Recapture: Purchasing Attendance Credits vs. Detachment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Finance 101 Midland Independent School District December 10, 2008.
Advertisements

Session V – February 26,  Texas ranks second behind California in the number of students enrolled in public schools.  With a 21.6% increase over.
Legislative Update Fall  State faced projected $25 billion shortfall and proposed $10 billion cut to education.  Cut $5.4 billion from public.
LTISD Legislative Priorities 84 th Regular Session, 2015 Session V – February 26, 2015.
Texas Taxpayers and Research Association June 7, Financing Public Education June 7, 2012 Dale Craymer El Paso Chamber.
 Presentation Objective: To provide an easy to understand school finance overview outlining the information necessary for one to draw factual conclusions.
AUSTIN Independent School District Overview AISD Budget Challenges  Unprecedented and permanent state cut to AISD revenue of nearly $50 million net of.
The Texas Tax & Budget Primer Dick Lavine, Eva DeLuna,
Fridley Public Schools ISD #14 Public Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2012.
District Planning And Advisory Committee Budget and Financial Overview Tuesday, May 20, 2014.
BRYSON ISD Public Hearing Budget and Tax Rate Prepared by David Stout.
BRYSON ISD Proposed Budget and Tax Rate Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent.
Lufkin ISD Tax Ratification Election (TRE) Lufkin ISD’s Plan to generate an additional $3,000,000 without a tax rate increase.
BRYSON ISD Adopted Budget and Tax Rate Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent.
LAO The State Education Budget Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented at: CASBO 2011 Annual Conference April 7, 2011.
Savoy ISD Tax Ratification Election (TRE) What is it and why it is needed.
“Educating Today’s and Tomorrow’s Future” “Improving LISD for Today and Tomorrow is an obligation for all citizens” Maintenance and Operations Tax Election.
Texas Impact Advocacy Camp Revenue Background January 13, 2009 Dick Lavine
Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: December 3, 2015 California School Boards Association 0.
School Finance 101 Your Name Your School District Contact Information Date:
School Finance 101 Your name Your school district Date Contact Information.
School Districts III April 7, State Tax Caps Before 2006 Before 2006, the legislature limited the M & O rate to $1.50 per $100 valuation. It capped.
Budget Workshop Date: 02/26/2015 Presenter: Kenneth Huewitt Chief Financial Officer.
Thornton Township High School District 205 Presentation of Final Budget Preparing Today for the Challenges of Tomorrow September
Renewal Levy May 5, Woodridge Local School District Renewal Levy Mills Continues Collection of $5,271,549 Combined Two Emergency Levies That.
WELCOME TO FRANKLIN CENTRAL SCHOOL BUDGET MEETING
Town meeting handout Article 3
Texas School Finance Johnny W. Hill, CPA Asst
Deficits, Surpluses, and the National Debt
RECAPTURE ON MAY 6 BALLOT
The 85th Legislative Session
School Districts III GOVT 2306, Module 11.
Excellence In Education
Discussion Topics Election Results Capital Facilities Financing
Overview of property tax levies for Idaho Schools
What is the most important day of this school year?
(This slide should be on the screen 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting while participants arrive and take their seats at their assigned tables.)
Tax Budget – Putting the puzzle pieces together
School Funding History
Presentation to Plano ISD Key Communicators October 19, 2017
School Districts III April 6, 2017.
Property Tax Reform The League of Oregon Cities is committed to assisting with the passage of legislation that will enhance local decision-making, provide.
Fennville Public Schools
Welcome.
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Long Range Planning Model Finance and Audit Committee
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
How are schools funded since Proposal A
The following presentation is a basic outline for discussing the importance of local decision-making and the threat of state preemption. It is expected.
Pettus Independent School District
Fiscal Policy Notes – AP Macroeconomics
Budget Update nd Interim Assumptions
LEGISLATIVE REVENUE PACKAGE ‘FLASH CARD’ FACTS
Governor's Budget Update
LEGISLATIVE REVENUE PACKAGE ‘FLASH CARD’ FACTS
Five-Year Financial Forecast
Fiscal Policy Notes – AP Macroeconomics
I want to thank you for serving on our School Council
The Big Picture about Kids Texas Center for the Judiciary F
Financing the Future Five-Year Financial Forecast
Issues for Indiana State and Local Governments,
This report was posted on the District’s website on January 31, 2019.
Fiscal and Economic Issues Discussion Group
Town Hall on Budget & Taxes
Woodbridge School District
Public School Finance 101 Greg Cartwright, Chief Financial Officer Allen Independent School District 7:45 – 7:55 Tim Carroll (embedded slides)
Texas School Finance History & Legislative Update April 2, 2019
Thinking forward for communities and schools.
K-W Public Schools Revoke & Replace Operating Levy November 5, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Recapture: Purchasing Attendance Credits vs. Detachment Date: February, 2017 2017-2018 Budget Planning Presenter: Budgeting and Financial Planning

Key Questions What is Recapture? Why are we here? Didn’t we already vote on this? What will the May 6 ballot language say? What is the difference between Purchasing Attendance Credits and Detachment? Which one costs more? What is the budget impact under each scenario? How does the vote impact my taxes?

