Hemodynamic effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in cardiac surgery: Assessment using magnetic resonance imaging  Rainer Petzina, MD, Martin Ugander,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Control of ventricular unloading using an electrocardiogram-synchronized Thoratec paracorporeal ventricular assist device  Raffael Amacher, MSc, Alberto.
Advertisements

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Hemodynamic effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in cardiac surgery: Assessment using magnetic resonance imaging  Rainer Petzina, MD, Martin Ugander,
T.K. Susheel Kumar, MD, Christopher J. Knott-Craig, MD 
Sternal Stability at Different Negative Pressures During Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy  Arash Mokhtari, MD, Rainer Petzina, MD, Lotta Gustafsson, MS,
Vacuum-assisted closure device for the management of infected postpneumonectomy chest cavities  Jean Yannis Perentes, MD, PhD, Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold,
Kashish Goel, MBBS, Hartzell V. Schaff, MD, Rick A. Nishimura, MD 
Preventing heart injury during negative pressure wound therapy in cardiac surgery: Assessment using real-time magnetic resonance imaging  Malin Malmsjö,
Blood Flow Responses in the Peristernal Thoracic Wall During Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy  Angelica Wackenfors, MS, Ronny Gustafsson, MD, Johan Sjögren,
New logos The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Ultrasound, endoscopy, and the recurrent nerve
Jonathan W. Weinsaft, MD, Mario Gaudino, MD, Leonard N. Girardi, MD 
Building a bioartificial heart: A 3-song saga
Personalized cardiac surgery: Can noninvasive flow imaging lead to individualized resection strategies for bicuspid aortopathy?  Nicholas D. Andersen,
Intrinsic cardiac stem cells are essential for regeneration
Clinical Outcome After Poststernotomy Mediastinitis: Vacuum-Assisted Closure Versus Conventional Treatment  Johan Sjögren, MD, Ronny Gustafsson, MD, PhD,
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Major complications during negative pressure wound therapy in poststernotomy mediastinitis after cardiac surgery  Rainer Petzina, MD, PhD, Malin Malmsjö,
A Protective Device for Negative-Pressure Therapy in Patients With Mediastinitis  Richard Ingemansson, MD, PhD, Malin Malmsjö, MD, PhD, Sandra Lindstedt,
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Quantification of caval flow contribution to the lungs in vivo after total cavopulmonary connection with 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging 
The use of vancomycin paste to reduce sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery— why is this still a “sticky” subject  Harold L. Lazar, MD  The Journal.
Calcified amorphous tumor of left atrium
Mano J. Thubrikar, PhD, Francis Robicsek, MD, Brett L. Fowler, BS 
Control of ventricular unloading using an electrocardiogram-synchronized Thoratec paracorporeal ventricular assist device  Raffael Amacher, MSc, Alberto.
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
The elusive mass in the right atrium: A liver in the heart
A simple modification to lower incidence of heart block with sutureless valve implantation  Bobby Yanagawa, MD, PhD, Jorge Cruz, MD, Lyna Boisvert, RN,
Protecting the aged heart during cardiac surgery: Use of del Nido cardioplegia provides superior functional recovery in isolated hearts  Arun Govindapillai,
A first start for lung transplantation?
Right ventricular failure after cardiac surgery: Why can't right ventricular assist device support fix the problem?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal.
The aortic valve–sparing operation
Michael Lanuti, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Choice of second pericardial drainage tube for posterior placement
Predicting Fontan failure: Why a chylothorax matters
Is endoluminal vacuum therapy “sponge worthy”?
A fate worse than death  Jennifer S. Lawton, MD 
The Ross procedure: Time to reevaluate the guidelines
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Deep sternal wound infection: a sternal-sparing technique with vacuum-assisted closure therapy  Ronny I Gustafsson, MD, Johan Sjögren, MD, Richard Ingemansson,
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Shunt right or left? Decision 2016
T. Brett Reece, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956  Richard A. DeWall, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Complete myocardial revascularization and Dor technique in a case of left lung agenesis  Rafael García Fuster, MD, PhD, José Alfonso Buendía, MD, Jordi.
Use of polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft to cover the kinking protector of left ventricular assist device facilitates later pump exchange  Evgenij.
