Overview of FDA’s Program for Reviewing New Food Contact Substances

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 1938, 1954, 1958 (FFDCA)
Advertisements

Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation Laura L. Hungerford, DVM, MPH, PhD Senior Advisor, Science and Policy, ONADE Professor, University of Maryland School.
Food Advisory Committee Meeting Risk assessments and susceptible life stages and populations December 16, 2014 Rachel Osterman Associate Chief Counsel,
Codex-UK ´Gebrauchsgegenstände´ 3. Juni 2008 / BMGFJ Packaging and Food Safety – A Global Approach DI Dr. tech Johannes Bergmair ofi Packaging Institute.
"Determining the Regulatory Pathway to Market" Classification Heather S. Rosecrans Director, 510(k) Staff Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices.
Good Afternoon, My name is Anna P
History of FDA and Related Regulatory Agencies
Case Study of the Codex Committee on Food Additives Related to Wine Trade Dennis Keefe, Ph.D. Office of Food Additive Safety U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Copyright © Martha Marrapese Partner Keller and Heckman LLP 1001 G St, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC
Introduction to Regulation
FDA’s Policy for Evaluating Bioengineered Foods Jeanette Glover Glew Food and Drug Administration Center For Food Safety and Applied Nutrition September,
Ohio Nano-Summit March 3, 2005 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Norris E. Alderson, Ph.D. Associate.
Regulation of Generic Drugs Office of Generic Drugs Craig Kiester Regulatory Support Branch.
Animal Feed GRAS Notifications Geoffrey K. Wong, M.S. Division of Animal Feeds Center for Veterinary Medicine Pet Food Institute Pet Food Institute October.
Malini M. Wileman, PhD, RAC Animal Biotechnology Interdisciplinary Group Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulation of.
Mrs. Brandi Robinson Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation Center for Veterinary Medicine Regulating Animal Drugs.
Probiotics: Safety Issues Francis B Palumbo, PhD, Esq. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy Center on Drugs & Public Policy.
Dietary Supplements Bradford W. Williams Special Assistant Division of Dietary Supplement Programs ONPLDS, CFSAN, FDA.
CVM’s Procedure for Setting Tolerances
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
The Biocidal Products Directive Presentation to the European Aerosol Federation 28 September 2005 Athens Greece Steve Smith, SC Johnson.
HHS Office of the General Counsel
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 1938, 1954, 1958 (FFDCA) Katie Buhai Period 3.
PRODUCT – PACKAGE INTERATION
Food: What Statistics Say and Don’t Say Food Consumption Tends Food Additives and How They Are Regulated.
Recycled Plastics in Contact with Food: FDA’s Policy Kristina E. Paquette, Ph.D. U.S. FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Office of Premarket.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Regulatory Primer 101 Patrick Kennelly, Chief Food Safety Section California Department of Public Health March 11, 2014.
NS 440 LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IN FOOD PRODUCTION SPRING YOUNTS DAHL, MS PHD INSTRUCTOR Unit 5: Policy Considerations in Food Regulation.
Best Practices: Where Industry Should Lead on Ensuring Proper Testing & Auditing Stephen F. Sundlof, DVM, PhD Senior Advisor for Animal and Food Safety.
Additives and Ingredients Subcommittee Food Advisory Committee The Office of Food Additive Safety George Pauli Associate Director for Science and Policy.
The Regulation of Colors
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Environmental Assessment of Genetically Engineered Animals at CVM (FDA) Animal Biotechnology Interdisciplinary Group Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S.
Janet McDonald, Ph.D., R.D. Regulation of Food & Dietary Supplements.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Toward Closer Cooperation in the New Decade? FDA Issues Martin J. Hahn Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P. NABCA 17.
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
미국의 마약류 관리제도 - FDA 와 NIDA 의 조직 및 업무 현황 의약품평가부 이선희.
Regulation of Generic Animal Drugs in the United States
It’s a food… It’s a drug… It’s AquAdvantage Salmon! Ricardo Carvajal Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C st Annual Tulane.
Carryover and Functional Use Maia M. Jack, Ph.D. Vice President, Science and Regulatory Affairs.
AFLATOXIN REGULATORY ISSUES
GRAS Overview and Industry Perspectives
The Politics of Food Agenda for Thursday April 9
GRAS Overview and Industry Perspectives
Safety of food additives: The regulatory Roadmap
Communication: Safety Summary
Grade A Dairy Equivalence
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
ROUTES TO REGULATORY CLEARANCE FOR NEW INTERVENTION PROCESSES
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
How to Put Together an IDE Application
Government Regulations
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
A “Successful” FDA Submission: Key Components Needed
Safety of food additives: The regulatory Roadmap
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
IND Review Process Seoul National University
All Those Laws and Regulations!!!
Anti-microbial Technologies
Compounded Drugs and Lack of Premarket FDA-Approval
GL18 (R) – Impurities: Residual Solvents in New Veterinary Medicinal Products, Active Substance and Excipients.
Food safety Food safety is defined as protection of consumer from adverse health effects of food under the responsibility and control of legislation.
Presentation transcript:

Overview of FDA’s Program for Reviewing New Food Contact Substances Jessica Cooper, Ph.D. Review Chemist U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) Office of Food Additive Safety (OFAS) Division of Food Contact Notifications (DFCN)

Requires pre-market approval of new uses of food additives. 1958 Food Additives Amendment to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) Requires pre-market approval of new uses of food additives. “any substance the intended use of which results or may reasonably be expected to result, directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component or otherwise affecting the characteristics of any food” “including any substance intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food” Established the standard of safety, the standard of review, and formal rulemaking procedures for food additives.

