Interaction between sulfur and reactive bromine in clouds

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Advertisements

METO 621 CHEM Lesson 2. The Stratosphere We will now consider the chemistry of the troposphere and stratosphere. There are two reasons why we can separate.
Becky Alexander Rokjin Park, Daniel Jacob, Bob Yantosca 1) Sea-salt emissions 2) Sea-salt/sulfate chemistry  O-isotopes 3) New aerosol thermodynamics.
METO 621 Lesson 21. The Stratosphere We will now consider the chemistry of the troposphere and stratosphere. There are two reasons why we can separate.
Lesson17. Heterogeneous and cloud processes Wide range of physical and chemical of substrate surfaces for heterogeneous reactions to take place. Clouds.
U N I V E R S I T Y O F W A S H I N G T O N S C H O O L O F N U R S I N G Sensitivity of surface O 3 to soil NO x emissions over the U.S. Lyatt Jaeglé.
Second ICAP Workshop Aerosol Modeling using the GISS modelE Sophia Zhang, Dorothy Koch, Susanna Bauer, Reha Cakmur, Ron Miller, Jan Perlwitz Nadine Bell.
Using satellite observations to investigate natural aerosol loading Colette L. Heald David A. Ridley, Kateryna Lapina EGU April 5, 2011.
Wuhu Feng and Martyn Chipperfield
METO 637 Lesson 16.
STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY. TOPICS FOR TODAY 1.Review of stratospheric chemistry 2.Recent trends in stratospheric ozone and forcing 3.How will stratospheric.
1 Motivation 2 Instrumentation and Retrieval 3 CONTRAST Profile Comparison Stratospheric case study 4 TORERO NH/SH gradients 5 Summary and conclusions.
1 Br radicals in the tropical troposphere: a GEOS-Chem perspective Johan Schmidt Harvard University CONTRAST/ATTREX/CAST STM (October 22 nd ) Thanks to:
Tomás Sherwen, Mat Evans, Lucy Carpenter Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, University of York, UK CAST Science team. Rainer Volkamer (c), Theodore.
A missing sink for radicals Jingqiu Mao (Princeton/GFDL) With Songmiao Fan (GFDL), Daniel Jacob (Harvard), Larry Horowitz (GFDL) and Vaishali Naik (GFDL)
NEW PERSPECTIVES ON ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY Daniel J. Jacob with Noelle E. Selin and Christopher D. Holmes Supported by NSF, EPA and Sarah Strode and Lyatt.
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
Modeling and measurements of oxygen isotope tracers of sulfate formation: Implications for the sulfur budget in the marine boundary layer Becky Alexander,
Improving Black Carbon (BC) Aging in GEOS-Chem Based on Aerosol Microphysics: Constraints from HIPPO Observations Cenlin He Advisers: Qinbin Li, Kuo-Nan.
QUESTIONS 1.What molar fraction of HNO 3 do you expect to partition into fog droplets at room temperature? How does this compare to the fraction that would.
The GEOS-CHEM Simulation of Trace Gases over China Li ZHANG and Hong LIAO Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences April 24, 2008.
Gas and Aerosol Partitioning Over the Equatorial Pacific Wenxian Zhang April 21, 2009.
The preservation of long-range transported nitrate in snow at Summit, Greenland Jack Dibb 1, Meredith Hastings 2, Dorothy Fibiger 3*, D. Chen 4, L. Gregory.
Why is the photochemistry in Arctic spring so unique? Jingqiu Mao.
Recent Trend of Stratospheric Water Vapor and Its Impacts Steve Rieck, Ning Shen, Gill-Ran Jeong EAS 6410 Team Project Apr
Aerosol Size-Dependent Impaction Scavenging in Warm, Mixed, and Ice Clouds in the ECHAM5-HAM GCM Betty Croft, and Randall V. Martin – Dalhousie University,
The impact of volcanic aerosols on stratospheric chemistry with implications for geoengineering Simone Tilmes WACCM team, Doug Kinnison,
