CalPERS Background 1,439 School Districts 1 State of California 1,581

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UPDATED FIVE-YEAR FORECAST 1 City Council Meeting -- December 15, 2014 Presented by Brian Cochran, Finance Manager.
Advertisements

1 Understanding Coronado’s CalPERS Rates. 2 Agenda  Basic Concepts  How Rates are Set  What causes rates to rise and fall?  Coronado Rates – historically.
FCERA Board of Retirement and Fresno County Board of Supervisors Joint Meeting – April 30, 2009 Contribution Volatility and Asset Smoothing FCERA Board.
March 26, 2010 Althea A. Schwartz, FSA Consulting Actuary Milliman Inc. Managing DB Pension Plans in Stressful Times.
1 New Hampshire Retirement System Presentation to NHSAA September 25, 2008.
Cal PERS Basics and Pension Reform Cities Association of Santa Clara County May 12, 2011.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Pension Funding Risks & Possible Method Changes Alan Milligan Chief Actuary.
David Lamoureux CalPERS Deputy Chief Actuary
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
The Illinois Pension Problem What is Wrong with Illinois Pensions?
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Report on State Actuarial Valuation Joint Hearing Assembly Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security Committee Senate Public Employment and Retirement.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
1 Statewide Retirement Systems Funding Updates Presentation to the Legislative Commission on Pensions & Retirement Dave Bergstrom, MSRS Executive Director.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
OPEBs: Implementation Issues for Public Power Joni Davis, Manager Financial Accounting and Reporting Omaha Public Power District September 27, 2005.
1 Interpreting Actuarial Information Fritzie Archuleta, ASA MAAA Senior Pension Actuary, CalPERS February 21, 2013.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
CALPERS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS City Council Workshop July 13, 2005.
March 9, 2006www.psers.state.pa.us1 PSERS An Update on the State of the Fund, the Employer Contribution Rate and Pending Legislation.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
UC Retirement System and the Restart of Contributions UCI Financial Expo April 15, 2010.
The Advanced Program in Accounting and Auditing Regulation – Module 28 Pension Funds Richard Berr Director, Valuations and Reporting June 20, 2006 `
California State Employees Retiree Healthcare Benefits GASB 45 Projections December 13, 2007.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
Governmental Accounting and Standards Board Pension Accounting Changes September 10, 2013.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
Regional Transportation District Salaried Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Plan Presented by: Terry Bright January 13, 2015  Foster City, CA  Denver,
1 California Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust Eastern Municipal Water District Annual Update August 19, 2015.
October 11, 2005 PRESENTATION TO THE 1818 SOCIETY The World Bank.
FRAMEWORK FOR CONSIDERING CHANGES IN ACTUARIAL FUNDING METHODOLOGIES Presentation to the FCERA Board of Retirement and the Fresno County Board of Supervisors.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
1818 Society Annual Meeting Pension Plan Performance October 11, 2006
Closing the Pension Funding Gap
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
Opening Remarks Moderator R. Kinney Poynter Executive Director NASACT
* and how does that compare with private sector rules?
League of AZ Cities and Towns PSPRS Pension Task Force August 15, 2014
Who is Actually Paying the Bill? By Brad Heinrichs, FSA, EA, MAAA
Chief Deputy County Executive
TLFFRA Educational Conference
PSRS/PEERS Update October 2017.
League of California Cities Presentation January 20, 2017
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
Discount Rate Discussion
California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
Other Post Employment Benefits
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Moving into the Future 60 Years of Retirement Security.
GASB 75 Employer Reporting Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
How did we get into this mess?
Actuarial Information / Valuations 101
MU Retirees Association Retirement Plan Update March 17, 2018
California Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust
Pension Update Community Meeting April 5, 2018
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Why cities are on the frontline of pension reform
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
Presented by: Director of Finance, Joseph Lillio February 5, 2019
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
CalPERS Update: A Solid Foundation for the Future
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
City of Palos Verdes Estates Pension Overview
Asset Liability Management
CalPERS Update & Discussion
Presentation transcript:

CalPERS Background 1,439 School Districts 1 State of California 1,581 Public Agencies 3,021 Total Employers in Retirement Program 650,000 Receiving Monthly Pension Benefit 1.85 Million Members Source: June 30, 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report * Retirees and beneficiaries and survivors

Our Members

Pensions are a Shared Responsibility Employer Employees CalPERS Pension

Shared Responsibility

annualized return Since 1988 Today: $335 billion in assets 11.20% 8.83% 4.39% 6.60% 8.40% 2016/17 Portfolio Return 5-yr Annualized Return 10-yr Annualized Return 20-yr annualized return annualized return Since 1988

CalPERS Historical Allocation Discount Rate,10yr Rolling Return, and 10yr US Treasury Yield

