Geographical Indications

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
TRADEMARKS CONTAINING A NATIONAL FLAG
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
2 Industrial Property 1. Introduction: notion of industrial property 2. International legal framework 3. Main substantive treaties in the field of industrial.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 CHALLENGES TO THE LISBON SYSTEM Presentation by Mihály Ficsor, Vice-President, Hungarian Patent Office WIPO/INPI Forum on Geographical Indications and.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th AIPPI-MIE International Conference Budapest, September.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
Understanding Industrial Property By Ronald De Four The University of the West Indies St. Augustine The material presented in this document was sourced.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
The Protection of Geographical Indications in Brazil Cristina Ninô Biscaia LL.M Munich Intellectual Property Law Center.
“Legal frameworks for the protection of Geographic Indications” Carmen Bullon FAO Development Law Service.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
Three Pillars of the Copyright System Any efficient copyright system must include: 1) appropriate legislation 2) management mechanisms 3) enforcement.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
“Bad Faith” Trademark Filings/Registrations: TIPO’s Solution Jeffrey CHEN TIPO, Chinese Taipei 37 th IPEG Meeting in Medan 1.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
Recent Developments at the International Level
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, Copyright, and Franchising
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
1st December 2009, Bratislava
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
IP Protection under the WTO
Community protection of geographical indications :
Department Of Commerce
Paris Convention §2 “(1) Nationals of any country of the Union shall, as regards the protection of industrial property, enjoy in all the other countries.
6th TLI Symposium Trademark Law and Other Rights in Distinctive Signs (30 October 2015) _________________________ Registered Trade Marks and Unregistered.
IP and Public Health patents on pharmaceutical products and access to medicines Giulio C. Zanetti, IDLO Beirut, May 2003.
Canada’s Approach to Geographical Indications
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

Geographical Indications Their legal protection, use and economic importance Giulio C. Zanetti, IDLO Beirut, May 2003

Terminology Geographical indications Appellations of origin Indications of source

Definitions A. Indication of Source: any geo. sign (word or symbol) used to indicate that a product or service originates in a given country/region/place. B. Appellation of Origin: any geo. sign (word or symbol) used to indicate that a product or service originates in a given country/region/place and its quality and characteristics are exclusively or essentially due to the geographical environment. C. Geographical Indications: A + B + reputation D. Difference with MARKS

3 elements of G. I. 1: must be the geographical name of a country/region/area. 2: must serve to designate a product originating in the country/region/area referred to. 3. There must be significant qualitative link between the product and the geo. area.

1) unauthorized persons from using a G. I 1) unauthorized persons from using a G.I. for g/s not originating from the geo. place indicated 2) unauthorized persons from using a G.I. for g/s not respecting quality standards Possibility to prevent Protection 3) that the G.I. becomes generic

INTERNATIONAL TREATIES How to protect a G. I. INTERNATIONAL TREATIES NATIONAL LAW protected as G.I. as such protected as collective/ certification mark protected under unfair competition law if: certain reputation misleading for consumers (proof of damages) Paris Convention Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False and Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods Lisbon Agreement TRIPS

The Paris Convention (1883) Article 1(2) - Indications of source and appellations of origin: objects of industrial property Article 10(1) - Seizure of goods bearing a false indication of source. When? 1)on importation, 2) in the country of affixation, 3) in the country into which the goods were imported Articles 9(3) and 10(2) - Who may request seizure Article 10bis - Protection against unfair competition Article 10ter - Obligation to provide legal remedies and to permit groupings of interested persons to sue

The Paris Convention (Cont.) Covers 140 countries But: Article 10 applies only to false indications of source (ie: not to deceptive ind. of source) Sanctions provided for not always mandatory (see article 9(4) to (6)) Does not address the question of geographic indications becoming generic in countries other than the country of origin

The Madrid Agreement (1891) Article 1 - seizure on importation of goods bearing false or deceptive indication of source Article 3 - indication of name and address of vendor must be accompanied by clear indication of the country or place of manufacture or production Article 3bis - prohibition of deceptive indications of source in connection with sale or advertising of goods Article 4 - leaves it to the courts to determine what appellations are generic, except as regards “regional appellations” of vine products

The Madrid Agreement (Cont.) Goes further than the Paris Convention But: Only 31 countries party Sanctions provided for are limited Indications of source are not protected against becoming generic (except for regional appellations of vine products).

The Lisbon Agreement (1958) Article 2(1) – definition of ‘appellation of origin’ (qualitative link) Article 1(2) - protection of appellations of origin recognized and protected as such in the country of origin and registered at the International Bureau of WIPO

The procedure G.I. Recognized and protected as such Country of origin - formal examination - inscription in Int Reg. - Notification to States - Publicat. in Bulletin WIPO National Administrations Right to refuse (12 months)

The Lisbon Agreement (Cont.) Article 5 - International registration Applied for by the competent administration of the country of origin Notification and publication Right of refusal, within a period of one year only condition: grounds must be indicated Right to grant third parties up to two years to terminate previous use International Bureau must be advised within three months of end of refusal period Article 3 - Content of protection Protected against any usurpation or imitation, even if true origin is indicated or if accompanied by expressions such as “type,” “make,” “imitation,” or the like Article 6 - Duration of protection As long as it is protected as an appellation in the country of origin The international registration may be canceled only at the request of the country of origin

The Lisbon Agreement (Cont.) Broad protection, not limited in time But: Only 17 countries bound No protection of indications of source Requires specific protection in the country of origin Sanctions left to national legislation (Article 8) Difficult to adapt to products other than agricultural products or handicraft

The Lisbon Agreement (Cont.) REVISION: Jan 1, 2002 Working lang.: French + English, Spanish Lang. of the appelation of origin  Lang. of the cuontry of origin + optional translat. Disclaimer Invalidation Corrections

TRIPS (1995) Article 22.1 – definition of ‘geographical indications’ (qualitative link) Article 22.1 – means to prevent use of G.I. that mislead the public Article 23 – special protection for wines and spirits Article 24 – exceptions (eg: no obligation to protect G.I. that are not protected in country of origin)

POST-DOHA DEVELOPMENT AGENDA status of negotiations possible solutions

www.wto.org www.wipo.int gzanetti@idlo.int Thanks!!!