QA/QC Methods for 13 MHz Brant Beach (BRNT) Test Case

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teresa Garner Larry Atkinson. Introduction to HFRADAR Sites & Data Circulation in the Bay Tidal Sub-tidal Quality Control Efforts Instrument Comparisons.
Advertisements

Specular reflectorquasi-specular reflector quasi-Lambert reflector Lambert reflector Limiting Forms of Reflection and Scatter from a Surface.
Lynn K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, M. Powell 2, B. Haus 1, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, RSMAS 2 Hurricane.
Specular reflectorquasi-specular reflector quasi-Lambert reflector Lambert reflector Limiting Forms of Reflection and Scatter from a Surface.
Influence of Antenna Pattern Distortions on Surface Current Data collected by a CODAR HF-Radar System Josh T. Kohut Scott M. Glenn Donald E. Barrick.
Carolinas Coast: A One-Stop Shop for Marine Observations in the Carolinas Funded by the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration A partnership among:
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay Larry Atkinson Teresa Garner Jose Blanco.
Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras: ~1000 km Coastline Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network Hugh Roarty, Ethan Handel, Erick Rivera, Josh.
Appendix K Phase 2 HGB Mid Course Review Average Minimum and Maximum Temperatures from at 9 Weather Stations in East Texas and West Louisiana.
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems Coastal HF Radar IMCS Building Room 214C ph: Dunes of sand and seaweed,
Assessment and Quantification of HF Radar Uncertainty Fearghal O’Donncha Sean McKenna Emanuele Ragnoli Teresa UpdykeHugh Roarty.
Moonlight reflecting off ice crystals in cirrostratus clouds can cause a halo to appear around the moon. Such a halo often indicates that precipitation.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Seeing Sandy’s Impacts with Remote Sensors MODIS satellite view of Hurricane Sandy at 2:20 pm EDT Monday,
Ligurian Sea Mid-Atlantic Bight Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network Radar Network Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut, Erick Rivera,
SCM 330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Surface Current Mapping with High Frequency RADAR.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay.
0 0 Figure 3. Near real-time comparisons of 6 minute NOAA ADCP data (blue) and hourly CODAR data (red) at (YS) York Spit (CH) Cape Henry and (TS) Thimble.
L. K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, B. K. Haus 1, Brad Parks 1, Peter Vertes 1, Lew Gramer 2, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical.
Research and Development to Meet Urban Weather and Climate Needs Dr. Richard D. Rosen NOAA Research September 23, 2004 Presentation at “Challenges in Urban.
U.S. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program 5-Year Review David Green, NOAA Tsunami Program Manager National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
The VIEW antenna is located on an open beach and is more isolated from structures which can cause distortion; therefore, its pattern shape is similar to.
NASA Ocean Color Research Team Meeting, Silver Spring, Maryland 5-7 May 2014 II. Objectives Establish a high-quality long-term observational time series.
Application of Radial and Elliptical Surface Current Measurements to Better Resolve Coastal Features  Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn 
MARACOOS Stakeholder Input Session MARACOOS as the Backbone of Ocean Observing in the MidAtlantic: recent developments around support of marine fisheries.
Mr. Robert Forney Dr. Hugh Roarty Dr. Scott Glenn Measuring Waves with a Compact HF Radar MTS/IEEE OCEANS15 October 2015 Washington DC.
L. K. (Nick) Shay, J. Martinez-Pedraja and M. Archer Department of Ocean Sciences, RSMAS To improve our understanding of surface processes and their linkages.
Figure 2. Near real-time comparisons of 6 minute NOAA ADCP data (blue) and hourly CODAR data (red) at (YS) York Spit (CH) Cape Henry and (TS) Thimble Shoals.
From Regional and National to Global 1. Ocean observations for societal benefit Climate, operational ocean services, ocean health USA Committee for the.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
CASE #3: Floating Away The Situation: While entering New York Harbor, several boxes of rubber ducks fell off their cargo ship. Using the data provided,
Climate Change Impacts on Estuarine Larval Fish Composition Jamie F. Caridad and Kenneth W. Able Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences. Rutgers University.
Real-Time Beyond the Horizon Vessel Detection
Eric M. Gulledge, Luma Akil and H. Anwar Ahmad
Validation of an ultra high frequency radar (River sonde) for current mapping in the urbanized Hudson River estuary 2010 summer research institute at.
Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network
Evaluation of Three Antenna Pattern Measurements for a 25 MHz SeaSonde
Sea Surface Temperature as a Trigger of Butterfish Migration: A Study of Fall Phenology Amelia Snow1, John Manderson2, Josh Kohut1, Laura Palamara1, Oscar.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay
Mid Term II Review.
A Closer Look at CODAR HF Radar Spectra
Multi-year Trends and Event Response
Mid-Atlantic Blue Ocean Economy 2030
MARACOOS High Frequency Radar Network Operations
Bistatic Systems: Preparing for Multistatic
Combining Ocean Observing Systems with Statistical Analysis to Account for a Dynamic Habitat Collin Dobson1,John Manderson2,Josh Kohut1,Laura Palamara1,Oscar.
Application of 13 MHz SeaSonde Systems for Vessel Detection
OCG High Frequency Radar
Hugh Roarty, Michael Smith, Ethan Handel and Scott Glenn
M7Plus Unit-10: Statistics CMAPP Days (Compacted Days 1 – 5 )
Correlation between cross-valley winds and along-valley velocity
Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn March 5th, 2015
Colin Evans, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut
Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems
Analysis of the Wind Resource off New Jersey for Offshore Wind Energy Development Hugh Roarty, Joe Riscica, Laura Palamara, Louis Bowers, Greg Seroka,
HF Radar Systems Engineering Plan
Recognizing First and Second Order Features
October 27, 2011 New Brunswick, NJ
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
LCDR George Wright, USN OC 3570 – Winter 2008 Friday, March 14th 2008
Natalie Laudier Operational Oceanography 13Feb2009
Diurnal Variability in Ocean Currents off Huntington Beach
An Ocean Current Monitoring System for Coastal New Jersey
Offshore Atmospheric and Ocean Monitoring to Support DEEPWATERwind’s Offshore Wind Energy Project Development and Operations Rich Dunk, Ph.D.,
A Multi-static HF Radar Network for the
Cole: I think that most of these changes/additions are ‘yours’ to make
Observing the Ocean from the Rutgers University “COOL Room”
Coastal Ocean Dynamics Radar (CODAR) Mapping of
Assessment of Satellite Ocean Color Products of the Coast of Martha’s Vineyard using AERONET-Ocean Color Measurements Hui Feng1, Heidi Sosik2 , and Tim.
Presentation transcript:

