Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H&P Mobile GeoChemistry Escondido, CA
Advertisements

Quantitative Gas Chromatography
Hit “esc” to quit hit any key to continue Effects of Aging on Surface Inertness and Analyte Recoveries in SUMMA Passivated and Fused Silica Lined Canisters.
Hit “esc” to quit hit any key to continue Detection of Ignitable Liquids from Smoke Residues by Large Volume Static Headspace.
Analytical Chemical Sensing using High Resolution Terahertz/Sub-millimeter Wave Spectroscopy Benjamin L. Moran, Alyssa M. Fosnight, Ivan R. Medvedev Department.
PURGE & TRAP Training Commercial July, 22th 2010 Saint-Antoine - France.
Hit “esc” to quit hit any key to continue Analysis of Beverages using Large Volume Static Headspace / GCMS.
The Foundations: Classical Split and Splitless Injection
Week 3 Collection and Analysis of Biodiesel
Environmental Health Laboratories Yongtao B. Li, Ed J. George, Earl M. Hansen, and Jerry J. Thoma and Werner Martin and Peter D. Smith (LEAP Technologies)
Today: Conclusion of Distillation/GC Introduction to Exp
Figure 1. Influence of sample solvent on peak shape. The sample is dissolved in buffer with (a) 0%, (b) 30%, (c) 50%, and (d) 70% acetonitrile. Sample.
Chem. 231 – 2/4 Lecture. Announcements I Homework Set 1 is due 2/6 New Set will be available 2/6 (hopefully) which will be due 2 weeks later Quiz 1 on.
Nitrosamine Detection in Meat By Beryl Ombaso, Chemistry 4101, Fall
Extraction Methods Static Headspace (HS) Dynamic Headspace
Gas Chromatography Carrier Gas Flow Control Injector Port Column Column Oven Detector Recorder The GC system consists of gas supplies for the mobile phase.
ASTM WK Standard Test Method for Dissolved Gases Anne Jurek – Applications Chemist.
自動化溫室效應氣體分析系統 之建立與應用 1 Speaker : Ming-Xia Li Advisor : Prof. Jia-Lin Wang Construction of an automated GC system for measuring atmospheric greenhouse gases.
Gerstel 頂空進樣 Headspace MPS 三合一系統 ( 液體,頂空, SPME) Page 2.
A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Anne Jurek – Applications Chemist.
Air Quality Monitoring Networks Maine DEP 2015 Annual AQ Monitoring Meeting MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protecting Maine’s Air, Land and.
Utilization of Accuracy Profiles as a Tool for the Validation of Analytical Methods A. Ceccato, P. Jacobs, A. Flament, M. Gibella and W. Dewé Lilly Development.
Overbrook Scientific.
PHOTOVAC, Inc. Voyager Gas Chromatograph Concept.
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers by HRGC/HRMS Coreen Hamilton Brian Fowler Louis Haviland Axys Analytical Services, Ltd.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Created with MindGenius Business 2005® Instrumentation (1) Instrumentation (1) Origins Preparative column chromatography (Glass columns) Internal diameter:
Waters HPLC Competitive Review
Micro Analytical GC System for Tea Aroma in Product Quality Control Fred Lewis, Principal Chemist, Analytical Science Laboratory, Unilever John Crandall,
INVESTIGATION OF MONO-ISOPROPYLNAPHTHALENE, DI-ISOPROPYLNAPHTHALENE AND TRI-ISOPROPYLNAPHTHALENE IN THE ENVIRONMENT AROUND THE PAPER RECYCLING PLANT Suzuki.
UNEXPECTED VOCS IN SOIL GAS ASSESSMENT RESULTS James M. Harless, PhD, CHMM Vice President / Principal Cheryl Kehres-Dietrich, CGWP Principal Paul Roberts.
FAME in AVTUR using GC Heart-Cut and refocusing – IP PM EL Piet Koppen – AC Analytical Controls EI Fame in Jet workshop March 1, 2012.
9100 HPLC Trouble shooting.
The world leader in serving science For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures Quantitative Analysis of 4 Immunosuppressant Drugs in Whole.
Introduction to Gas Chromatography
Chromatography is one of widely used separation techniques of chemical mixtures, exploiting differences in their physical/ chemical properties. All chromatography.
Laboratory microwave oven 2.45 GHz multimode microwave reactor Maximum power of 900w The experimental SFME variables were optimised in order.
Evolution GC-MS/MS: Pesticide analysis in canola oil Evolution GC-MS/MS: Pesticide analysis in canola oil Vivian Watts 1, Ingo Christ 1, Mark Misunis 2.
Robert Kettner Determination of the Relevant Impurity Toluene in Formulations by Headspace Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionisation or Mass Spectrometric.
OVEN Initial temp: 40 'C (On) Maximum temp: 400 'C Initial time: 2.00 min Equilibration time: 0.50 min Ramps: # Rate Final temp Final time
Plasma Free Metanephrines Analysis using LC-MS/MS with Porous Graphitic Carbon Column Xiang He (Kevin) and Marta Kozak Thermo Fisher Scientific.
Multi-Analyte LC-MS/MS Methods – Best Practice.
American Chemical Society, Fall 2012
GC Trouble shooting.
6850/6890 分流动画 Split/Splitless 进样口 – 部件
James Byrd, Marta Kozak 28 Apr 2011
Revathi a/p Rajan Postgraduate Student, School of Health Sciences
Determination of Algae Compounds in Drinking Water
For Forensic Toxicology use Only
LC-MS/MS Analysis of Tetracycline antibiotics in Honey using Advance UHPLC-EVOQ™ SIMA LAB PVT LTD.
Determination of Vismodegib by
Silicon-Lined Canister Cleaning Practices and Blank VOC Concentrations
Clinical Research Use Only Not For Diagnostic Purposes
Evaluation and Application of SPME Arrows
Developing a Consensus Test Method for Measuring Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water utilizing Headspace Analysis with Gas Chromatography and Mass.
Added Monrovia and South Bend to the slide.
524.3 Purge Flow Study Anne Jurek – Sr. Applications Chemist
Alexandria Pavkovich Jason Thomas Trent Sprenkle
Gas Chromatography.
How to Meet the Analytical Requirements of NJ Low Level TO-15
Deyuan Kong, Brian Morlan, Roopa Kamath, and Sara Mcmillen
Extraction Procedure (2)
Hello.
Overview of the Technology and Best Practices
Data Collection, Reporting, and Communication
Presentation Title 11/28/2018 Confidentiality label
BTEX in Air with Calidus GS-T
Gas Chromatography.
Gas chromatography Software
Darrell Clinton and H. Dorota Inerowicz Purdue University
Presentation transcript:

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Anne Jurek – Applications Chemist

Overview Who is EST analytical? Typical Ethanol and 1,4-Dioxane Issues Experimental parameters examined Observations Conclusions Q&A

Introduction to EST Analytical Purge & Trap Experts Privately held Founded in 1990 Environmental roots Full Support and Service PURGE & TRAP

Purge & Trap Products

Ethanol and 1,4-Dioxane Problems Compounds are miscible in water and difficult to purge out. Compounds are difficult to clean up after a sample is run, blank contamination Recovery issues when running a calibration standard

Ethanol and 1,4-Dioxane Problem Source Identify Problem Source: EST Analytical researched ethanol and 1,4-dioxane problems and found that the main source is the fact that ethanol and 1,4-dioxane like to hang on to the sparge tube and the frit therein.

Rxi-624Sil MS 30m x 0.25mm I.D. 1.4µm film thickness GC/MS Parameters GC/MS Agilent 7890A/5975C inert XL Inlet Split/Splitless Inlet Temp. 220ºC Inlet Head Pressure 12.153 psi Mode Split Split Ratio 40:01:00 Column Rxi-624Sil MS 30m x 0.25mm I.D. 1.4µm film thickness Oven Temp. Program 45ºC hold for 1 min, ramp 15ºC/min to 220ºC, hold for 1.33 min, 14 min run time Column Flow Rate 1mL/min Gas Helium Total Flow 44mL/min Source Temp. 230ºC Quad Temp. 150ºC MS Transfer Line Temp. 180ºC Scan Range m/z 35-300 Scans 5.2 scans/sec SIM Ions (0.7min to 3.49min) 45, 46 SIM Ions (3.5min to 14min) 58, 88 Solvent Delay 0.7 min

Purge and Trap Starting Parameters Purge and Trap Concentrator EST Encon Evolution Trap Type Vocarb 3000 Valve Oven Temp. 150ºC Transfer Line Temp. Trap Temp. 35ºC Moisture Reduction Trap (MoRT) Temp. 39ºC Purge Time 11 min Purge Flow 40mL/min Purge Temp. Tested Parameter Dry Purge Temp. ambient Dry Purge Flow Dry Purge Time 1.0 min Desorb Pressure Control On Desorb Pressure 5psi Desorb Time 0.5 min Desorb Preheat Delay 10 sec Desorb Temp. 250ºC Moisture Reduction Trap (MoRT) Bake Temp. 210ºC Bake Temp 260ºC Sparge Vessel Bake Temp. Bake Time 6 Bake Flow 85mL/min Purge and Trap Auto-Sampler EST Centurion WS Sample Type Water Water Volume 5ml Extraction Internal Standard Vol. 5 µl

Parameters Tested Altered Parameters Baseline Parameters A Iteration B Iteration C Iteration D Iteration E Iteration F Iteration G Sparge Vessel Type 5ml Fritted 40ml Vial, 10ml purge volume 5ml Fritless Bulbless Purge Temperature (ºC) Room Temp. 40 60 Sparge Bake Temperature (ºC) 110 Not Applied Not Applied* *For Iteration E, the patented Water Prep-Mode was used.

Traditional Sparge Vessel

Fritless Bulbless Sparge Vessel

Water Prep Mode Patented feature of the Centurion Runs all samples in the soil station of the Centurion Requires a syringe option Transfers water samples into a separate vial in the soil station without exposing the sample to atmosphere, thus providing fresh “glassware” for each sample

Water Prep Mode Step 1 Empty vials are placed in one tray while water standards or samples are placed in the second tray. The system transports the empty vial to the soil sampling station and it is moved onto the sample needle

Water Prep Mode Step 2 The arm moves over to the full water vial, the vial is pressurized with helium gas and the prescribed water volume is removed. Internal standard (IS) is added by injecting IS into the sample as it is transported to the vial in the soil sampling station.

Water Prep Mode Step 3 The sample is heated and purged in the same manner as a soil sample, and the analytes are trapped on the analytical trap. Next, the analytes are desorbed onto the GC column.

To Make an 8260 Standard at 200ppm Diluted in P&T Methanol Standard Preparation To Make an 8260 Standard at 200ppm Diluted in P&T Methanol Amount Restek Part # Standard Concentration Final Vol. 200µl 30466 Ethanol 10.0mg/ml 2.0ml 30265 2-Cleve 2.0mg/ml 30633 Cal Mix #1 30042 502.2 Cal Mix #1 30489 Acetates 30465 Cal Oxy 2.0-10.0mg/ml 30287 1,4-Dioxane 160µl 30073 Surr. Mix 2.5mg/ml 80µl 30006 VOA Cal Mix #1 5.0mg/ml Use 2ml volumetric flask and dilute standards to 2.0ml in purge and trap methanol To Make a 10x Dilution of the 8260 Standard (From 200ppm to 20ppm) Diluted in P&T Methanol 200µl of 200ppm standard diluted to 2.0ml in purge and trap methanol

Prepared an 8260 Curve Diluted in De-ionized/UV Treated Water Curve Preparation Prepared an 8260 Curve Diluted in De-ionized/UV Treated Water Concentration Standard Standard Amount Final Vol. 0.5ppb 20ppm 2.5µl 100ml 1ppb 5µl 2ppb 10µl 5ppb 25µl 10ppb 50µl 20ppb 200ppm 50ppb 100ppb 200ppb 100µl Water Standards Fill 40ml Vial with final standard leaving no headspace in the vial.

Curve Average RF Curve Average Response Factors Compound Baseline--RT purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake 40ºC Purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake 60ºC Purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake 40ºC Purge, No Sparge Bake Water Extraction 40ºC Purge 40ºC Purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake, Fritless Bulbless Sparger 40ºC Purge, NoSparge Bake, Fritless Bulbless Sparger Ethanol 0.002 0.004 0.011 0.008 0.012 0.009 0.015 1,4-Dioxane 0.003 0.010 0.013

Curve Linearity Curve Linearity Compound Baseline--RT purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake 40ºC Purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake 60ºC Purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake 40ºC Purge, No Sparge Bake Water Extraction 40ºC Purge 40ºC Purge, 110ºC Sparge Bake, Fritless Bulbless Sparger 40ºC Purge, NoSparge Bake, Fritless Bulbless Sparger Ethanol 0.997* 14.520 10.600 11.540 0.999* 14.710 10.200 1,4-Dioxane 0.998* 13.810 14.840 12.290 7.470 13.720 7.160 *Indicates linear regression

Precision Results at 50ppb Precision at 50ppb (%RSD) Compound Parameter Iteration A B C D E F G Ethanol 13.43 7.29 12.48 2.47 2.54 6.18 3.68 1,4-Dioxane 9.44 7.64 14.86 2.10 4.34 7.20 2.51

Percent Recovery at 50ppb Compound Parameter Iteration   A B C D E F G Ethanol 170.24 108.45 125.90 110.68 93.71 80.05 96.53 1,4-Dioxane 148.44 128.01 122.49 110.95 101.55 80.27 97.45

Ethanol and 1,4-Dioxane Carryover Graphic

Ethanol and 1,4-Dioxane Carryover Table Average Carryover after 50ppb Compound Iteration A B C D E F G Ethanol 63ppb 76ppb 38ppb 58ppb ND 1,4-Dioxane 53ppb 60ppb 52ppb 44ppb 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50ppb 0.53ppb Naphthalene 0.59ppb 0.61ppb 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.57ppb ND signifies Non Detect

