To regulate or not to regulate? “Over The Top Services” in Namibia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ITU-T 1 EU Commission Open Workshop – Identifying policy and regulatory issues of Next Generation Networks, Brussels 22 June 2005 Some comments on ITU-T.
Advertisements

Overview of Convergence APT-ITU workshop on the International Telecommunications Regulations Bangkok, 6-8 February 2012 Preetam Maloor, ITU.
Evolution of NGN and NGA scenario in Nepal Nepal Telecommunications Authority.
Saif Bin Ghelaita Director of Technologies & Standards TRA UAE
Botswana Policy Statement at the WSIS+10 Honourable Nonofo E. Molefhi Minister of Transport and Communications.
VoIP - Australian Regulatory Practice and Directions Duncan MacAuslan Task Coordinator - VoIP ITP Training September 2006.
Towards a Connected Continent: How to achieve a European Single Market for Telecommunications? Speeding up NGN ubiquity: a pillar for digital growth Athens,
Regulatory Requirements for Broadband Lebanese Broadband Stakeholders’ Group Workshop TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY AUTHORIT Y (TRA), LEBANON January 2010.
Telecommunication Development Bureau ITU and ICT Development Trieste, 9 February 2004 Hamadoun I. Touré Director BDT.
Connectivity as raw material of Digital Economy 'Challenges for telecoms in the new Internet ecosystem' BEREC-EMERG-REGULATEL-EaPeReg Summit Barcelona,
BITS Pilani Pilani Campus Losses incurred by the TSPs due to shifting from Voice to VoIP AAYUSH GUPTA 2013B3A3652P PRADEEP BANERJEE 2013A3PS274G.
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009 Multimedia Service Delivery on Next Generation Networks Pradeep De Almeida, Group Chief Technology Officer Dialog Telekom.
1 ICT 5: Driving demand - Accelerating adoption: Regulator’s role Daniel Rosenne Chairman, Tadiran Telecom Communications Services, Israel October 7 th,
Iמשרד התקשורת Israel Ministry of Communications Internet (over-the-top) services and challenges to regulation Adi Cahan-Gonen Senior Professional Advisor.
Network Convergence Policy in China July Introduction In China, the regulation and development of telecom/internet networks and broadcasting networks.
6. Next Generation Networks A. Transition to NGN B
IP Telephony Regulation in Korea Information & Communication Policies for the Digital Economy Korea Information Strategy Development Institute Chong-Hoon.
International Telecommunication Union Committed to Connecting the World The World in 2009: ICT Facts and Figures Jaroslaw K. PONDER Strategy and Policy.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Welcome and Overview July  Welcome to CANTO  Update on Digicel’s broadband projects  Broadband investment and the impact of OTTs  Legal.
MOBILE VALUE ADDED SERVICES (MVAS). BASIC DEFINITION OF MVAS : VALUE ADDED SERVICES (VAS) in telecom industry refer to non-core services, the core or.
Net Neutrality The debate in the US and in the EU Balázs BARTÓKI-GÖN CZY.
March 2004Richard Stastny1 IP Communications in Europe Implications of Regulation Richard Stastny, ÖFEG* * The opinions expressed here may or may not be.
The Digital Revolution and The Global E-Marketplace Chapter 25 Matakuliah: J0474 International Marketing Tahun: 2009.
2011 East African Internet Governance Forum (EA – IGF) Rwanda Cyber briefing: Positive steps and challenges Didier Nkurikiyimfura IT Security Division.
© 2007 Independent Communications Authority of South Africa All Rights Reserved 1 “ Competitive Platforms for the Delivery of Digital Content” EBU
Evolution towards the Next Generation Network
1 GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications ISACC Opening Plenary Presentation GSC-11 SOURCE:ISACC TITLE:ISACC Opening Plenary Presentation.
Overview of Network Neutrality Kyle D. Dixon Senior Fellow & Director, Federal Institute for Regulatory Law & Economics The Progress & Freedom Foundation.
TDSAT INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION October 2004 New Delhi, India Susan Schorr, Regulatory Officer Telecommunication Development Bureau.
Internet Protocol TeleVision
GSC Global Standards Collaboration GSC August – 2 September 2005 Sophia Antipolis, France August 28 – September 2, ISACC Opening Plenary Presentation.
Providing Seamless Connectivity in E-commerce
1 TINF 2010 Tuesday 30 November 2010 Present and Future Regulation of Electronic Communications Vesa Terävä European Commission Information Society & Media.
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
Donnie DeFreitas Eastern Caribbean Telecommunications Authority (ECTEL) October 29 th 2008.
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Copyright © 2006 Heathkit Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Presentation 1 – Introduction to VoIP.
Stakeholders Forum on QoS and Consumer Experience (Nairobi, Kenya, 23 to 25 November 2015) Role of Global & Regional Communities, Policy Makers, Regulators.
Center for Information and Communication Technologies Technical University of Denmark IP migration’s implication for the concept of Universal Service and.
Constructing An Effective Statutory & Regulatory Framework for Broadband Networks Phoenix Center Symposium December 1, 2005 Disclaimer: Views presented.
Differential pricing of Data Services Akhilesh Kumar Trivedi Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, India.
Economic impact of Over-the-Top (OTT) services. SG-3 has committed to a work item on the economic impact of over-the- top (OTT) services. The resultant.
t What is VoIP? t How this technology is changing business model in telecom industry?  How this theme has been discussed in the world ? t What are the.
MCCAA Conference Friday 14 th March 2014 New measures on the EU single market for telecoms Grace Attard, ACR, EESC Pauline Azzopardi, ACR.
Business Data Communications Arunabha Mukhopadhayay.
Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications and Postal Services Costs to Communicate September 2016.
Managing the (Traffic) Managers
Net Neutrality: WhaT YOU NEED TO KNOW
MISY 3312: Introduction to Telecommunications Summer 2012 VoIP
Transformation of Telecom Business in the new World of Data
ENUM/Convergence Workshop
RIGHT ON PRIVACY IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Over The Top (OTT) Services: CTO Study to understand the Dynamics & Opportunities Shola Taylor Secretary General, CTO.
Online platforms Brussels, September 2016.
Emerging ICT needs – a Practitioners Perspective
E-COMMERCE Learning Unit 8: Electronic Commerce Strategy
How ICT Regulation Creates a Framework to Enhance Economic Development
ITU an Overview Combined International SNO and 8th African SNO
Internet Interconnection
A. Sethuraman Executive Director Huawei Telecommunications India
IP and NGN Projects in ITU-T Jean-Yves Cochennec France Telecom SG13 Vice Chair Workshop on Satellites in IP and Multimedia - Geneva, 9-11 December 2002.
Good Morning 1/17/2019.
Presentation on Legislative Framework & Licensing
Didier Chauveau ETSI OCG ECN&S Chairman ETSI Board Vice Chairman
WCIT12 Update Planning & International Relations Department
Innovation Dynamics in the IP Environment
Modernising Regulatory Frameworks
Net Neutrality: a guide
Collaborative regulation in the digital economy
Presentation transcript:

