TTIPS Model Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
Advertisements

Presented by : Delaware Department of Education March 15, 2011.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Funding Opportunities for Newly Identified Priority Schools ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
Understanding Title I. Title I Defined A federal allocation of funds for schools classified as low income for the purpose of assisting students to demonstrate.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 We Can Do Better: Becca Walawender, Deputy Division Director,
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Charter School Orientation July, 2013 Anita Villarreal Title I, Part A State Coordinator Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Texas Title I Priority Schools (TTIPS) Grant Cycle 3 Grant Overview & Applicant Conference 1 © Texas Education Agency, 2014.
S CHOOL I MPROVEMENT G RANTS An Overview of Fiscal Year (FY) DRAFT.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
West Virginia Department of Education
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Title I and Prekindergarten
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Planning for Dramatic Improvement Part B
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Beecher Hills Elementary School (Mays Cluster)
Kindergarten – Middle School
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
School Improvement Grants
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
Presentation transcript:

TTIPS Model Overview

Federal Program TTIPS grant is the Texas implementation of the Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, School Improvement Grants (SIG) Federal program purpose: SIG funds under section 1003(g) of the ESEA are used to improve student achievement in Title I schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring so as to enable those schools to make adequate yearly progress and exit improvement status. Federal program goal: The SIG program provides grants to support rigorous interventions aimed at turning around our Nation’s persistently lowest achieving schools.

SIG Requirements All SIG projects must be “whole-school reform” SIG requirements define whole-school reform as a strategy that is designed to: Improve student academic achievement/attainment Be implemented for all students in the school Provide student non-academic support Provide family and community engagement Address, at a minimum, and in a comprehensive and coordinated manner: School leadership Teaching and learning in at least one core content area Include professional learning for educators

Cycle 3 For the Cycle 3 TTIPS Grant, campuses were allowed to choose from 4 Models: Restart, Closure, Turnaround, and Transformation. 16 total campuses were awarded (1 campus has closed) 15 campuses chose to implement the Transformation Model (14 remain) 1 campus chose to implement the Turnaround Model

Cycle 4 3 new Models were added for Cycle 4, giving the campuses 7 Models to choose from: Transformation, Turnaround, Restart, Closure, Whole-School Reform, State Design Model (Early College High School), and Early Learning Intervention. 5 total campuses were awarded 2 campuses chose to implement the State Design Model (ECHS) 3 campuses chose to implement the Early Learning Intervention Model

Cycle 5 The Models for Cycle 5 were carried over from Cycle 4: Transformation, Turnaround, Restart, Closure, Whole-School Reform, State Design Model (ECHS), and Early Learning Intervention. 18 total campuses were awarded 4 campuses chose to implement the Transformation Model (1 campus will implement this Model using the Rural Exception) 1 campus chose to implement the Whole-School Reform Model 4 campuses chose to implement the State Design Model (ECHS) 9 campuses chose to implement the Early Learning Intervention Model

Closure One-year grant Covers reasonable and necessary closing costs Moves students to higher-achieving schools within the LEA A higher-achieving school within the LEA must exist in order for this to be an option

Restart The LEA closes a school and re-opens under new management New management may be: a Charter school operator, Charter Management Organization, or Education Management Organization New management is chosen through rigorous review

Turnaround Dramatic and comprehensive intervention Produces significant gains within two years Prepares school for transformation

Transformation Focused on building capacity and changing school culture Provides operational flexibility to schools Improves instruction through PD Increases teacher and leadership effectiveness Creates community-oriented schools

Whole-School Reform LEA partners with a model developer Implemented for all students Targets: school leadership, at least one academic content area, non-academic supports for students, and family/community engagement

State-Design Model (ECHS) Consistent with the Texas concept of developing a fully operational ECHS ECHS must be fully operational by the second year of TTIPS Comprehensive improvement strategy

Early Learning Must address each of the transformation model Offers full day kindergarten and pre- kindergarten Meets the requirements of a high- quality preschool program of the USDE Preschool Development Grants program

In your pre-implementation… Where do each of the requirements appear? Where can you demonstrate real work? (for items not currently being implemented) Work in groups to identify the requirements, using your approved grant. Pre-Kindergarten Guidelines: http://tea.texas.gov/pkg.aspx