Cannabis Use and Memory Brain Function in Adolescent Boys: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study  Gerry Jager, Ph.D.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Neural Correlates of Antinociception in Borderline.
Advertisements

Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Meta-analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Planning Before and After Cognitive- Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder  Chaim.
Neonatal Amygdala Functional Connectivity at Rest in Healthy and Preterm Infants and Early Internalizing Symptoms  Cynthia E. Rogers, MD, Chad M. Sylvester,
Jian-Zhong Xiang, Malcolm W Brown  Neuron 
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Disrupted Neural Synchronization in Toddlers with Autism
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex
Avi Mendelsohn, Yossi Chalamish, Alexander Solomonovich, Yadin Dudai 
Communicative Signaling Activates ‘Broca's’ Homolog in Chimpanzees
Rachel Ludmer, Yadin Dudai, Nava Rubin  Neuron 
Dyspnea-Related Cues Engage the Prefrontal Cortex
The Human Hippocampus and Spatial and Episodic Memory
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2009)
Sequential effects of propofol on functional brain activation induced by auditory language processing: an event-related functional magnetic resonance.
Butorphanol Suppression of Histamine Itch Is Mediated by Nucleus Accumbens and Septal Nuclei: A Pharmacological fMRI Study  Alexandru D.P. Papoiu, Robert.
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Human Hippocampal Dynamics during Response Conflict
Activity in Both Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex Predicts the Memory Strength of Subsequently Remembered Information  Yael Shrager, C. Brock Kirwan,
Liping Wang, Lynn Uhrig, Bechir Jarraya, Stanislas Dehaene 
Elizabeth J. Coulthard, Parashkev Nachev, Masud Husain  Neuron 
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Neural Correlates of Visual Working Memory
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 1996)
The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention
Between Thoughts and Actions: Motivationally Salient Cues Invigorate Mental Action in the Human Brain  Avi Mendelsohn, Alex Pine, Daniela Schiller  Neuron 
Improving therapy outcome prediction in major depression using multimodal functional neuroimaging: A pilot study  Johannes Schultz, Benjamin Becker, Katrin.
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Distributed Neural Systems for the Generation of Visual Images
Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain
The Functional Neuroanatomy of Object Agnosia: A Case Study
Mathilde Bonnefond, Ole Jensen  Current Biology 
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
Effect of propofol on the medial temporal lobe emotional memory system: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects  K.O. Pryor, J.C.
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
Absolute Coding of Stimulus Novelty in the Human Substantia Nigra/VTA
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Uri Hasson, Orit Furman, Dav Clark, Yadin Dudai, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
Neural Correlates of the Attentional Blink
Broca's Area and the Hierarchical Organization of Human Behavior
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
René Marois, Hoi-Chung Leung, John C. Gore  Neuron 
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Cerebral Responses to Change in Spatial Location of Unattended Sounds
Orienting Attention Based on Long-Term Memory Experience
Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell
Interaction between the Amygdala and the Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System Predicts Better Memory for Emotional Events  Florin Dolcos, Kevin S LaBar,
Arielle Tambini, Nicholas Ketz, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
Sam C. Berens, Jessica S. Horst, Chris M. Bird  Current Biology 
Repeatability of supraspinal responses to automated,
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 135, Issue 6, Pages e1 (December 2008)
Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptation to Delayed Action Effects
The Human Basal Forebrain Integrates the Old and the New
Tiffany Love, B. S. , Yolanda R. Smith, M. D. , M. S. , Carol C
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages e6 (February 2019)
Perceptual Classification in a Rapidly Changing Environment
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill, Mark D'Esposito, Irene P. Kan  Neuron 
Caroline A. Montojo, Susan M. Courtney  Neuron 
Common Prefrontal Regions Coactivate with Dissociable Posterior Regions during Controlled Semantic and Phonological Tasks  Brian T Gold, Randy L Buckner 
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Yuko Yotsumoto, Takeo Watanabe, Yuka Sasaki  Neuron 
