MS4 and Trading Considerations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SW101 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Advertisements

Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation DRAFT SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) (GP )
Municipal St rm Water Program. Storm Water Programs Industrial –bus maintenance yards Construction –addition of a gym Municipal.
A Review of the Hollis Stormwater Management Ordinance Todd H. Dresser, CHMM Cuoco & Cormier Engineering Associates.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
City of Puyallup Planning Commission Presentation February 8, 2012.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
WOOLPERT Managing NPDES Phase II Requirements on a County-Wide Basis Jared Livingston.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
Overview of Montana’s Stormwater Regulatory Program.
Workshop on the draft General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water from Small MS4s Fresno August 6, 2002 Redding August 8, 2002 San Luis Obispo August.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Innovative Data Management and Planning Strategies for TMDL Compliance
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
Framework for CSO Control Planning
Municipal Stormwater Permitting
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments
Advanced Environmental Management (AEM) Training Phase I
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
What is Required to Achieve Worksheet 10
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Stormwater Management Program
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
So I have a TMDL Wasteload Allocation
CLEAN WATER ACT (1972) EPA DESIGNATED TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) MS4 GENERAL PERMIT ADMINISTERED.
Alternative Compliance for New Developments
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
MS4 = Municipal Separated Storm Sewer System
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

MS4 and Trading Considerations LGAC September 29, 2016

Outline MS4 Permitting Water Quality Elements Local Water Quality 2/132 MS4 Permitting Water Quality Elements Local Water Quality Pollutants of Concern Effected Waters Outline

Regulates discharges from collection system and land that drains to them Technology Based Public Education Public Involvement Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Construction Site Stormwater control Post-Construction Stormwater management Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Basic Program 1srt Generation Focus – Now in 3+ generations Compliance Rate is Low MS4 Permitting

Water Quality Elements NPDES Permits Must Also Contain WQBEL Early generation permits technology orientated Chesapeake Bay changed focus General Approach Develop Plans to Meet WLA for state approval Plan – Specified Controls and multi-term Implementation Schedule Bay Plans and Local TMDL Plans Pace of Implementation is determined by MEP Consider Financial and Technical Capability Permit Writers Determination Water Quality Elements

ComParison Bay Reductions – N, P, S 16%-40% Reduction Pace determined in WIP: 2025 Timeframe Local WLA – Pathogens, Metals, P, S (Volume issue) 80%+ Reduction Multiple permit terms to achieve Laid out in TMDL Implementation Plans General Approach taken by the states: Restore local hydrology Address local impairments you address the Bay targets ComParison

Can You Meet Your Local Allocations by Meeting the Bay Allocation? Depends Can You Meet Your Local Allocations by Meeting the Bay Allocation?

What are The Constraints? Pollutants Percent Reduction Location What are The Constraints?

Pollutant Trading ConSiderations What if the pollutants are different? Perhaps No Limitations on Trading Need to Consider whether Controls have multi-pollutant benefit What if some of the pollutants are the same? How does trading effect the restoration of local water? Multi-Pollutant Benefit Delay in Restoration Local Water Quality Implications Pollutant Trading ConSiderations

Location: Case 1 What is effect of Local Water Quality? Buyer Seller Buyer Seller Location: Case 1 What is effect of Local Water Quality?

Location: Case 2 What is effect of Water Quality? Buyer Seller Location: Case 2 What is effect of Water Quality?

Location: Case 3 What is effect of Local Water Quality? Seller Buyer Buyer Seller Location: Case 3 What is effect of Local Water Quality?

MS4 Trading Most Difficult of the Trading Scenarios Rate of controls determined by MEP What effect does trading have upon MEP What effect does trading have upon local water quality restoration How does this handle the volume issue Needs to be revisited each permit term Mechanism is Restoration Plans submitted with Application Restrictions need to included in permit Subject to EPA Review Subject to Public Comment MS4 Trading

Restoration Plans and Incorporation of Trading Comprehensive Restoration Plans Key to Implementation Explain the impairments being addressed Inter-relationship of pollutants and controls available Proposed level of Trading and BMPs to be installed Where the credits will be obtained What is impact upon local water quality and pace of restoration How will this change in future permits Permit Writer reviews MEP is met Water quality restoration as soon as possible Restoration Plans and Incorporation of Trading

MS4 Trading: Other Considerations Most progress is measured at the end of the permit term Trading allows the possibility of obtaining reduction credits throughout the permit term, addressing impairments early Trading May offer a more economical approach: MEP may require a faster rate of local water quality restoration due to potentially more economic approach. Prerequisites Acceptable Trading Regulations and/or Technical Guidance Permits constructed so as to allow trading MS4 Trading: Other Considerations