50ppb Chromatogram

Curve Linearity and RF Table Compound Water Extraction 40ºC Purge   Fritless Bulbless Sparge Vessel, 40ºC purge, Sparge Bake Curve Linearity Response Factor Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.30 0.543 7.73 0.420 Chloromethane 11.39 1.016 12.68 0.963 Vinyl Chloride 2.08 0.927 5.31 0.889 Bromomethane 11.04 0.547 14.45 0.568 Chloroethane 11.48 0.613 12.83 0.623 Ethanol 0.999* 0.012 14.71 0.009 Trichlorofluoromethane 3.86 0.614 7.91 0.540 1,1-Dichloroethene 4.26 0.611 6.46 0.517 Acetone 13.93 0.346 13.09 0.392 Carbon Disulfide 5.64 2.112 7.28 1.544 Methylene Chloride 13.51 0.786 9.99 0.728 MTBE 3.38 2.113 2.39 2.174 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.99 1.419 8.15 1.245 2-Butanone 5.86 1.574 9.97 1.901 Chloroform 10.60 1.330 5.51 1.211 Benzene 2.89 3.079 2.23 2.735 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.458 4.85 0.410 1,4-Dioxane 7.47 0.010 13.72 Toluene 12.28 1.136 4.15 0.958 2-Hexanone 6.69 0.367 5.14 0.448 Chlorobenzene 6.08 1.340 2.93 1.156 Ethylbenzene 7.62 2.321 6.16 1.994 Xylene (m+p) 7.87 1.804 5.89 1.527 Xylene (o) 7.56 1.819 5.6 1.614 Bromoform 0.259 13.74 0.286 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 6.15 1.266 4.33 1.213 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 7.97 0.245 4.89 0.271 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.68 1.291 5.61 1.020 Naphthalene 12.46 3.787 5.1 3.365 Hexachlorobutadiene 9.30 0.556 7.86 0.376 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 12.74 1.253 5.08 0.955

Precision and Accuracy Table Compound Water Extraction 40ºC Purge   Fritless Bulbless Sparge Vessel, 40ºC purge, Sparge Bake Precision (%RSD) % Recovery Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.03 96.45 6.62 100.91 Chloromethane 3.71 90.88 4.44 87.32 Vinyl Chloride 4.72 97.24 5.13 95.08 Bromomethane 3.20 89.98 5.25 90.29 Chloroethane 4.18 90.66 4.76 87.49 Ethanol 2.54 93.71 6.18 80.05 Trichlorofluoromethane 4.80 98.25 6.45 98.41 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.99 98.96 5.73 101.07 Acetone 3.30 93.93 3.06 89.45 Carbon Disulfide 4.27 98.19 5.49 100.13 Methylene Chloride 2.12 91.85 2.31 92.19 MTBE 1.55 100.14 1.72 104.56 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.97 100.83 3.67 106.21 2-Butanone 1.21 93.14 4.7 95.12 Chloroform 2.60 92.31 99.47 Benzene 2.92 97.77 3.8 100.65 1,2-Dichloropropane 2.46 99.63 3.17 105.24 1,4-Dioxane 4.34 101.55 7.2 80.27 Toluene 3.50 92.80 4.79 102.29 2-Hexanone 1.64 98.85 1.81 106.37 Chlorobenzene 2.19 97.14 3.1 97.02 Ethylbenzene 3.45 98.97 Xylene (m+p) 3.18 97.64 4.06 98.29 Xylene (o) 2.45 99.50 3.62 98.74 Bromoform 1.52 116.43 1.42 109.97 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.09 94.79 2.06 100.72 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.91 104.86 1.19 104.47 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 98.69 2.71 98.64 Naphthalene 95.10 1.63 101.97 Hexachlorobutadiene 4.49 97.58 5.07 96.15 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 93.05 99.03

Conclusions The carryover of the 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol proved to be the main problem with precision and accuracy of standards over time. The traditional sparge vessel with the frit and bulb was the most troublesome for analyte carryover. The fritless/bulbless sparge vessel showed a marked improvement in the precision and accuracy of the results.

Conclusions The fritless/bulbless sparge vessel also displayed much less carryover than the traditional sparge vessel. Heating the fritless/bulbless sparge vessel would be the recommendation for testing a full 8260 compound list due to the carryover of the heavier compounds is limited with this feature.

Conclusions A new “sparge” vessel proved to be the optimum option for this analysis. Automated water extraction provided a new 40ml vial for purging each sample thus there was no carryover because samples were purged in a disposable vial. Water extraction also provided excellent linearity and compound response for the analytes of interest.

For more information or application notes visit our website at: www.estanalytical.com Questions: ajurek@estanalytical.com