COSA Committee Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America Step 7 Identify Population Objectives Population Objective is set here.
Advertisements

Evaluating Local Lobster Population Dynamics with Geo- referenced Trap Arrays, Mark-recapture Methods & Seabed Mapping Richard A. Wahle 1 Michael J. Dunnington.
Strong Seasonal Dynamics of Harbor Seals, an Upper-Trophic Predator in Cook Inlet Peter Boveng, Josh London and Robert Montgomery Polar Ecosystems Program.
The Discovery Corridor Concept and its Applicability January 13/14, 2004 workshop St. Andrews Biological Station, St. Andrews, N.B.
Wildlife Response Guidelines Canada - United States Marine Spill Pollution Contingency Plan CANUSLANT Annex Wildlife Response Working Group.
Modeling Bowhead Whale Habitat: Integration of Ocean Models with Satellite, Biological Survey and Oceanographic Data Dan Pendleton, NEAq / NOAA Fisheries.
Marine Mammals Working Group Summary of Results Ihor Hlohowskyj North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning Meeting Minerals Management.
Bristol Bay / N. Aleutian Basin -- Seabirds & Shorebirds Presented by Kathy Kuletz, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Marine Mammal Ecology Ecology : An attempt to describe and explain the patterns of distribution and abundance of organisms. These patterns reflect the.
Modeling Bowhead Whale Habitat: Integration of Ocean Models with Satellite, Biological Survey and Oceanographic Data Dan Pendleton, NOAA / NEAq Jinlun.
Sea turtles of the UAE: Status and Conservation Options
Office of Renewable Energy Programs NAC-CESU Annual Meeting June 12, 2013 Mary C. Boatman, Ph.D. Environmental Studies Chief.
Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Canada
Migrations in the Sea Objectives
North Aleutian Basin (NAB) Information Status and Research Planning Meeting Hilton Hotel, Anchorage November 28 - December 1, 2006 Paul Stang, Alaska Regional.
NAB Planning area Bristol Bay/Alaska Peninsula Avian Crossroads and Destination Bill Larned Chris Dau U S Fish and Wildlife Service.
Developing a Literature Database for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Elisabeth Ann Stull North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning.
CURTIN’S NORTHWEST MARINE RESEARCH WAMSI NORTH WEST MARINE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM 21 February 2013 WA Maritime MUSEUM CMST, Remote Sensing, Department of Applied.
1 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Assessing Historic Properties and Cultural Resources in the Main Hawaiian Islands Dave Ball, MA, RPA Pacific Region.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ARCTIC RESEARCH AND MONITORING WORKSHOP- JANUARY 23 RD, 2009 Mark Shasby USGS- Alaska Regional Office.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
The Quest for Recovery Continues - Yukon Delta NWR – February 15, Spectacled Eiders on Yukon Delta NWR Melissa Gabrielson Wildlife Biologist Yukon.
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Birds Working Group Summary Findings John Krummel and the.
Evaluating variation in abundance of Arctic cisco in the Colville River using existing scientific information and traditional knowledge 2006Marine Science.
Working Group Results Kirk LaGory North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning Meeting Minerals Management Service Anchorage, Alaska November.
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Kirk LaGory North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research.
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Fish and Fisheries Working Group John Hayse North Aleutian.
Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Kim Poole Wildlife Discipline Lead Aurora Wildlife Research Jess Dunford Wildlife Biologist Gartner Lee Limited.
Subsistence Use and Knowledge of Beaufort Salmon Populations Courtney Carothers Assistant Professor of Fisheries School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences.
Chukchi Sea Environmental Studies Program Caryn Rea Environmental Studies Lead ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. January 23, 2009 Environmental Studies Baseline.
Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.
Supporting Community Participation in U.S. Arctic Ocean Governance Strengthening Institutions Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment.
Robert Suydam Department of Wildlife Management, Alaska North Slope Borough Ph.D.-Fisheries, (Univ. of Washington, expected in 2005), M.S-Biology, (Univ.
Arctic Waterways Safety Committee Doug DeMaster NOAA 10 Dec 2015.
1 Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Marine Birds and Marine Mammals Evaluations for Round 1 External Proposed MPA Arrays in the MLPA North Coast Study.
OSC Scientific Committee Meeting May 2013 James Michael Price Coordinator for Marine Mammals Studies Headquarters
Environmental Studies Program 1  The Studies Program functions to establish information needed for assessment and management of impacts from OCS exploration,
Provide impartial information on the health of our ecosystems and environment, the natural hazards that threaten us, the natural resources we rely on,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act & Birds of Conservation Concern.
OCS Scientific Committee Meeting May 2013 P RESENTER : Donna Schroeder M ARINE E COLOGIST Pacific Region C ONTACT.
Marine Science in Alaska: 2005 Symposium Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans & Atmosphere.
1 The Avian Knowledge Network: Decision Support System for Adaptive Management Leo Salas & Grant Ballard – California Avian Data Center, PRBO Conservation.
COSA Committee Meeting
Baseline Ecological Study of Wind Turbines at Block Island Wind Farm
COSA Committee Meeting
COSA Committee Meeting
TURNKEY IST, Lisbon March 2015
COSA Committee Meeting
COSA Committee Meeting
COSA Committee Meeting
June 22, 2017 Keely M. Hite Social Science Specialist
Tourism’s effects on Antarctic Animals
Sea Surface Temperature as a Trigger of Butterfish Migration: A Study of Fall Phenology Amelia Snow1, John Manderson2, Josh Kohut1, Laura Palamara1, Oscar.
COSA Committee Meeting
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Marine Mammals Working Group Ihor Hlohowskyj North Aleutian.
COSA Committee Meeting
COSA Committee Meeting
Hurricanes and Hatchlings Don’t Mix
High-Frequency Radar Surface Currents in Alaska: Bering Strait
COSA Committee Meeting
Delivering Conservation
Western Regional Air Partnership 2003 Technical Workplan Elements
Dr. Jennifer Provencher
TG Data - Inspire Usage Options
Population Delineation and Sea Ducks presented to SDJV Continental Technical Team at November 2015 meeting John Pearce, USGS Alaska Science Center.
COSA Committee Meeting
USFWS At-Sea Observer Program
APPENDIX SLIDES Bill Larned Chris Dau U S Fish and Wildlife Service.
National Oil and Gas Program and NEPA
Revisiting the COSA Questionnaire
Presentation transcript:

COSA Committee Meeting June 23, 2017 Heather A. Crowley Oceanographer Alaska OCS Region heather.crowley@boem.gov / 907-334-5281

Environmental Resource Areas: Using Habitat-Based Density Models and Tagging Data for Analysis of Biological Resources BOEM Information Need: A consistent method for developing and refining Environmental Resource Areas (ERAs) used for BOEM’s OSRA. Date Information is Required: The tools or analyses are needed to assist BOEM in NEPA analyses for potential future lease sales, EPs, and DPPs

Background To facilitate analysis of the vulnerability of different species to contact from a potential oil spill BOEM identifies Environmental Resources Areas (ERAs), which are areas of concern relating to social, environmental, or economic resources, including critical habitat or use areas for different species of concern. Currently, various methods are used to define the location and geographical extent of ERAs, depending on the availability of data.

Environmental Resource Areas in the Chukchi Sea ERA Name Map Vulnerable General Resource Specific Resource Reference 1 Kasegaluk Lagoon Area A-2f May-October Birds, barrier island, seals, whales Birds: BLBR, LTDU, eiders (STEI, COEI), loons (all 3 species) Dau and Larned, 2004; Johnson, 1993; Johnson, Wiggins, and Wainwright, 1993; Laing and Platte, 1994; Lehnhausen and Quinlan, 1981. 2 Point Barrow, Plover Islands A-2d Birds, barrier island Birds: SPEI, LTDU Fischer and Larned, 2004; Troy, 2003. 8 Maguire, Flaxman Islands Birds: nesting COEI, molting LTDU, PALO Fischer and Larned, 2004; Flint et al., 2004; Johnson, Wiggins, and Wainwright, 1993; Johnson, 2000; Johnson et al., 2005; Noel et al., 2005. 9 Stockton Islands, McClure Islands A-2e Birds: nesting COEI, molting LTDU, staging SPEI Fischer and Larned, 2004; Flint et al., 2004; Johnson, Wiggins, and Wainwright, 1993; Johnson, 2000, (Table 2); Johnson et al., 2005; Noel et al., 2005; Troy, 2003. 10 Ledyard Bay SPEI Critical Habitat Unit A-2b July-November Birds Birds: seabirds, molting/staging SPEI, staging YBLO 66 FR 9146-9185; Laing and Platte, 1994; Petersen, Larned, and Douglas, 1999; Piatt and Springer, 2003. 14 Cape Thompson Seabird Colony Area A-2a Birds: seabirds, gulls, shorebirds, waterfowl, staging YBLO Piatt et al., 1991; Piatt and Springer, 2003; Springer et al., 1984; Stephenson and Irons, 2003. 15 Cape Lisburne Seabird Colony Area Birds, marine mammals Birds: seabird breeding colony, staging YBLO Oppel, Dickson and Powell, 2009; Piatt et al., 1991; Piatt and Springer, 2003; Roseneau et al., 2000; Springer et al., 1984; Stephenson and Irons, 2003. 17 Angun and Beaufort Lagoons Birds: molting LTDU, scoters, staging shorebirds Johnson and Herter, 1989. 18 Murre Rearing and Molting Area Birds: murre foraging, rearing, and molting area Piatt and Springer, 2003; Springer et al., 1984. 19 Chukchi Sea Spring Lead System April-June Birds, whales Birds: seabird foraging area; spring migration area for LTDU, eiders (KIEI, COEI), loons Connors, Myers, and Pitelka, 1979; Gill, Handel, and Connors, 1985; Johnson and Herter, 1989; Oppel, Dickson, and Powell, 2009; Piatt et al., 1991; Piatt and Springer, 2003; Sowls, Hatch, and Lensink, 1978; Swartz, 1967. 