EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Automatic prediction of SEP events and the first hours of their proton fluxes with E > 10 MeV and E > 100 MeV Marlon Núñez Universidad de Málaga, Spain.
Advertisements

The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
NMDB Kiel Meeting, 3-5/12/2008 On the possibility to use on-line one-minute NM data of NMDB network and available from Internet satellite CR data for.
Flare Luminosity and the Relation to the Solar Wind and the Current Solar Minimum Conditions Roderick Gray Research Advisor: Dr. Kelly Korreck.
4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,
SEP Acceleration Mechanisms Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof Johns Hopkins U./Applied Physics Lab. ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop Kennebunkport,
+ Hard X-Ray Footpoint Motion and Progressive Hardening in Solar Flares Margot Robinson Mentor: Dr. Angela DesJardins MSU Solar Physics Summer REU, 2010.
COMESEP: Forecasting the Space Weather Impact Norma Crosby 1, Astrid Veronig 2, Eva Robbrecht 3, Bojan Vrsnak 4, Susanne Vennerstrøm 5, Olga Malandraki.
GEANT-4/Spenvis User Meeting November 2006 Solar Energetic Particle Modelling Activities at ESA A.Glover 1, E. Daly 1,A. Hilgers 1, SEPEM Consortium 2.
CISM SEP Modeling Background The major SEP events come from the CME-generated coronal and interplanetary shock(s) These “gradual”events can have a “prompt”
DOPPLER DOPPLER A Space Weather Doppler Imager Mission Concept Exploration Science Objectives What are the most relevant observational signatures of flare,
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
Detecting EUV waves Detecting Dimmings www. SolarDemon.oma.be near real-time, Flare, Dimming, and EUV wave Monitoring E. Kraaikamp 1, C. Verbeeck 1, and.
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
Acoustic Holographic Studies of Solar Active Region Structure A. Malanushenko 1,2, D. Braun 3, S. Kholikov 2, J. Leibacher 2, C. Lindsey 3 (1) Saint Petersburg.
Implementation of Radiation Storm Forecasting with SOHO/COSTEP Bernd Heber 1, Arik Posner 2,3, Oliver Rother 1, and Reinhold Müller-Mellin 1 (1) IEAP,
Solar Energetic Particle Events: An Overview Christina Cohen Caltech.
Decay Phase of Proton and Electron SEP Events E.I. Daibog 1, K. Kecskeméty 2, Yu.I. Logachev 1 1 Skobeltsyn Inst. of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State Univ.,
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
SEP Forecast Product: Data Description Only Arik Posner 1,2 (1) Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX (2) currently at NASA/HQ, SMD-Heliophysics.
- “Level” refers to the long-term irradiance, measured as the significant daily minimum, i.e. without flares or instrumental artefacts. - “Variance” refers.
Comparative data quality assessment for ACE SIS, ACE EPAM, WIND 3DP, SOHO/ERNE, and SOHO EPHIN during selected solar energetic particle events B. Heber.
Computational Model of Energetic Particle Fluxes in the Magnetosphere Computer Systems Yu (Evans) Xiang Mentor: Dr. John Guillory, George Mason.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Ed Stone Symposium February 11, 2006 Voyager Observations of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Heliosheath F.B. M c Donald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C.
1 IGY The ALERT signal of ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays: physics basis, the ways of realization and development Anashin V., Belov A.,
Project: Understanding propagation characteristics of heavy ions to assess the contribution of solar flares to large SEP events Principal Investigator:
1 SEP “Campaign Events” for SHINE 2003 Question: Can we identify solar/interplanetary factors that drive SEP spectral and compositional variability at.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
End-to-End Overview of Hazardous Radiation Len Fisk University of Michigan.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT SIMULATIONS: A PARAMETER STUDY FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF MULTI-SPACECRAFT SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Multi-spacecraft observations of solar energetic electron events during the rising phase of solar cycle 24 W. Droege 1, R. Gomez-Herrero 2, J. Kartavykh.
Approaches to forecasting radiation risk from Solar Energetic Particles Silvia Dalla (1), Mike Marsh (2) & Timo Laitinen (1) (1) University of Central.
