Incentive Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.
Advertisements

Compensation Strategy Extent of Pay for Performance –type of performance rewarded –individuals vs groups Market comparisons –Who is the reference group?
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd. PPTs t/a Human Resource Management in Australia: Strategy-People-Performance by De Cieri & Kramar 1 1 Performance-related.
Jayendra Rimal Traditional Bases for Pay: Seniority and Merit.
Managing Human Resources Bohlander  Snell  Sherman
Introduction Organizations have a relatively large degree of discretion in deciding how to pay. Each employee’s pay is based upon individual performance,
Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 10-1 Presentation Slide 10-1 Advantages of Incentive Pay.
Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay
Incentive Rewards 19 Matakuliah: J0124 – Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Tahun : 2010.
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 12 Recognizing.
Chapter 12 Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay
Designing Compensation and Benefit Packages
Motivation III Motivation in practice Organizational Behaviour The Individual.
12 Entrepreneurship Managing New Ventures for Growth.
Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage
MGTO 231 Human Resources Management Pay for performance Dr. Kin Fai Ellick WONG.
Variable Pay: Incentives for Performance
Incentive Plans. Pay influences employees through u Reinforcement theory u Expectancy theory.
DISIGNING SOUND INCENTIVE SCHEMES, PARAMETERS AND REQUREMENT Presented By : Mukesh Upadhyay Roll No. 39 MPM 3 rd Sem.
Pay-for-Performance Plans
Pay-for-Performance Plans
Human Resource Management TENTH EDITON © 2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Variable Pay.
R OBERT L. M ATHIS J OHN H. J ACKSON PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama Copyright © 2005 Thomson Business & Professional.
12-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 3 rd edition by.
Human Resource Management TENTH EDITON © 2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. Variable Pay and Executive Compensation Variable Pay.
How Does Motivation Work?
Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay
IRWI N CHAPTER 16 Recognizing Individual Contributions with Pay ©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997.
Chapter 12 recognizing employee contributions with pay
Human Resource Management INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
IRWI N Pay for Individual Contributions ©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997 © Nancy Brown Johnson, 1999.
Human Resource Management Lecture 17 MGT 350. Last Lecture Pay Types of Reward Plans Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Rewards Intrinsic Financial versus Nonfinancial.
Strategy for Human Resource Management Lecture 23 HRM 765.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Pay for Performance 11.
BA 2204 and BAS 324 Human Resource Management Rewarding performance Instructor: Ça ğ rı Topal 1.
Compensation Pay for Performance. Key Topics – Pay for Performance Types of incentive plans Types of incentive plans Merit pay and motivation Merit pay.
Incentives & Gain sharing
12-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 3 rd edition by.
Chapter 7 Rewards and Performance Management
Copyright ©2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Human Resource Management in Australia 2e by De Cieri, Kramar, Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart & Wright.
Pay for Individual Contributions © Nancy Brown Johnson, 2004.
Jayendra Rimal. Introduction: Compensation Compensation refers to all forms of financial returns and tangible benefits that employees receive as part.
Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 12 Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
12-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Copyright © 2014 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin FUNDAMENTALS OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 5 TH EDITION BY R.A.
COMPENSATION.
Incentives – Performance linked Pay Part 2. Types of incentive plans.
Pay for Performance and Financial Incentives
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres and reward systems.
MOTIVATION Managing requires the creation and maintenance of an environment in which individuals work in group for accomplishment of common objective.
Incentive Pay Systems Chapter 14.
Motivation… Implications for managers
Motivation, Performance, and Pay
Variable Pay and Executive Compensation
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
11 Rewarding Performance
9 6 Total Rewards C H A P T E R Training Employees
Financial performance measures and reward systems
11 Motivating Employees In business, willingness is just as important as ability. —Paul G. Hoffman.
Employee Contributions: Determining Individual Pay
Performance Appraisal Basics
Chapter Fifteen Incentive Plans.
Chapter 11: Rewarding Performance
Long-term Incentive Plans
Compensation.
A Personnel Psychological Perspective
Pay for Performance and Financial Incentives
Presentation transcript:

Incentive Plans

Pay influences employees through Reinforcement theory Expectancy theory

Reinforcement Theory Behavior that is rewarded will be repeated.

Expectancy Theory Motivational Force = E * I * V Expectancy If I attempt this level of performance, am I likely to succeed? Motivational Force = E * I * V Instrumentality If I achieve this level of performance, am I likely to be rewarded? Valence What value do I place on the rewards available to me?

Incentive Programs Differ by Fitting program to situation depends on payment method frequency of payout ways of measuring performance choice of which employees are covered Fitting program to situation depends on organizational structure management style type of work

Types of Plans Merit Pay Individual Incentives Profit Sharing Ownership Gainsharing Group Incentives Alternative Reward Systems

Merit Pay Programs link performance appraisal ratings to annual pay increases focus: identifying individual differences in performance better performance results in higher reward, contingent on position in the range (compra-ratio)

Criticisms of Merit Pay merit pay systems focusing on individual performance discourage teamwork if performance is not measured fairly and accurately, the whole process will be contaminated apparent differences between people arise almost entirely from the system that they work in, not the people themselves coworkers, job materials, customers, management, supervision

Individual Incentives reward individual performance payments are NOT rolled into base pay performance is usually measured as a physical output rather than subjective ratings

Individual Incentives are rare because most jobs have no physical output measure administrative problems of setting and maintaining acceptable standards plans may be inconsistent with other goals (e.g. acquiring multiple skills, proactive problem solving) people may focus on what they get paid for and nothing else plans may reward output at the expense of quality

Profit Sharing payments are based on a measure of organizational performance (profits) payments do NOT become a part of base pay Advantage: may encourage workers to think more like owners Drawbacks: workers may perceive their performance has little to do with profit deferred nature of payouts

Ownership encourages employees to focus on the success of the organization as a whole but may not result in motivation for high individual performance gains not realized until stock sold (employees leaving company?) Methods: stock options ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans)

Gainsharing sharing productivity gains with employees differs from profit sharing in that instead of using an organization-level performance measure (profits) plans measure group or plant performance better for motivation Examples: Scanlon plan, Rucker plan, Improshare goes beyond money -- participation in problem solving = key

Conditions for effective Gainsharing management commitment need to change or a process of continuous improvement management acceptance & encouragement of employee input high levels of cooperation and interaction employment security information sharing on all productivity and costs goal setting commitment of all involved parties to change and improvement agreement on a performance standard calculation that is understandable, perceived as fair, closely related to managerial objectives

Group Incentives Focus = smaller work groups While gainsharing typically measures physical output, group incentives tend to measure performance in terms of a broader array such as cost savings successful completion of product design meeting deadlines Drawback: competition among teams

Alternative Reward Systems alternatives to cash -- travel merchandise earned time off symbolic awards plaques, coffee cups, bananas

Incentive Plans

Conditions for Effective Incentive Plans Plan is clearly communicated. Plan is understood by employees and management. Bonuses are easy to calculate. Employees participate in administrating the plan. Employees believe they are being treated fairly. Employees believe they can trust the company and that they have security. Bonuses are awarded as soon as possible after the desired performance.

Pay for Performance Plans

Conditions for Effective Performance-Based Pay Systems Pay-performance linkage must be perceived by employees Pay is valued by employees Employees must perceive that effort and ability lead to rewarded behavior Performance measurement must be fair Employees must trust the organization Pay program must be understood Employees must be able to control their performance Performance appraisal system cannot be biased There must be enough money to fund incentives A valid job evaluation must have been conducted