Understanding and Complying with Audits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Audit Readiness & Success I 2012 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings1 Fall 2012 Applicant Trainings The E-rate Program Audit Readiness & Success.
Advertisements

E-Rate Central E-Rate Overview and Update September 2014.
Beginner’s Presentation I 2012 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Understanding the Basics Fall 2012 Applicant Trainings The E-Rate Program.
Changes and Corrections I 2012 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Changes and Corrections Fall 2012 Applicant Trainings The E-rate Program.
1 Preparing the Audit. 2 Preparing For An Audit  Types of audits  Preparing for the audit  Record keeping.
04/26/20071 Documentation for E- Rate Audit Purposes Amber Prioleau E-Rate Manager/Network Technician.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program Training for Success Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland.
The E-rate Program Understanding the Basics Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Portland I St. Louis I New Orleans I.
THE DIRTY DOZEN: COMMON MISTAKES & HOW TO AVOID THEM 1.
E-rate Program Beginner’s Presentation: Understanding the Basics Fall 2010 Applicant Trainings.
E-rate Audits/Reviews Be prepared!! Prepared by Judy Jones, State Library of Iowa.
Introduction to E-rate I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Introduction to E-rate Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings E-rate Program.
Avoid the Dirty Dozen Mistakes I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Avoid the Dirty Dozen Mistakes Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings E-rate.
Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial Fall 2013 Applicant.
How Do I Run a Good Competitive Bidding Process? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans.
Understanding and Complying with Audits I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-rate Program Understanding and Complying with Audits.
Intro Jeannene Hurley Michigan Department of Education 2006, Year 9 Funding Year.
Beginners Session Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston.
Introduction to E-rate I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-Rate Overview Minnesota Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings Mary Mehsikomer.
Presented by: Bob Rice, President Triple R Consultants E-Rate Top 10 things you need to know! ©2011 Triple “R” Enterprises, Inc.
What Documents Should I Keep? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland San.
Craig J. Nichols, Secretary E-RATE 201 NEW FORMS & PROPOSED CHANGES, OPENINGS, CLOSINGS & MERGERS, COMMON MISTAKES 1.
E-Rate Training for TASBO Members October 8, 2008 Presented by Susan Sullivan Director of Technology/Media.
Successful Invoicing Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis.
The E-rate Program Understanding the Basics Washington K-12 Statewide Training, November 23, 2015 Presentation posted at
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland.
Invoicing Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October.
© 2016 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Audit Compliance September – November 2016.
The E-Rate Program Tips for Success Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
E-RATE PROGRAM APPLICATION PROCESS, PART 2
Correcting Ministerial & Clerical Errors
POST COMMITMENT.
Service Provider Training I July 25, 2017
After the FCC Form 471 E-rate Program Applicant Training
Navigating the Audit Process
Navigating the E-rate Invoicing Process
Correcting Ministerial & Clerical Errors
E-rate Filing Process Overview
State of E-rate E-rate Program
Navigating the E-rate Invoicing Process
Step 3: Legally Binding agreements and contracts
Sample Bid Evals and Best Practices
E-rate Program Avoid the Dirty Dozen Mistakes
A YEAR IN THE LIFE OF AN E-RATE APPLICANT
Service Provider Training Schools and Libraries Division
Navigating the E-rate Invoicing Process
Understanding the Audit Process
© 2017 Universal Service Administrative Co.
E-rate Filing Process – Post-commitment
What happens after you receive an FCDL?
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Process Overview for Service Providers
FINISHING FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2017 AND WORKING ON FY2018
Understanding the Audit Process
Fall 2018 Service Provider Training
Introduction to Invoicing
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Ensuring Program Compliance
Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division
Service Provider DO’s and DON’Ts Mel Blackwell and John Noran
Ministerial and Clerical Errors
Introduction to E-rate
2019 Service Provider Training
2019 Service Provider Training
Process Overview for Service Providers
WORKING ON FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2019
Audits 2019 Applicant Training.
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Complying with Audits E-rate Program Understanding and Complying with Audits

Overview PQA / BCAP Audits What’s New Common Audit Findings Invoicing Discount Calculation Competitive Bidding Document Retention

Audits Performed Payment Quality Assurance Program (PQA) Beneficiary/Audit Compliance Program (BCAP) Commitment to support Improper Payments Improvement Act (IPIA) requirements Assess estimated rates of improper payments Assessment, not audit Commitment to safeguarding the integrity of the Universal Service Fund (USF) Assess compliance with FCC rules Performance or agreed-upon procedures

E-rate Program What’s New

What’s New BCAP service provider audits Start in late spring 2013 Desk audits (no site visits) Randomly selected Auditing of invoices submitted Auditing FYs 2010 & 2011 Applicants may receive a questionnaire about the service provider’s process. (e.g., were services delivered timely) USAC prepared a documentation checklist for service providers to use when preparing for an audit. The list is located on USAC’s website as BCAP Checklist.

