STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing for Stiffness
Advertisements

Chapter 5 – Torsion Figure: 05-00CO.
Strength of Material-5 Torsion Dr. Attaullah Shah.
Torsional Shaft Function: transmit torques from one plane to the other. Design of torsional shafts: stress and deformation T T T.
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203
CHAPTER 5 TORSION.
Chapter 3 Torsion Torsion Engr. Othman A. Tayeh. DEFORMATIONS IN A CIRCULAR SHAFT Φ the angle of twist.
1 Structures QDR1 Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones Team 2: Balsa to the Wall Matt Negilski Mike Palumbo Chris Selby Tara Trafton.
Combined Loadings Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels Cylindrical Pressure VesselSpherical Pressure Vessel.
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
Critical Design Review AAE490 Project 1 March 2003 Nicholas Baker Brian Chernish Andrew Faust Doug Holden Mara Prentkowski Nicholas Setar.
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Selection of Materials and Shape
Propulsion QDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 20, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
November 12, 2003QDR1 Team 5 Structures and Weights QDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
Rear spar for control surface hinges Styrene foam wing core Balsa spars carry bending load 0.25 in x 0.25 in T.E. Reinforcement Materials Employed: Balsa:
Over view Landing Gear Landing Gear Weight Determination Weight Determination Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Analysis.
Team 5 Structures PDR Presented By: Ross May James Roesch Charles Stangle.
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials Final Review.
Beams and Deflections Zach Gutzmer, EIT
9 Torsion.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Machine Design I (MCE-C 203) Mechatronics Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University Dr. Ahmed Salah Abou Taleb Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering.
PROBLEMS ON TORSION.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
December 1, 2003PDR1 Team 5 Structures and Weights PDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
Structures PDR 1 Team Boiler Xpress Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal VanMeter October 12, 2000.
1 CHAP 8 STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING FINITE ELEMENTS FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Nam-Ho Kim Edited and audio Raphael Haftka.
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Structures Preliminary Design Review #1 October 12, 2000.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS QDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 6, 2003.
Engineering Analysis & Updated Layout Drawings SofaKing 9 March 2005.
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
11 Energy Methods.
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
Team “Canard” September 28th, 2006
Pure Bending.
DYNAMICS & CONTROL PDR 1 TEAM 4
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003
Structures and Weights
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
SAE AERO 2017 Joseph Zongolowicz, Kathy Hansen, Nick Montana, Marquis Ward, Frank Dixon, Thomas Houck, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao, Kevin Schesventer,
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
PROBLEMS ON TORSION.
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2
Structures and Weights Preliminary Design Review
Structures Overview Material Properties Structures Construction
Theory of Simple Bending
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
Units of N m.
Structures QDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 13, 2003
COST QDR TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford,
Strength of Material Torsion Dr. Attaullah Shah.
TORSION CO 2 : ABILITY TO ANALYZE TORQUE-LOADED MEMBER EVALUATE THE VALUES AND DISTRIBUTION OF BENDING AND SHEAR STRESSES IN BEAM SECTION By: ROSHAZITA.
Team 5 Structures and Weights QDR #1
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 3 TEAM 4
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
PROPULSION QDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
PROPULSION PDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Discuss effects of applying torsional loading to a long straight member Determine stress distribution within the member under torsional.
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
Mechanics of Materials ENGR Lecture 22 Torsion 1
PROPULSION QDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Topics Since Exam 2 Shear and Moment Diagrams Torsion Bending
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Presentation transcript:

STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 1 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah October 28, 2003

OVERVIEW Materials Wing Analysis Tail Boom Sizing C-G Determination Landing Gear

Modulus of Elasticity (ksi) Material Properties Material Density (lb/ft3) Modulus of Elasticity (ksi) Al 2024-T6 178.2 10500 Balsa 5.1 490 Basswood 24.9 1500 Spruce 24.5 1230 Sources: - www.matweb.com - US Dept. of Agriculture

Wing Analysis Procedure Calculated sectional lift coefficient Evaluated sectional wing bending moment Sized I-beam to desired proportions Trade Study Minimize material weight Maximize stress loading capacity Selected most suitable material and thickness

Wing Analysis Actual bending moment at each point along spar Root Bending Moment = 508.5 ft-lbf Actual bending moment at each point along spar Based on lifting line theory

Wing Analysis

Wing Analysis

Wing Analysis 508.5 ft-lbf

Wing Analysis Single spar wing structure selection I-beam Material: BALSA (Ochroma Pyramidale) 12% Height = 0.357 ft = 4.28 in Base = 0.216 ft = 2.59 in Thickness = 0.051 ft = 0.61 in Weight = 11.0 lbf Saftey Factor = 2 (for Sigma) t factor = 2.6 times increase for required thickness

Tail Boom Sizing Cylindrical tubes Availability More efficient than solid rods Used twist and deflection constraints Appropriately sized inner diameters Found corresponding outer diameters

Tail Boom Sizing Equation for Deflection I: moment of inertia (in4) P: estimated maximum aerodynamic load applied to end of boom (lbf) E: modulus of elasticity (ksi) L: length of tail boom (in) d: deflection of end of boom (in)

Tail Boom Sizing Equation for Twist Torsion Constant J f: angle of twist (rad) T: applied torque (ft-lbf) L: length of tail boom G: shear modulus (ksi) J: torsion constant (in4) Torsion Constant J For circular tube: t: thickness (in) r: radius of tube (in)

Tail Boom Sizing Known Constants Twist Deflection T = 15 ft-lbf P = 26.73 lbf L = 5 ft E = 10500 ksi set d = 2 in Twist T = 15 ft-lbf L = 5 ft G = 3920 ksi set f = 5 deg = 0.0873 rad

Tail Boom Sizing Set inner diameter to be 1.6 in Solve for the outer diameter that satisfies both constraints Outer diameter = 1.7 in Thickness = 0.05 in Weight for both booms = 5.04 lbf

Tail Boom Sizing

C.G. LOCATION ESTIMATION This figure shows the approximate weights and C.G. locations of the main components: z x Wing W = 12.04 lb x = 1.55 ft z = 0 ft Avionics Pod W = 20 lb x = -1.44 ft z = - 0.58 ft Tail Section W = 2.3 lb x = 8.23 ft z = 0.075 ft Main Gear W = 3 lb x = 0 ft z = -1.25 ft Tail Booms W = 5.94 lb x = 4.05 ft z = 0 ft Engines, Fuel, Casings W = 12.72 lb x = -0.3 ft z = -0.5 ft Tail Gear W = 0.5 lb x = 8 ft z = -0.21ft NOT TO SCALE

C.G. LOCATION ESTIMATION LIFT z x Total Weight: W = 54.5 lb C.G. Location: x = 0.47 ft, z = -0.38 ft Wing M.A.C.: x = 0.775 ft Static Margin: SM = 10.0% WEIGHT SM = – (xCG – xMAC) / c NOT TO SCALE

TAILDRAGGER LANDING GEAR CONSTRAINTS RAYMER 11.2 3.1 ft Represents C.G. location 0.47 ft Z 0.38 ft X 18.80 deg. (16 - 25 deg) 1.35 ft 1.42 ft 10.04 deg. (10 - 15 deg) 8 ft NOT TO SCALE

WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION ∑MB = 0 ∑MA = 0 FA W = 54.5 lbf FB y = 7.43 ft Center of Gravity FA W = 54.5 lbf FB Main Gear Tail Gear y = 7.43 ft x = 0.70 ft Wy ∑MB = 0  FA = = 49.81 lbf x + y 91% of weight carried by main gear 9% by tail gear FB = Wx x + y ∑MA = 0  = 4.68 lbf NOT TO SCALE

FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS Torsion constraint on spar Geometry of wing ribs Geometric layout of tail Moments and products of inertia

QUESTIONS?