NOnA NuMI Off-axis ne Appearance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TAUP 2007 R. Plunkett 14 September,2007 Status of the NOvA Experiment Robert Plunkett Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL, USA TAUP 2007.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Karol Lang, University of Texas,NOvA, XII International Workshop on “Neutrino Telescopes”, Venice, March 6-9, Karol Lang University of Texas at.
 and the US Neutrino Programme Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH GDR Neutrino IPNO Orsay, 4 octobre 2006.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February The NO A Experiment P5 Meeting SLAC 21 February 2008 Gary Feldman.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Leon Mualem — NNN07 The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Workshop on Next Generation.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
F Axis Off Axis Introduction Off-Axis Cambridge Meeting 12 January 2004 Gary Feldman.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
The NOvA Experiment At Fermilab Mark Messier Indiana University 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP’08) Philadelphia, PA July 30,
NO A goals & physics NO A goals & physics NO A sites & detectors NO A sites & detectors NO A now & future NO A now & future.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Liquid scintillator for an off-axis neutrino detector? (The Minnesota group) We are actively investigating a liquid scintillator option for the off-axis.
NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration.
F Axis The NO A Experiment: Phase 2 of the Fermilab NuMI Program Workshop on Physics with Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrinos from Muon Storage Rings Maury.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2009.
 Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH November 23, NO A is a Long Baseline experiment using the NUMI beam from Fermilab Now being used for MINOS (732km)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
MINOS/NO A Deborah Harris Fermilab NuFact’04 Osaka University July 28, 2004.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Gary Feldman MINOS in Cambridge 24 March NO A Update MINOS Collaboration Meeting Cambridge, England 24 March 2009 Gary Feldman.
F Axis NO A Status NO A Collaboration Meeting Fermilab 17 November 2006 Gary Feldman.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Harvard Neutrino Group DoE Review August 21, 2006.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Low Z Detector Simulations
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
NO A Zebulun Krahn University of Minnesota NNN2009 Estes Park, CO October 8-10 th 2009.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
NOvA in light of non-zero θ 13 Gavin S. Davies Iowa State University for the NOvA Collaboration nuTURN Workshop Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
The NO A Near Detector: An overview Jose A. Sepulveda-Quiroz For the NO A Collaboration Iowa State University and Argonne National Laboratory APS April.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
F Axis The NO A Experiment Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 25 January 2007 Gary Feldman Harvard University.
1 Status of the NO A Experiment Sarah Budd Argonne National Lab On behalf of the NO A Collaboration Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2010 June 2, 2010.
1 Sam Childress. 2 S. Childress NNN11 Existing Fermilab Neutrino Beams 120 GeV NuMI 8 GeV BNB 2 J. Strait.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
DOE review slide 1 MINOS Software and Data Analysis Peter Litchfield, U. of Minnesota DOE Review, 28 th August 2003  Progress on Offline Software  Detector.
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector
Overview of the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO)
Peter Litchfield Minnesota University For the NOA collaboration
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
Title : SciBooNE -- Experimental study of neutrino cross-sections for a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment and the development of the detectors.
Fine-Grained Near Detector(s) at JHF: Purpose and Thoughts
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February
High Energy Neutrino Detectors Day 2
Fermilab Proton Beams: Program Perspectives Greg Bock Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson-DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook May 5,
Presentation transcript:

NOnA NuMI Off-axis ne Appearance Dan Cronin-Hennessy University of Minnesota Nov 1, 2006 DPF/JPS D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Outline Brief overview of NOnA The lepton mixing matrix and NOnA goals Details of NOnA Site Beam Detectors Physics reach Summary D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Overview NOnA is optimized for measuring ne appearance. - The goal is to improve MINOS’s nm  ne reach by approximately an order of magnitude. The NOnA far detector - Current plan for a 20 kT far detector - “totally active” liquid-scintillator detector - 810 km baseline - 12 km off the NuMI beamline axis (Ash River, MN likely) The uniqueness of NOnA is the long baseline - required for determining mass ordering D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Matter Effects D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Matter Effects D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Ambiguity p+ p- p+ p- Klong CP Violation MATTER Matter Effects D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

