King’s College London Pre-Sessional Programme

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical and Analytical Thinking
Advertisements

Academic English Seminar Skills “An Introduction to EAP – Academic Skills in English” Lesson 1.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
CM602: Effective Systems Development Exam Preparation Slide 1 Exam Preparation Preparing for the CM602 Examination D.Miller J. Horton.
The Socratic Seminar: A Student-Centered Approach to Inquiry-Based Discussion Elizabeth Smith English Language Fellow.
LISTENING AND TALKING STRATEGIES. Pair talk Easy to organise Ideal for promoting high levels of participation Ideal for quick-fire reflection and review.
Assessment for Learning Practical ideas to use in your classroom every day.
Essays/ Assignments Structuring.
Slang and Language Change UNIT 1. Unit Objectives  Practice effective listening and note-taking strategies;  Prepare to listen to the lecture about.
Critical reading Introduction. Lesson aims To expand the understanding of critical reading by studying an Internet article and listening to an academic.
How to Write a Book Review. Before You Begin Remember, there is no right way to write a book review. Book reviews are highly personal and reflect the.
AQA Religious Philosophical & Ethical Studies
thinking is not driven by answers but by questions
NEEDS ANALYSIS.
Level 1 group discussions
Paraphrasing Class #8 February 14, 2013.
Hair & Beauty Functional English CONVERSATION SKILLS
Writing a Literature Review
Leading Group Discussions
Discussions: Can they help students grow more and perform better?
“A change of heart about animals” By jeremy Rifkin
The Final Exam.
UNIT 1 Revision: Education
Life is a by Jack London.
Listening Speaking Reading Class Preparation Class Preparation Class Preparation Class Preparation Online Tools Online Tools Online Tools Online Tools.
Formative assessment through class discussion
Formal Writing: Organisation
“A change of heart about animals” By jeremy Rifkin
What is Shared Inquiry? Shared Inquiry is a method of learning in which students actively search for answers to questions raised by a text. This search.
ELA II – Friday Writing Lessons
Argument Essay Tips I’ll upload these notes to Weebly today! It would be worth putting into your binder for future reference.
Socratic Seminar “I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.” - Socrates.
Debate Unit 1 Standards Comprehension and Collaboration
Socratic Conversation
Accountable Talk with English learners

Socratic Seminar By participating in
Lesson 13 I can participate in collaborative discussion and support my analysis of a text with evidence.
Small Group Discussions
Act V & End of Play Responses
Expectations for a successful discussion
Critical and Analytical Thinking
Practice Socratic Seminar: “The Necklace”
Persuasive Essay (One-sided Argument)
Take out your essays. Prepare for conversation.
Tim Strode and Bridget O’Leary October 2018
Soft Skills – Individual - Reflection
How to prepare for your presentation
How are these advertisements persuasive?
Critical and Analytic Reading and Writing
Writing the Body Paragraphs
Chapter 4: Writing a Rhetorical Analysis
They Say, I Say Chapter 1 and 12
The art of persuasive writing
Session 1 - Political Participation
Seminar “a form of academic instruction which has the function of bringing together medium- sized groups for recurring meetings, focusing each time on.
How are these advertisements persuasive?
What is History? Lesson 1 CHW 3MR.
Year 8 Civil Rights Assessment
Writing Test 30-minute essay
Scientists argue, but they argue about ideas.
Lesson 33: Culminating writing task: revising a claim and gathering evidence About this lesson Students begin the writing process to answer the prompt.
B1-B2 Unit Three Lesson 1B Recreation survey.
Lesson 8: Analyze an Argument
Lesson 6: Analyze & Evaluate London’s Argument
Group Discussion.
Teaching International Students from Diverse Groups
Experts by Experience Group Observations.
Homework Frequency KS3: Weekly KS4: Weekly
Presentation transcript:

King’s College London Pre-Sessional Programme Seminar Skills : Debating and Argument Building Skills

Lesson Overview Reflecting on what is involved in preparing for a seminar Ways of establishing and supporting your opinion Reviewing the texts Activating language Seminar discussion

Reflecting on Preparing for a Seminar On Monday you were given two texts about ‘happiness’ and this morning you wrote an essay: Should happiness be a political concern? In what ways could politicians and governments improve a country’s happiness? Now you are going to participate in a seminar discussion about what you read. Have you reflected on your reading? Have you added any other ideas or opinions you have?