What’s New PQA improper payment rate The current Federal law requires programs to have an improper payment rate less than 2% for E-rate Starting next year the improper payment rate standard changes to a rate of less than 1.5% Applicants can ensure the improper payment rate is less than the standard when applicants are compliant with program rules

E-rate Program Common BCAP & PQA Findings

Invoicing One out of every 5 audits, especially non-compliant audits, has an invoicing finding. Auditors identify errors on SPIs and BEARs.

Invoicing Invoicing Findings Avoid by Recurring services received and invoiced after the end of the fund year in which the services were requested. Ineligible equipment or services on the invoice. Discount incorrectly calculated on the invoice. Avoid by Use the FCDL to prepare the SPI or BEAR. FCDL comments explain what ineligible entities or services were removed and/or the amount of funding reduced. Discount percent, last date to invoice, recurring and non-recurring amounts are listed on the FCDL.

Invoicing Invoicing Findings Avoid by Invoiced for equipment or services not on the Item 21 attachment. Entity(ies) ineligible on the invoice. Ineligible entities (e.g., Fire Department, City Hall, etc.) Schools or libraries not on the FCC Form 471 Block 4. Avoid by Reconcile service provider’s bill to Item 21 attachment. Reconcile entity(ies) receiving service to FCC Form 471 Block 4.

Invoicing Invoicing Findings Correct by Overbilling or unsubstantiated charges. Invoicing for the non-discount portion. Invoicing for services or equipment not delivered. Correct by Returning funds to USAC. Return funds when you over-invoice USAC. See USAC’s website for guidance. Submit an FCC Form 500 to reduce or cancel the funding when services are not delivered. Perform these corrections as soon as they are detected

Discount Calculation Discount Finding Avoid by Library uses the NSLP data from school district(s) served. Avoid by Library should uses the NSLP data from school district(s) in which the library is physically located, not the population served.

Discount Calculation Discount Findings Avoid Finding Incorrect urban /rural status Includes ineligible students (e.g., pre-K, Head Start, etc.) Avoid Finding Refer to USAC’s website tools to assist you. To determine rural status: Table of Rural Areas by State. To determine eligibility of students and/or facilities: Eligibility Table for Non-traditional Education.

Competitive Bidding Competitive Bidding Finding Disqualification factors improperly applied Service providers are not informed about disqualification factors (e.g., mandatory walk-through). Applicant lacks documentation to support why bids were disqualified. Avoid by Inform potential bidders about disqualification factors. Include on FCC Form 470 description of services, RFP (or other document describing the procurement), or post the disqualification factors on your website. Make sure the information is accessible.

Competitive Bidding Competitive Bidding Finding FCC Form 470 did not indicate RFP was issued. Avoid by Check the RFP box on FCC Form 470. Repost the FCC Form 470 if you issued an RFP and failed to check the box. Avoid issuing supplemental documents which change the scope or quantity of the services requested .

Competitive Bidding Competitive Bidding Finding Price of the eligible goods is not the primary factor in the bid evaluation. Avoid by Create separate criteria for other evaluation factors (e.g., ineligible products). Weight the criterion for the price of the eligible products and services higher than the other criteria in your bid evaluation.

Competitive Bidding Competitive Bidding Finding Avoid by Bids were not advertised in accordance with state and local rules. Avoid by Familiarize yourself with advertising requirements in local publications (e.g., dollar thresholds, advertising time period, type of services or equipment). Remember you must be compliant with USAC program rules and your state and local rules.

Competitive Bidding Competitive Bidding Finding Avoid by Applicants use a written bid evaluation Avoid by Document the bid evaluation process, use a bid matrix or worksheet. Use price as the primary factor, when you have more than one bid criteria Document how the winning bidder was selected

Document Retention Lack of Documentation Findings NSLP data documents submitted to auditors not the same documents used to prepare the FCC Form 471. Unable to demonstrate maintenance was performed. No record of an equipment transfer request submitted to USAC. Unable to locate equipment on fixed asset log. Applicant did not have evidence of public notice and/or public hearing or meeting required by CIPA. Applicant did not pay its non-discount share. Service provider did not pay reimbursements.

Document Retention Retain, Retain Documentation must be retained for 5 years from last date of service delivery and can be in electronic format or paper. Applicants & service providers must retain ALL documentation that shows compliance with all FCC rules. Any document from a prior year that supports current year activities must be kept for a period of 5 years after the last day of service delivered. E.g., Contract from 2005, used to support FY 2014 recurring service FRNs, must be kept until at least June 30, 2020.

Document Retention Documents to Retain RFPs or similar documents All bid responses & correspondence Contracts, service agreements, addendums, etc. Item 21 attachments Purchase requisitions, POs, Packing Slips, customer bills Delivery & installation records Maintenance logs Payments (canceled checks, credit card receipts, ACH transactions)

Document Retention Documents to Retain (continued) USAC-approved SPIN changes and/or service substitutions (request, supporting documentation, and approval) USAC-approved invoice deadline extension, service delivery and service substitution (request, supporting documentation, and approval) Documents used to prepare forms (i.e., discount calculation docs like surveys, NSLP data, etc.) FCC Forms Letters received from USAC (e.g., FCC Forms 498, 474)

Questions?