Model Simulation of tropospheric BrO Xin Yang, J. Pyle and R. Cox Center for Atmospheric Science University of Cambridge 7-9 Oct Frascati, Italy.
Iodine Chemistry And It’s Role In Ozone Depletion PRESENTED BY: Farhana Yasmin.
GLOBAL MODELING OF MERCURY WITH Br AS ATMOSPHERIC OXIDANT Chris D. Holmes and Daniel J. Jacob and funding from EPRI and NSF.
Improved understanding of global tropospheric ozone integrating recent model developments Lu Hu With Daniel Jacob, Xiong Liu, Patrick.
Impact of dimethylsulfide chemistry on sulfate Golam Sarwar, Kathleen Fahey, Kristen Foley, Brett Gantt, Deborah Luecken, Rohit Mathur October 7, 2015.
Oxygen isotope tracers of atmospheric sulfur/oxidant chemistry Becky Alexander Harvard University NOAA Postdoctoral Fellow ACCESS, September 2003.
METO 621 CHEM Lesson 4. Total Ozone Field March 11, 1990 Nimbus 7 TOMS (Hudson et al., 2003)
Effect of BrO Mixing Height to Ozone Depletion Events Sunny Choi.
March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison and S. Walters Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
Marine biogenic emissions, sulfate formation, and climate: Constraints from oxygen isotopes Becky Alexander Harvard University Department of Earth and.
OZONE DEPLETION AT POLAR SUNRISE SOURCES AND MECHANISM OF REACTIVE HALOGEN SPECIES EAS6410 Jide & Rita.
Aerosol 1 st indirect forcing in the coupled CAM-IMPACT model: effects from primary-emitted particulate sulfate and boundary layer nucleation Minghuai.
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
Modal Aerosol Treatment in CAM: Evaluation and Indirect Effect X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, R. Easter (PNNL) J.-F. Lamarque, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, F. Vitt, H. Morrison,
March 9, 2004CCSM AMWG Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison S. Walters and the WACCM group Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
 17 O Sulfate as a Proxy for Paleo Atmospheric Chemistry: Getting it Right at the Poles Becky Alexander Harvard University Telluride Atmospheric Chemistry.
CONSTRAINTS FROM RGM MEASUREMENTS ON GLOBAL MERCURY CHEMISTRY Noelle Eckley Selin 1 Daniel J. Jacob 1, Rokjin J. Park 1, Robert M. Yantosca 1, Sarah Strode,
aerosol size and composition
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
Hannah M. Horowitz Daniel J. Jacob1, Yanxu Zhang1, Theodore S
Atmospheric modelling of the Laki eruption
TOWARDS AN AEROSOL CLIMATOLOGY
The First Global Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon
Snowpack photochemistry - focused on the PAN(Peroxyacetyl Nitrate)
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Electrolysis AQA Chemical Changes 2 Reactions of acids
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
AEROSOLS REDUCE ATMOSPHERIC OXIDATION
70% of the Earth is covered by ocean water!
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM
Stephen Mueller & Jonathan Mallard Tennessee Valley Authority
Oxygen isotope tracers of atmospheric sulfur/oxidant chemistry
Aerosol Optical Thickness
大气圈地球化学及其环境效益.
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
Particle formation and growth
Troposphere-to-Stratosphere Transport of VSLS
New Developments in Heterogeneous Aerosol Processes Affecting NOx and SO2 Randall Martin.
SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF OZONE PRECURSORS FROM GOME
Determination of uptake coefficients ClO radicals with surfaces of sea
University of Alaska Fairbanks
1.5 b Learning Outcomes apply knowledge of oxidation and reduction to explain the rusting of iron give an example of an oxidising and a reducing bleach.
Benchmarking of chemical mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

