Adherence to the Labeling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEs in a New Device Space: An FDA View of Mitral John Laschinger, MD CDRH, ODE, DCD, SHDB Predictable And SuStainable Implementation Of National Registries.
Advertisements

Amplatzer® Septal Occluder
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
IRB PRESENTATION REGULATORY PATHWAYS HDE – PMA William Hellenbrand MD Director – Pediatric Cardiology Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons.
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
The Science of Quality By Design Janet Woodcock, M.D. May 19, 2004.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
Trial Design Issues Associated with Evaluation of Distal Protection Devices in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts Bram D. Zuckerman, MD, FACC Medical Officer,
Aortic Stenosis -The Unmet Need Simon Ray University Hospitals of South Manchester ACI 2009.
© free-ppt-templates.com 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of Valvular Heart Disease Guideline of 2014 DR. OMAR SHAHID TR CARDIOLOGY SZH.
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Lessons Learned from the TVT Registry Experience
The CRT of EFS Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
What should be the optimal Design for TAVI Procedure.
Patient Eligibility for Commercial TAVR in the US
Use of Postmarket Data to Support Premarket Approvals
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
Clinical Trial Design for Second Generation TAVI - Academic View
What Are the FDA Requirements for Submitting an IDE?
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
OUS Data: What does the CE Mark Really Mean?
J. Matthew Brennan, MD, MPH Duke University School of Medicine
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
Appropriate Regulation of Adjunctive Devices: Embolic Protection
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences.
University of Pennsylvania
CMS and FDA The History and Horizon of Regulatory Coordination
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
The FDA Early Feasibility Study Pilot and the Innovation Pathway
FIM in USA: Impact on the Landscape of Innovation
FDA Guidance on Early Feasibility Studies, Including First-in-Human
First-in-Man, First In The USA: What’s The Difference?
Opportunities to Study Valve Iterations and Modifications in the US
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
Michael Mack, M.D. Dallas, TX February 21, 2010
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
Larry L. Wood Corporate Vice President Edwards Lifesciences
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Annual Outcomes With Transcatheter Valve Therapy
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Structural Heart Disease and Devices in Japan and USA
Early Feasibility in the USA –An Academic View
US Early Feasibility Studies (EFS)
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
Annual Outcomes With Transcatheter Valve Therapy
Crucial Statistical Caveats for Percutaneous Valve Trials
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Reply The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Mitral Valve Disease.
EDUCATE: A NESTcc Demonstration Project Regulatory Perspective
NIH’S Redefinition of Clinical Trials and Using the New Human Subjects Form Chris Sylvester, M.A. Senior Grant Administrator (AO) Grants and Contracts.
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Patient Involvement in the Development and Use of Safe Medicines Introductory Section – Concepts to Consider CIOMS XI WG Second Meeting October 23-24,
Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Clinical Investigations
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Presentation transcript:

Adherence to the Labeling John Laschinger, M.D. Medical Officer FDA/CDRH/ODE/DCD/SHDB

I/we have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report. John Laschinger, MD I/we have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.

Current On Label Indication for Use: SAPIEN THV SAPIEN is indicated for transfemoral delivery in patients with severe symptomatic calcified native aortic valve stenosis without severe aortic insufficiency and with ejection fraction > 20% who have been examined by a heart team including an experienced cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist and found to either be: in operable and in whom existing co-morbidities would not preclude the expected benefit from correction of the aortic stenosis; or be operative candidates for aortic valve replacement , but who have a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted operative risk score > 8% or are judged by the heart team to be at a 15% risk of mortality for surgical aortic valve replacement.

What is “On-label” Use FDA Device Clearance or Approval is limited to specific Indications for Use – 3 Components: Intended Use: What - What device is designed to do (e.g. Correction of aortic stenosis) Why – Clinical disease or condition (e.g. Critical AS) Conditions of Use Where, who, and how of insertion (e.g. Hybrid suite, heart team, transfemoral access, training, etc) Target Population Who – Target patient population (e.g., patient at high or extreme risk for surgery, symptomatic with no AI) Label Purpose: Provide information regarding results of evaluation Transmit applicable warnings and precautions for that indication Describe potential limitations of the evaluation (e.g., populations not included in studies) or potential performance problems under described circumstances or conditions

Why Off-label Use? FDA does not regulate the practice of Medicine Information provided in the labeling may or may not be applicable depending on how far “off-label” FDA recognizes other clinical needs/uses not covered by the label may exist Device has not been evaluated for the Indication New Intended use New or lower risk Target Population The focus of the pivotal trial was inadequate to support a specific marketing approval or clearance for all clinical situations New Conditions of Use within an approved target population Higher risk segment of an approved target population RCT Generally Needed Targets for Label Expansion

A Better Path: Label Expansion Encourages the collection of additional data needed for the expanded Indications RCT not always necessary Early interaction with FDA Common Goal: least burdensome path Sponsors – Ability to Market devices appropriately End-users - Provided with clinically relevant information Patient - Protection and Early Access

Current Initiatives in SHDB with Labeling Implications Clinical studies based on pre-operative risk stratification (e.g. PARTNER IIA, COAPT) Initiation of registries to capture real-world use - TVT Identify how devices are really used Capture “real world” performance information Acquire data necessary for expansion of label indications within approved populations Refine pre-clinical testing requirements to keep up with rapid evolution of devices and materials Encouraging pre-clinical testing outside of the proposed labeling to help understand potential issues with “off label” use (e.g. valve-in-valve)

Progress on Initiatives TVT Registry active at > 130 sites FDA has accepted the concept of using single arm study data to support label expansion for approved indications/populations FDA has approved ACCF/STS sponsored IDE study using data from real-world registries Alternate Access (non-femoral) in patients inoperable for surgical AVR TVT registry used for data collection Data from TVT registry used as comparator

John Laschinger, M.D. john.laschinge@fda.hhs.gov Thank You! John Laschinger, M.D. john.laschinge@fda.hhs.gov

On-label The pre-clinical evaluation was appropriate for the intended use Testing involved use of the device in accordance with the instructions for use (e.g., preconditioning, sizing) Clinical information included in the label reflects the intended use

Regulation and Off-label Use FDA regulates interstate commerce of medical devices, not the practice of medicine FDA encourages appropriate evaluation of devices to allow for modification of the labeling to protect and promote public health Manufacturers need to do what they can to limit known off-label usage Restrict distribution/promotion Modify labeling