European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ionosphere Scintillation and Earthquakes
Advertisements

Seismology Forum Meeting 2014:
Mmax and the Maximum Catalog Magnitude Martin Chapman Department of Geosciences Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA Mmax Workshop Golden, Colorado.
DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND PROPERTIES OF THE Dst INDEX R.L. McPherron Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles.
On dependence of seismic activity on the 11 year variations in solar activity and/or cosmic rays Zhumabek Zhantayev, Galina Khachikyan, Nikolay Breusov.
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Identification and Analysis of Magnetic Substorms Patricia Gavin 1, Sandra Brogl 1, Ramon Lopez 2, Hamid Rassoul 1 1. Florida Institute of Technology,
Acceleration – Magnitude The Analysis of Accelerograms for the Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures.
A magnitude 7.3 earthquake occurred to the east of Kathmandu, in an area close to Mount Everest. This large earthquake is the largest aftershock so far.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , EARTHQUAKE.
European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2006 Vienna, Austria, 02 – 07 April 2006 Paper’s objectives: 1. Contribute to the validation of MODIS aerosol.
Earthquake spatial distribution: the correlation dimension (AGU2006 Fall, NG43B-1158) Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of.
03/09/2007 Earthquake of the Week
Abstract The non-dipolar portions of Earth's main magnetic field constitute substantial differences between the geomagnetic field configurations of both.
Geomagnetic field Inclination
Magnitude verses Intensity!
Earthquakes.
V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.
Earthquakes Susan Bilek Associate Professor of Geophysics New Mexico Tech How to figure out the who, what, where, why… (or the location, size, type)
Earthquakes.
2/13/15 Bell Ringer (L32) How are mid-ocean trenches formed?
Model of the D-layer disturbances related to natural disasters. Alexey I. Laptukhov, Valery M. Sorokin, and Alexey K. Yaschenko PUSHKOV INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL.
Southern Taiwan University Department of Electrical engineering
Web.ics.purdue.edu/~braile Online Searches
Inside Earth Chapter 2 Earthquakes 2.2 Earthquakes and Seismic Waves.
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
Toward urgent forecasting of aftershock hazard: Simultaneous estimation of b-value of the Gutenberg-Richter ’ s law of the magnitude frequency and changing.
Europlanet Graz, 1-2 June Gerald Duma Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics Vienna, Austria AN ELECTROMAGNETIC PROCESS REGULATES EARTHQUAKE.
Bucharest, May Gerald Duma Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics Vienna, Austria GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS AND EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
Objective Data  The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid.  Data from the NASA Langley Research Center.
Chapter 4: Earth and Moon. From the Earth, Venus appears as a white planet in the evening sky or the morning sky. From Mars, the Earth might appear as.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract We.
Scatter Diagrams scatter plot scatter diagram A scatter plot is a graph that may be used to represent the relationship between two variables. Also referred.
Random Matter Density Perturbations and LMA N. Reggiani Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - Campinas SP Brazil M.
How do scientists know the structure of the Earth? Rock samples (direct evidence) Seismic waves (indirect evidence) –Vibrations that travel through Earth.
ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation.
Interannual to decadal variability of circulation in the northern Japan/East Sea, Dmitry Stepanov 1, Victoriia Stepanova 1 and Anatoly Gusev.
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
Abstract Session SM1.1 At present, there is a great debate over whether or not we are in a global cluster of large earthquakes, temporarily.
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
Abstract The space-time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a stochastic process in which seismicity is classified into background and clustering.
January 24, Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Lecture 2. Plate Tectonics January 24, 2008 John G. Anderson Professor of Geophysics.
EARTHQUAKES cont’d …. September 19 and 20th
A.Liudchik, V.Pakatashkin, S.Umreika, S.Barodka
Elementary Statistics
Mentor: Dr. Jinchun Yuan
European Geosciences Union, General Assembly 2016
A snapshot of the 3D magnetic field structure simulated with the Glatzmaier-Roberts geodynamo model. Magnetic field lines are blue where the field is directed.
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic.
Investigating Relationships
2-7 Curve Fitting with Linear Models Holt Algebra 2.
2.6 Draw Scatter Plots and Best-Fitting Lines
1.3 Modeling with Linear Functions Exploration 1 & 2
Global Map Skills Second Grade Common Assessment
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
Ch Earthquakes Earthquakes are caused gigantic fractures in the Earth’s crust, which produce ground vibrations. The pressure (force/area) acting.
The Sun The interior of the sun has three layers:
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Earthquakes! OBJECTIVES Differentiate between Focus & Epicenter
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
Earth Science Notes Earthquakes.
Unit 5: Plate Tectonics Part 2: Tectonic Plates.