Standard of safety: Reasonable Certainty of No Harm (Legislative History of the FD&C Act) “The concept of safety used in this legislation involves the question of whether a substance is hazardous to the health of man or animal. Safety requires proof of a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the proposed use of an additive. It does not -- and cannot -- require proof beyond any possible doubt that no harm will result under any conceivable circumstance.” (H.R. Report No. 2284, 85th Congress, 1958.)

Formal rulemaking procedures: petitions and CFR Interested party petitions the agency The petition process is the scientific, administrative, and legal basis for issuing food additive regulations FDA reviews the data submitted and makes a determination of safety Results in a regulation in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR) Regulations are generic and anyone or company in compliance with the conditions outlined in the authorizing regulation may use the additive For example, 21 CFR 175.300 (Resinous and polymeric coatings)

1997 FDA Modernization Act Amendment to FD&C Act to establish a premarket notification process for food contact substances (FCSs) “any substance intended for use as a component of materials used in manufacturing, packing, packaging, transporting, or holding food if such use is not intended to have any technical effect in such food” This notification process is intended to replace the petition process as the primary means for authorizing new uses of food additives that are food contact substances Standard of safety and standard of review are the same for direct food additives and food contact substances

Features of a Food Contact Substance Notification (FCN) 120-Day review period after receipt of a complete submission Listed in our Inventory of Effective Notifications Exclusive for the manufacturer or supplier

The FCN: Demonstrating Human Safety The FCN has the following parts: Identity of Substance Substances, not formulations Intended use (Chemistry review) Exposure information (Chemistry review) Safety Narrative (Toxicology review) An Environmental Assessment or Claim of Categorical Exclusion (Environmental Review).

FCN Chemistry Information Chemistry data is reviewed to establish the identity of a food-contact substance and for assessing potential consumer exposure to the substance. The sponsors or notifiers must provide supporting analytical data. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ucm081818.htm

FCN Chemistry Information Identity Physical/chemical specification Manufacturing Information Impurities Conditions of Use Technical Effect Stability Migration Levels in Food Exposure Estimates What is the FCS? What has the potential to migrate? How much is migrating? How much are we consuming?

Migration Levels in Food Migration data is used by FDA to assess potential consumer exposure to a substance Migration levels in food may be estimated by: Migration Testing Calculation 100% migration assumption Diffusion theory calculation

Typical Migration Testing Accelerated temperature/time conditions intended to simulate thermal processing and extended storage Consistent with the intended conditions of use with respect to use level, food types and temperatures Use of food simulating solvents rather than real foods

Exposure Assessment To estimate probable consumer exposure in terms of concentration (ppb or ppm) of the FCS in the daily diet or Estimated Daily Intake (EDI, mg/person/day) of the substance Combine migration levels determined from migration studies with packaging information on uses of food contact articles that contain the FCS

Packaging Factors Food-type distribution factor (ft) – distribution of packaging use among food types Example: polymer coated metal f(aq) = 0.16 , f(acidic) = 0.35, f(al) = 0.40, f(fatty) = 0.09 Consumption factor (CF) – fraction of the daily diet expected to contact specific packaging materials Example: Metal (polymer coated) 0.17 Metal (uncoated) 0.03

Concentration of FCS and its impurities in the Daily Diet Total migration of the FCS ( <M> ) <M> = Faq (Maq) + Facidic(Macidic) + F alcohol (Malcohol) + Ffatty (Mfatty ) Dietary Concentration (DC) DC = <M> x CF = µg migrant/g food or ppb in the daily diet Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) EDI = 3000 g food/person/day x DC

Exposure Estimate Calculation Example FCS is copolymer intended for use as component in can coatings Food types : aqueous, acidic, and fatty foods Maximum temperature of 121 ºC (250 ºF) (High temperature, heat sterilized or retorted) Possible migrants: FCS oligomers, monomer A, monomer B, Impurity C

Exposure Estimate: Example Migration Testing Test sample: Coating containing FCS Food simulants: 10% ethanol – aqueous and acidic foods, miglyol – fatty foods Test conditions: High temperature, heat sterilized or retort Test samples analyzed for possible migrants

Exposure Estimate: Example For FCS oligomer: <M> = ΣFi (Mi) <M> = Faq(Maq) + Facidic(Macidic) + Mfatty (Mfatty) <M> = (0.16)(500ppb) + (0.35)(500ppb) + (0.09)(600) <M> = 309 ppb Exposure Calculation Migration Testing Chemical Migration 10% Ethanol (µg/g) Miglyol FCS oligomer 500 600 Monomer A 50 60 Monomer B 40 80 Impurity C < 5.0 < 5 DC = CF <M> = 0.05 (309 ppb) = 15.5 ppb = 15.5 µg FCS/g food EDI = DC (3kg/p/d) = 46.5 µg/p/d

Exposure Estimate: Example Chemical Migration 10% Ethanol (µg/g) Miglyol <M> (ppb) DC EDI (µg/p/d) FCS oligomer 500 600 309 15.5 46.5 Monomer A 50 60 31 1.6 4.7 Monomer B 40 27.6 1.4 4.1 Impurity C < 5.0 < 5 <3 <0.2 <0.5

Thank you