From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cancer cachexia by J.N. Gordon, S.R. Green, and P.M. Goggin QJM Volume 98(11): October 17, 2005 © The Author Published by Oxford University.

Advertisements

© Oxford University Press How are the plates moving?

Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3 but for x = 5.5.

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

Figure 1. Orbital evolution of the planetesimals and Jupiter-mass planet in simulation S1. The solid points show the planetesimals. The radii of the planetesimals.

Figure 1. HATLAS J (z = , marked with vertical line)

From: Ion chemistry in the coma of comet 67P near perihelion

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 3. The hybrid simulations results

Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.

Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.

From: Blue-Light Hazard From Gas Metal Arc Welding of Aluminum Alloys

From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge

Figure 1 Timeline of the project.

Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ2 density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black)

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. VoC conceptual framework linking employment mobility and welfare production regimes From: Complexity in Employment Life Courses in Europe in.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Figure 2. The residuals to a phenomenological continuum model, revealing strong features at the iron L, iron K, and Compton hump bands. The data are from.

Figure 1. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) testing uptake and results among women delivering at Bairo Pite Clinic in Dili, Timor-Leste. From: Prevalence.

Source: Authors’ elaboration with data from Eurostat.

Figure 3. Inclination instability in the outer Solar system

From: Where do we go from here

Figure 5. Time-series and spectra of a noise-only record before (a and c) and after (b and d) model-based subtraction of powerline harmonics. The model.

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of patient selection and study design.

Fig. 1. Change in the number of white vapor, red vapor, and black spots (vertical) during 517–975 CE (horizontal axis). The bars in /blue /and/red/ represent.

Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.

Fig. 2. Semi-major axis vs. eccentricity (left) and semi-major axis vs

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss.

Figure 1. (A) Cumulative risk of breast (diamonds) and ovarian (squares) cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. (B) Cumulative risk of breast (diamonds) and.

Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.

Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases

Fig. 1 Study cohort flow diagram.

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

Figure 1. A decay chain normalized by the total number of nuclei in the chain. The dashed line depicts e−1/t, where e is Euler number. From:

Figure 6. Electron energy spectrum in equation (5) in units of 1047 multiplied by γ2 (solid line) at γ > γ0 compared with.

Effects of progressive and degressive elastic elements in load-sharing

Figure 1. Position vectors of the components – Sun, Earth, Moon and particle (P) – of the studied four-body problem in the barycentric ecliptic coordinate.

Figure 1. HR (95% CI) of death from dementia associated with weight or BMI in middle age and in old age. From: Adiposity in middle and old age and risk.

different predicted values (D)

Figure 3 Doctors leaving (Matthews, 2013, p.13.)

Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Qualitative analysis—themes and subthemes regarding detention minimisation Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 Phases of the research. Author’s own work.

Figure 1. Changes to the orbital parameters of close binary star systems due to dynamical interactions in star-forming ... Figure 1. Changes to the orbital.

Fig. 3 Interrelationship between themes describing the experiences of people with shoulder disorders Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

The observed X-ray coronal line ratios O vii (f+i)/r (G ratio) versus O vii f/i (R ratio), overlaid with curves of constant ionization parameter (log U = −1,

Figure 1 Plot showing the interaction between Indigenous group belonging and use of family health centres Figure 1 Plot showing the interaction between.

Figure 1. Flow diagram for selection of articles for systematic review. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content.

The independent additive value of total greyscale + power Doppler synovitis ... The independent additive value of total greyscale + power Doppler synovitis.

Figure 1. Observed mean (SD) micafungin plasma concentrations.

Prediction corrected visual predictive check showing observed data concentrations (blue circles) and percentiles (red dashed lines: fifth and 95th percentile,

Chapter 11 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Montage of HST ACS colour postage stamps of the BCGs of the constituent clusters and groups of the Cl1604 supercluster. Montage of HST ACS colour postage.

Normalized radial cumulative stellar mass distribution centred on the BCG (left-hand panel) and the MMCG (right-hand panel) for the MCXC/SDSS comparison.

Image stamps of an example fit for a bulge+disc object with B/T = 0

Top: probability distribution of the mass-to-light ratios observed when nebular emission is included in the fitting, stacked across all of the MC samples.

Nine examples of MCXC MMCGs which were not also selected as MCXC BCGs

Comparison between MIPS/24 μm and HST/WFC3 H-band (F160W) images for objects #427 and #428. Comparison between MIPS/24 μm and HST/WFC3 H-band (F160W) images.

The 1/Vmax SMF for the high-redshift samples.

Figure 1 Strategies for reconciling protection and participation.

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Presentation transcript:

From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★ Figure 8. Colour–colour diagram showing g − i from the CFHTLS-D1 versus J − K<sub>s</sub> for sources with K<sub>s</sub> < 23.5 in VIDEO. The solid blue line denotes the stellar locus fit from (Baldry et al. 2010) offset by 0.1 mag in J − K<sub>s</sub> colour as described in the text. From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★ Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2012;428(2):1281-1295. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts118 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2012 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society 1