Establishing and Supporting Your Opinion (1) Once you have thought about an issue , listened to a lecture and/or done some background reading, you can form your own opinion on the subject. What is our subject for today? What do you understand by ‘happiness’ and ‘political concern’? Should happiness be a political concern? In no more than 3 sentences, explain why you believe happiness SHOULD or SHOULDN’T be a political concern. Try to develop just one point in these 3 sentences, giving your opinion and supporting points and/or evidence. Compare your texts in your pairs. Have you developed just one point? Have you given your opinion? Have you provided supporting points and/or evidence

Establishing and Supporting Your Opinion (2) When you participate in a seminar discussion you need to decide what your opinion is on the main issues and provide evidence to support these opinions. You need to give: an explanation arguments to support your point of view examples Look at the following example about cloning.

Read the opinion below and complete the first entry in the table. “In the past, biological diversity has prevented species from being eradicated by diseases such as the Black Death. Clones decrease the diversity of animal and plant life because they are identical to the parent organism. I believe that cloning would reduce the adaptability and could even threaten the survival of many species.” Argument / Issue For / Against Explanation Effect Evidence or Examples cloning would reduce biological diversity clones are genetically identical to the parent organism so lack diversity survival will be threatened if organisms have less diversity

How useful are your notes? Spend 5-10 minutes thinking about this question (and what you argued this morning) and note your ideas in the table. Remember that you should consider arguments against your position too so that you are prepared for the discussion. Argument / Issue For / Against Explanation Effect Evidence / Examples

Referring to Research Sometimes during a discussion it is necessary to refer to what other people (experts) have said about a topic. Why do you think this is? Referring to expert sources gives your argument support and credibility. It also shows you have read around the topic and are well informed of the most up-to-date research and/or issues. How do you think you can refer to expert sources during a seminar discussion: if everybody has read the same texts? if you are referring to an additional text which the other students do not have? E.g. As Jones points out in his 2008 paper entitled ‘The Moral Objection to Cloning’, the biggest obstacle to legitimising cloning is the abuse of science.

Referring to Research Look back at your notes. Have you written down the authors of the sources anywhere? Now look at your table. Add the author’s name where you have used an example from a source to support your argument. This will help the other people in the class to understand your argument during the seminar discussion.

Language Activation Think about the language we have looked at so far for participating in a seminar. How well can you do the following? Try to think of at least two expressions for each role: Introducing a topic to a group Agreeing Disagreeing Asking for repetition Asking a question Interrupting Making an excuse Returning to the point Encouraging someone to join in Summarising points

Seminar Discussion on Happiness Now you have done all the preparation for the seminar, you need to carry it out! You are going to spend at least 15 minutes discussing the material you have prepared. Should happiness be a political concern? In what ways could politicians and governments improve a country’s happiness?

What kind of contributor am I? Think about your contribution to the debate. Evaluate how well you did the activities on the left and how you could improve your skills and performance. Try to identify the areas where you need to improve. How good am I? 1= improvement needed 5= excellent Action needed Am I well-prepared? Do I contribute? Am I a good listener? Can I argue a point? Do I support others? Do I ask relevant questions? Do I say enough? Are my language skills good? Do I work well with others? Do I use appropriate strategies, e.g. to interrupt, ask for clarification...

Monitoring your participation: the tutor’s viewpoint On your programmes next year, tutors are likely to assess how much and how well everybody participates in a seminar. Seminars help tutors to evaluate students’ knowledge and academic skills. In some cases, you might be formally assessed on your performance, so it is very important that you take the opportunity to participate fully.

Communication and Participation Look at the list below and decide how well you do these things. The student... arrives on time. has the necessary paperwork with them. has done the required preparation. uses appropriate language strategies, e.g. asks someone to repeat what they have said to clarify a point. asks relevant questions. agrees and disagrees and can give full reasons. supports opinions with suitable arguments. listens well. works well with others. takes notes. presents points fluently and uses accurate English. understands the main points of the seminar. does the required homework. Which of these points do you think are most important from the tutor’s point of view? Adapted from Task Module 3, Unit 5