The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: Implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Advertisements

Effect of Barrett's esophagus surveillance on esophageal preservation, tumor stage, and survival with esophageal adenocarcinoma  Kimberly S. Grant, MD,
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
The eighth edition TNM stage classification for lung cancer: What does it mean on main street?  Frank C. Detterbeck, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Rounding numbers The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Local recurrence after surgery for non–small cell lung cancer: A recursive partitioning analysis of multi-institutional data  Chris R. Kelsey, MD, Kristin.
One in every 14 patients with early-stage lung cancer is not being treated!  Benny Weksler, MD, MBA  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Prognostic Significance of the Number of Lymph Nodes Removed at Lobectomy in Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer  Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, MD, PhD, Jason.
It is not just about surgery versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, it is about curing as many patients with lung cancer as possible  Alessandro Brunelli,
Mark W. Onaitis, MD, Rebecca P. Petersen, MD, John C
Lung cancer screening: No more excuses
Prognostic significance of histologic differentiation, carcinoembryonic antigen value, and lymphovascular invasion in stage I non–small cell lung cancer 
Surgical treatment is decisive for outcome in chondrosarcoma of the chest wall: A population-based Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study of 106 patients  Björn.
Prognostic evaluation based on a new TNM staging system proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer for resected non–small.
Outcomes of unexpected pathologic N1 and N2 disease after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer  Hong.
Intrinsic cardiac stem cells are essential for regeneration
Factors predictive of prognosis after esophagectomy for squamous cell cancer  Houhuai Li, MD, PhD, Qingzhen Zhang, Lin Xu, MD, Yijiang Chen, Yongxiang.
Pattern of lymphatic spread in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single- institution experience  Bin Li, MD, Haiquan Chen, MD, Jiaqing Xiang,
Randomized controlled trial of a special acupuncture technique for pain after thoracotomy  Gary Deng, MD, PhD, Valerie Rusch, MD, Andrew Vickers, PhD,
The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: Implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer.
How should we treat air leaks?
Go on-pump or off-pump in diabetic patients?
Interstitial tumor-associated macrophages combined with tumor-derived colony- stimulating factor-1 and interleukin-6, a novel prognostic biomarker in non–small.
Refining esophageal cancer staging
One-year results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury (RESCUE trial)  Ali Khoynezhad, MD, PhD, FACS, Carlos E. Donayre,
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Treatment trends in early-stage lung cancer in the United States, 2004 to 2013: A time- trend analysis of the National Cancer Data Base  Kathryn E. Engelhardt,
Ellen Kim, MD, MPH, Siran Koroukian, PhD, Charles R. Thomas, MD 
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Proposed Revision Of The Staging Classification For Esophageal Cancer
Postinduction positron emission tomography assessment of N2 nodes is not associated with ypN2 disease or overall survival in stage IIIA non–small cell.
Feiran Lou, MD, MS, Camelia S. Sima, MD, MS, Prasad S
The Prognostic Value of the Number of Negative Lymph Nodes in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Transthoracic Resection  Po-Kuei Hsu, MD, Chien-Sheng Huang,
Impact of positive pleural lavage cytology on survival in patients having lung resection for non–small-cell lung cancer: An international individual patient.
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Appropriateness of Surgical Approach in Black Patients with Lung Cancer—15 Years Later, Little Has Changed  Emanuela Taioli, MD, PhD, Raja Flores, MD 
A first start for lung transplantation?
Valerie W Rusch, MD, Ennapadam S Venkatraman, PhD 
Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Results in 663 patients  Raja.
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology.
Michael Lanuti, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Are discordant positron emission tomography and pathological assessments of the mediastinum in non–small cell lung cancer significant?  Daniel J. Tandberg,
Nabil P. Rizk, MD, Venkatraman E. Seshan, PhD, Manjit S
Niv Ad, MD, Lawrence M. Wei, MD 
The impact of lymph node station on survival in 348 patients with surgically resected malignant pleural mesothelioma: Implications for revision of the.
A fate worse than death  Jennifer S. Lawton, MD 
Case reporter's notebook: The who, what, when, where, how, and why of extraction of a benign intracaval tumor  Verdi J. DiSesa, MD, MBA  The Journal of.
Video-assisted resection for lung cancer results in fewer complications  Lunxu Liu, PhD, MD, FRCS  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Carcinoma of the esophagus: Prognostic significance of histologic type
Prognosis and “granularity”: Building on staging foundations?
Effect of Barrett's esophagus surveillance on esophageal preservation, tumor stage, and survival with esophageal adenocarcinoma  Kimberly S. Grant, MD,
Bernard J. Park, MD, Raja M. Flores, MD, Valerie W. Rusch, MD 
Development of a patient-centered aggregate score to predict survival after lung resection for non–small cell lung cancer  Alessandro Brunelli, MD, Michele.
Sebastien Gilbert, MD, Andre B. Martel, BSc, Andrew J
Positron emission tomography predicts survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma  Raja M. Flores, MD, Timothy Akhurst, MD, Mithat Gonen, PhD, Maureen Zakowski,
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Ventricular assistant in restrictive cardiomyopathy: Making the right connection  Robert D.B. Jaquiss, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Raja M. Flores, MD, Bernard J
Apples remain apples NO matter what
Lung cancer randomized controlled trials should compare stereotactic body radiation therapy with observation, NOT surgery  Raja M. Flores, MD  The Journal.
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
Alexander H. Moskovitz, MD, Nabil P
Michael J. Weyant, MD, Manjit S
Proceed with caution: The importance of surveillance in patients with pathologic complete response after chemoradiation therapy plus surgery for esophageal.
Reappraise the advanced technique for tumor localization and sentinel lymph node assessment in clinical early-stage non–small cell lung cancer  Chengwu.
Presentation transcript:

The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: Implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system  Nabil Rizk, MD, Ennapadam Venkatraman, PhD, Bernard Park, MD, Raja Flores, MD, Manjit S. Bains, MD, Valerie Rusch, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages 1374-1381.e2 (December 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039 Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival showed poor discrimination between stages IIa and IIb (P = .71), as well as between stages IVa and IVb (P = .81). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Recursive partitioning analysis using the variables T, N, and M (M1b and M1) essentially recreates the AJCC staging system with the exception of the M descriptor. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Recursive partitioning analysis that includes the number of involved lymph nodes as a variable in addition to T, N, and M (M1b and M1) identified the presence of more than 4 involved lymph nodes as the single most important discriminator of survival, irrespective of T stage. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 In T2-3 tumors, patients with no positive lymph nodes have the best prognosis, and patients with 4 or more positive lymph nodes have the worst prognosis. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Among of T2-3 tumors with 0 to 4 involved lymph nodes, survival was significantly better if more than 18 lymph nodes were removed. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 In patients with an adequate lymphadenectomy (>18 lymph nodes removed), depth of invasion is no longer a significant predictor of survival. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E1 Recursive partitioning analysis using T, N, M as variables. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E2 Recursive partitioning analysis using T, N, M and number of positive lymph nodes as variables. LN, Lymph nodes. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E3 Recursive partitioning analysis using T, N, M, number of positive lymph nodes, and total number of lymph nodes as variables. LN, Lymph nodes. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E4 Recursive partitioning analysis using T, N, M and total number of lymph nodes as variables in patients with more than 18 lymph nodes removed. LN, Lymph nodes. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2006 132, 1374-1381.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.039) Copyright © 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions