MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 9, 2012D. R. Dietderich, LARP CM-18 Cable Fabrication Plans and Experience D.R. Dietderich Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory bnl - fnal- lbnl -
Advertisements

WP10.2 – status Reported by L. Bottura and C. Senatore Meeting at CERN, February 2 nd, 2014.
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
F. BORGNOLUTTI Oct. 16 th 2012 Winding Test plan for the MQXF Cable.
Outline: Goals for the cable development at CERN. Main parameters of the cable. Cable development work for a cable width of 15.1 mm and for a cable width.
Nb3Sn Cable and Insulation for LARP High-Gradient Quadrupole Magnets
11 Oct , 2013 by Video LBNL Cable Experience for HiLumi HiLumi LARP/LHC Strand and Cable Internal Review Oct , 2013 by Video D.R. Dietderich,
Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications.
Eucard WP 7.3 HFM Winding and tooling tests Insulation choice F.Rondeaux /01/2011 Dipole design review- II-8 Winding and tooling tests – insulation.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 QXF Conductor and Cable Arup K. Ghosh Feb
Collaboration Mtg, St Charles, IL 10/5-6, 2005 A. Ghosh1 Conductor R&D Plan Arup K. Ghosh BNL.
MQXF RRP® Strand for Q1/Q3 A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Status of MQXF Conductor LARP Update
QXF Cable Status D.R. Dietderich Conductor Working Group Video Meeting, Sept. 17, 2014.
CERN/CEA Collaboration agreement No. KE2275/TE WP4 – Nb 3 Sn technology development Pré-Kick-off meeting 03/07/2014.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
F. Borgnolutti January 17 th 2013 Proposal for a winding test procedure for qualifying the QXF cable.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
Plans and schedule for QXF Giorgio Ambrosio and Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design.
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
Quality assurance of the QXF- Q2 Nb 3 Sn cable mass production C. Scheuerlein, 6 November 2014 HL-LHC/LARP International Review of the Superconducting.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Large Hadron Collider Accelerator Research Program Dimensional Changes of Nb 3 Sn Cables during Heat Treatment LBNL: Ian Pong Dan Dietderich.
Outline: Main characteristics of the FRESCA2 cable Main characteristics of the strand Strand stability, an issue to avoid magnet quench at low field Procurement.
LARP Meeting April 2006LARP Magnet Program – D.R. Dietderich LARP Cable R&D D.R. Dietderich LBNL.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
MQXF Q1/Q3 Conductor Procurement A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Conductor Review Oct 16-17, 2013LARP Strand :Specs. Procurement, Measurement- A. Ghosh1 LARP Strand: Specifications, Procurement and Measurement Plans.
1st FNAL-CERN Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, May 13, 2011
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
E. Todesco OUTPUT OF THE CABLE REVIEW E. Todesco and the QXF team CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 10 th December 2014 QXF design review, CERN.
LARP Meeting, Oct. 6, 2005 D.R. Dietderich, LBNL1 LARP Cable R&D FY05 & FY-06 Plans D.R. Dietderich, LBNL Geneva, IL October 5-6, 2005 bnl – fnal – lbnl.
Outline: Strand R&D and strand procurement and inventory. Main parameters of the cable without a core. Results obtained during the cable development without.
ECC Clément Lorin – Maria Durante Acknowledgements: Fresca2 team.
Stress review - CERN, Review on stress sensitivity Part I R. Flükiger B. Seeber Group of Applied Physics (GAP) University of Geneva 1.
1 QXF / SQXF heater design update M. Marchevsky (12/03/13)
1 Cable Functional Specification March Conductor Working Group Arup K. Ghosh (BNL)
HL-LHC QXF Conductor/Cable Internal Review. Thank You First of all, let me thank everybody for accepting an extended work time and have this meeting over.
Report from Session 2 Main Dipoles. P. McIntyre 2005 – 24T ss Tripler, a lot of Bi-2212, Je = 800 A/mm2 E. Todesco T, 80% ss 30% NbTi 55 %NbSn.
29 th September 2009 EuCARD-WP7 HFM Conductor specification and procurement Luc OBERLI CERN, TE-MSC-SCD.
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
LARP Collaboration Meeting 15 Nov 1-3, 2010 A2C- Materials Working Group Arup Ghosh (coordinator), Emanuela Barzi, Dan Cheng, Dan Dietderich, Soren Prestemon,
LARP Collaboration Meeting 15 Nov 1-3, 2010 Conductor Procurement and Qualification Arup K. Ghosh (BNL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research.
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
QXF Cable with Annealed Wire D.R. Dietderich QXF Working Group Video Meeting, Feb. 12, 2014.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
CERN Cabling Experience FRESCA 2, 11 T Dipole and MQXF A. Ballarino
Lessons learnt from CERN experience
Coil Design and Fabrication
Model magnet test results at FNAL
11 T cable development and procurement strategy at CERN
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
Development of High Current Nb3Sn Rutherford Cables for NED and LARP
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
QXF Cable Winding Test and End Parts Design
CERN Conductor and Cable Development for the 11T Dipole
11 T dipole coil features and dimensions
Mechanical stability and QXF coil winding
MQXF Short Models Status and Plans
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2
MQXF updates P. Ferracin October 9th, 2014.
Long term behavior and high-QI test in the MQXFS program
Assessment of stability of fully-excited Nb3Sn Rutherford cable with modified ICR at 4.2 K and 12 T using a superconducting transformer and solenoidal.
Presentation transcript:

MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2 Luc Oberli MQXF Cable Review Nov. 5, 2014 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Outline 1st Part: Overview on the main results obtained on the MQXF cables fabricated before to arrive to the “first iteration” cable parameters. Experience with the MQXF cable fabrication Status of the cable performance concerning the critical current degradation during cabling. 2nd Part: Development program to improve the mechanical stability of the cable. 3rd Part: MQXF cable fabricated with RRP 132/169 wire for the first quadrupole model Status of the MQXF cable fabrication for the first quadrupole model Analysis of the results obtained on the MQXF cables fabricated with RRP 132/169 wire Conclusion 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

“First iteration” cable parameters Mid-thickness = 1.525 mm +/- 0.010 mm Width = 18.15 mm +/- 0.050 mm Keystone angle = 0.55 deg. +/- 0.10 deg. Pitch Length = 109 mm +/- 3 mm S.S. core width = 12 mm Core thickness = 25 mm t Strain : 1 – (t/2d) Thin edge 15.4 % Thick edge 5.2 % 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

1st part Experience with the MQXF cable fabrication CERN’s experience based on 16 different cabling runs dedicated to the MQXF cable fabrication Fabrication of 4 cables with the “first iteration” dimensions with RRP 132/169 wire for the quadrupole model program (4 cabling runs and in total 650 m of cable). Fabrication of 14 RRP cables and 10 PIT cables with different parameters during the R&D program before to arrive to the “first iteration” parameters for the cable (10 cabling runs and in total 250 m of cable). Variation of width, mid-thickness, keystone angle and transposition pitch in the following range: During the winding tests, all the cables were NOT sufficiently mechanically stable Measured average Ic degradation for 10 RRP cables between 0.5 % and 7.8 % RRR of extracted RRP strands above 97. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of the results obtained for 10 cables fabricated with RRP 132/169 wire before to arrive to the “first iteration” parameters for the cable Run ID Cable width Keystone angle Mid-thickness Pitch length 1 – (t/2d) Strain thin edge Ic Degradation (average) RRR Extracted Virgin 82 17.8 mm 0.65 1.50 mm 113 mm 17.7 % 1.8 % 137 168 1.53 mm 16 % 2.9 % 143 125 mm 0.5 % 2.6 % 126 3.8 % 132 90 0.67 1.534 mm 109 mm 15.8 % 2.5 % 112 268 0.66 17.8 % 5 % 122 92A 18.1 mm 0.62 1.512 mm 16.8 % 2.4 % 115 93A 0.58 1.479 mm 18.3 % 2.7 % 97 97B 0.54 1.520 mm 15.2 % 7.8 % 176 239 Low critical current degradation for most of the cables with the exception of the cable 97B having a quite high degradation of 7.8 % . The RRR values of the extracted strands from the RRP cables are quite sensible to the cabling deformation at the level of the thin edge, but the RRR values stay above 97. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Critical current degradation of the extracted strands from 10 RRP cables fabricated before to arrive to the “first iteration” cable parameters 50 Ic measurements performed on extracted strands (~ 5 Ic per cable) to evaluate the Ic degradation depending of the cable parameters. Ic degradation in a range between 0 and 9 % 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of the critical current degradation obtained for the cables 92A and 97B Ic degradation measured on extracted strands from these two RRP cables. Ic Degradation run 92A : 3.3 %, 1.6 %, 4.9 %, 0 % (average = 2.7 %) Ic Degradation run 97B : 3.3 %, 8.5 %, 6.5 %, 4.3 %, 9.2 %, 7.5 % (average = 7.8 %) Cable 92A Shearing of the sub-elements can be seen in the strands located at the cable thin edge for both cables. Cable 97B 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of the results obtained for 10 cables fabricated with RRP 132/169 wire before to arrive to the “first iteration” parameters for the cable Run ID Cable width Keystone angle Mid-thickness Pitch length 1 – (t/2d) Strain thin edge Ic Degradation (average) RRR Extracted Virgin 82 17.8 mm 0.65 1.50 mm 113 mm 17.7 % 1.8 % 137 168 1.53 mm 16 % 2.9 % 143 125 mm 0.5 % 2.6 % 126 3.8 % 132 90 0.67 1.534 mm 109 mm 15.8 % 2.5 % 112 268 0.66 17.8 % 5 % 122 92A 18.1 mm 0.62 1.512 mm 16.8 % 2.4 % 115 93A 0.58 1.479 mm 18.3 % 2.7 % 97 97B 0.54 1.520 mm 15.2 % 7.8 % 176 239 Low critical current degradation for most of the cables with the exception of the cable 97B having a quite high degradation of 7.8 %, no explanation was found why the Ic degradation of the cable 97B increased to 7.8 %. The RRR values of the extracted strands from the RRP cables are quite sensible to the cabling deformation at the level of the thin edge, but the RRR values stay above 97. Conclusion : all these results indicate that the strain at the cable thin edge shall not exceed 16 %. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

2nd part Development program to improve the mechanical stability of the cable Cable design for the cable development program The new cable parameters were chosen with the goal to improve the mechanical stability of the cable for winding and to decrease the critical current degradation To improve the mechanical stability of the cable for winding, the keystone angle was decreased to 0.4 degree in order to increase the strain at the cable thick edge. To minimize the Ic cable degradation, the mid-thickness of the cables was fixed to a value such that the strain at the cable thin edge doesn’t exceed 15.3 %. For the PIT cable, the strain thin edge was even decreased to 13.1 %. Strand type Keystone angle Mid-thickness Strain thin edge Strain thick edge RRP 0.36o 1.499 mm 15.2 % 8.5 % PIT 0.40o 1.540 mm 13.1 % 5.7 % 1.524 mm 14.1 % 6.6 % 0.39o 1.501 mm 15.3 % 8.1 % Baseline 0.55o 1.525 mm 15.4 % 5.2 % 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Results of the winding tests done with cables having a keystone angle of 0.4 degree to assess the mechanical stability of the cable The keystone angle was reduced to 0.4 degree to compact more the thick edge of the cable while compacting the thin edge less than 15.3 %, in particular for the PIT cables. Sample Cable ID Core Strand Width (mm) Mid-thickness (mm) Strain thin edge (1-t/2d) Pitch length Winding test in unfavourable direction without tool Winding test in unfavourable direction with tool 1 H16OC0165A Yes RRP 18.09 1.499 15.2 % 109 unstable stable 2 H16OC0166AA PIT 1.540 13.1 % 3 H16OC0166AB 1.524 14.1 % 4 H16OC0166AC 1.5013 15.3 % The cables are stable only with the tool in the unfavourable direction. A very slight tendency of a strand pop out on the outer surface of the cable is noticed only at the end of the turn, but most of the time the strand pop out disappears by itself. Conclusion: For the RRP cable, the decrease of the keystone angle to 0.4 degree brings more stability to the cable (but the tool remains essential for winding) and should diminish the risk to have a strand pop out during winding of the outer layer coil. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Status of the QXF cable fabrication done with RRP 132/169 wire for the first quadrupole model Run ID Strand Type Core width Cable width Keystone angle Mid-thickness 113A Reduced Sn 14 mm 18.14 mm 0.57o 1.5237 mm 120A Low cost 18.13 mm 0.56o 1.5257 mm 121A Regular Sn 1.5260 mm 121B 12 mm 0.575o 1.5227 mm Baseline 18.15 mm 0.55o 1.525 mm Core not perfectly centred within the cable. Always a tendency to move toward the cable thick edge. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of the results obtained for the cables fabricated with RRP 132/169 wire for the first MQXF model. Heat treatment for all the cables: 50 hours at 640 C RRP wire with regular Sn content except for the run 113A (reduced Sn) Run ID Cable width Keystone angle Mid-thickness Pitch length 1 – (t/2d) Strain thin edge Ic Degradation (average) RRR Extracted Virgin Cable Ic Calculated from Ic of extracted strands 113A 18.15 mm 0.57 1.524 mm 109 mm 15.7 % 3.5 % 257 354 25760 A 121A 18.14 mm 0.56 1.526 mm 15.5 % 3.2 % 194 291 25840 A 121B 0.575 1.523 mm 2.8 % 191 25940 A 122B 18.09 mm 0.36 1.499 mm 15.2 % 3.1 % 161 280 26424 A All the Ic values for the four cables are greater than 25 280 A (40 * 632 A) Specified Ic of the wire at 12 T and 4.2 K : 632 A 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of the critical current degradation obtained on the 18 Analysis of the critical current degradation obtained on the 18.15 mm wide cable Heat treatment used for all the cables : 48h/210C + 48h/400C + 50h/640C RRP strand with regular Sn was used in the fabrication of all cables, with the exception of the run 113A. Ic degradation measured on extracted strands. Ic degradation values are in a range between 0 % and 6.4 % Degradation run 113A : 3.4 %, 0 %, 4.3 %. 6.4 % (average = 3.5 %) Degradation run 121A : 2.4 %, 4.65 %, 2.8 %, 3.1 % (average = 3.2 %) Degradation run 121B : 0.5 %, 6 %, 0 %, 4.7 % (average = 2.8 %) Run 121A Run 113A Run 121B Shearing of the sub-elements clearly seen in the RRP strands located at the cable thin edge. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of the RRR results obtained on the 18.15 mm wide cable Heat treatment used for all the cables : 48h/210C + 48h/400C + 50h/640C Most of the RRR measurements were made on 8 cm long samples from extracted strands having two deformed sections corresponding to the thin edge and thick edge of the cable. Run 113 : RRR = 228, 234, 309, 258, 259, 259 (RRR virgin 350) Run 121 A: RRR = 170, 180, 182, 199, 209, 222 (RRR virgin 291) Run 121 B: RRR = 171, 174, 186, 200, 207, 208 (RRR virgin 291) 05/11/2014

Analysis of the RRR results obtained on the 18.15 mm wide cable Local RRR values measured on extracted strands at the level of the thin edge or at the level of the thick edge of the cable are more relevant to evaluate the effect of cabling in order to qualify the cable. (Local RRR dominates electrical stability) Local RRR measurements performed on four extracted strands from the cable 113A. (RRP wire with reduced Sn content) Reduction of the RRR at the level of the thin edge section, but RRR remains largely above 100 Local RRR : 149 , 196, 182, 178 Thick edge Thin edge 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of the RRR results obtained on the 18.15 mm wide cable Local RRR measurements performed on seven extracted strands from the two cables 121A and 121B Sharp reduction of the RRR at the level of the thin edge section, but RRR remains above 100 Local RRR : 106, 118, 120, 167, 117, 130, 124 Thick edge Thin edge 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

Analysis of an heavy deformed strand from the cable 121A and 121B From time to time along the cables, heavy deformed strands were detected at the level of the thin edge. These extracted strands were selected to determine the value of the local RRR. The distance between the voltage taps was reduced to ~ 2 mm to measure the local RRR of the abnormally squeezed strand at the level of the thin edge. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli

MQXF cables fabricated with RRP 132/169 wire Conclusion MQXF cables fabricated with RRP 132/169 wire for the first quadrupole model and with the “first iteration” cable parameters were fully qualified Performances well within the expectations concerning the average Ic degradation of the cable which is below 5 %. Local RRR of the cable thin edge above 100, but the starting value of the RRR of the virgin wire was above 250. In the worst case, the local RRR can drop to 87. To better control the reduction of the RRR at the cable thin edge, preferable to have a thin edge thicker by 30 micrometers. 05/11/2014 Luc Oberli