Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 , and Shirley Clark3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sedimentation Test of Soil Texture
Advertisements

Robert Pitt, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE, BCEE, University of Alabama Shirley Clark, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE, Penn State - Harrisburg Brandon Steets, P.E., GeoSyntec.
The Effects of Soil Properties on Rain-garden Bioretention and Soil Processes in a Semi-arid City Melissa Mckinley 1, Jordan Brown 2, and Mitch Pavao-Zuckerman.
Filtration by Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E.
Shirley E. Clark, Ph.D., P.E., D. WRE Robert E. Pitt, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, D. WRE.
Laboratory Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Ash Sita Marie Syal, Mohammad Kabalan, Matt Hambright, and Dr. Dimitrios Zekkos, P.E.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
Infiltration Through Compacted Urban Soils and Effects on Biofiltration Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama.
Chapter 3 Compaction. To improve the density and other properties of soil Increases the solid density improves strength Lowers its permeability Reduces.
3. Grain Size Distribution (Das, Chapter 2) Sections: 2.5, 2.6, 2.7
Oak Hill Case Soil Physical Problems. Poor Drainage Surface Drainage Reflects the ease with which water can move downslope. Reflects access to catch.
Introduction to Soil Mechanics
Academic Background: Ph.D. Candidate in Water Resources Engineering, The University of Alabama, Currently Candidate for Master in Applied Statistics, The.
Suspended particle property variation in Gaoping Submarine Canyon Ray T. Hsu and James T. Liu Institute of Marine Geology and Chemistry, National Sun Yat-sen.
Dr. Martin T. Auer Michigan Tech Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Water Supply.
GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES (CE1203)
Earthwork: Use of Fine Grained & Granular Material.
Urban Stormwater Runoff Contamination Associated with Gutter and Pipe Material Use Olga Ogburn 1 and Robert Pitt 2 1 Graduate Student; Civil, Construction,
7. Soil Compaction (Das, chapter 6)
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
B.S. Engineering Science, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA MSCE, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA Ph.D., Environmental Engineering,
Chemical and Microbiological Quality of Stormwater Runoff Affected by Dry Wells; A Case Study in Millburn, NJ Leila Talebi 1, Robert Pitt 2 1 PhD Candidate,
Turbidity and Water. Turbidity is a measure of water clarity, how much the material suspended in water decreases the passage of light through the water.
Evaluating Scour Potential in Stormwater Catchbasin Sumps Using a Full-Scale Physical Model and CFD Modeling Humberto Avila Universidad del Norte, Department.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CFAC Review Thomas F. Joos, P.E. Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering Division May 8, 2007 NSLS-II Conventional.
ASSOCIATIONS OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) WITH SIZE FRACTIONATED SEDIMENT PARTICLES Jejal Reddy Bathi, Geosyntec Consultants, Santa Barbara,
Academic Background: Ph.D. Student in Water Resources Engineering at the University of Alabama. Currently working on Computational Fluid Dynamics and Physical.
Soils Up Close: The Soil Profile and Horizon Characteristics.
B.S. Engineering Science, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA MSCE, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA Ph.D., Environmental Engineering,
Stormwater Management Studies in Areas Undergoing Reconstruction Following the Tornado that Hit Tuscaloosa, AL Redahegn Sileshi 1, Robert Pitt 2, Shirley.
PERFORMANCE OF A GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON BIOFILTER IN LOW STRENGTH WASTEWATER TREATMENT D. S. Chaudhary, H. H. Ngo and S. Vigneswaran Environmental Engineering.
SOIL-WATER RELATIONSHIPS: PERMEABILITY AND DRAINABILITY
Amanda Garzio-Hadzick 1, Daniel Shelton 2, Yakov A. Pachepsky 2, Robert L. Hill 1, Andrey Guber 2, Randy Rowland 2, Zane Hadzick 1, 1 University of Maryland,
College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION. 2 According to their particle sizes, soils are divided into two: Coarse grained soils: Gravel » Sand Fine grained soils: Silt &
Area Measurements from Site Plans and Introduction to WinSLAMM Analyses Robert Pitt Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama.
SmartDrain TM for Enhanced Biofiltration Controls Redahegn Sileshi and Robert Pitt Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering University.
Objectives Define water holding capacity and gravitational water.
Water Movement Below Surface
By Blue Herrings Paul Ayala, Hamid G Makki, Jimmy Tran, Felicia Sainvilus.
B.S. Engineering Science, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA MSCE, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA Ph.D., Environmental Engineering,
Noboru Togawa  Ph.D Student at the University of Alabama, expected graduation, spring, 2010  Master in Environmental Engineering at the University of.
FIELD PERFORMANCE FOR UP FLOW FILTRATION DEVICE Noboru Togawa Robert Pitt Robert Andoh Kwabena Osei Richard Field Anthony Tafuri Department of Civil, Construction,
Sources of Bacteria and their Variability in Urban Watersheds Robert Pitt Cudworth Professor Urban Water Systems Department of Civil, Construction, and.
Gennaro Cioffi. Field evidence for rapid downstream fining of river gravels through selective transport Ferguson, R.I, Hoey, T., Wathen, S. and Werrity,
Soil Stress and Pore Water Pressure
Soil Properties determination
7-4.4 SOIL QUALITY. Soil is one of the most valuable abiotic factors in an ecosystem because everything that lives on land depends directly or indirectly.
R.A. Chavez | G.O. Brown LRGV Stormwater– South Padre Island May 18, 2016 The Impact of Variable Hydraulic Conductivity on Bioretention Cell Performance.
Use of a Vadose Zone Biobarrier for Removal of Nitrate from Percolating Groundwater Jim Hunter, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 and Shirley Clark3
Soil Texture and Textural Class
How is Water Recycled?.
Cudworth Professor of Urban Water Systems
CFAC Review NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Update
Soils Up Close: The Soil Profile and Horizon Characteristics
Soil Classification – Part 1 Sieve Analysis
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2, and Shirley Clark3
Olga Ogburn Background
Soil 7.EC.5A.2 Construct explanations of how soil quality (including composition, texture, particle size, permeability, and pH) affects the characteristics.
Soil Quality
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2, Shirley Clark3, and Chad Christian4
Soils and their Significance
Water use and treatment
What is Soil? T Webb HHS.
Growth promoting substances
7.EC.5A.2 Construct explanations of how soil quality (including composition, texture, particle size, permeability, and pH) affects the characteristics.
ASSESSMENT OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT IN CANAANLAND, OTA, OGUN STATE, NIGERIA. Isiorho, S. A. Department of Geosciences, Indiana University – Purdue University,
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Setback area relative to drainage area Runoff volume, mean of 4 events
Presentation transcript:

Flow Rate and Sediment Trapping Laboratory Experiments using Various Biofilter Media Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 , and Shirley Clark3 1Former Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 2Cudworth Professor of Urban Water Systems, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 3Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering, Penn State, Harrisburg, PA

Introduction Controlled fill-factorial lab column tests were conducted to determine flow and particle trapping capabilities of sand-peat media mixtures, Tuscaloosa surface and subsurface soils, and media samples from biofilter facilities, along with very coarse media as used in supporting layers and underdrains. Sand media a b Surface (a) and subsurface soil (b) media from Tuscaloosa, AL USA

Biofilter Media Characteristics Standard biofilter media The median sizes of the biofilter sand-based media mixtures ranged from 400 to 2,000 μm and the uniformity coefficients ranged from 5.5 to 40. Example Media Mixtures D50 (um) Uniformity 10% Peat and 90% sands 350 to 1875 up to 22 25% Peat and 75% sands 300 to 1875 up to 16 50% peat and 50% sands 300 to1625 up to 20 Tuscaloosa surface soils 270 6 Tuscaloosa subsurface soils 1300 33 Standard biofilter media Kansas City 2000 40 North Carolina 700 Wisconsin (avg.) 500 5.5

Laboratory Column Tests More than 100 column tests were conducted during full-factorial experiments to identify the most significant factors affecting media performance. The media layers were about 0.5 m (1.5 ft ) thick. Four liters of test water were poured into each lab column that was filled with one of the media mixtures. The surface ponding depths in the columns ranged between 28 cm (11 in.) and 36 cm (14 in.) to correspond to the approximate maximum ponding depths at biofilters. Effluent samples were collected from the bottom of the columns at the beginning, middle, and end of the drainage time and composted in clean 1 L bottles for the lab analyses.

Lab Column Inf. Test Results Surface 3D plot of uniformity and texture vs. final infiltration rates for hand compacted conditions. Higher infiltration rates were observed for mixtures having low uniformity and higher median size values, as expected.

Particulate Trapping Experiments Full factorial tests examined particulate trapping for median particle size, uniformity, compaction, organic content, and sediment concentrations for each particle size category. Challenge water was made by adding sediment to Black Warrior River water (coarse sand: medium sand: Sil-Co-Sil 250 = 10:15:75 by mass) along with fines from the river water, resulted in a particle size distribution covering a wide range of particle sizes. The concentrations of sediment in the influent challenge water ranged from about 100 to 1,000 mg/L during the different experiments.

Particle Size Distribution in Test Water The challenge water covered a wide range of particle sizes, with a median size of about 25 um. This mixture was not intended to represent stormwater, but to provide sufficient particulate samples in each particle range that were individually examined.

Laboratory Solids Analysis The constituents analyzed included: SSC (complete sample volumes were split using USGS/Dekaport cone splitter) TDS (< 0.45 um particles) PSD (by sieves and Coulter Counter) turbidity (continuous and for each sample) conductivity (continuous and for each sample). USGS/Dekaport cone splitter.

Particle Trapping Test Results Example line performance plots for sand-peat media mixtures for different particle size ranges. Significant reductions occurred during most of the lab column tests, with somewhat better removals for finer media and slower infiltration rates. No reductions were observed for very coarse materials.

Conclusions Controlled flow studies using full factorial analyses indicated that texture and uniformity of the media mixture have the greatest effect on the measured final infiltration rates of the media. The organic matter in the biofilter media did not have a significant effect by itself on the infiltration rates compared to the other factors (texture, uniformity, and compaction). However the organic matter serves as a reservoir of nutrients and water in the biofilter media enhancing plant growth that enhances long-term performance.

Conclusions Compaction did not significantly affect the infiltration rates for the mixtures having large amounts of sand and little peat; however infiltration studies conducted previously indicated that compaction significantly affected typical soil infiltration rates having normal organic content, especially if high in fines content. The particle trapping experiments using sand-peat mixtures and Tuscaloosa surface soil samples indicated that significant reductions occurred for most sand-based media mixtures Coarse media (pea gravel and larger did not indicate any significant particulate removals).

Acknowledgments This research was supported by the Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.