1 SEP Timing Studies: An Excruciatingly Brief Review Allan J. Tylka US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC SHINE 2006 Where was the CME when the SEPs.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
The COMESEP Space Weather Alert System Luciano Rodriguez on behalf of the COMESEP Consortium (European Commission FP7 Project )
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz Extraterrestrische Physik Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik Christian Albrechts-Universität.
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, Y. Zheng, L. Mays and A. Wold
B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington,
Solar Demon Near real-time automatic
Scientists demonstrate a new Solar Energetic Particle warning technique using K-COR ground coronagraph data A Heliophysics science publication using ESA/NASA.
George C. Ho1, David Lario1, Robert B. Decker1, Mihir I. Desai2,
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, C. M. S. Cohen, R. A. Mewaldt,
SPAIN'S NATIONAL ASSETS
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
Marlon Núñez and David A. Núñez Universidad de Málaga
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
NASA's Flight Missions, Present to 2020
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Galactic Cosmic Ray Propagation in the 3D Heliosphere
Alexei Struminsky1,2  1 Space Research Institute
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
. Multipoint, galactic cosmic ray observations associated with a series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the case study of June 2015 A. Papaioannou1,
Detection of Solar Neutrons and Protons by the ground level detectors
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
Gradients of Galactic Cosmic Rays: Ulysses KET Results
Solar Energetic Electrons and Radio Emission Signatures
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik
Presentation transcript:

EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz (labrenz@physik.uni-kiel.de) Extraterrestrische Physik Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik Christian Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Leibnizstraße 11, 24118 Tel.: +49-431-880-3975 Near realtime forecasting of MeV protons on the basis of sub relativistic electrons J. Labrenz¹, B. Heber¹, P. Kühl1, C. Sarlanis2, O. Malandraki3, A. Posner4 1 IEAP / CAU Kiel, Extraterrestrische Physik, Kiel, Germany 2 ISNet, Athens, Greece 3 National Observatory of Athens, IAASARS, Athens, Greece 4 NASA Headquarters, Heliophysics, Washington DC, U.S.A. REleASE proton intensity forecast based on ACE/EPAM electron data Abstract A major hazard on human and robotic space exploration activities is the sudden and prompt occurrence of solar energetic ion events. In order to provide up to an hour warning time before these particles arrive at Earth, relativistic electron and below 50 MeV proton data from the Electron Proton Helium Instrument (EPHIN) on SOHO were used to implement the 'Relativistic Electron Alert System for Exploration (REleASE)'. It has been demonstrated that the analysis of relativistic electron time profiles provides a low miss and false alarm rate. High Energy Solar Particle Events foRecastIng and Analysis (HESPERIA) is a project funded within the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (PROTEC-1-2014 Call: Space Weather). Within this project the REleASE forecasting scheme was rewritten in the open access programming language PYTHON and will be made public. As a next step, we have analyzed the possibility to also use, along with relativistic electrons (v > 0.9 c) provided by SOHO, near-relativistic (v <0.8 c) electron measurements from other instruments like the Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (EPAM) aboard the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE). This would prove to be particularly useful during periods that SOHO does not provide continuous near real-time data. We show that the ACE/EPAM observations can be adapted to the REleASE forecasting scheme to provide reliable SEP forecasts. A comparison of measured and forecast proton intensities by SOHO/EPHIN and ACE/EPAM will be presented. In future we will quantify the false alarm rate and detection probability of solar ion events. Electron intesities SOHO/EPHIN vs. ACE/EPAM Figure 6 The left panel shows the same plot as figure 5 but with corrected EPAM data. The EPAM electron intensity was background subtracted, raised to the power of 1.02 to correct for different correlation at higher intensities and divided by ten. This mapped EPAM data can be used as input for REleASE. The right panel shows the comparison of the electron rise parameter. This parameter is the linear slope of the log of the electron intensity. A correlation between of the rise parameter between EPHIN and EPAM can not be seen. REleASE is based on forecast matrices which correlate the electron intensity and the rise parameter with future proton intensities (see figure 7). Because of the much stronger dependence of the forecast on the electron intensity we decided to use the shown EPAM rise parameter and the electron intensity as input for REleASE. + Introduction Figure 4 The main goal REleASE in the framework of the larger HESPERIA project