Teacher SLTs 2016-2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Take PLAN? PLAN shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. PLAN lets you know if you’re on target for college.
Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.
TPSS Leader & Teacher SLTs School Year.
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Teacher Evaluation Training June 30, 2014
Student Learning targets
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
School Accountability
ONEONTA HIGH SCHOOL 8 TH GRADE - OCTOBER 2010 PRESENTED ON DEC. 14, 2010 ACT EXPLORE RESULTS.
Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.
Compass Framework & Goal Setting for Principals: Work Session St. James Parish August 25, Compass Framework & Goal Setting for.
A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.
Changes to assessment and reporting of children’s attainment A guide for Parents and Carers Please use the SPACE bar to move this slideshow at your own.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Changes to assessment and reporting of children’s attainment A guide for Parents and Carers Please use the SPACE bar to move this slideshow at your own.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
USING MAP DATA TO SET GOALS AND ENGAGE STUDENTS AND FAMILIES 7/14/16.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
STRATEGIC OPERATING GOALS
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Charlton Kings Junior School
Teacher SLTs
Release of PARCC Student Results
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Growth Models Oklahoma
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
FY17 Evaluation Overview: Student Performance Rating
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Understanding your PreACT scores
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Abney Elementary Parent University
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Teacher SLTs
EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012
Redesign Family Meeting
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Understanding your PreACT scores
Leader SLTs
Leader SLTs
Redesign Family Meeting
Teacher SLTs
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Teacher SLTs
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
JACKSON SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School Math Informational Night
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
Presentation transcript:

Teacher SLTs 2016-2017

Goal 2: Priority Assessment Index Goal 1: SPS Math assessment index for the school Math assessment index for my class ELA assessment index for the school ELA assessment index for my class Leader Assistants Teachers

For classes that have an end of year state assessment (3-8, EOC): Goal 1: Assessment Index for Entire Class Teacher will use the same method for setting their assessment index goal as the principal. ELA, math, science, and social studies* LDOE chart for rating scale (see next slide) Based on the performance of students in their classroom only. Use their previous year’s results to set the goal using the SPS calculator. Use Student Stats to access information. For students with no scores (home school, transfers): do not include them in your baseline goal or the final calculation to determine if you met the goal. Example: The Math Assessment Index for my classroom will increase by __ points from current index to goal index. *see next slide for an example of the process using the Rating Scale Charts.

Student Achievement Data Component This is the number you get from the calculator. For C Schools Student Achievement Data Component State Average My Class 2016-2017 Recommended Target Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceeds SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): with grade 8 75.2   ≤ 0.0^ 0.1 - 1.8^ 1.9 - 3.5 > 3.5 SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): w/out grade 8 75.0 0.1 - 1.6^ 1.7 - 3.1 > 3.1 Assessment Index Overall 69.7 0.1 - 1.0^ 1.1 - 1.9 > 1.9 ELA Assessment Index 76.6 0.1 - 3.8 3.9 - 7.6 > 7.6 Math Assessment Index* 66.0  60 < 0.0* 0.1 - 4.1 4.2 - 8.2 > 8.2 Science Assessment Index 65.3 Social Studies Assessment Index 67.5 Dropout/Credit DCAI Index 131.2 0.1 - 2.9 3.0 - 5.7 > 5.7 Progress Points Math: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 51.8% 0.1 - 5.3^ 5.4 - 10.5 > 10.5 ELA: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 0.1 - 2.2^ 2.3 - 4.3 > 4.3 The goal is the bottom of Full Attainment. SLT: The Math Assessment Index for my classroom will increase by 4.2 points from 60 to 64.2. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: The index did not increase. The index increased from 0.1 – 4.1 points. 4.2 – 8.2 points. The index increased more than 8.2 points.

Social Studies Social Studies: Because there was not an operational state test last year in Social Studies, social studies teachers will… Grades 5 – 8: Use the state test results for their current students from the 14-15 school year to determine their baseline assessment index for their class. The state assessments are normed to be comparable across multiple years. These can accessed through Student Stats Use this method for teachers that only teach social studies. If they teach other core classes, the can write their goal on those subjects. Grades 3* – 4: The district recommends that teachers not write a Social Studies goal for this year. 3rd and 4th grade teachers should write goals on the other subjects taught. If you have a 3rd or 4th grade teacher that only teachers Social Studies, write goal based on district average. *see next slide for more information about 3rd grade.