Interaction between sulfur and reactive bromine in clouds  Qianjie Chen, Johan Schmidt, Viral Shah, Lyatt Jaeglé, Thomas Sherwen and Becky Alexander HOBr + S(IV)  Sulfate + Br- I am Qianjie Chen from University of Washington. First I would like to acknowledge all the coauthors for your contribution to this work and NSF for the funding. In this work, we’ve added one reaction into GEOS-Chem, the oxidation of SO2 by reactive bromine HOBr in cloud droplets, and we found this reaction is very important for both the sulfur and reactive bromine budgets in the troposphere, especially the reactive bromine budgets. My name is Qianjie Chen and I am a graduate student in University of Washington, working with Prof. Becky Alexander. Today I am going to talk about a reaction that is not well-known but potentially very important for tropospheric chemistry. That is the in-cloud oxidation of bisulfite and sulfite by HOBr, one of the reactive bromine species, to produce sulfate and bromide ions. This is the reaction we added into GEOS-Chem. We want to see the impacts on both sulfur and reactive bromine budgets in the troposphere.

Our previous work Δ17O (‰) SO2 SO2· H2O HSO3- SO32- SO42- OH H2O2 O3 O3, HOBr/HOCl gas aerosols HOBr/HOCl clouds This study is motivated by our previous work that measured oxygen isotopes of sulfate in the aerosol samples collected in the remote MBL. We quantified the contribution of each pathway to sulfate formation for those aerosol samples and found that 33-50% of sulfate in the remote MBL is produced from HOBr/HOCl oxidation, which is a large contribution. a large fraction of sulfate in the MBL is produced by HOBr/HOCl oxidation. In that study, we measured oxygen isotopes of sulfate collected from two ship cruises, and calculated that 30-50% of sulfate is produced from HOBr/HOCl. We further calculated the HOBr/HOCl concentration needed to explain the observations, which is on the order of 0.01-0.1 ppt. Then, in this study, we add the HOBr+S(IV) reactions into the model, by assuming a first-order uptake of HOBr onto the cloud droplets. Oxygen isotopes observations indicate 33~50% of sulfate in the remote MBL is produced via HOBr/HOCl oxidation. [Chen et al., ACP, 2016]

HOBr + S(IV)  Sulfate + Br- GEOS-Chem v9-02; 4°x5°; tropospheric sulfur chemistry from Alexander et al. [2012] and bromine chemistry from Schmidt et al. [2016]. 4 90N-60N 60N-30N In Schmidt et al. [2016], tropospheric BrO column was overestimated when sea salt debromination (HOBr+Br-SS+H+Br2) was switched on. In our study, sea salt debromination is switched on, since it is the largest source of Bry. 2 4 30N-Eq. Eq.-30S Tropospheric BrO column (1013 cm-2) 2 So we added this new sulfate formation mechanism into GEOS-Chem. We used V9-02 version, with 4x5 degree resolution. The tropospheric sulfur chemistry is from Alexander et al. (2012), with updates on cloud pH and some bug fixes. The bromine chemistry is from Schmidt et al. (2016), with updates on the alkalinity of sea salt aerosols and bromide recycling on aerosols. In Schmidt et al., the model overestimated the satellite observations of BrO column when sea salt debromination was switched on. So for their standard simulations, they switched off sea salt debromination source, to better match the observations. However, sea salt debromination is the biggest source of Bry in the troposphere. So in our simulations, we always turn it on. 4 30S-60S 60S-90S 2 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Month [Schmidt et al., 2016]

Changes in Bry budget after adding HOBr+S(IV) -20% -40% -60% -80% Let me show you some results. This is the fractional change of tropospheric Bry burden after adding the HOBr+S(IV) reactions in the model. The tropospheric Bry burden decreases by 50% globally. The decrease is larger over the ocean and at higher latitudes, for example about 80% decrease over Southern Ocean. The high-latitude ocean is the place where we have a lot of clouds for the HOBr+S(IV) reactions to occur. It is also the place where bromocarbon decomposition is weak so sea salt debromination is more important. The reaction we add into the model decreases sea salt debromination rates by competing with HOBr+Br-/Cl- reactions and lowering HOBr abundance. It is also the place where sunlight is weaker so that more HOBr was used to recycle HBr in aerosols and cloud droplets before adding the reaction. Tropospheric Bry burden decreases by 50% globally Decrease of Bry is larger at: high-latitude ocean (MBL) Reasons: HOBr+S(IV) decreases sea salt debromination rates by competing with HOBr+Br-/Cl- and lowering HOBr abundance.

Compared with satellite BrO Now we compare our model results with satellite observations for tropospheric BrO column, before and after adding the reaction. Both simulations include sea salt debromination. We can see a big decrease in BrO column, especially at mid latitudes. The decrease at polar regions is due to the decrease at mid latitudes because there is no snow source of Bry in the model. Overall, modeled BrO column underestimates observations after adding the reaction. We anticipate an increase in BrO if we have a coupling iodine-bromine-chlorine chemistry scheme in the future. Polar regions, no snow source. Both include sea salt debromination Adding the snow source could improve the model. Modeled BrO columns underestimate observations after adding HOBr+S(IV). GOME-2 tropospheric BrO from Theys et al. [2011].