64 Peard Bay Area Birds: eiders (all 4 species), loons (all 3 species) Fischer and Larned, 2004; Laing and Platte, 1994. 65 Smith Bay Birds, marine mammals, whales Birds: eiders (SPEI, KIEI), YBLO Earnst et al., 2005; Powell et al., 2005; Ritchie, Burgess, and Suydam, 2000; Ritchie et al., 2004; Troy, 2003. 67 Herschel Island (Canada) Birds: LTDU, BLBR, scoters, eiders, loons, shorebirds Johnson and Richardson, 1982; Richardson and Johnson, 1981. 68 Harrison Bay Birds: eiders (KIEI, COEI), scoters (BLSC, SUSC), geese (BLBR, CANG, GWFG), loons, shorebirds Connors, Connors, and Smith, 1984; Dau and Larned, 2004, 2005; Fischer and Larned, 2004. 69 Harrison Bay/Colville Delta Birds: geese (BLBR), eiders (KIEI, COEI), LTDU, scoters (BLSC, SUSC), loons (all 3 species) Bergman et al., 1977; Dau and Larned, 2004, 2005; Fischer and Larned, 2004; Johnson and Herter, 1989.

Environmental Resource Areas in the Chukchi Sea

Background Relationship with Previous Work/Efforts: This study will utilize large datasets amassed by BOEM and others in the last forty-plus years documenting habitat and oceanographic parameters as well as spatial presence and other information for a wide range of species.

Background Relationship with Concurrent/Future Efforts: The tools and methods developed in this study will allow for routine update of ERAs as additional data becomes available.

Study Objectives Assess the utility of different techniques to evaluate distribution, abundance and timing of behaviors of marine mammals or birds Identify one or more representative species or population(s) for assessing methodologies Investigate seasonal patterns of movement of the identified species in Cook Inlet, the Beaufort Sea, or the Chukchi Sea Evaluate spatial variations in seasonal density of identified species in the focus area.

Methods This study will assimilate available monitoring information derived from aerial and ship surveys, satellite tags, monitoring buoys, remote sensing, ocean models, etc. Researchers will develop methods to analyze the biological resource densities to help develop a documented method for refining ERAs to support the OSRA process.

Methods Methodologies considered may include development habitat-based models similar to those used by Roberts et al. (2016) in the Atlantic or estimation of biological resource densities, such as those developed by Citta et al. (2015) to identify core-use areas for bowhead whales.

Relationship to Strategic Science Questions This study is most directly relevant to these questions: How can BOEM best assess cumulative effects within the framework of environmental assessments? How can BOEM better use existing or emerging technology to achieve more effective or efficient scientific results? What affected resources, measures, and systems are best used for long-term monitoring? How are ocean currents and biota affected by reduced sea ice conditions?