Evaluation of IRI-2012 by comparison with JASON-1 TEC and incoherent scatter radar observations during the solar minimum period Eun-Young Ji,
Chapter 5.2 Earthquakes and seismic waves
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
QUIZ – Earthquakes! REVIEW
Presentation transcript:

European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic field Khachikyan G., Zhumabayev B., Toyshiev N., Kairatkyzy D., Seraliyev A., Khassanov E. Institute of Ionosphere Almaty, Kazakhstan e-mail: (galina.khachikyan@gmail.com) Abstract EGU2017-7350 Session SM1.1 General Contribution on Earthquake Figure 5 shows that ZGSM values are more strong in equatorial eastern hemisphere (5b) in comparison with the western hemisphere (5a). This may be a reason of the most strong seismicity at the globe namely in the eastern hemisphere (region of Sumatra, for example). Also, Figure 5 gives a hint that a maximal possible earthquake magnitude Mmax at any seismic region had to vary with time and season because ZGSM shows such variations. Conclusion. It is possible to estimate maximal possible earthquake magnitude (Mmax) for any seismic region on the base of maximal possible geomagnetic ZGSM component. This allows one to carry out global seismic zoning (in first approximation) on the base of the main geomagnetic field data. Empirical relations between Mmax and {log[abs(ZGSM)]} may be used for prediction of earthquake magnitude if the place and time of future earthquake are already predicted. References [1] Khachikyan G., Inchin A., Lozbin A. Spatial distribution of seismicity: relationships with geomagnetic Z-component in geocentric solar magnetospheric coordinate system. International Journal of Geosciences. 2012. – V.3. – № 5. – P. 1084-1088. [2] Global NEIC catalog for 1973-2011. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/epic/epic_global.html [3] Tsyganenko N. A. Geopack: A Set of Fortran Subroutines for Computations of the Geomagnetic Field in the Earth’s Magnetosphere,” 2008. http://geo.phys.spbu.ru/~tsyganenko/Geopack-2008.html. [4] The International Geomagnetic Reference Field model. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vmod/igrf.html Introduction. Seismic zoning is among the most complicated and extremely important problems of modern seismology. In solving this problem, a very important parameter is the maximal possible earthquake magnitude (Mmax) which is believed at present depends on horizontal size of geoblocks. In addition to this opinion, it was found in [1] that Mmax value in any seismic region may be determined using ZGSM value that is geomagnetic Z-component estimated in geocentric solar-magnetosphere coordinate system (GSM). In that paper, an empirical relation between ZGSM and Mmax was obtained for the case of the whole planet. In this report we present empirical relations for some local regions with different types of tectonics.   Data Data on earthquakes with М ≥ 4.5 occurred at the globe in 1973-2011 were taken from the global NEIC catalog [1]. For the each of the epicenters, the value of the geomagnetic Z component in Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric) coordinate system (ZGSM) was calculated with using the FORTRAN subroutines Geopack- 2008 [3] and the International Geomagnetic Reference Field model (IGRF-10) [4]. Results  Figure 1 presents the result from [2] that is a scatter plot of the magnitude of earthquakes occurred at the globe in 1973-2010yrs versus {log[abs(ZGSM)]} in epicenter. Black lines show an envelope of maximal magnitude in sequential bins of 0.15 size, and a red solid line is the linear fit to envelope. Approximation relation between {log[abs(ZGSM)]} and maximal magnitude (fit to envelope) is shown in the capture to Figure 1. Investigations in more details showed that the coefficients of the regression equation are different for regions with different type of tectonics (Figures 2-4). Comparison of figures 2-4 shows that the most prominent correlation between {log[abs(ZGSM)]} and Mmax with correlation coefficient R=0.97 takes place in the region of the strongest seismicity at the globe in the eastern hemisphere (Figure 4). Discussion  The relationship between the intensity of the main geomagnetic field and released seismic energy is expectable, because both the main geomagnetic field and the tectonic activity of the planet are related somehow to the same source - the convection in the Earth’s liquid core. The relationship between earthquake magnitude and geomagnetic Z - component estimated namely in geocentric solar magnetosphere coordinate system (GSM), in which the interaction of the solar wind magnetic field with the geomagnetic field is better ordered, evidently points on the external (triggering) earthquake occurrence in the extremely stressed rock media. Interestingly, the value of geomagnetic ZGSM component for geographical region varies rather strongly with time and seasons. Figure 5 presents, for example, diurnal ZGSM variations for different months at the geographic equator but for two longitudes: 90˚W and 90˚E (5a, 5b, respectively). Figure 1. A scatter plot of the magnitude of earthquakes with M≥4.5 occurred at the globe in 1973-2010yrs. Black solid line is an envelope of maximal magnitude in sequential bins of 0.15 size, and a red solid line is the linear fit to envelope as follows: Mmax=(5,22±0,17)+(0,78±0,06){log[abs(ZGSM)]}, with correlation coefficient R=0.91, standard deviation SD=0.56, and probability 95% [1]. Figure 2. The same as in Figure 1 only for the local region of the San Andreas Fault, defined by the coordinates 300N-450N, 1050W -1350W. The linear fit to the envelope is as follows (red line): Mmax = (4,04 ± 0.38) + (0.7 ± 0.13) log[abs(ZGSM)], with correlation coefficient R=0.91, SD=0.34, and p = 95%. Figure 5. The diurnal variations of geomagnetic ZGSM – component for different months at earth’s surface at latitude 00, longitudes 900W and 900E (a, b, respectively) for 2005 year [1]. Figure 3. The same as in Figure 1 only for the local region of inland seismicity in Eurasia defined by the coordinates 300N-450N, 00 -1100E. The linear fit to the envelope is as follows (red line): Mmax = (12.44 ± 0.48) + (1,15 ± 0.2) log[abs(ZGSM)], with R = 0.87, SD = 0.98, p = 95%. Figure 4. The same as in Figure 1 only for the territory of the strongest seismicity in the world defined by the coordinates 200S-200N, 900E-1500E. The linear fit to the envelope is as follows (red line): Mmax = (- 17.5 ± 1.5) + (5.7 ±0.4) log[abs(ZGSM)] with R = 0.97, SD = 0.4, p= 95%.