How California Shares Indicator 7 Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Advertisements

California Statewide System of School Readiness Networks Inclusion of Children with Disabilities Prepared by Chris Drouin, Special Education Division Anne.
2/27/2014 The California Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Field Meetings Fall 2008 Preschool Learning Foundations for Special.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 Secondary Transition Update Secondary Transition Update.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Activities to Address Issues Related to SLPs Implementation of the California Desired Results Assessment System August 27, 2007 Patty Salcedo and Larry.
MPRRC U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Special Education Technical Assistance Resources for Charter Schools.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers.
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers June 2009.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
What is the Desired Results System? The Desired Results System is a project of the California Department of Education. It helps make sure that children.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
WELCOME TO CE 100 Preparing for a Career in Early Childhood Development –Unit 4 Class will start at the top of the hour! Please turn the volume up on your.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Linking the DRDP to Instruction: Using the DRDP (2015) Reports
Overview of the DRDP (2015) For Children with IFSPs and Their Families
Overview of the DRDP (2015) For Children with IFSPs and Their Families
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Vermont Agency of Education 4 December 2015
 Is unique to Nebraska with its self- assessment process.  Is intended to be a component of your district’s School Improvement Process.  Is an ongoing.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Facilitator: Angela Kapp Authentic Assessment Session 1 Session 1 Level 2 Minnesota Department of Human Services.
Individual Family Service Plans vs
The Early Education & Support Division presents…
Social and Emotional Learning
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
What is “Annual Determination?”
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
National, State and Local Educational Environments Data:
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Contractor Assurance Systems (CAS) Summit August 23, 2016
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
SPR&I Regional Training
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
School Readiness and the Assessment of Children with Disabilities
Activities to Address Issues Related to SLPs Implementation of the California Desired Results Assessment System August 27, 2007 Patty Salcedo and Larry.
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
School Readiness and the Assessment of Children with Disabilities
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Nevada County SELPA Local Plan Update
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Desired Results for Children and Families
Session V: Environment Rating Scales
Alignment Across the Ages
Presentation transcript:

How California Shares Indicator 7 Results with Local Education Agencies The Desired Results Access Project, Napa County Office of Education California Department of Education, Special Education Division 09/11/17

Today’s Presenters Sheila Self, M.Ed. 619 Coordinator, Policy and Program Services California Department of Education, Special Education Division Patty Salcedo, M.A. Co-Director Desired Results Access Project Elizabeth Schroeder, M.S. Senior Data Reports System Manager Jennifer Fisher, ECSE M.A. Early Start & Preschool Program Specialist Southwest SELPA

Agenda Introductions California’s Indicator 7 Reporting to Local Education Agencies (LEAs) Desired Results Developmental Profile (DRDP, 2015) Overview Indicator 7 Reports for LEAs Using the Indicator 7 Reports Questions

California’s Indicator 7 Reporting The California Department of Education (CDE), Special Education Division (SED) contracts with the Desired Results Access Project to: Assure the appropriate assessment of children with Individual Family Service Plans (IFSPs) and Individualized Education Program (IEPs) with the DRDP (2015) Produce the Indicator 7 report for the Part B State Performance Plan (SPP)-Annual Performance Report (APR) using DRDP assessment results NOTE: The CA Dept of Dev. Services is the lead agency for Part C, and thus produces the Part C SPP-APR

The CDE uses the DRDP for Indicator 7 The DRDP (2015) is an early childhood assessment developed by the CDE for all children birth to five receiving CDE services SELPAs report DRDP data twice yearly to the CDE, SED. California is unique in that we have developed our own instrument for all children and includes the ability to address federal reporting requirements. Note: need to define SELPA, just in case folks aren’t aware on the call. SELPAs are Special Education Local Plan Areas: In 1977, all school districts and county school offices in California were required to form geographical regions of sufficient size and scope to provide for all special education service needs of children residing within the region. Each region became known as a Special Education Local Plan Area – SELPA. Today, there are over 120 SELPAs in the State.

Indicator 7 Results: An Evolution of Sharing 2006-2014 Results published by SELPA with the SPP document posted on the CDE website. 2015 The Desired Results Access Project prepared an Excel spreadsheet by SELPA and school district. 2016 Indicator 7 Reports for LEAs website launched providing interactive access to district, SELPA and state results. Indicator 7 results have not always been widely available for SELPAs and districts to review and use. Starting in 2008 these results were only available on annual basis in the SPP report In 2009, the department started to release LEA reports that include the results for Indicator 7 at the SELPA level. Flat file published materials on our state website. Not interactive or easy to access. Wanted to shift to a method of delivering this information to the field… In 2015, in an effort to provide this information at a further disaggregated level, the DR Access Project released the results in an Excel spreadsheet by SELPA and district Finally, we rolled out the website that allows administrators access to the Indicator 7 results on an easy-to-use platform broken down by SELPA and district We are looking forward to showing you this fantastic resource that has certainly increased access to Indicator 7 results across our state, but also increased the utility of this information. Elizabeth will dive into the system in just a few minutes, but first… Patty will give you a brief introduction to our assessment, the DRDP (2015)…

The DRDP (2015)

https://draccess/org Key Features of the DRDP (2015) Designed for all children Developed using universal design Includes adaptations for children with disabilities Focuses on progress, not deficits Is an authentic, observation-based assessment Promotes family participation Provides reports to teachers Meets federal accountability requirements: Scaled on a large sample of California’s children using a Rasch measurement model View at https://draccess/org 8

How DRDP data is used to measure progress on the preschool outcomes This diagram illustrates how the measures on the DRDP are aligned and provide information relative to the three OSEP outcome areas. The three OSEP outcome areas should be familiar to you…. OSEP 1: Social relationships, which includes getting along with other children and relating well with adults, OSEP 2: Use of knowledge and skills, which refers to thinking, reasoning, problem-solving, and early literacy and math skills, and OSEP 3: Taking action to meet needs, which includes feeding, dressing, self-care, and following rules related to health and safety.

Indicator 7 Reports System for LEAs

Indicator 7 Reports System for Local Educational Agencies This reports system is intended for SELPA and district administrators The “Indicator 7 Reports System for LEAs” website is an interactive portal where you can view Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes results by SELPA and District The system went live in May 2016 and includes results for 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16.

Features of the Reports System View state, SELPA, and district-level results View state results by disability category Print state, SELPA, or district results

Utility of the Reports System Administrators can review: results over time at the State, SELPA and district level SELPA results compared to state actual results as well as targets district results compared to overall SELPA results and other districts within that SELPA Third bullet: Why we do state results? We offer this because it is important for SELPAs and district to see how their results compare to the state actual results, because the original targets were set high.

State-level Results Deleted two comments

State-level Results by Year

Select a SELPA

SELPA-level Results

SELPA-level Results by Year

District-level Results

District-level Results by Year

Worksheet

Using the Indicator 7 Reports for LEAs: Perspectives of an LEA Administrator

Using the Indicator 7 Reports What is the first thing you look at on this report?

Using the Indicator 7 Reports How do you use this report?

Using the Indicator 7 Reports How do you link this data back to professional development and support for teachers and administrators?

Questions?

Resources and Support Detailed guidance, including detailed instructions for navigating the website are available on the website: indicator7reports.draccess.org   DR Access Project website: www.draccess.org Any questions? Email: reports@draccess.org Phone: 1-800-673-9220 Ext. 4

Thank you!