— a VO test case? The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Redshift Galaxies in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) Mark Dickinson (National Optical Astronomy Observatory) for the GOODS team.
Advertisements

The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Preliminary Results and Lessons Learned Mauro Giavalisco Space Telescope Science Institute and the GOODS team.
207th AAS Meeting Washington D.C., 8-13 January The Spitzer SWIRE Legacy Program Spitzer Wide-Area Infrared Extragalactic Survey Mari Polletta (UCSD)
Extremely Large Telescopes and Surveys Mark Dickinson, NOAO.
Extracting a SN spectrum from EMMI Thank you Sandro (and Hans, Jean-Louis, Gianni and the EMMI team)
15 years of science with Chandra– Boston 20141/16 Faint z>4 AGNs in GOODS-S looking for contributors to reionization Giallongo, Grazian, Fiore et al. (Candels.
Optimal Photometry of Faint Galaxies Kenneth M. Lanzetta Stony Brook University.
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in.
The SIRTF SWIRE Survey SWIRE is a shallow/moderate depth survey of ~70 sq. degrees in all 7 SIRTF imaging bands 5  sensitivities: 17.5 mJy 160  m 2.75.
A Bolometric Approach To Galaxy And AGN Evolution. L. L. Cowie Venice 2006 (primarily from Wang, Cowie and Barger 2006, Cowie and Barger 2006 and Wang.
Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.
SFR and COSMOS Bahram Mobasher + the COSMOS Team.
January 10, th AAS Meeting, Washington, D.C. 1 The COSMOS Survey: Data Products and Archives Patrick L. Shopbell (Caltech), Nicholas Z. Scoville.
C. Halliday, A. Cimatti, J. Kurk, M. Bolzonella, E. Daddi, M. Mignoli, P. Cassata, M. Dickinson, A. Franceschini, B. Lanzoni, C. Mancini, L. Pozzetti,
COSMOS Team Meeting, Kyoto, 23 May 2005 C-COSMOS The Chandra Cycle 7 COSMOS Proposal Martin Elvis (PI) & 32 others.
Dusty star formation at high redshift Chris Willott, HIA/NRC 1. Introductory cosmology 2. Obscured galaxy formation: the view with current facilities,
UCL, Sept 16th 2008 Photometric redshifts in the SWIRE Survey - the need for infrared bands Michael Rowan-Robinson Imperial College London.
Introduction to Spitzer and some applications Data products Pipelines Preliminary work K. Nilsson, J.M. Castro Cerón, J.P.U. Fynbo, D.J. Watson, J. Hjorth.
Image credit: ESO/NASA/ESA/JPL-Caltech Unveiling the astrophysics of high-redshift galaxy evolution.
Padua: 1604 → 2004 – Supernovae as cosmological lighthouses SNLS – The SuperNova Legacy Survey Mark Sullivan (University of Toronto) on behalf of the SNLS.
Luminosity and Mass functions in spectroscopically-selected groups at z~0.5 George Hau, Durham University Dave Wilman (MPE) Mike Balogh (Waterloo) Richard.
X-ray Surveys with Space Observatory Khyung Hee University Kim MinBae Park Jisook.
Modern Quasar SEDs Zhaohui Shang ( Tianjin Normal University ) Kunming, Feb
RADIO OBSERVATIONS IN VVDS FIELD : PAST - PRESENT - FUTURE P.Ciliegi(OABo), Marco Bondi (IRA) G. Zamorani(OABo), S. Bardelli (OABo) + VVDS-VLA collaboration.
ASTRONOMY BROWN BAG SEMINAR SWIRE Spitzer Wide – area Infra Red Extragalactic survey MARCH 17, 2009 DAVID CORLISS.
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
An established ESA-ESO cooperation. 15/16 ESOST-ECF2 What is the ST-ECF? Established at ESO in1984 following an open call-for-proposals Fourteen.
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
MMT Science Symposium1 “false-color” keV X-ray image of the Bootes field Thousands of AGNs in the 9.3 square degree Bootes field * X-ray and infrared.
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