Nonsurgical management of traumatic cardiac pseudoaneurysms
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Ventricular assistant in restrictive cardiomyopathy: Making the right connection  Robert D.B. Jaquiss, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Valve-sparing root replacement: Still so much to learn
The continuing challenge of congenital heart disease in China
After neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, predicted pulmonary function may be reduced by 10%  Benny Weksler, MD, MBA  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Why arch curvature affects arch resistance
First in line for robotic surgery: Would you want to know?
More than vital: Who bears the burden?
Energized lung resections
Respect the aorta The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2016 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) focused update: Implications for surgeons  Richard J.
Prevention and management of sternal wound infections
Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy  Onnen Grauhan, MD, PhD, MBA, Artashes Navasardyan,
Journal changes and initiatives
Hari R. Mallidi, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Designing valves: An art or science?
Zipping up after a median sternotomy: Are we at the end of the wire?
Presentation transcript:

Hemodynamic effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in cardiac surgery: Assessment using magnetic resonance imaging  Rainer Petzina, MD, Martin Ugander, MD, PhD, Lotta Gustafsson, MD, PhD, Henrik Engblom, MD, PhD, Johan Sjögren, MD, PhD, Roland Hetzer, MD, PhD, Richard Ingemansson, MD, PhD, Håkan Arheden, MD, PhD, Malin Malmsjö, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages 1154-1162 (May 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011 Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cross section of the thoracic cavity with an open sternotomy. The heart is covered with 4 layers of paraffin gauze dressing. A polyurethane foam dressing is placed between the sternal edges, and noncollapsible drainage tubes are inserted into the foam. The open wound is sealed with transparent adhesive drape, and drainage tubes are connected to a purpose-built vacuum source. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 133, 1154-1162DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cardiac output (A and D), stroke volume (B and E), and heart rate (C and F) were measured using the established technique for MRI flow quantification. Measurements were performed before the vacuum source was turned on (VAC off) and at a negative pressure of 75 mm Hg (white bars), 125 mm Hg (light gray bars), and 175 mm Hg (dark gray bars), and 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 minutes after the vacuum source was turned on (VAC on). Measurements were undertaken both with (A, B, and C) and without (D, E, and F) 4 layers of paraffin gauze dressing covering the heart. The results are shown as means of 6 experiments. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001. Note how cardiac output and stroke volume decrease over time. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 133, 1154-1162DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Results from one experiment during the application of −175 mm Hg in a sternotomy wound without interface dressing. Real-time MRI flow quantification in the ascending aorta throughout 42 seconds of the application of VAC (top panel). VAC on denotes when the vacuum source was turned on, and sternal edges adapted denotes when the lateral movement of the sternal edges was completed, which presumably reflects the completion of VAC application. (Bottom panel) A magnification of the flow in the top panel during representative heart beats. The first 2 beats (duration = 1.5 seconds) show representative flow prior to the application of VAC. The second 2 beats (duration = 1.5 seconds) show representative flow after the completion of VAC application, showing a reduced area under the curve compared with the bottom left panel, indicating a reduced stroke volume. These data are the basis for the results presented in Figure 4. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 133, 1154-1162DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Changes in cardiac output (top), stroke volume (middle), and heart rate (bottom) measured using real-time MRI flow quantification during the application of −175 mm Hg in a sternotomy wound without interface dressing. VAC on denotes when the vacuum source was turned on, and sternal edges adapted denotes when the lateral movement of the sternal edges was completed, which presumably reflects the completion of VAC application. Note how the cardiac output and stroke volume declined during the application of negative pressure and then seemed to stabilize. See Methods for further details. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 133, 1154-1162DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 End-diastolic volume (top) and end-systolic volume (bottom) were measured using MRI chamber volume quantification before VAC negative pressure was turned on (0 mm Hg) and approximately 1.5 minutes after the application of −75, −125, and −175 mm Hg. Measurements were undertaken both with and without a wound interface dressing covering the heart. The results are shown as means of 6 experiments. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 133, 1154-1162DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The vacuum source was set to successively deliver negative pressures from 50 to 200 mm Hg at 25 mm Hg increments. Wound pressures were recorded with no interface dressing (under foam) and after the interposition of 4 layers of the paraffin gauze dressings (under interface dressing). Values are presented as means ± SEM from 6 experiments. **P < .01. Note how the pressure in the wound was lower in the presence of an interface dressing. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 133, 1154-1162DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions