Strategies For Making Assessment Meaningful and Manageable

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Measurable Annual IEP Goals
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Three: Developing Standards-based Measurable Annual Goals Standards-based IEP State-Directed.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Nettie’s Nickel 4 Comprehensive AT Report Writing 2 Support a District’s Offer of FAPE Nettie Fischer, ATP July 22, 2014.
Creating Collaborative Standards-Based IEPs: A Training for IEP Team Members Session Three.
TEKS BASED IEPs PLAAFPS GOALS & OBJECTIVES
IEP DEVELOPMENT STAFF DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 14, 2008 PATRICIA GRIFFIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION/PPS.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
11 th Grade Michigan Merit Examination 2010 compared to 2012.
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development
WRITING A COMPREHENSIVE REPORT IN SPECIAL EDUCATION
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
Distinguishing Language Acquisition From Learning Disabilities April 24, 2014.
Assessment for ASD Programming November 2012IDEA Partnership1.
Get To Know Your Neighbors Let’s Play HUDDLE! 1. November ESE Meeting Chapter 4 – IEP – ESE Reminders – Reviewing Present Levels – Accommodations and.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
PRESENT LEVELS OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE PLAAFP.
The Nuts & Bolts in developing an Eligibility IEP Charter School Institute.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Fall 2014.
Clinical Documents Diagnostic Reports. Purposes To indicate whether or not a person needs therapy To support that recommendation with all necessary data.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Sarah Cordett, M.A. CE240 - Young Children with Special Needs: Unit 3.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
NEW Oregon IEP: Identifying Changes and Useful Tools Laura Petschauer November 13, 2015.
Post Secondary Transition CANAR, NOVEMBER 12, 2015.
+ PPBOCES Leadership Team: Corridor Training October 2015 Digging Deeper into evaluation, eligibility and IEP Development IEP: Present Levels IEP: Service.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
October 12, 2015 Measurable Annual Goals. October 12, 2015 Outcomes for Measurable Annual Goals Training Purpose of Measurable Goal Training IDEA Regulation.
1 IEP Case Study: PLEPs, PLOPs, PLAFPs, and IEPs Week 7 and 8 (Combined)
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
More Guidance on PLAAFP and Goals
Reporting Assessment Information (Assessment Report/ITP)
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
CD1: Principles and Philosophies of Education
American Institutes for Research
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Clinical Documents Progress Reports.
Writing Effective IEPs
IFSP and Functional Outcome and Goal Development
EL (English Language) Students and WIDA Standards
Engaging Families in the Assessment Process
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
Learning Prompt- How do you think tonight’s readings connect to the next steps in our assessment process?
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Learning Prompt- How do you think tonight’s readings connect to the next steps in our assessment process?
Special Education Process
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP)
Student Needs Assessment Committee
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Early Childhood Special Education
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student Progress SBIEP Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student.
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Curriculum and Assessment
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

Strategies For Making Assessment Meaningful and Manageable Andrea M. Capizzi, Ph.D. M. Alexandra Da Fonte, Ph.D. Vanderbilt University CEC Convention 2017

Agenda Purpose of assessment Importance of quality assessment Effective assessment reports Assessment and instruction

Goal of assessments Eligibility Identification of student’s strengths and areas of needs Guide instruction

Why do we need quality assessment? IEP teams must consider recent student evaluation when developing an IEP (IDEA, 2006) Assessment results should act as baseline information against which progress toward goals should be measured Allows IEP development and instructional decision- making based on documented student strengths and needs (Bateman & Herr, 2006; Etscheidt, 2003; Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2002)

What makes meaningful assessment challenging? Teachers often struggle with using and interpreting assessment results to guide their instruction Full assessment reports are thorough, contain information related to past and current assessment results, summarize findings, create a picture of student strengths and weaknesses, and make recommendations related to classroom, school, and home. (Cohen & Spenciner, 2007, Hood & Johnson, 2002; Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2002) But – many teachers don’t have skills in conducting comprehensive assessment

How can assessment be streamlined and made more meaningful? Comprehensively evaluate student needs Provide instruction that is tied to and driven by identified student needs Use ongoing assessment to evaluate and monitor student progress Evaluate, modify, and plan instruction accordingly Follow a systematic process: assessment → instruction

