Franklin County Our System Our Way.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building futures for our most vulnerable children What do we need to change in law, policy and practice? Professor Gillian Schofield School of Social Work,
Advertisements

The Signs of Safety Approach
Signs of Safety A Framework that Works.
Through the eyes of a child
A New Practice Model for Child Welfare
ADOPTION & FOSTERING SERVICE EVENT Monday 2nd March 2015
Partnership-Based Practice in Children and Family Services A Brief Overview of Solution Focused Therapy & The Signs of Safety*
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
Signs of Safety Toni Morkin, Senior Manager
Signs of Safety Barb Lacroix Child Intervention Practice Specialist
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
1. We Continually Examine our Use (Misuse) of Power, Use of Self and Personal Biases 1.We must be aware of and recognize how we use the power of the position.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Working in collaboration and partnership with families and children.
Support students at risk of harm
Making Small but Significant Changes. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this module participants will be able to: Understand how protective factors.
Family-Centered Care Collaboration: Practice Components Unit II 1.
What is the Family Common Assessment Framework? The Family Common Assessment Framework (Family CAF) is a new way of working with families. It involves.
Signs of Safety Webinar Series UC Davis Extension Center for Human Services Northern Training Academy Overview of Signs of Safety Implementation.
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
PERSON CENTERED PLANNING. PERSON-CENTERED PLANNING  Person-centered planning is a process for learning how a person wants to live and what is important.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. To learn about the Katie A. Settlement Agreement and its impact on the Child Welfare and Mental Health systems To appreciate the Shared.
Violence in families: Strengthening our practice
Signs of Safety Toni Morkin, Senior Manager
POCKET GUIDE TO SOLUTION FOCUSED SKILLS IN THE FIELD
The Value of Person-Centered Planning
Assessment and Analysis
North East Lincolnshire Council Practice Briefing
Signs of Safety Barb Lacroix Child Intervention Practice Specialist
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
TRIPLE JEOPARDY: Protecting
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
TRAUMA SENSITIVE SCHOOL
Concrete support in times of need
What things needs to be included in personal care?
Including protective factors in assessment
What is Community Housing Network?
Making Small but Significant Changes
Trilogy of Risk PowerPoint – Tips on how to use it
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: This presentation is designed to help people who implement shared plans of care to explain the practice to other professionals.
Trauma Informed Care in the Community
K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment
Integrating Protective Factors into Case Planning
THE IMPORTANCE OF ENGAGEMENT and Connecting
Slide 1.
Creating Danger Statements & Safety Goals in Partnership with Families
STATE: This “daisy” represents common systems that families may interact with throughout their lives. One of the biggest challenges in human services.
Making the ‘C’ count in EHC Plans
Read the quote and with the person next to you, discuss what you think it means. Do you agree? Why / why not? Be prepared to share your thoughts with the.
Strategies to increase family engagement
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Progressive Engagement & Diversion
Applying Critical Thinking in Child Welfare
A guide for parents and students
Alison Brabban & Sally Smith
A policy perspective on school disaffection
YAB 101: Strategic Sharing
Building Stronger Families Protective Factors framework
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
“The Approach” One-on-one Problem Solving
Completing the Child’s Plan (Education – Single Agency Assessment)
Psychosocial Support for Young Men
Safeguarding and Volunteers Training
Beyond The Bake Sale Basic Ingredients
Keeping Children Safe and Protective Behaviours
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

Franklin County Our System Our Way

Trauma Informed Community System of Care 5 Domains of Well Being Signs of Safety Trauma Informed Community Sometime it can feel like we have a zillion new buzz words in any given year. You feel like new initiatives are being shoved in your face every single day. The truth is, that is the reality. As human knowledge grows, we learn and adapt to new and different ways and methods of helping those we are charged with caring for. Today, we are going to try and make sense of several of these initiatives and how they fit together to serve children and youth in our community, especially those who are the most vulnerable. We are going to briefly cover the first two and then go into more detail with Signs of Safety and Five Domains of Well Being.

Trauma Informed Community System of Care Signs of Safety 5 Domains All these initiatives are synergistic – they feed into one another and are apart of one another. Trauma Informed Community is an initiative in both the community as a whole and in individual agencies/schools to ensure that we are doing all we can to ensure those in our community effected by trauma are being heard. Changing the question from “what’s wrong with you?” to “What happened to you?” The System of Care is a child serving system-wide approach and philosophy that all the child serving agencies within Franklin County work under. Signs of Safety is an individualized family-based approach for building safety for our children and families through engagement of the families and the community supports that surround them. The Five Domains of Well-Being gives us a framework of five universally needed, yet independently driven areas of life that a person needs to thrive.

Trauma Informed Community Prezi Presentation

System of Care The way Franklin County works together to meet the needs of Children and Youth

Franklin County System of Care Community partners and families working together to provide an array of services to meet the needs of a child at risk. It's all about ... Increasing family involvement and voice Increasing access to effective services e.g. by removing barriers Improving provider relationships and employee satisfaction Focusing not just on the individual/family needs, but also on the needs of the community

A System of Care is guided by Core Values Family-driven and youth-guided Culturally and linguistically competent Community-based Trauma Informed Most importantly Strength based and . . . Individualized

Signs of Safety https://youtu.be/x6WYm4F9mik

Key characteristics of SOS The Signs of Safety approach seeks to create a more constructive culture around child protection organization and practice. Designed to be used with young people and their families drawing on their resources and empowering service recipients to do more to keep their children safe Focuses on the key current issues Highlights what is already working well Can trigger immediate progress Developed from practice Engages whole supportive team approach

How can child protection professionals actually build partnerships with parents where there is suspected or substantiated child maltreatment? There is a perceived struggle between family engagement and the agency’s responsibility for child safety. The Signs of Safety is a process for building safety through engagement.