To regulate or not to regulate? “Over The Top Services” in Namibia Emilia Nghikembua Head Legal Advice ICT Summit, 10 October 2016

Introduction The internet was recognised as an evolutionary innovation with potential to disrupt the traditional wat of transporting information. ITU adopted the definition of “Converged Next Generation Networks”. Enables unfetted access for users to networks and to competing service providers and/or services of their choice; and Supports generalised mobility which will allow consistent provision of services to users. (ITU,2001) NGN led to a converged ICT ecosystem in which all services are provided over a technologically neutral broadband internet network.

What are OTT’s? No legal definition An OTT provider can be defined as: a service provider offering ICT services but neither operates a network nor leases network capacity from a network operator. Instead, OTT providers rely on: the global internet and access network speeds to reach the user; hence going “over-the-top” of a telecom service provider’s (TSP’s) network

OTT riding “over the top” of the Network Operator Source TRAI, 2015

Factors leading to OTT Growth Source: Sujata,2015

Characteristics OTT’s utilise technologies that: Use Internet Protocols packet-switched connections Have traditionally been carried over the dedicated circuit-switched connections of the PSTN Services provided under the OTT umbrella: -Typically relate to media and communications - Generally free or lower in cost as compared to traditional methods of delivery.

Types of OTT’s The best known examples of OTT are Skype, Viber, WhatsApp, Chat On, Snapchat, Instagram, Kik, Google Talk, Hike, Line, WeChat, Tango, ecommerce sites (Amazon, Flipkart etc.),Ola, Facebook messenger, Black Berry Messenger, iMessage, online video games and movies (Netflix, Pandora). Source: https://www.google.com.na/search?q=ott+images&biw

What is the problem really ?

Regulatory Imbalances Source Detecon, 2014

Regulatory Imbalances Source:ITU,2015

Regulatory Imbalances Source: ITU,2015

Regulatory Imbalances Source: ITU,2015

Net Neutrality Eliminates any type of discrimination in transmission and access of content. Consumers will access content, applications and services: At same service quality , internet speed and price No priority or degradation based on content, application or service No laws or regulations to enforce Internet remains unrestricted!

Regulatory Reforms India United States of America Voice calling rates are low, mobile penetration is low at 20%, QoS of OTT services is lower suitable regulatory framework to define the basis for classification of OTT players United States of America Regulates VOIP (portability, calling records, universal service) Internet reclassified as a telecommunications services (FCC has the powers to regulate OTT players)

BUT does not include the internet – hence no OTT! Namibia Communications Act regulates the provision of telecommunications services by issuing the following class licences: Electronic communications network service Electronic communications service BUT does not include the internet – hence no OTT!

Response Strategies Source: Detecon,2014

Recommendations Should the OTT players offering communication services through applications be brought under the licensing regime? Is the growth of OTT impacting the traditional revenue stream of TSP’s ? Should the OTT players pay for the use of the TSP’s network over and above data charges paid by consumers?

Are there any imbalances in the regulatory environment and what should be the framework to address these issues? How should the security concerns be addressed with regard to OTT players providing communication services? What are should be our views on net-neutrality in the Namibia context?

Consider the implementation of cybersecurity and data protection laws Consider content regulations

OTT products and services: Conclusion OTT products and services: are a natural evolutionary consequence of the explosive growth of the internet; Modern innovations that take advantage of converged broadband networks ; and Are an integral part of the ICT ecosystem Therefore, regulators must enact frameworks that support the business cases of all the players in the ecosystem in order to achieve digitised economies!

Thank you