What is Recapture? Recapture (Robin Hood) legislation was passed in 1993 in an attempt to equalize disparities between property-wealthy and property-poor districts. Under current law, local property taxes recaptured from property-wealthy districts do not actually increase funding for property-poor districts, but instead replace and free-up State general revenue that may be spent for other purposes.

Why are we here? Although noting that the current funding system satisfied minimum constitutional requirements, the recent Texas Supreme Court decision stated our school funding system was Byzantine and undeniably imperfect. HISD property values per student exceed the level set by the Legislature, requiring HISD to equalize its wealth by either Purchasing Attendance Credits or detaching property. Under current law, even a school district with almost 80% economically disadvantaged students and over 30% English language learners, is considered wealthy and is therefore subject to Recapture.

Didn’t we already vote on this? Yes, in November 2016 HISD voters voted AGAINST Proposition 1: on Purchasing Attendance Credits, making HISD subject to Detachment to pay our Recapture obligation. Since then circumstances have changed: action by the Texas Education Agency and other factors have reduced HISD’s current Recapture obligation from about $162 million to about $77 million. This action also decreases future Recapture obligations. In addition, the vote began a conversation among legislators in Austin about changing the state’s school finance system. In light of the changes, the Board of Education called a new election for May 6, 2017, to allow voters to reconsider how HISD will satisfy its Recapture obligation based.

What will the May 6 ballot language say What will the May 6 ballot language say? *Ballot language is mandated by state law* Early voting is April 24 to May 2, 2017 General election will be held Saturday, May 6, 2017

What is the difference between voting FOR or AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits? FOR Purchasing Attendance Credits A vote “FOR” means the District will Purchase Attendance Credits to pay our Recapture obligation. Simply put, HISD will wire funds to the state comprised of local property taxes. AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits (Detachment) A vote “AGAINST” means detaching commercial properties and reassigning to other school districts to pay our Recapture obligation. Simply put, the TEA will take the most valuable buildings on HISD’s tax roll and they will be reassigned to another school district for taxing purposes. **The state gets our local property tax dollars in both scenarios. Both are ways to equalize wealth between districts.**

Which option costs more overall? Detachment A vote FOR Purchasing Attendance Credits: HISD will make Recapture payments to the state, but our total tax collections will continue to grow to offset these payments as property values rise. A vote AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits (Detachment): Commercial properties will be permanently detached from HISD, and the district will permanently lose those tax collections for district operations. In addition the district will lose future tax collections on the detached property used to pay back the district’s debt for building schools. These tax collections are not lost under the Purchase of Attendance Credits. Overall, HISD will lose more money under Detachment.

Why does a vote AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits (Detachment) cost more? Under detachment, HISD loses $73 million in tax collections that are used to pay back debt used to build schools. $73.8 million less in taxes to pay back debt

What is the budget impact of voting FOR Purchasing Attendance Credits? A vote FOR Purchasing Attendance Credits will give the district more capacity in the future to fund schools. Under this option, the district’s budget will fluctuate, but HISD does not project significant budget deficits under this scenario. Between fiscal years 2016 and 2021, the HISD projects budget net total growth of $162 million.

What is the budget impact of voting AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits (Detachment)? A vote AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits (Detachment) means the District has less capacity to fund schools in the future. A vote AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits (Detachment) means the District will face budget cuts. Detachment will cause the district’s budget to fluctuate; tax collection losses will lag the year after property is detached, producing budget volatility. Between fiscal years 2016 and 2021, the HISD projects budget net total growth of $113 million. However, during this time the District also projects the district will need to cut its budget by $86 million in fiscal year 2019.

How does the vote impact the property tax rate in HISD? Under both scenarios, the HISD tax rate may increase to fund the financial needs of the District to keep teacher pay competitive, pay for fixed cost increases, and pay back district bonds. However, a vote AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits (Detachment) would result in a higher tax rate over the next two to three years because the District will have less property to tax.

How will Detachment affect who pays taxes? As more and more commercial properties in HISD are detached, the shared responsibility of funding public education in Houston shifts from a relatively equal responsibility between commercial and residential to more residential.

How will taxes of detached commercial properties be impacted? A vote AGAINST Purchasing Attendance Credits means our highest valued commercial properties will be detached. Residential properties cannot be detached Detached properties will be assigned to a new district and will likely pay a higher tax rate. The Texas Education Agency has decided the first detached properties will be assigned to Aldine ISD. About $8 billion worth of property has been identified for Detachment. HISD has the lowest tax rate among school districts in Harris County. HISD’s total tax rate is $1.2067 Maintenance & Operations (M&O) - $1.0267 Interest & Sinking (I&S) - $0.18 Aldine ISD’s total tax rate is $1.3233880 Maintenance & Operations (M&O) - $1.1333880 Interest & Sinking (I&S) - $0.19

How do you want HISD to pay its Recapture Obligation? *Ballot language is mandated by state law* Early voting is April 24 to May 2, 2017 General election will be held Saturday, May 6, 2017

Thank you Date: February, 2017 2017-2018 Budget Planning Presenter: Budgeting and Financial Planning