Pacific water transport in the Arctic Ocean simulated

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical simulation of internal tides in the Sicily and Messina Straits Jihene Abdennadher and Moncef Boukthir Institut Preparatoire aux Etudes d’Ingenieur.
Advertisements

Salt rejection, advection, and mixing in the MITgcm coupled ocean and sea-ice model AOMIP/(C)ARCMIP / SEARCH for DAMOCLES Workshop, Paris Oct 29-31, 2007.
HYCOM and the need for overflow/entrainment parameterizations.
Temperature and salinity variability of the Atlantic Water in the Eastern Eurasian Basin between 1991 and 2011 Meri Korhonen R/V Akademik Fedorov, August.
Yoichi Ishikawa 1, Toshiyuki Awaji 1,2, Teiji In 3, Satoshi Nakada 2, Tsuyoshi Wakamatsu 1, Yoshimasa Hiyoshi 1, Yuji Sasaki 1 1 DrC, JAMSTEC 2 Kyoto University.
Chukchi/Beaufort Seas Surface Wind Climatology, Variability, and Extremes from Reanalysis Data: Xiangdong Zhang, Jeremy Krieger, Paula Moreira,
Modeling circulation and ice in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas
Role of the Southern Ocean in controlling the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation Igor Kamenkovich RSMAS, University of Miami, Miami RSMAS, University.
P. N. Vinayachandran Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (CAOS) Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Bangalore Summer.
2005 ROMS Users Meeting Monday, October 24, 2005 Coupled sea-ice/ocean numerical simulations of the Bering Sea for the period 1996-present Enrique Curchitser.
A Regional Ice-Ocean Simulation Of the Barents and Kara Seas W. Paul Budgell Institute of Marine Research and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research Bergen,
The Role of Surface Freshwater Flux Boundary Conditions in Arctic Ocean/Sea-Ice Models EGU General Assembly, Nice, April 2004 Matthias Prange and Rüdiger.
The Louvain-la-Neuve sea ice model : current status and ongoing developments T. Fichefet, Y. Aksenov, S. Bouillon, A. de Montety, L. Girard, H. Goosse,
Jonathan Whitefield Peter Winsor Tom Weingartner USING IN SITU OBSERVATIONS TO VALIDATE THE PERFORMANCE OF ECCO IN THE ARCTIC SEAS.
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
1-Slide Summary Explicit Southern Ocean eddies respond to forcing differently than parameterizations.  We need eddy resolving ocean climate models. Spurious.
Mind maps (from interviews) Atmosphere.mm Ocean.mm Mind maps (from interviews) Atmosphere.mm Ocean.mm Query tools CIM software.png CIM software.png CIM.
River plume experiments with HYCOM in an idealized basin Rafael Vergara Schiller Villy Kourafalou University of Miami - RSMAS 11 th HYCOM meeting – Apr.
Validation Analysis of the 0.72˚ HYCOM/CICE run Dmitry Dukhovskoy, Pam Posey, Joe Metzger, Alan Wallcraft, and Eric Chassignet.
Imposed versus Dynamically Modeled Sea Ice: A ROMS study of the effects on polynyas and waters masses in the Ross Sea John M. Klinck, Y. Sinan Hüsrevoglu.
Production and Export of High Salinity Shelf Water in a Model of the Ross Sea Michael S. Dinniman Y. Sinan Hüsrevoğlu John M. Klinck Center for Coastal.
WHOI -- AOMIP 10/20/2009 Formation of the Arctic Upper Halocline in a Coupled Ocean and Sea-ice Model Nguyen, An T., D. Menemenlis, R. Kwok, Jet Propulsion.
AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Improved modeling of the Arctic halocline with a sub-grid-scale brine rejection parameterization Nguyen, An T.,
The Linear and Non-linear Evolution Mechanism of Mesoscale Vortex Disturbances in Winter Over Western Japan Sea Yasumitsu MAEJIMA and Keita IGA (Ocean.
The dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice module in the Bergen Climate Model Helge Drange and Mats Bentsen Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Bjerknes.
1) What is the variability in eddy currents and the resulting impact on global climate and weather? Resolving meso-scale and sub- meso-scale ocean dynamics.
Mixed Layer Ocean Model: Model Physics and Climate
Experience with ROMS for Downscaling IPCC Climate Models 2008 ROMS/TOMS European Workshop, Grenoble, 6-8 October Bjørn Ådlandsvik, Paul Budgell, Vidar.
AOMIP status Experiments 1. Season Cycle 2. Coordinated - Spinup Coordinated - Analysis Coordinated 100-Year Run.
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Ocean Climate Simulations with Uncoupled HYCOM and Fully Coupled CCSM3/HYCOM Jianjun Yin and Eric Chassignet Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