Factors Driving Funding Risk Plan Demographics Market Conditions Asset and liability ratios Plans are maturing Public employees are living longer Increased cash outflows Current portfolio and market environment includes significant risk of volatility Market valuations and return expectations SCOTT Let’s start with some of the factors that are driving Funding Risks. And as you know these risk factors are not specific to just CalPERS. These risks apply to most pension plans and may also be a risk factor in your plan. Maturity levels are at their highest levels and they are expected to continue to increase. More than 10,000 baby boomers will turn 65 each day, and this pattern will continue through 2030… which totals almost 4 million people a year. Not only are the baby boomers starting to retire in large numbers, retirees are also expected to live longer in retirement, and also receive benefits for a longer period of time. ERIC Another risk factor is what we have seen in the financial markets over the past 10 years. It’s safe to say they have brought volatility and uncertainty to the economy.   The need to look at the funding of pension funds is needed more than ever before, as economists and financial experts believe that over the next five to 10 years the economy will head into a cycle of lower returns. Even recently, while the Dow being up is certainly a good thing, it is not necessarily an indicator of the types of investments that we have at CalPERS. We are invested in stocks, which are represented by the Dow, but we also have investments in bonds, real estate, private equity, and a number of other markets. Having a diverse portfolio like we do keeps the fund safe in times where the stock market isn’t doing as well as it is currently.

Why A Discount Rate Change in December 2016? Market conditions have changed Seeing more uncertainty in the forecast Next 10 years are consequential To close the cash flow funding gap Risks in system continue to grow

Change in Market Conditions 7.5% 7.1% Assumed rate of return

Contribution & Benefit Payments

Approved Discount Rate Phase-In for Public Agencies Required contributions from FY 2018-19 to FY 2020-21 FY 2018-19 ─ 7.375% FY 2019-20 ─ 7.25% FY 2020-21 ─ 7.0%

Timing of Change to Annual Valuations Valuation Date Contribution Rate Change State 6/30/16 17/18 Schools & Public Agencies 18/19 Affiliate Plans

Contribution Increases From Discount Rate Change   Normal Cost UAL Payments Valuation Date FY Impact Misc. Plans Safety Plans 6/30/2016 2018-19 0.25% - 0.75% 0.5% - 1.25% 2% - 3% 6/30/2017 2019-20 0.5% - 1.5% 1.0% - 2.5% 4% - 6% 6/30/2018 2020-21 1.0% - 3.0% 2.0% - 5.0% 10% - 15% 6/30/2019 2021-22 15% - 20% 6/30/2020 2022-23 20% - 25% 6/30/2021 2023-24 25% - 30% 6/30/2022 2024-25 30% - 40%

Asset Liability Management (ALM) Framework Plan Demographics Benefit Structure Market Conditions Actuarial Reports Actuarial Policies: Smoothing/ Amortization Asset Liability Management (ALM) Pension Beliefs Funding & Risk Mitigation Policy Treasury Management Actuarial Assumptions Investment Allocation External Factors Driving Risk External Factors Reducing Risk PEPRA As illustrated in this image, our pension beliefs are at the foundation of our ALM process. They are our guiding principles and standards in our journey to identify and develop risk mitigation strategies. The pension beliefs reflect CalPERS view on the importance of retirement security, defined benefit plans, fiduciary duty, and the need to ensure long-term pension sustainability. The boxes above pension beliefs represent the many ways we examine our assets and liabilities, as well as our economic and actuarial assumption. And to the left and right you’ll notice the external and internal factors that are driving pension risk. Later I’ll talk more about the factors driving risk as this is where we really need to focus our attention and ensure that together we are doing what we can to mitigate those risks.

Stay Informed Through the ALM Process Nov. 2017 Experience Study & Educational Workshop: Candidate Portfolios Dec. 2017 First opportunity for Board to Adopt ALM Changes Feb. 2018 Second Opportunity for Board to Adopt ALM Changes Jan. 2017 Educational Workshop: Public Access Apr. 2017 Educational Workshop: Private Assets Jul. 2018 Implementation of Board Decisions Jun. 2017 Approval of Capital Market & Economic Assumptions Jul. 2017 Fiscal Year Investment Returns Announced & Educational Workshop: Leverage Oct. 2017 CalPERS Educational Forum

Considerations Pension prefunding options for employers CalPERS’ focus: reducing cost & complexity Vested rights cases for county pension systems PEPRA employees will reduce unfunded liability curve Already nearly 30% of all members Stakeholder engagement with Board and executive team

QUESTIONS Thank you for your time today. We hope this information is helpful to your decision making. Now we can open it up for questions….

Definitions Asset Liability Management (ALM) — An integrated look at our assets and liabilities to determine the right mix of investments for our portfolio, specifically designed to achieve a sound and sustainable fund. Done on a rolling 4-year cycle. Discount Rate — Also known as the “assumed rate of return”. It is what we assume our $304 billion in investments will return in a typical fiscal year, July 1 to June 30. Normal Cost — The annual cost of service accrual for the upcoming fiscal year for active employees. The normal cost should be viewed as the long term contribution rate. Risk Mitigation Policy — A mechanism that triggers adjustments to strategic asset allocations and reduces discount rate by a set amount when returns exceed a certain threshold.  Unfunded Liability / Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAL) — When a plan or pool’s Market Value of Assets is less than its Accrued Liability, the difference is the plan or pool’s Unfunded Liability. If the Unfunded Liability is positive, the plan or pool will have to pay contributions exceeding the Normal Cost.