Three CORE Principles Working Relationships Between Professionals and Families Between Professionals Themselves This is the Heart & Soul of Effective Practices Munro’s Maximum: thinking critically, fostering a stance of inquiry As soon as professionals decide they know the truth about a given situation this begins to fracture working relationships with everyone involved Stop digging for the ultimate truth and start thinking critically The single most important factor to minimizing errors is to admit that you may be wrong (Munro 2008) Landing grand aspirations in everyday practice Learn from your everyday experiences of what works well, learn from your colleagues everyday experiences of what goes well

Principles Signs of Safety Respect service recipients as people worth doing business with. Cooperate with the person, not the abuse. Recognize that cooperation is possible even where coercion is required. Recognize that all families have signs of safety. Maintain a focus on safety. Learn what the service recipient wants. Always search for detail. Focus on creating small change. Don’t confuse case details with judgements. Offer choices. Treat the interview as a forum for change. Treat the practice principles as aspirations, not assumptions.

6 Practice Elements Understand the position of each family member. Find exceptions of the maltreatment/negative behavior. Discover family strengths and resources. Focus on goals. Scale safety and progress. Assess willingness, confidence and capacity.

ABOVE ALL, IT’S A QUESTIONING APPROACH the Signs of Safety demonstrates the notion of the interview as a forum for change. Relationship questions: “What would your sister say is your biggest strength as a parent?” Exception questions: “Have there been times when you felt like blowing up, but instead you stayed calm?” Coping questions: “ What have you done to keep it from getting worse?” Goal formation/preferred future questions: “What would be the first sign that you were making progress?” Support/network identification questions: “Who is the first person you would call if you were in some kind of trouble?” These become critical in helping family develop systems of support. Scaling questions: First, define what the goalposts of 0-10 represent, then ask person to rate within that scale. Child welfare involved families often report that their workers speak in language they don’t understand. Workers that use professional jargon and general, diagnostic terms come across as paternalistic and prescriptive. It is important to use plain, behaviorally-specific language; language the family and it’s network can clearly understand.

Mapping Tool HARM DANGER STATEMENTS Complicating factors Existing strengths EXISTING SAFETY SAFETY GOALS Next steps

Using the Safety Scale Questions. On a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 means everyone knows the children are safe enough for the child protection authorities to close the case and zero means things are so bad for the children they can’t live at home where do you rate this situation? What makes it that for you? What else?

Your Turn In your group, decide on a case scenario – we all have 1001 stories – just make sure to maintain confidentiality Using the House model Write down what your worried about and draw a picture of your worries Write down what is working well and draw a picture of your good things Now everyone scale from 1 to 10 Write down your goals and next steps and draw a picture of your dreams

Five Domains of Well Being https://youtu.be/s8yZRS3PWio

WHAT THE FIVE DOMAINS OF WELLBEING MEAN FOR INDIVIDUALS Social Connectedness - The degree to which a person has and perceives a sufficient number and diversity of relationships that allow her or him to give and receive information, emotional support and material aid; create a sense of belonging and value; and foster growth. Stability - The degree to which a person can expect her or his situation and status to be fundamentally the same from one day to the next, where there is adequate predictability for a person to concentrate on the here-and-now and on the future, growth and change; and where small obstacles don’t set off big cascades. Safety - The degree to which a person can be her or his authentic self and not be at heightened risk of physical or emotional harm. Mastery - The degree to which a person feels in control of her or his fate and the decisions she or he makes, and where she or he experiences some correlation between efforts and outcomes. Meaningful Access to Relevant Resources - The degree to which a person can meet needs particularly important for her or his situation in ways that are not overly onerous, and are not degrading or dangerous. Social Connectedness - Related concepts: belonging, social capital, social networks, social support, reduced social isolation and exclusion Stability - Related concepts: resiliency, permanency, certainty Safety - Related concepts: security; absence of harm, risk or danger Mastery - Related concepts: control, choice, self-efficacy, self-esteem, self-confidence, empowerment, applying knowledge Meaningful Access to Relevant Resources - Related concepts: having knowledge, meeting “basic” needs, cultural competence (of resources), utilization rates, service integration/defragmentation, reduced barriers, information and referral, navigation

Tradeoffs: Decision, Choice and Change When we decide if something is “worth it,” we are balancing tradeoffs. When people make choices different from what we might expect or want, they may be weighting tradeoffs differently. Sometimes we make (or are forced to make) change that involves significant tradeoffs that we or others never anticipated. If the tradeoffs are too big, we don’t sustain change. Sometimes, we’re aware of tradeoffs. Sometimes, we forget to think about them, especially for other people. This is where we all seem to fail. Professionals need to understand that everyone has to weigh their options. A person that is in rehab is many times told that they cannot hang around with the people that they use to hang around with. They must trade off social connection for safety. Is it worth it? Have we given them another viable option to have social connections that are meaningful and not judgmental.

Your Turn Using the same case scenario as earlier Using the five domains and identify in each what they have and what could be put in place to strengthen Social Connectedness Stability Safety Mastery Meaningful Access to Relevant Resources

Moving Franklin County Forward

BASED APPROACH

Teamwork is Essential

INDIVIDUALIZED

Moving the cheese… What we need… What we don’t need… Hold each other accountable Keep it on the positive Openness to other ideas and perspectives Patience Blame Game Negativity Those who think they have all the answers Remember that implementation is a journey and like any journey, we need to pay attention to our map

Resources www.franklincountykids.org Annie Foncannon Schulte annie@franklincountykids.org 636-234-7133