June 7, 2010COSMOS Team Meeting, IfA, Hawaii 1 The COSMOS Archive: Eight Years of Data Patrick L. Shopbell (Caltech), Nick Scoville (Caltech), The COSMOS.
The Future of the Hubble Space Telescope Steven Beckwith April 25, 2005 Space Telescope Science Institute.
Wide Field Astronomy from Space Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute January 9, 2002.
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
Evidence of a Fast Evolution of the UV Luminosity Function of LBGs beyond z=6 from a wide and deep HAWK-I Survey Andrea Grazian INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico.
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini Roman Young Researchers Meeting 2009 July 21.
Exploringthe μJy and nJy Sky with the EVLA and the SKA Ken Kellermann NRAO East Asia SKA Workshop December 3, /2/20111KASI, Daejeon, Korea.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Garth Illingworth (UCO/Lick Obs & University of California, Santa Cruz) and the HUDF09 team AAS January 2010 Washington DC Science with the New HST The.
Cosmos Survey PI Scoville HST 590 orbits I-band 2 deg. 2 !
WFC3 EBL Collaborators: –Tim Dolch, Ranga-Ram Chary, Asantha Cooray, Anton Koekemoer, Swara Ravindranath Near-Infrared Extragalactic Background Fluctuations.
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini THE ORIGIN OF GALAXIES: LESSONS FROM THE DISTANT.
Adam G. Riess Space Telescope Science Institute How (we think) Nature makes a SN Ia Homogeneity: 1.4 Mo, ergs Negligible hydrogen, lots of IME Mature.
The Black Hole-Galaxy Evolution Connection Ezequiel Treister Einstein Fellow IfA, Hawaii IfA, Hawaii Credit: ESO/NASA, the AVO project and Paolo Padovani.
Observations of Near Infrared Extragalactic Background (NIREBL) ISAS/JAXAT. Matsumoto Dec.2-5, 2003 Japan/Italy seminar at Niigata Univ.
SWIRE view on the "Passive Universe": Studying the evolutionary mass function and clustering of galaxies with the SIRTF Wide-Area IR Extragalactic Survey.
Ezequiel Treister Advisors: Meg Urry (Yale) José Maza (U. de Chile)
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
The Galaxies and Cosmos Explorer Tool Mary Kay Hemenway, Shardha Jogee, Sarah Miller, Aaron Smith, Achal Augustine, and Dan Lester (University of Texas.
Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
High Redshift Galaxies/Galaxy Surveys ALMA Community Day April 18, 2011 Neal A. Miller University of Maryland.
AGN from the 13H XMM/Chandra deep radio/X-ray survey
K(2 m) Version of JASMINE and its Science
The Hubble Legacy Archive (HLA) Slitless Spectroscopy Project
A Survey of Starburst Galaxies An effort to help understand the starburst phenomenon and its importance to galaxy evolution Megan Sosey & Duilia deMello.
NICMOS Measurements of the Near Infrared Background
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Mathew A. Malkan (UCLA) and Sean T. Scully (JMU)
Evidence for a Population of high redshift Submm Galaxies
Quasars: old black holes with young stars (?)
Galaxy Evolution and Supernovae from a Deep-Wide WFC3 Survey
NIRSpec simulation data-package
Galaxy Populations in the Most Distant Clusters
Multi-Wavelength Imaging Using Multi-Observatory Data
Extra-galactic blank field surveys with CCAT
Emanuele Daddi ESO K20 survey PI: A Cimatti (Arcetri) Collaborators:
Future Challenges Today’s burning questions in EGPN research, and the strategies, tools & techniques needed to answer them Outline: Overview (10 min) Open.
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
Looking forward to new telescopes and back to the dark ages
Presentation transcript:

— a VO test case? The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey A deep, multi-wavelength public survey to study the formation and evolution of galaxies and AGN Bob Fosbury on behalf of the GOODS teams STScI/ESO/ST-ECF/JPL/SSC/Gemini/Boston U./U. Ariz./ U. Fla./UCLA/UCSC/IAP/Saclay/Yale/AUI See: www.stsci.edu/science/goods/ www.eso.org/science/goods/ 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

What is GOODS? An orchestration of limiting observations of the HDF-N and the CDF-S regions (~ 300 square arcmin in total) with the most powerful telescopes over the widest wavelength range 30 times larger solid angle than HDF-N + HDF-S Based on large programmes with SIRTF, HST, Chandra, Newton, VLT etc. Producing datasets and derived products for the public domain 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Primary science goals The mass assembly history of galaxies Tracking the formation of the Hubble sequence Census of energetic output from star formation and supermassive black holes Measurements or limits on the discrete source component of the extragalactic background light (EBL) Discovery of high-z supernovæ to explore the cosmic expansion 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Science #1 The mass assembly of galaxies Aims: Goal: to measure distribution function of stellar mass and star formation rates -> assembly via quiescent star formation, starbursts & mergers IRAC observes restframe near-IR at high redshift, providing the best photometric measure of total stellar content Aims: Reach ~1 mag fainter than L* at z ~ 3 Reach ~L* at z ~ 5 Provide correspondingly deep optical to near-IR data for SEDs, phot-z’s, M/L Extensive spectroscopy to measure z’s, spectral properties, calibrate phot-z’s 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Science #2 Supermassive black holes in AGN contribute to ‘energy budget’ at high z may (re)ionize the IGM may be an integral component of galaxy formation and evolution Connection to bulge mass & evolution Fueling through interactions/mergers Relation to starbursts/ULIRGs Seeds of early galaxy formation ? Census of high redshift AGN hampered by lack of knowledge of population of obscured ‘type 2’ objects, especially at high z Obscured AGN detectable in hard X-rays (Chandra, XMM-Newton) and (sometimes) radio Dust-absorbed radiation is re-emitted at mid- and far-IR wavelengths 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Starburst/AGN discrimination Using broad-waveband SED and orientation to identify ‘ordinary’ AGN (obscured & unobscured) at the ‘QSO epoch’ (z > 2) 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Science #3 The Extragalactic Background Light EBL provides an integral record of emission, absorption and re-radiation of photons over cosmic history Backgrounds may consist of discrete, cosmologically distributed sources + a possible diffuse/isotropic component Goals: Faint source counts and P(D) at 3–24 mm Provide best measure of discrete source component to EBL (lower limit) Compare to other measures of total EBL (COBE/DIRBE, IRTS, g-ray limits) GOODS 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Science #4 High z supernova search Hubble ACS observations designed (time sequence of z-band exposures) to find ~12 Type 1 supernovæ 1.2<z<1.8 Critical epoch for exploring the dynamics of the cosmic expansion Hubble time allocated to follow 6 SNe P70 FORS2 proposal for spectroscopy of 3 SNe in CDF-S 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

GOODS sensitivity 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Major components SIRTF Legacy Hubble Treasury ESO Large Program PI: M Dickinson STScI 647 hours IRAC + MIPS Hubble Treasury PI: M Giavalisco STScI 398 orbits ACS (+ existing WFPC2, NICMOS and STIS) ESO Large Program PI: C Cesarsky ESO Imaging: 396 hours ISAAC, 40 hours WFI Spectroscopy: proposals for complete low-res spectroscopy of ~ 6000 sources in CDF-S to R~25 (> 30 nights MOS already allocated to other programs in CDF-S) 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Components cont. Chandra XMM-Newton VLA, ATCA, Merlin, WSRT 1 Msec on CDF-S & HDF-N HDF-N to go to 2 Msec in CXO Cycle 3, — 5 Msec goal XMM-Newton 500 ksec CDF-S; 225 ksec HDF-N VLA, ATCA, Merlin, WSRT Radio continuum imaging KPNO, CTIO, Subaru, Gemini, Keck, Palomar, MMT Optical/NIR imaging and spectroscopy JCMT SCUBA imaging of HDF-N GALEX UV imaging 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

IRAC 3.6 – 8 µm MIPS 24 µm (contingent on performance relative to GTO program) 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

SIRTF imaging 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Schematic layout of GOODS fields 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Chandra/SIRTF exposure maps 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

ACS layouts 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

ISAAC JHKs imaging of CDF-S The tiles numbered in cyan were completed in period 68. The yellow tiles are from a program by Giallongo et al. Blue is EIS WFI field 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