Keys to conducting comprehensive assessment Observations Identify areas to evaluate and select appropriate tools (e.g., academic, behavior, communicate, motor, sensory) Conduct assessment and write report (Identify strengths and areas of needs) Plan for instruction Know student’s limits when conducting assessment – you can’t just plow through Share observation forms

Observations Multiple settings, contexts, times of the day, etc. Should guide your selection of areas to measure Consider: Environment Adaptations Behavior management strategies Academic functioning Communication skills Social interactions Transitions Motor skills Know student’s limits when conducting assessment – you can’t just plow through Share observation forms

Identify areas to evaluate and tools to use Social skills & Behavior Math Reading Writing Language & Communication Sensory Skills Social skills Conceptual or functional academic skills Independent living skills Communication skills Sensory skills Personal care skills Employment or work skills Severe Disabilities High Incidence Know student’s limits when conducting assessment – you can’t just plow through Share observation forms

Conduct assessment and write report Components of a comprehensive assessment report Identifying data Background information (educational, medical, family) Previous testing and evaluation Classroom observation Current assessment Assessment results Summary/ conclusions  Recommendations  

Identifying data Name Parents’ Names Age at time of testing Teacher Gender Date of Birth Grade School Parents’ Names Teacher Referred by Dates of testing Examiner(s) Date of Report

Background information “sets the stage” for the rest of the report. Family History: tells a little bit about student’s family/living arrangements Developmental/Medical History: gives relevant history related to milestones and health Educational History: provides information about past academic experiences, grades, performance. This section should how a pattern of academic performance and should also detail any inconsistencies in the student’s school history. Social History: gives information related to the student’s social functioning. This may include the student’s involvement with peers, and participation in sports and organizations. Summary of Previous Testing/Evaluation: provides an overview of past assessments and results

3. Classroom observations Summary of observations of the student in the classroom or other school settings Focus on needs and strengths

4. Current assessment List tools used Provide rational for and brief description of each These should be appropriate for the student as well as the examiner

5. Assessment results Behavioral observations of the student’s behavior during testing List test scores in a table Organize by test and by content area Statement of any limitations of the scores or any concerns that the scores don’t adequately represent a student’s true skills

6. Summary/ conclusions     This is one of the most important parts of the report Interpret the results by identifying relationships across assessment tools Helpful to tie to past assessments if possible Summarize student’s strengths and deficits in skills

7. Recommendations To the school, teacher, parent Suggest goals that meet stated deficits Often helpful to number these or put in bullet format Identify an ongoing assessment plan to monitor student progress

Assessment-Based IEPs IEPs should be developed based on current assessment data Present Levels statements should drive Annual Goals, which should, in turn, drive Short Term Objectives

Graphic Organizer to guide development of PLAAFPs, Annual Goals, STOs (Capizzi, 2008)

Present levels of performance: IEP Provides a ”snapshot” of the student’s performance at the time the IEP is written Provides a baseline against which you can evaluate progress State skills positively Include normative scores, percentiles, behavioral data, specific skills etc. (Capizzi, 2008; deBettencourt & Howard, 2007)

IEP: Annual Goals Should come from needs identified through annual assessment At least one goal for each area of need noted in the Present Levels Statements Should project a realistic level of progress in a year Essential Components: Specific description of the skill Method of measuring the skill Criterion against which progress will be measures

IEP: Objectives/Benchmarks Allows measurement of progress toward annual goals These are the “stairsteps” toward reaching the annual goal Need to be written in a measurable way so that that assessment throughout the year allows progress monitoring No longer required but many states still require them

Instruction Should be designed to meet student needs Focus on IEP objectives while also addressing grade- level objectives Objectives for each day’s instruction should be assessed

Progress monitoring Ongoing progress monitoring of progress toward annual goals Efficiency can be increased by building daily instructional objectives that, when assessed, provide data toward progress monitoring

Wrap-up Goal: Writing effective and useful reports Identification of student’s strengths and areas of needs Guide instruction Writing effective and useful reports Write in a simple style Write as single space Write in the third person Avoid reports longer than 5 pages Be objective. Explain and describe the data Use sections headings Use complete sentences: “tell a story” Avoid using technical terms/jargon

Q&A