QA/QC Methods for 13 MHz Brant Beach (BRNT) Test Case Colin Evans, Ethan Handel, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn cevans@marine.rutgers.edu Introduction A test case was conducted for a Rutgers 13 MHz system located in Brant Beach, NJ (BRNT). Unusual large variations in the radial magnitudes during the first week of May, 2012 indicated a potential problem with the antenna and/or an issue in the First Order processing. Reprocessing with a higher noise factor of 6.3 (8dB) and a maximum radial velocity of 60 cm/s instead of 180 cm/s was conducted and compared to the real time radials from the neighboring 13 MHz sites in Seaside Park, NJ (SPRK) and Brigantine, NJ (BRMR). Anomalies in the Radial Field FIGURE 3. Standard deviation plots for SPRK, BRNT, and BRMR. The averaging method included a minimum requirement of 12 vectors for each range and bearing. The color indicates the current direction relative to the radar location and the size of the dot represents the magnitude of the standard deviation. a) b) FIGURE 2. BRNT radial field during test case study for (a) ideals and (b) measured. In order to retain a better understanding of what the radial field was showing overtime, the standard deviation for each range and bearing was applied to a 24-hour radial velocity average. After examining the quality of the data at the radial level, the next logical step is to analyze the spectra and First Order Line settings. First Order Line Settings During real time processing, a portion of the Second Order Bragg was being processed as First Order. After reprocessing with the FOL changes, the Bragg peaks were more defined. FOL Setting Real Time Reprocessed Factor down peak nulls 501.19 10.00 Noise Factor 4 (~6dB) 6.3 (~8dB) Maximum Radial Velocity 180 cm-s 60 cm-s a) b) FIGURE 4. First Order Bragg Processing with real time FOL settings (a) compared to reprocessed settings (b). The table to the right displays the different settings. FIGURE 1. (a) Location of the Rutgers 13 MHz CODAR sites. Blue represents Seaside Park, NJ (SPRK), red represents Brant Beach, NJ (BRNT), and green represents Brigantine, NJ (BRMR). (b) SPRK site location. (c) BRNT site location. (d) BRMR site location. b) a) A significant change in the radial field was the result of the new FOL settings. The radial velocities were compared to NOAA tide station water levels and neighboring 13 MHz radars. a) b) c) c) d) d) FIGURE 5. Subplots comparing the BRNT hourly averaged real time and reprocessed radials to the NOAA Atlantic City tide gauge water level measurements (a) and to the real time hourly average radial velocities from the neighboring 13 MHz sites. The reprocessed standard deviation plots are shown to the right for the ideal (c) and measured radials (d). The data used from each 13 MHz site was collected from a combined transmit/receive dome-style antenna. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This work was funded by NOAA Award Number NA11NOS0120038 “Towards a Comprehensive Mid-Atlantic Regional Association Coastal Ocean Observing System (MARACOOS)”. Sponsor: National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) NOAA-NOS-IOOS-2011-2002515 / CFDA: 11.012, Integrated Ocean Observing System Topic Area 1: Continued Development of Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems. The radars were purchased under a grant from the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities entitled “An Advanced Atmospheric/Ocean Assessment Program Designed to Reduce the Risks Associated with Offshore Wind Energy Development Defined by the NJ Energy Master Plan and the NJ Offshore Wind Energy Economic Development Act”