undetectable (undetectable-6.25)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
Advertisements

Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Background There is uncertainty regarding the frequency, predictors, and outcomes of IRIS events Prior studies on IRIS have been limited to convenience.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
When to Initiate ART in Adults and Adolescents (2009 WHO Guidelines) Target PopulationClinical conditionRecommendation Asymptomatic Individuals (including.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
NIAID ERADICATE Open-label W12 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment naïve HIV infection on stable ART ≥ 8 weeks and HIV RNA < 50 c/ml.
Agenda  Update on Darunavir: Perry Mohammed  Update on Etravirine: Rekha Sinha  Update on TMC278: Peter Williams  Update on TMC207: Karel De Beule.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Weekly Alendronate Safe and Effective at Increasing Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on: McComsey GA, Kendall.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F.
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Phase 3b Treatment-Naive
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, United Kingdom
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced HIV Coinfection
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Melissa Herrin, Jan Tate ScD, MPH & Amy Justice, MD, PhD
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

undetectable (undetectable-6.25) P1887 Skin Rash Related to Once-daily Boosted Darunavir-Containing Regimens in HIV-infected Taiwanese: Incidence and Associated Factor Kuan-Yin Lin1, Chien-Yu Cheng2, Chia-Jui Yang3, Mao-Song Tsai3, Szu-Min Hsieh1, Hsin-Yun Sun1, Wang-Huei Sheng1, Mao-Yuan Chen1, Sui-Yuan Chang1, Shu-Hsing Cheng2, Chien-Ching Hung1 1National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei; 2Taoyuan General Hospital, Taoyuan; 3Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan Chien-Ching Hung, M.D., Ph.D E-mail: hcc0401@ntu.edu.tw Abstract Results Figure 1. Summary of DRV/RTV-related adverse effects in 238 patients 238 patients who switched to once-daily DRV/RTV-containing regimens (Group A) and 178 patients who switched from 2 NRTIs plus nNRTI or other PI to 2 NRTIs plus PI other than DRV/RTV (Group B) were included (Table 1). In per-protocol analysis, the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA load <50 copies/ml increased from 26.2% (62/237) at baseline to 70.8% (68/96) at week 24 and 82.7% (67/81) at week 48; the median CD4 cell count increased from 291 to 402 and 448 cells/μl at weeks 24 and 48, respectively. The mean duration of DRV/RTV exposure was 37.9 weeks, and 21.4% of the patients developed any grade of adverse effects (Figure 1). In multivariate analysis, the history of rash to the preceding nNRTI-containing regimens before switch was independently associated with DRV/RTV-related rash (Figure 2). Compared with Group A in which 26 patients (10.9%) developed rashes after switch to DRV/RTV-containing regimen, 7 patients (3.9%) in Group B experienced rashes after switch to PIs other than DRV (P=0.009). Objectives: To investigate the incidence of and associated factors with skin rashes among HIV-infected Taiwanese patients who received once-daily darunavir (DRV) boosted by ritonavir (RTV) (800/100 mg) plus 2 NRTIs. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of HIV-infected patients who switched to once-daily DRV/RTV-containing regimens in 2012-2013. Patients who switched from 2 NRTIs plus nNRTI or other PI to two NRTIs plus PIs other than DRV were chosen as comparators. Results: During the 2-year study period, 238 patients who switched to once-daily DRV/RTV-containing regimens (Group A) and 178 patients who switched from 2 NRTIs plus nNRTI or other PI to 2 NRTIs plus PI other than DRV/RTV (Group B) were included. Compared with Group B in which 7 (3.9%) developed rashes after switch to PI other than DRV, 26 patients (10.9%) in Group A developed rashes after a median interval of 14 days of starting DRV/RTV-containing regimens (P=0.009). In multivariate analysis, patients with a history of rashes related to the previous nNRTI-containing regimens before starting DRV/RTV-containing regimens were more likely to develop rashes with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.53 (95% CI, 1.45-8.62). Conclusions: Once-daily regimens containing DRV/RTV is associated with a higher rate of adverse cutaneous reactions than other PI-containing regimens in HIV-infected Taiwanese, especially in those who have a history of rashes to nNRTI-containing regimens before switch to DRV/RTV-containing regimens. Figure 2. Incidence for DRV/RTV-related skin rash in different groups (%) * AOR, 3.53 95% CI, 1.45-8.62 Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients in Groups A and B. Baseline characteristics Group A (N=238) Group B (N=178) p Male, n (%) 230 (96.6) 171 (96.1) 0.757 Mean age, years (SD) 38.3 (10.1) 39.8 (10.9) 0.128 Men who have sex with men, n (%) 177 (74.4) 139 (78.1) 0.380 CDC class A, n (%) 205 (86.1) 159 (89.3) 0.621 Duration of HIV infection, mean (SD), years 4.6 (4.6) 4.7 (5.0) 0.487 Duration of ARV therapy, mean (SD), years 3.2 (4.2) 3.8 (4.6) 0.439 Baseline PVL, median (range), log10 copies/ml 5.04 (2.91-7.15) 4.97 (2.60-7.00) 0.279 Baseline CD4 count, median (range), cells/μl 200.0 (0-1230) 202.0 (0-980) 0.797 PVL at switch, median (range), log10 copies/ml 3.33 (undetectable-7.00) undetectable (undetectable-6.25) < 0.001 CD4 count at switch, median (range), cells/μl 291.0 (0-1336) 413.5 (2-1237) Comorbidity, n (%) HBV- or HCV-coinfected Hypertension Hyperlipidemia Diabetes mellitus Chronic kidney disease Chronic hepatitis 71 (29.8) 14 (5.9) 25 (10.5) 9 (3.8) 4 (1.7) 41 (17.2) 39 (21.9) 25 (14.0) 52 (29.2) 12 (6.7) 1 (0.6) 17 (9.6) 0.070 0.005 0.172 0.300 0.025 Introduction Once-daily DRV/RTV (800/100 mg) is the preferred regimen for antiretroviral-naïve and early antiretroviral-experienced patients without DRV resistance-associated mutations. While skin rash has been shown to develop in 3% of the patients who received DRV/RTV-containing regimens in clinical trials with rare discontinuation of the treatment, a recent observational study conducted in Japan reported a higher rate of skin rash occurring in 11% of the ARV-naïve patients who initiated DRV/RTV. We aimed to examine the incidence and risk factors of skin rash to DRV/RTV-containing regimens when DRV/RTV (800/100 mg) was introduced into clinical use in Taiwan in 2012. Conclusions Once-daily DRV/RTV (800/100 mg)-containing regimens cause a higher risk of skin rashes than other PI-containing regimens in HIV-infected patients who are ethnic Chinese. A history of skin rash to nNRTI before switch to DRV/RTV is independently associated with an increased risk of DRV/RTV-related skin rash (AOR, 3.53). More pharmacogenetic investigations are warranted. Methods Design: retrospective cohort study, 2012-2013. Study sites: 3 major designated hospitals for HIV care in northern Taiwan. 3. Subjects: switched to once-daily DRV/RTV (800/100 mg)-containing regimens. Comparators: switched from 2 NRTIs plus nNRTI or other PI to 2 NRTIs plus PIs other than DRV. 5. Primary endpoint: skin rash of any grade