Assessment of the ECCO2 optimized solution in the Arctic An T. Nguyen, R. Kwok, D. Menemenlis JPL/Caltech ECCO-2 Team Meeting, MIT Sep 23-24, 2008.
Interannual to decadal variability of circulation in the northern Japan/East Sea, Dmitry Stepanov 1, Victoriia Stepanova 1 and Anatoly Gusev.
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Modifications of the MICOM version used in the Bergen Climate Model Mats Bentsen and Helge Drange Nansen.
Tropical Atlantic SST in coupled models; sensitivity to vertical mixing Wilco Hazeleger Rein Haarsma KNMI Oceanographic Research The Netherlands.
15 Annual AOMIP Meeting. WHOI, 1- 4 November 2011 Numerical modeling of the Atlantic Water distribution in the upper Arctic Ocean: Sensitivity studies.
The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.
Alexandra Jahn 1, Bruno Tremblay 1,3, Marika Holland 2, Robert Newton 3, Lawrence Mysak 1 1 McGill University, Montreal, Canada 2 NCAR, Boulder, USA 3.
Numerical modeling of Atlantic and Pacific waters dynamics Elena Golubeva Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics Siberian Branch.
AO-FVCOM Development: A System Nested with Global Ocean Models Changsheng Chen University of Massachusetts School of Marine Science, USA
Dmitry Dukhovskoy, Andrey Proshutinsky and Mary-Louise Timmermans Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies Florida State University Acknowledgement:
THE BC SHELF ROMS MODEL THE BC SHELF ROMS MODEL Diane Masson, Isaak Fain, Mike Foreman Institute of Ocean Sciences Fisheries and Oceans, Canada The Canadian.
Toward improved understanding of mass and property fluxes through Bering Strait Jaclyn Clement Kinney 1, Wieslaw Maslowski 1, Mike Steele 2, Jinlun Zhang.
E. Golubeva, G.Platov, M.Krayneva, D.Yusupova Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics, SB RAS Novosibirsk,
Eddies in the Beaufort Sea & its impact to ecosystem Watanabe (2011, JGR) & Nishino et al. (2011, GRL) 2) Preliminary results of XCTD measurement during.
Climate System Research Center, Geosciences Alan Condron Peter Winsor, Chris Hill and Dimitris Menemenlis Changes in the Arctic freshwater budget in response.
Coordinated experiments to identify roles of different factors in the ocean dynamics and hydrography Andrey Proshutinsky 1, Eiji Watanabe 2, Elena Golubeva.
Impact of sea ice dynamics on the Arctic climate variability – a model study H.E. Markus Meier, Sebastian Mårtensson and Per Pemberton Swedish.
Gent-McWilliams parameterization: 20/20 Hindsight Peter R. Gent Senior Scientist National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Guoping Gao 1, Changsheng Chen 1, Andrey Proshuntinsky 2 and Robert. C. Beardsley 2 1 Department of Fisheries Oceanography University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth.
Impacts of Vertical Momentum Mixing in an Arctic Ocean Model Youyu Lu 1, Greg Holloway 2, Ji Lei 1 1 Bedford Institute of Oceanography 2 Institute of Ocean.
Horizontal density structure and restratification
A Dynamical Model of the Beaufort Gyre: A Balance between Ekman Pumping and Eddy Fluxes Jiayan Yang & Andrey Proshutinsky Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
On (in)correctness of estimating heat flux across a single section Wieslaw Maslowski Naval Postgraduate School AOMIP Workshop, Woods Hole, MA, October,
Outline of the talk Why study Arctic Boundary current? Methods Eddy-permitting/resolving simulations Observational evidence Mechanisms of the current.
Coupling ROMS and CSIM in the Okhotsk Sea Rebecca Zanzig University of Washington November 7, 2006.
Wind-driven halocline variability in the western Arctic Ocean
Preliminary Results from the Global Ocean Simulations with the Baringer-Price-Yang Marginal Sea Boundary Condition Model Wanli Wu, William Large and Gokhan.
Mesoscale eddies and shelf-basin exchange in the western Arctic Ocean
Gennady A. Platov, Elena N. Golubeva, Victor I. Kuzin
Nguyen, An T. , D. Menemenlis, R
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
Marie-Noëlle HOUSSAIS
A first assessment of changes in the Arctic Ocean freshwater
Observations of the North Atlantic Subtropical Mode Water
Shelf-basin exchange in the Western Arctic Ocean
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
O. Melnichenko1, N. Maximenko1, and H. Sasaki2
John (Qiang) Wang, Paul G. Myers, Xianmin Hu, Andrew B.G. Bush
Xuezhu Wang, Qiang Wang, Sergey Danilov, Thomas Jung,
Presentation transcript:

Pacific water transport in the Arctic Ocean simulated AOMIP Workshop #12 @ WHOI Jan. 15, 2009 Pacific water transport in the Arctic Ocean simulated by an eddy-resolving coupled sea ice-ocean model Eiji Watanabe1 and Hiroyasu Hasumi2 1 : International Arctic Research Center, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks 2 : Center for Climate System Research, Univ. of Tokyo, JAPAN

Motivation Introduction Pacific water is predominant sources of heat, freshwater and nutrients Freshwater content [m] (Sref = 34.8 psu) Schematic image of Pacific water pathway Model Low FWC High-salinity OBS Steele et al. (2004) Steiner et al. (2004) Eddy-induced transport is important for Pacific water pathway ?

Model Description Method Coupled sea ice-ocean model : COCO (developed at Univ. of Tokyo) Sea ice part - momentum equation based on Mellor and Kantha (1989) - 0-layer thermodynamics (Semtner, 1976) / two thickness category - EVP rheology (Hunke and Duckowicz, 1997) Ocean part :COCO 3.4 (CCSR ocean component model version 3.4) - free surface general circulation model (OGCM) - UTOPIA/QUICKEST for trace advection (Leonard et al., 1994) - turbulent closure scheme (Noh and Kim, 1999) - Smagorinsky’s biharmonic viscosity (Griffies and Hallberg, 2000) - enstrophy preserving scheme (Ishizaki and Motoi, 1999) Model parameter (background value [m2/s] ) - horizontal viscosity : 5.0×10, horizontal diffusivity : 1.0 - vertical viscosity : 1.0×10-4, vertical diffusivity : (0.1 ~ 3.0)×10-4

Experimental Design Method Model domain : Chukchi shelf and southern Canada Basin - horizontal resolution : about 2.5 km - vertical level : 2 - 5 - 10 - 15 - 20 - 30 - 40 - 50 - 60 - 80 - 100 - 125 - 150 - 175 (25L) [m] - 200 - 250 - 300 - 350 - 400 - 500 - 700 - 1000 - 2000 - 3000 - 4000 Boundary condition - NCEP/NCAR reanalysis monthly  (wind, temperature, radiation etc.) - lateral : sponge for ocean   open for ice - Pacific water inflow at Bering Strait Model bathymetry [m] Bering Strait Chukchi shelf Model topography [m] Northwind Ridge Initial condition - T, S : PHC in March - ocean circulation : static - sea ice : shown later Barrow Canyon Canada Basin Alaska N Integrated for 1 year from Mar to Feb

Pacific Water Transport Result Pacific Water Transport Pacific water inflows into Canada Basin by mesoscale eddy activities Pacific water content [m] Virtual tracer prescribed at Bering Strait Maximum velocity [cm/s] in Barrow Canyon Pacific water transport [Sv] Canada Basin Barrow Canyon Oct Maximum in late summer N Feb

Instability of Barrow Canyon Jet Result Instability of Barrow Canyon Jet Mesoscale eddies are generated by instability of Barrow Canyon jet Northward velocity [cm/s] (Aug) Energy conversion rate [KJ/m2/mon] Baroclinic instability is dominant N APE ↓ EKE Alaska Barrow Canyon Jet strength depends on surface stress and buoyancy flux ? These fluxes are related to sea ice condition ?