SIRTF observations Component IRAC Deep IRAC Ultradeep MIPS Nominal area ~300 arcmin2 ~50 arcmin2 Exposure time per map position 23.6 h (47.2 h in overlap) +46.5 h (total 70.1/93.7 h) 10.4 h Total time 409 h 99.3 h 139.2 h Individual exposure time 200 s 30 s Total dithers per map position 425 837 240 AOR information: Map positions per AOR 2 x 2 1 2 Number of AORs 68 18 48 Total clock time per AOR 21653 s 19852 s 10442 s Time per map position per AOR 5000 s 18600 s 4680 s Dithers per map position 25 93 30 Repeats within each AOR 5 (6) AOR repeats 17 9 4 Epochs per field / total 2 / 4 2 / 2 1 / 2 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

IRAC (3.6–8µm) simulations of HDF-N Handbook PSF 100 hour exposure Optimistic PSF 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

ACS observations (starting soon) Four broad, non-overlapping filters: F435W (B), F606W (V), F775W (i), & F850LP (z) Exposures of 3, 2.5, 2.5, and 5 orbits, respectively Five visits separated by about 45 days to search for high redshift supernovæ Extended-source sensitivities only 0.5-0.8 magnitudes shallower than WFPC2 HDF observations 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Chandra: CDF-S and HDF-N 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

ISAAC & FORS, BVRIJHKs 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

ISAAC number counts Ks-band number counts from ~ 60 arcmin2 from ISAAC observations (red histogram) Central 2 x 2 arcmin regions only (blue dotted histogram) (Gilles Bergond 2002) 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

CDF-S: X, opt, NIR FORS-B,R, ISAAC-Ks, Chandra Classification by opt. spect. Type 2 QSO 2 Type 1 Galaxies G.Hasinger, P.Rosati, J.Bergeron, V.Mainieri, G.Szokoly and the CDFS Team (2002) 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

CDF-S spectroscopy Already have several hundred redshifts in CDF-S area (Cimatti, Rosati) — but mostly for specific types of object GOODS proposes to do ‘complete’ low-res spectroscopy for ~ 6000 objects to RAB = 25 Using FORS2 for red sources (~ 560) and VIMOS for the remainder: needs 10 + 13 nights 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Data products “All data and data products from GOODS Legacy program and its supporting observations will be made public and distributed as quickly as possible to enable community research.” SIRTF data: Raw and basic pipeline processed frames: available from SSC archive Version 0.5 – best-effort reduced images (BCD-based or with limited reprocessing) 3 months after each campaign; mosaics if possible Version 1.0 – full release of image data products and initial catalogs, 3 months after last campaign Version 2.0 – final recalibrated data products and catalogs, 1 year after last campaign Similar release schedule for Hubble and ESO data ISAAC V0.5 was April 2002, V1.0 in July 2002 (thanks to EIS!) See www.eso.org/science/goods/ 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

GOODS and VO What is the attraction of the GOODS project for the development of VO? GOODS is not huge in data volume but it is extremely rich in complexity: Multi-wavelength imaging with different PSFs Resolution of confusion limits at long SIRTF ls Complex mosaicing strategies incorporation of geometric distortion corrections Photometric quality control catalogue production for different purposes Multi-object spectroscopy Number counts, P(D) for the EBL Archiving of complex data products i.e., it may make a useful prototype 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Products from GOODS V0.5, V1 and V2 data products Including photometric/astrometrically calibrated mosaics and catalogues Catalogues extending beyond confusion limit (e.g., for MIPS) Spectral catalogues and atlases Colour composite images Enhanced calibration files and models Software developed as needed for the programme Self-calibration; deconfusion; SED construction and analysis… PR materials 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

Products to GOODS Tailored archive utilities … e.g., for derived data products housekeeping tools for complex datasets cutout servers: multi-instrument image-based comparison tools … 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

What GOODS needs People To pipeline process data, check quality, do photometric and astrometric calibration To build and check catalogues To develop dedicated s/w for special needs To design and implement archive data structures and descriptions To select sources and design MOS programmes … 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

What the science user needs A scientific objective An accessible, easy to navigate, archive Clear, complete and trustworthy descriptions of the contents 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO

…so, is GOODS a good VO test case? The GOODS teams are obliged to structure and describe the data and the derived products The archives will be tailored by collaboration between the teams and the archive providers Which part of this process do we call the VO? 10 June 2002 GOODS & IVO