Changes in sulfur budget after adding HOBr+S(IV) OH (12030 -- 12010) (32%) SO2 343 -- 338 (Gg S) SO42- 432 -- 460 (Gg S) H2O2 O3 S(IV): SO2H2O HSO3- SO32- O2+Mn(II)/Fe(III) HOBr (0 -- 2200) (8%) Blue: before and Red : after adding HOBr+S(IV) reactions Fraction of sulfate produced from HOBr 50% HOBr accounts for 8% of sulfate production globally. The amount of sulfate produced in gas phase remains unchanged. 40% For the sulfur budget, HOBr accounts for about 8% of sulfate formation globally. This fraction can be very high when HOBr mixing ratio is high. For example, over tropical ocean, the fraction of sulfate produced from HOBr can reach up to 50%. We see the amount of sulfate produced from OH oxidation in the gas phase remains almost unchanged, which is interesting because there should be less SO2 available to be oxidized in the gas phase after adding a new aqueous phase reaction. The reason why it is unchanged is because Bry decreases after adding the reaction so that O3 and OH concentrations increase. An increase in the OH concentration enhances the DMS oxidation so that more SO2 is produced. So, adding the HOBr+S(IV) reactions in the aqueous phase does not necessarily result in a decrease in gas phase SO2 oxidation and new particle formation. We need to consider the impacts of this reaction on Bry and OH budgets, which were not considered before. Where is this reaction more important? We can see a higher fraction of sulfate produced from HOBr oxidation over low latitude ocean where HOBr mixing ratio is high. The fraction is pretty small over high latitude ocean, which is likely due to the underestimate of HOBr abundance over those regions in the model. This global map shows the fraction of sulfate produced from HOBr oxidation. The global sulfate burden increases by 6% from 432 Gg S to 460 Gg S. ----- Meeting Notes (4/27/17 15:54) ----- take home key message colorbar remove HOBr mixing ratio 30% 20% 10%

Ongoing work in collaboration with Tom Breider DMS oxidation cloud droplets new particles OHaq DMSO MSA MSA SO42- O3,aq SO2 OH DMS OH H2SO4 SO2 DMSO OH (low T), BrO OH (high T), NO3, Cl, O3 DMS MSA/nssSO42- (1) Xue-Long 2012 (2) RITS 1993-94 I want to show another aspect of sulfur-halogen interactions in the troposphere, which is the DMS oxidation. I am adding a couple of DMS oxidation pathways into GEOS-Chem, both gas phase and multiphase reactions, including oxidation of DMS by BrO, Cl radicals and O3. DMSO is added as a new tracer in the model. We will use the observations of MSA/nssSO4 ratio as a constraint for the model. In this project, we will add a couple of reactions into GEOS-Chem. DMSO will be added as a chemical tracer in GEOS-Chem, which will undergo transport, deposition and chemical reactions in the model. We will add oxidation of DMS by Cl radical, O3 in both gas and aqueous phase and BrO. We will also add the oxidation of DMSO by OH in both gas and aqueous phase. We can see that these chemical reactions we add will affect the MSA/nssSO4 ratio. So we will use the observations of MSA/nssSO4 ratio as a constraint for the model. We have observations from Xue-Long cruise in 2012 and the RITS cruise in 1993 and 1994. abstraction addition phytoplankton

Conclusions Inclusion of HOBr+S(IV) reactions in the model reduces global tropospheric Bry burden by 50%, initiated by decrease in bromide recycling in cloud droplets. About 8% of sulfate is produced via HOBr oxidation globally. Our model underestimated this HOX+S(IV) pathway due to too low HOBr and the lack of HOCl+S(IV). In-cloud sulfate production via HOBr oxidation does not necessarily result in less gas-phase SO2 oxidation. To conclude, adding the reaction reduces Bry burden by 50%, which is initiated by decrease in bromide recycling in cloud droplets. About 8% of sulfate is produced through HOBr oxidation globally. Our model could have underestimated sulfate production from HOX due to too low HOBr and the lack of HOCl+S(IV) reaction. The in-cloud sulfate production from HOBr oxidation does not necessarily result in less gas-phase SO2 oxidation, due to an increase in OH concentrations. This work is now under review in GRL. [Chen et al., 2017, under review]