Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques Aletta Hazeveld, James J.R. Huddleston Slater, Yijin Ren American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume 145, Issue 1, Pages 108-115 (January 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011 Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 A flowchart of the working process of rapid prototyping. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Plaster model and corresponding replicas seen from the occlusal and frontal directions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Bland-Altman plot showing the mean systematic difference of clinical crown height measurements of jetted photopolymer models compared with plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Bland-Altman plot showing the mean systematic difference of mesiodistal measurements of jetted photopolymer models compared with plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 5 Bland-Altman plot showing the mean systematic difference of clinical crown height measurements of digital light processing models compared with plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 6 Bland-Altman plot showing the mean systematic difference of mesiodistal measurements of digital light processing models compared with plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 7 Bland-Altman plot showing the mean systematic difference of mesiodistal measurements of 3D printing models compared with plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions
Fig 8 Bland-Altman plot showing the mean systematic difference of clinical crown height measurements of 3D printing models compared with plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014 145, 108-115DOI: (10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011) Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists Terms and Conditions