Grade 3 Since the current 3rd grade students do not have any state testing data and only district benchmark results in ELA and mathematics. There are two options for setting their goal. Option 1: Write a goal based on the assessment index for ELA, mathematics, or science using one of the following methods: Compute their own classroom’s assessment index for ELA, mathematics, or science from the 15-16 school year and use that as a baseline for this year’s goal. Use the school’s assessment index in ELA, mathematics, or science from the 15-16 school year as the baseline for this year’s goal. Use the state average assessment index in ELA, mathematics, or Science for that letter grade as their baseline for this year’s goal. Evaluators can adjust up or down depending on class composition. If using Assessment Index see guidance on Adjustments slide. Option 2: Use the district average of Basic and above to set goal – similar to K-2 and like last year. See slides on that method and adjustments later in the PowerPoint.

High School EOCs To compute the baseline assessment index for EOC courses: Option 1: Use the teacher’s 15-16 EOC results to compute a baseline assessment index. Option 2: Use the school’s 15-16 EOC assessment index as their baseline assessment index. Option 3: From the LDOE charts, use the state average EOC assessment index in ELA, mathematics, or Science for that letter grade as their baseline for this year’s goal. Option 4: Compute a baseline assessment index using the SPS calculator from students previous scores. For LEAP scores use the following conversion: Basic = Good Mastery and Advanced = Excellent Evaluators can adjust up or down depending on class composition. See guidance on next slide.

Adjustments This is for 3rd grade or HS courses using an assessment index baseline that is not derived from the students currently in their class. Based on the composition of the class in relation to the rest of the classes at the school – below or above – the principal can adjust the baseline assessment index accordingly. The adjustment should be based on the LDOE charts. For example… If the school is a C and the class is an advanced class, then the baseline assessment index used should be the B assessment index in that subject. If the school is a C and the class is significantly lower, then the baseline assessment index used should be the D assessment index in that subject. C School State Average Assessment Index Overall 69.7 ELA Assessment Index 76.6 Math Assessment Index* 66.0 Science Assessment Index 65.3 Social Studies Assessment Index 67.5 B School State Average Assessment Index Overall 85.8 ELA Assessment Index 91.6 Math Assessment Index* 82.4 Science Assessment Index 83.6 Social Studies Assessment Index 83.0 D School State Average Assessment Index Overall 51.8 ELA Assessment Index 59.6 Math Assessment Index* 47.9 Science Assessment Index 45.9 Social Studies Assessment Index 49.8

For classes without a State Test and using a District-wide Common Assessment: K-2 (3*) ELA and math, non-EOC tested HS core subjects The percent of students scoring proficient1 in my 2nd grade math classes2 on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment3 will be at the District Average (DAVG)4. 1however proficient is defined: Basic or above, Good or Excellent, 80% or higher, etc.) 2 grade and subject you teach 3 whatever District-wide End of Year test is given for the grade and subject. See district chart for list of assessments. 4 this will be determined at the end of the year – there will be variance by grade of school – see upcoming slide. *This is one option for 3rd grade. ** This example is for a C School

Goal Differentiation Based on School Letter Grade Goal would be… Written as… A Schools 20% higher than the district average* DAVG+20 B Schools 10% higher than the district average** DAVG+10 C Schools District Average DAVG D Schools 10% lower than the district average DAVG-10 Schools will use their new 15-16 Letter Grade to set SLTs. * “A” schools will write their goals to meet Mastery or above. **When the district average is greater than 70%, the top ranges will split the difference between that number and 100. Use this chart to make adjustments based on class composition when using the District Average to set the goal. Goals can be moved up or down using increments of 5%.

Examples of Target Statements – 2nd grade ELA A Schools The percent of students scoring Mastery or higher in my 2nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be 20% above the District Average (DAVG+20). B Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my 2nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be 10% above the District Average (DAVG+10). C Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my 2nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG). D Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and abvoe in my 2nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be 10% below the District Average (DAVG-10).

Examples of Target Statements – English I A Schools The percent of students scoring Excellent in my English 1 classes on the English I District End of Year test will be 20% above the District Average (DAVG+20). B Schools The percent of students scoring Good or Excellent in my English 1 classes on the English I District End of year test will be 10% above the District Average (DAVG+10). C Schools The percent of students scoring Good or Excellent in my English 1 classes on the English I District End of Year test will be at the District Average (DAVG). D Schools The percent of students scoring Good or Excellent in my English 1 classes on the English I District End of Year test will be 10% below the District Average (DAVG-10).

Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – C School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring proficient in my 2nd grade math classes on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG to 15% above the target. More than 15% above target. Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – B School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring proficient in my 2nd grade math classes on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment will be 10% above the District Average (DAVG+10). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG+10 to 15%* above the target. More than 15%* above target. *If the DAVG is greater than 70% this % will be the difference between the district average+10% and 100% divided by 2.

Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – D School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring proficient in my 2nd grade math classes on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment will be 10% below the District Average (DAVG-10). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG-10 to 15% above the target. More than 15% above target. Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – A School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring Mastery in my 2nd grade math classes on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment will be 20% above the District Average (DAVG+20). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG+20 to 99% score proficient. 100% of students score proficient.

Goal 2 For teachers who teach more than one core subject tested by the state: Assessment index for other core subject: ELA, math, science, social studies (5-8). For teachers who only teach one core subject tested by the state: Set a goal for students below proficient. Format on next slide.

Below Proficient Goal 30% of students in my 8th grade math classes1 who scored below proficient2 on the 7th grade math LEAP test will improve at least one performance level3 on the 8th grade math LEAP test. 1 The common grade and subject class that you teach. It should include all of the same classes that you teach. 2 However proficient is defined (Basic or above, Good and Excellent). 3For example, from Approaching Basic to Basic, Unsatisfactory to Approaching Basic. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: Less than 15% improve one achievement level. 15% - 29.9% improve one achievement level. 30% - 45% improve one achievement level. More than 45% improve one achievement level.

Sample K-8 Below Proficient Goal 30% of students in my 3rd grade math class1 who scored below Basic on the previous year's benchmark test will improve at least one performance level3 on the 3rd grade mathematics LEAP test. 1 The common grade and subject class that you teach. It should include all of the same classes that you teach. 2 However proficient is defined (Basic or above, Good and Excellent). 3 For example, from U to AB, AB to B.

Sample 9-12 Below Proficient Goal 30% of students in my English II class1 who scored below proficient2 on the previous year's English I End of Year benchmark test will improve at least one performance level3 on the English II EOC. 1 The common grade and subject class that you teach. It should include all of the same classes that you teach. 2 However proficient is defined (Good and Excellent). 3 For example, from Poor to Fair, Fair to Good

Sample 9-12 Below Proficient Goal 30% of the 11th graders in my English III class1 who scored below an 18 2 on the previous year's English portion of the Plan test will score and 18 or higher3 on the English portion of the Spring 2015 ACT taken by 11th graders .

Pre-K Same as last year. ELA: Get Ready to Read The percent of students scoring Average and above in my pre-kindergarten class on the Get Ready to Read assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG). Math: District Pre-K Math Assessment The percent of students scoring Average (20-28) and above in my pre- kindergarten class on the District Pre-K Math Assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG).  

SLT Example without a State or District End of Year test The percent of students scoring proficient1 in my 8th grade Physical Education class2 on the end of year assessment3 will be 80%4. 80% of the students in my physical education class will score proficient on the end of the year assessment. 1however proficient is defined: Basic or above, Good or Excellent, 80% or higher, etc.) 2 grade and subject you teach 3 Whatever end of year assessment is appropriate for the class. If there is a national, state college, certification or district test available, that test should be used. 4 General definition of proficiency. This may vary based on school letter grade, historical data, and baseline data. ** This example is for a C School

Number of SLTs Principals may want to consider having their teachers write more than two goals in order to cover all of the tested subjects they teach or to include school-wide initiatives. The results are averaged for a final rating.

Suggested Scale for other non-tested grades and subjects Percent of students who score “proficient” D or F schools:  70% C schools:  80% B schools:  90% A schools:  100% *based on the idea that A schools are expected to have 100% of their students proficient. Adjustments can be made based on academic and non-academic courses and baseline data. When there are no proficiency levels assigned, proficient will be defined as 80% or higher.

Timeline November 18: SLT's discussed and approved by evaluators December 2: SLT's posted and accepted in CIS by evaluators

Resources District SLT website (C&I Webpage): http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531 Progress Monitoring Information: http://tangischools.schoolwires.net/domain/3683 District End of Year Test Information: http://tangischools.schoolwires.net/Page/19940