Dependence on Sea Ice Condition Result Dependence on Sea Ice Condition Relationship of Pacific water transport with sea ice is focused on Sea ice concentration [ - ] (Sep) Integrated from different initial ice thickness Pacific water transport [Sv] retreat to basin SICE small ice case N MICE medium ice case remain in shelf Shelf-to-basin transport is promoted in smaller ice case LICE large ice case

Barrow Canyon Jet Result Strong jet and sharp density front appear in smaller ice case Pacific water tracer [ - ] and potential density [kg/m3] (Aug) Velocity of Barrow Canyon jet [cm/s] Alaska SICE Contribution of surface stress ? Contribution of surface buoyancy flux ? LICE

Surface stress [Pa] (Aug) Result Surface Momentum Flux Surface stress = wind stress + ice-ocean stress (τIO) Surface stress [Pa] (Aug) Surface stress [Pa] Jet velocity [cm/s] Sea ice margin Slight surface stress N SICE Barrow Canyon MICE Enhanced ice-ocean stress LICE

Pacific water tracer [ - ] and potential density [kg/m3] (Aug) Result Surface Momentum Flux Pacific water tracer [ - ] and potential density [kg/m3] (Aug) trapped along shore SICE diffused westward LICE Pacific water and density profiles are also altered by sea ice-ocean stress

Velocity of Barrow Canyon jet [cm/s] Result Surface Buoyancy Flux No sea ice-ocean stress cases Velocity of Barrow Canyon jet [cm/s] Jet strength is almost same regardless of sea ice conditions Dependence on surface buoyancy flux is negligible

Ocean Freshwater Transport Result Ocean Freshwater Transport Insufficient eddy-induced transport is important factors for salinity bias ? Freshwater transport from Chukchi shelf to Canada Basin Pacific water tracer [m] (Feb) 795 km3/yr SICE : 797 km3/yr LICE : 888 km3/yr N MICE Freshwater transport is larger by being mixed with sea ice meltwater in large ice case

Summary in Eddy-resolving Model Most of Pacific water inflow into Canada Basin by mesoscale eddies. Generation of eddies is accompanied by instability of Barrow Canyon jet. The inflow is promoted in smaller summer ice extent case. Process of jet braking by ice-ocean stress is important. Freshwater transport is larger in large extent case Pacific water content [m] N MICE MICE

Problem on Model Setting Discussion Problem on Model Setting Enormous computer resource is necessary for eddy-resolving modeling Time required for 10 yrs integration (ARSC / 64 cpu) Eddy-resolving model (2.5 km) - 1 year (entire Arctic Ocean) - 1 month (Chukchi ~ Canada Basin) Basin-scale model (25 km) - 3 days (entire Arctic Ocean) Basin-scale model cannot explicitly reproduce mesoscale eddies Fine Resolution Coarse

Subgrid-scale Eddy-induced Transport Discussion Subgrid-scale Eddy-induced Transport Impact of GM diffusion in the Arctic Ocean modeling is evaluated k = 100 m2/s (control case) k = a L2/T (variable GM case) primitive sophisticated Eddy-induced transport Image of isopycnal layer thickness diffusion

Experimental Design Method Model domain : Arctic Ocean, Greenland Sea, Baffin Bay - horizontal resolution : about 25 km - vertical level : 2 - 5 - 10 - 15 - 20 - 30 - 40 - 50 - 60 - 80 - 100 - 125 - 150 - 175 (25L) [m] - 200 - 250 - 300 - 350 - 400 - 500 - 700 - 1000 - 2000 - 3000 - 4000 Boundary condition - NCEP/NCAR reanalysis daily mean  (wind, temperature, radiation etc.) - sponge layer in Atlantic side - Pacific water inflow at Bering Strait Canada Siberia Greenland Bering Strait Fram Eurasian Basin Canada Basin Initial T, S : PHC / no sea ice Spin up : 10yrs (restored at all depths) Climatorogical run : 10yrs [CTL] k = 100 m2/s, [VGM] k = a L2/T

Pacific water content [m] Result Pacific Water Pathway Pacific water content [m] CTL VGM Shelf-to-basin transport is underestimated Pacific water spreads over Canadian Basin

Salinity Distribution Result Salinity Distribution Salinity anomaly [psu] (ann, 0 ~ 200m) VGM - PHC CTL - PHC Appropriate representation of eddy-induced transport is essentially important for modeling on Pacific water pathway and freshwater variation

Reason for Remaining Bias Future Work Reason for Remaining Bias High-salinity bias in Canada Basin still remains even in VGM case Pacific water pathway is not completely reproduced yet Local narrow current may also have a key for Pacific water transport Additional local processes should be clarified in future research Pacific water content [m] Potential temperature [C] Image of possible dynamics on local baroclinic current VGM Sumata and Shimada (2007)