Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

GSEM project SPENVIS/GEANT4 Workshop, Leuven, Belgium, October 2005 Daniel Haas, DPNC Genève Outline Description of GSEM HEP Range Telescope Radiation.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
E166 Collaboration J.C. Sheppard SLAC, October, 2003 E166 Background Test Simulations: Overview-what do we need J. C. Sheppard.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn October 15, 2003.
RF background simulations MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
1 JASMIN Activation Experiments (T-972/993/994) Yoshimi Kasugai on behalf of JASMIN Activation team JASMIN Activation team Y. Kasugai, K. Oishi, H. Matsumura,
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Background from the NIST test The pencil neutron beam (1 mm 2 ) with intensity about 7000 n/sec The beam was completely absorbed in the beam stop with.
HPS Beamline: Background Rates, Sensitivity to Field Uncertainties M. Ungaro1HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLAB, May Concrete Wall thickness Study.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
Chapter 3Atoms and Elements 3.6 Isotopes and Atomic Mass 1  24 Mg 25 Mg 26 Mg Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education, Inc.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
RF background, update on analysis Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Analysis phone conference, October 30, 2007.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
Moving the NPDGamma Experiment to the SNS FnPB Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky overview of NPDGamma transition to the SNS expected.
Mitchell Yu Carol Guimaraes Arturo Fiorentini York University 2013/11/22 NuStorm Near Detector Flux Study.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
CHANDLER Detector Neutronics Modeling Alireza Haghighat William Walters Nuclear Science and Engineering Lab (NSEL) Nuclear Engineering Program, Mechanical.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Radiation Protection RTMR 284 CHAPTER 20 PART II.
The ALICE Cosmic Ray Physics Program
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
Conditions at a potential location of a beam dump experiment at LCLS-II Clive Field, SLAC: 4/29/16.
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Simulations of UAr dark matter detectors shielded by LAr vetoes
LEMMA Test Beam Meeting
Fast Radiation Simulation and Visualized Data Processing Method
GAMOS tutorial Shielding Exercises
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation B
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Polarized WACS Experiment (E ) Using Compact Photon Source (CPS)
SoLID Simulation Zhiwen Zhao 2016/08/27.
Chapter 2 part 1: Basic Chemistry
The NPDGamma Experiment at the SNS FnPB
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Anti-Neutrino Simulations
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
in c-tau factory detector
Atoms and Subatomic Particles Ch 4. Section 2
Monte Carlo simulations for the ODIN shielding at ESS
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Living things consist of atoms of different elements.
Presentation transcript:

Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose Ivan Logashenko Physics Department, Boston University December 12, 2008

Background simulation overview Hits in “sensitive detectors” energy deposition Cerenkov radiation Sensitive detectors: central cells central cell walls light guides muon veto counters human bodies Primary particle incoming neutrons stopped neutrons cosmic muons Simulation is done one particle at a time. Any hits in sensitive detectors are saved in the output file together with the full history of incoming particle.

Overall structure of simulation Beamline simulations Background simulations Sensitivity simulation B- and E-field calculations Storage simulations He3 simulations

Structure of background simulation code Geant4 engine version 4.9.0 patch 2 Analysis script (ROOT) Geometry description Output file Histograms XML-file materials size, shapes positions optical properties sensitive detectors Primary generators and tracking of the particles. G4NDL3.11 cross-section database for low-energy neutrons UCN production is included and used for normalization Hits in the sensitive detectors (energy deposition + Cerenkov photons) Full history of the particle, which caused the hit Loop through the hits and fill histograms Can be used in the sensitivity simulations Independent of the particular geometry

Ground electrodes and SQUIDs Detector geometry (1) Mu-metal shield and aluminum can Magnets and lead shield “Large” veto “Small” veto Ground electrodes and SQUIDs Concrete walls Collimator HV support and central enclosure

Detector geometry (2)

Incoming neutrons generator (1) Neutrons are generated at the collimator window with phase space according to output of beamline simulation (C.Crawford) Energy and angular distribution of incoming neutrons Histogram – beamline simulation, dots – primary generator of background simulation Interactions are switched off

Incoming neutrons generator (2) View from the side View from the top Interactions are switched off ~20 inch

Incoming neutron flux The background rates and absorbed dose depend on the incoming neutron flux – number of incoming neutrons per second The flux in calculated from the number of generated UCNs: from the background simulation, in average, we get 1 UCN (<200 neV) per 0.8 million of incoming neutrons. The UCN production cross-section in simulation agrees with the cross-section, quoted in the Design Report. from the design report, the expected UCN production rate is 0.3 UCN/cm3/sec common volume of measurement cells in simulation is 7.6 liters incoming flux is: 0.3*7600*0.8*106 = 1.8*109 n/sec If the incoming flux changes, the background rates and absorption doses should be adjusted proportionally

Absorbed dose 4 3 2 1 To calculate absorption dose, 4 “humans” are added to the picture: 1 – at the back 2 – right on top of the mu-metal shield 3 – 1.5 meters above the mu-metal shield 4 – in the control room Body elemental composition (by weight): 61% O, 23% C, 10% H, 2.6% N, 2% Ca, 1% P

Dose per 1 hour of the beam Dose per 1 year (107 sec of beam) Dose calculation 30 million incoming neutrons are simulated and the integrated energy deposition in each “human” is calculated. Almost all energy deposition is prompt – the integrated dose after 1 second after neutrons come is ~500 less that the dose during the first second. The dose [rad/sec] is calculated as follows: Energy_deposition[eV] * 1.8e9/3e7 * 1.6e-19[J/ev] / 90[kg] * 100[rad/Sv] Beam flux factor “Human” weight Dose per 1 sec of the beam Dose per 1 hour of the beam Dose per 1 year (107 sec of beam) At the back 0.35*10-6 rad/s 1.2 mrad/h 3.5 rad On top of the mu-metal shield 1.0*10-6 rad/s 3.6 mrad/h 10 rad 1.5 meters above mu-metal shield 0.30*10-6 rad/s 1.0 mrad/h 3 rad In the control room 0.10*10-6 rad/s 0.35 mrad/h 1 rad Statistical error is 10-20% (30-40% for the control room)

Backup slides

Materials Acrylic Aluminum6061 Mu-metal Lead G10 Concrete 60% Carbon + 32% Oxygen + 8% Hydrogen (Deuterium for the front window) Aluminum6061 97% Al + 1.2% Mn + 0.2% Cr + 0.3% Cu + 0.5% Fe + 0.5% Si + 0.2% Zn + 0.1% Ti Mu-metal 80% Nickel + 16% Iron + 4% Molybdenum Lead Pure lead G10 Si O2 C3 H3 Concrete 1% H + 0.1% C + 53% O + 1.6% Na + 0.2% Mg + 3% Al + 34% Si + 1.3% K + 4.4% Ca + 1.4% Fe Natural isotope composition is used for all elements.