate beam brightness and its stability and reproducibility are strongly influenced by the RF-generated electron beam. To take profit of the compactness of these novel acceleration techniques, a X-Band LINAC is under studying.

X-Band LINAC parameters X-Band LINAC parameters LINAC layout and parameters E0~100 MeV EL=580 MeV (Phase 1) EL=1060 MeV (Phase 2) LINAC 1 LINAC 2 S-Band RF Gun 2 S-Band TW structures Bunch Compressor The preliminary LINAC layout foresees an S-Band Gun, two S-Band TW structures (3 m long) and an X-Band booster with a bunch compressor. The beam energy after the S-band injector is 100 MeV. Two cases of X-Band LINAC energy gain have been studied for two different phases: Phase 1, Egain=480 MeV and Phase 2, Egain=960 MeV. Present status Our wishes X-Band LINAC parameters Lt 12 m E0 100 MeV Phase 1 Phase 2 Egain 480 MeV 960 MeV <G> 40 MV/m 80 MV/m EL 580 MeV 1060 MeV X-Band LINAC parameters Lt 16 m E0 100 MeV Phase 1 Phase 2 Ultimate Egain 480 MeV 960 MeV 1280 MeV <G> 30 MV/m 60 MV/m 80 MV/m EL 580 MeV 1060 MeV 1380 MeV

LINAC DESIGN GOALS The Linac design goals to be reported in the CDR are the optimized design of the X- band TW structures on the base of the parametrized performances of the basic accelerating cell obtained with simulations, and the proposed RF layout for the machine. This means: Define the optimal filling time and length of the structures; Make our choice between Constant Gradient or Constant Impedance options (or eventually define a suitable trade off in between); Define the layout of the complete RF system on the base of: the TW section optimized parameters the chosen scenario (available space for the Linac RF) the available RF power sources (klystrons)

Preliminary SLED and X-Band LINAC parameters Example: compressed pulse of 100 ns 3 dB coupler SLED parameters frequency 11.9942 GHz tk 1.5 μs Q0 180000 Qe 20000 Ek From Klystron Eout To accelerator The RF LINAC layout is based on klystrons with SLED that feed several TW accelerating structures operating on the 2π/3 mode at a frequency of 11,9942 GHz.

Effective shunt impedance and accelerating gradient CI (Constant Impedance) CG Gradient) Fixing the quality factor Q of the cells equal to 6500 it is possible to calculate the normalized effective shunt impedance Rs/R as a function of the section attenuation τs. The choice of τs fixes the filling time of the structure and hence the compressed pulse length after the SLED. If we consider the optimum τs value (τs0) it is possible to calculate the accelerating gradient profile after one filling time.

Geometrical parameters Single cell study with HFSS d b a t r t/2 Geometrical parameters a [mm] 3 ÷ 6 b [mm] 10,075 ÷ 11,480 d [mm] 8,332 (2π/3 mode) r [mm] 1 t [mm] 2.5 The single cell parameters (α, R, vg/c, Q, Scmax/E2acc) have been calculated with HFSS as a function of the iris radius.

Single cell study with HFSS Field attenuation constant / Normalized group velocity Maximum value of normalized modified Poynting vector Shunt impedance per unit length Quality factor

Constant Impedance X-Band LINAC parameters The final LINAC parameters as a function of the iris radius have been calculated using the simulated single cell parameters. The minimum iris radius has to be fixed according to the beam dynamics calculations and single bunch beam break up limits. Similar results can be obtained considering CG structures, in this case a is the average iris radius <a>. CG structures exhibit lower Scmax.

Constant Gradient LINAC parameters (12 m available / 24 TW sections) KLYSTRON SLED MODE CONVERTER CIRCULAR WAVEGUIDE LINAC MODULE FOR PHASE 1 MODULATOR HALL LINAC LINAC MODULE FOR PHASE 2 Constant Gradient LINAC parameters <a> [mm] 3.2 Ls [mm] 500 Qe 21400 vg/c [%] 2.5 – 0.77 Tp [ns] 121 Ns 24 Phase 1 Phase 2 Egain [MeV] 480 (680) 960 Ptot [MW] 56 223 N° klystrons 3 (1 every 8) 6 (1 every 4) Results and RF layout (12 m available / 24 TW sections) According to the beam dynamics calculations, <a> has been fixed to 3,2 mm obtaining 24 structures (8 in LINAC 1 and 16 in LINAC 2). Each structure is 500 mm long. Considering a waveguide attenuation of 20%, for a 50 MW klystron the net available power is 40 MW. For Phase 1 we propose 1 klystron every 8 structures, for Phase 2 we propose 1 klystron every 4 structures. For phase 1 we have also extra power to reach an higher gradient.

Constant Gradient LINAC parameters (16 m available / 32 TW sections) LINAC MODULE FOR PHASE 1 LINAC MODULE FOR PHASE 2 KLYSTRON MODULATOR HALL MODE CONVERTER CIRCULAR WAVEGUIDE MODE CONVERTER SLED LINAC HALL Constant Gradient LINAC parameters <a> [mm] 3.2 Ls [mm] 500 Qe 21400 vg/c [%] /Tp [ns] 2.5 – 0.77 / 121 Ns 32 Phase 1 Phase 2 ultimate Egain [MeV] 640 905 1280 Ptot [MW] 74 149 297 N° klystrons 2 (1 every 16) 4 (1 every 8) 8 (1 every 4) Results and RF layout (16 m available / 32 TW sections) For Phase 1 we propose 1 klystron every 8 structures, for Phase 2 we propose 1 klystron every 4 structures. For phase 1 we have also extra power to reach an higher gradient.