is to analyze the possibility of using REleASE-style forecasting that so far is based on relativistic electron data (v > 0.9 c) provided by SOHO/EPHIN to now work near relativistic electron data provided by ACE/EPAM (v < 0.8 c). EPAM data has a lower time resolution over 5 minutes, while EPHIN's time resolution is one minute. The above figure shows the time profile for year 2014 of electrons measured by EPHIN in black and EPAM in red. The EPAM electron intensity is shifted down by a factor of 100 for reasons of comparison (red on top). One can see that both time profiles show similar behavior. Any increase in EPHIN data shows an increase in EAPM as well. The figure also shows that there is a higher background in EPAM data (10^-1) with respect to the EPHIN data (below 10^-2). Note that the EPAM data is already shifted down by a factor of 100. ~ 30-90 min. Figure 1 Sketches of a Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) event. While traveling along the interplanetary magnetic field lines relativistic and near relativistic electrons arrive at Earth ~30 minutes earlier than than ions below 50 MeV/n. This effect is used by REleASE to forecast proton intensities with near-realtime measurements of relativistic electrons. In reality SEP's may have a longer path from Sun to Earth due to magnetic disturbances and scattering. Posner 2007 found: 1. Relativistic electrons always arrive at 1 AU ahead of non-relativistic SPE ions. 2. Coming from one source with “identical” propagation conditions, significant correlations between electron and proton time-profiles exist. 3. Therefore, a matrix to forecast proton intensities was developed. Posner, A., Up to 1-hour forecasting of radiation hazards from solar energetic ion events with relativistic electrons, Space Weather, Vol. 5, S05001, doi:10.1029/2006SW000268, 2007. Figure 7 REleASE forecast matrix for one proton channel intensity in 60 minutes. The REleASE input (electron intensity y-axis and rise parameter x-axis) are converted to a future proton intensity (output) which is shown color coded. The matrix is based on EPHIN data from year 1998 – 2002 (learning phase). Figure 8 Comparison of forecast proton intensities based on EPHIN (red) and EPAM (green) data with measured proton intensities (black). For the May 2012 SEP event both forecast are in good agreement with the measured proton intensity. Conclusions / future work – The original REleASE software (http://costep2.nascom.nasa.gov/) was rewritten in the open access programming language python. – Near realtime electron data from ACE/EPAM were mapped to SOHO/EPHIN electron data to use them as direct input to the REleASE forecast scheme. – The two new REleASE versions are running on the HESPERIA web server. The forecasts are displayed on the HESPERIA project web page: http://hesperia-space.eu/index.php/results/real-time-prediction-tools/release – The forecasts produced by the new REleASE versions are displayed in one graphic (as seen on the right side) which is refreshed every 5 minutes. – Future plans are to integrate an E-mail alert system, make the data public for download and to deliver a web based plotting tool to display the data for customized time periods. – There is still work to do before the above tasks can be accomplished. False Alarm Rates and the Probability of Detection for SEP events will be updated by using EPHIN and EPAM data from 2008 to 2015. Figure 5 This figure shows a quantitative comparison of the EPAM and EPHIN electron intensity of year 2012. The x-axis shows the EPAM electron intensity and the y-axis the corresponding electron intensity measured by EPHIN. For this comparison the mean EPHIN electron intensity of the 5 minute EPAM measurement interval was taken. The black line represents a ratio of 10 between EPAM and EPHIN data (EPAM 10 times higher). One can nicely see the higher EPAM background, a good correlation for medium intensities and a not so good correlation for higher electron intensities. The conclusion of this figure is that there is a correlation between EPAM and EPHIN data but the EPAM data has to be mapped to the EPHIN data before they can be used as input for the REleASE scheme. Figure 2 One goal of the HESPERIA project is to create a copy of the existing REleASE software in the open access programming language PYTHON and make the new code available to the public. Above one can see the flow chart of the new REleASE forecast scheme as implemented on the HESPERIA web server. The software searches for new near-realtime electron data every minute (step 1). If new data are found, the software downloads and processes the data (step 2 and 3) to provide forecasts of the expected proton intensities (step 4). The forecast results are then displayed on the HESPERIA web page in step 5 (http://hesperia-space.eu/). Figure 3 This figure shows the REleASE proton forecast made by the original software on the x-axis and the rewritten PHYTHON version on the y-axis for a solar particle event in May 2013. This functional test demonstrates as an example that both software codes provide identical forecasts. Acknowledgements This work was done in the frame of the HESPERIA project. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 637324. [Image Ref.: nasa.gov]