NOnA’s Potential Impact on Lepton Mixing sin22q13 In vacuum Dm232 and sin22q23 nm nm from same experiment. Dm232 precision measurement ~10-4 eV2. sin22q23 ~ 2% Mass Ordering Depends on sign of mass difference. ( ~30% effect for NOnA!). Can access by running both n and anti-n beams. CP Violation CPV in quark sector from CKM matrix well constrained. Far short in magnitude to explain baryogenesis. CPV in lepton sector is most likely a long term goal. D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Off-Axis Beam Narrow energy distribution. Higher intensity at optimal energy. Suppressed high energy tail (reduces NC contamination) D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Far Detector Site 810 km “Sophisticated” Site Selection Algorithm Walk along beam to Canadian border. Walk 14 mrad off-axis Walk toward Fermilab until first road appears. *Ambiguity resolved by terrain *This procedure yields a baseline that is optimal for the beam energy (particularly when recent MINOS results are included). *This procedure maximizes are sensitivity to the mass ordering. 810 km D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Far Detector 20 kT “Totally Active” liquid- scintillator detector. ~90 20 kT “Totally Active” liquid- scintillator detector. Cells are made from 16-cell rigid PVC extrusions (32-cell modules). 1 Plane = 12 extrusions 31 Planes are grouped into a block. Detector constructed in block units. 1300 planes Face is 15.7 m square Tracker Calorimeter Muon System D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Near Detector Near detector will be placed off-axis in MINOS access tunnel. Will be capable of moving along tunnel. * measure different components of background. D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Detector Technology Inexpensive Design Extruded PVC Module (~20,000) Inexpensive Design Extruded PVC Module - utilizes existing manufacturing infrastructure - current focused on increasing reflectivity Liquid scintillator filled cells. WLS fiber - 0.7 mm diameter - looped end (“perfect” reflector) - readout both ends on one side Avalanche Photodiode - Hamamatsu multi-pixel - 85% QE D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

*Light collection efficiency demonstrated. Novel aspect of NOnA is the challenge of achieving sufficient light output at a length scale of 15 m. *Light collection efficiency demonstrated. *Sufficiently low noise from APD operating -15o C. *Attenuated spectrum matches well APD response curve. *First tests completed with existing extrusion die. *> 20 pe demonstrated for current design Light output results 3-cell full-length prototype (April 2005) 48 ft D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Simulated NOnA Events Signal nepe-pp+ En=2.5 GeV Background nmnm-np+p0 En=2.8 GeV Physics results to follow are based on full reconstruction Raw hits are used to construct physics objects Likelihood function developed to distinguish signal and background. Likelihood cut chosen to maximize FOM. Blind hand scan analyses show room for improvement in current reconstruction. Possible FOM gains of order 20%. D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

PID Performance and Resolution Energy resolution Electron and muon separation 0.10/E0.5 Electrons Muons Type Efficiency For 100 events Signal 0.23 86 CC nm 7.1x10-4 1 NC nm 1.3x10-3 6 Beam ne 6.6x10-2 7 D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Assumed Schedule CD1 completed (April 2006): Recommendation to approve. CD2 (Mar 2007): TDR in progress. Occupancy of FD (Mar 2010) Beam exists: Data taking begins when ~20% of Detector Complete D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Proton Plan FY10: Down time to convert Main Injector to 1MW source Coversion of Recycler and Accumulator into proton stackers Construction of Booster-Accumulator and Accumulator- Recycler transfer lines. FY11: 44 weeks @ .4MW to .7 MW FY12: 38 weeks @ .7MW to 1MW Beyond FY12: 44 weeks @ 1MW Assumptions Accelerator uptime .85 Average relative to peak: .90 NuMI uptime: .90 Six year run after completion of construction. Protons on target: 60.3x1020 D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

3 sigma sensitivity to q13 Physics projections based on 1)run plan 2) proton beam & 3) detector parameters that were presented on previous slides. D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Parameters Consistent with a 1% and 4% nmne oscillation probability D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Resolution of the mass hierarchy Establishing CP violation requires resolving mass ordering since the matter effects contribute an apparent CP violation. Resolving the mass ordering provides information for interpreting future neutrino double beta decay results. Window to very high energy scales - new physics. (e.g. GUT generally favor normal ordering). D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Supernova Current NOnA design includes 3 meter overburden Purpose is to reduce contamination from the EM component of cosmic interactions. Fringe benefit is greater sensitivity to galactic SN. D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Summary NOnA provides highest sensitivity to sin22q13 compared to other near-term planned experiments. NOnA exploits existing NuMI beam. It will provide the required information for planning future more ambitious n-physics projects. It is unique for its capabilities in resolving the mass ordering. It has some sensitivity to CP violation. - depends on size of sin22q13. D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Proton Plan 0.4 MW while collider runs 0.7 MW after collider shoutdown 1.2MW upgrade Proton Driver possible but not included in sensitivities presented today. POT: 60.3x1020 Details 2006 Shutdown Maximum Booster rep. rate increases from 7.5Hz->9Hz Main Injector Improvements will allow studies of full 2+9 operation Assume beam loss in Main Injector limits us to 2+5 as standard operation. 2007 Shutdown Installation of half of Booster correctors will allow increased throughput Collimation and RF Improvements in the Main Injector will allow operational slip stacking (2+9) operation to NuMI 2008 Shutdown With the installation of last Booster correctors and improved gamma-t magnets, all Proton Plan projects complete. D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM

Backup D. Cronin-Hennessy UofM