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Cannabis Use and Memory Brain Function in Adolescent Boys: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study  Gerry Jager, Ph.D., Robert I. Block, Ph.D., Maartje Luijten, M.Sc., Nick F. Ramsey, Ph.D.  Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry  Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 561-572.e3 (June 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001 Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 1 Temporal sequence of events for the working memory task. Note: Each epoch starts with presentation of the memory set (a set of five consonants, for example, “FGMPT”), and is followed by 10 trials showing a single consonant. Subjects have to press a button as fast as possible if the letter belongs to the memory set. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 2 Temporal sequence of events for the associative memory task. Note: Each epoch starts with an instruction slide (5 seconds) followed by a fixation cross (2.5 seconds). This is followed by eight trials of 7.5 seconds each (picture pair 5 seconds, fixation cross 2.5 seconds). Subjects respond by pressing one of two buttons, according to the instruction in each task condition. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 3 Regions of interest for the working memory task. Note: (A) Left inferior frontal gyrus. (B) Left precentral/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. (C) Left superior parietal cortex. (D) Anterior cingulate cortex. Regions of interest are based on the contrast between novel and control task (p < .001). Numbers above slices indicate z coordinates of the Montreal Neurological Institute system. Slices are in neurological orientation (i.e., left side is left hemisphere). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 4 Regions of interest (ROI) for the associative memory task. Note: (A and B) Left and right (para)hippocampal gyrus (PHG). (C) Left middle occipital gyrus. (D and E) Right and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. (F) Anterior cingulate cortex. ROIs are based on contrast-associative learning versus simple classification (p < .001). Numbers above slices indicate z coordinates of the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) system. Slices are in neurological orientation (i.e., left side is left hemisphere). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 5 Behavioral data. Note: (A) Working memory task: mean reaction time ± standard error of mean (SEM) of correct responses on targets for both groups and mean percentage of errors as percent of all trials (±SEM) during the control task (CT), after (PT), and before practice (NT). (B) Associative memory task: accuracy during simple (percentage correct responses) classification (SC) and recognition (RE) (± SEM) for both groups. CAN = cannabis users; DN = drug-naive controls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 6 Activity levels per region of interest for working memory task (in arbitrary units [AU]) after practice (PT) and before (NT) for both groups. Note: Activity levels were marginally higher in users compared with controls during NT (F(1,40) = 2.77, p = .10), but no significant group effects were found during PT. ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; l-IFG = left inferior frontal gyrus; l-PCC/DLPFC = left precentral/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; l-SPC = left superior parietal cortex. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 7 Contrast values per region of interest for the working memory task (in arbitrary units [AU]), i.e., difference in activity before and after practice. Note: ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; l-IFG = left inferior frontal gyrus; l-PCC/DLPFC = left precentral/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; l-SPC = left superior parietal cortex. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE S1A Graphic presentation of the results of a nonparametric two-sample t test for the working memory task (STERN) contrasting signal-to-noise (SNR) images from the US scanner (n = 23) and Dutch scanner (n = 21), family-wise error (FWE)–corrected p value = .05 (corresponding threshold value of T = 5.11). Note: In green, the areas that show significantly higher SNR in US scans compared with Dutch scans. In blue, the areas of the opposite contrast, i.e., significant higher SNR in Dutch scans compared with US scans. In red (superimposed), the regions of interest (ROI) for STERN, used in the ROI analysis. Images are in radiological orientation, i.e., left = right. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions

FIGURE S1B Graphic presentation of the results of a nonparametric two-sample t test for the associative memory task (PMT) contrasting signal-to-noise (SNR) images from the US scanner (n = 24) and Dutch scanner (n = 21), family-wise error (FWE)–corrected p value = .05 (corresponding threshold value of T = 5.18). Note: In green, the areas that show significantly higher SNR in US scans compared with Dutch scans. In blue, the areas of the opposite contrast, i.e., significant higher SNR in Dutch scans compared with US scans. In red (superimposed), the regions of interest (ROI) for PMT, used in the ROI analysis. Images are in radiological orientation, i.e., left = right. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49, 561-572.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.001) Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Terms and Conditions