Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Advertisements

Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements:
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
PS Booster Studies with High Intensity Beams Magdalena Kowalska supervised by Elena Benedetto Space Charge Collaboration Meeting May 2014.
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon, Matthew Wing 28 th January 2015.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
FNAL, May 10, Introduction for Beam Diagnostics Laboratory Main Mission: R&D on charged particle beam diagnostics for e + /e - linear colliders.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
REQUIREMENTS FOR FCC DILUTION KICKERS AND BEAM DUMP LINE GEOMETRY F. Burkart, W. Bartmann, M. Fraser, B. Goddard, T. Kramer FCC dump meeting 18 th June.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Preliminary Design of Electron Beam line F. Velotti, C. Bracco, B. Goddard and M. Meddahi.
PSB-PS TRANSFER AT 2 GEV - CONCEPTS AND OPTICS W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira et al. ABT LIU Review, 20-Nov-15.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Issues Concerning Different Beam Lines Integration C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
AWAKE: A Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment at CERN C. Bracco on behalf of the AWAKE collaboration C. Bracco - ICHEP2014.
X-band Based FEL proposal
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Beam transfer considerations for LAGUNA Angelina Parfenova, W. Bartmann, L. Ducimetiere, B. Goddard, V.Kain, M.A. Kowalska, M. Meddahi, B. Puccio, F. Velotti.
Feasibility Study of the AWAKE Facility at CERN Edda Gschwendtner, Chiara Bracco, Brennan Goddard, Malika Meddahi, Ans Pardons, Elena Shaposhnikova, Helga.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
HiRadMat Summary of Phase-I and plans for Phase-II commissioning J. Blanco, N. Conan, V. Kain, K. Cornelis, B. Goddard, C. Hessler, M. Meddahi, C. Theis,
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
Preservation of Magnetized Beam Quality in a Non-Isochronous Bend
EAAC, Isola d’Elba, September 2017, WG1
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Status on Work for Splitter FS and Dilution System FS
AWAKE proposals for BE/BI
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
Progress of SPPC lattice design
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Transfer Line for EIC.
AWAKE Experiment at CERN
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN C.Bracco, F.M. Velotti, J. Bauche, A. Caldwell, B. Goddard, E. Gschwendtner, G. Le Godec, L.K. Jensen, M. Meddahi, P. Muggli, J.A. Osborne, A. Pardons, A. Petrenko

Outlines AWAKE p+ beam line AWAKE e- beam Present CNGS layout Needed lattice modifications for AWAKE beam Optics Beam instrumentation AWAKE e- beam Geometric layout and optics Preliminary results on space charge effects 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

AWAKE in the CERN Accelerator Complex 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

AWAKE in the CERN Accelerator Complex CNGS AWAKE experiment will be installed @ the end of the CNGS beam line 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Experimental Layout Self-modulation instability (SMI) p+ bunches produced by the CERN SPS enters the plasma cell  self-modulation instability (SMI)  microbunches spaced at the plasma wavelength (~ 1 mm) . 2 TW laser pulse, co-propagating and co-axial with the p+ beam  plasma ionisation + controlled SMI. Witness bunch of 1.25·109 e- injected downstream of the SMI saturation  up to 40% e trapped and accelerated from 20 MeV up to 2.1 GeV over a 10 m plasma cell. 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

End of CNGS Proton Beam Line p+ Beam from SPS Final focusing quadrupoles + trajectory correctors + Beam instrumentation TARGET area 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

End of CNGS Proton Beam Line p+ Beam from SPS Final focusing quadrupoles + trajectory correctors + Beam instrumentation TARGET area 7.16 % Plasma cell The end of the present CNGS line has to be modified to install the AWAKE plasma cell: new final focusing system + laser integration 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing MBG dipoles: Length [m] 6.3 Aperture Width [mm] 140 Aperture Height [mm] 37 Max.Magnetic Field [T] 1.91 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing QTG quadrupoles: Length [m] 2.2 Aperture Width [mm] 45 Aperture Height [mm] Max.Magnetic Field [T/m] 34 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing QTS quadrupoles: Length [m] 1.5 Aperture Width [mm] 80 Aperture Height [mm] Max.Magnetic Field [T/m] 24 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing QTL quadrupoles: Length [m] 3.0 Aperture Width [mm] 80 Aperture Height [mm] Max.Magnetic Field [T/m] 24 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing X X Future Layout Plasma cell 2 quads (1 QTG + 1 QTS) are removed 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing Future Layout Plasma cell 2 quads (1 QTG + 1 QTS) are removed 7 left quads are displaced and reshuffled for the new final focusing 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Lattice Modifications Present Layout (end of the line) FODO Final Focusing Future Layout Plasma cell 2 quads (1 QTG + 1 QTS) are removed 7 left quads are displaced and reshuffled for the new final focusing 1 MBG is displaced + 4 B190 are added to create the chicane for laser integration (1.9 m long, 1.6 T max. magnetic field) 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Chicane for Laser Integration -2980 -3000 2 × B190 -3020 CNGS Tunnel wall y [m] Present Beam New Beam -3040 2 × B190 -3060 CNGS Tunnel wall Plasma cell -3080 -3100 4213 4214 4215 4216 4217 4218 x [m] MAD-X conversion of CERN Coordinate System 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Chicane for Laser Integration p+ beam B190 1 mrad kick 12 m -2980 -3000 2 × B190 -3020 CNGS Tunnel wall y [m] Present Beam New Beam -3040 2 × B190 Offset between proton beam and laser axis = 24 mm @ Mirror: Beam size ~ 5 mm (6 sigma envelope + 3.5 mm mrad emittance + 1 mm orbit + 1 mm mechanical misalignment ) Laser spot size ~ 4.3 mm (1 sigma) Mirror radius= 13.0mm (3 sigma, 0 angle, 9.2 mm for 45° angle) Mirror thickness= 6 mm (4.2 mm for 45° angle) Total needed offset ~ 18.4 mm -3060 CNGS Tunnel wall Plasma cell -3080 -3100 4213 4214 4215 4216 4217 4218 x [m] MAD-X conversion of CERN Coordinate System 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Final Focusing and Dispersion Matching Experiment requirements: round beam, beam size @ plasma cell entrance 1 s = 200 ± 20 mm  bx = by = 4.9 m & Dx = Dy = 0 (400 GeV, 3.5 mm mrad normalised emittance, Dp/p =1 ‰) Achieved: Plasma cell Dx= 0.029 m Dy = 0.029 m Plasma cell bx =by = 4.9 m sx =sy = 224 mm 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Beam Instrumentation # bunches # p+ per bunch Repetition Rate [s] Energy [GeV] CNGS 2100 1.05 × 1010 6 400 AWAKE 1 3.00 × 1011 30 Existing CNGS beam instrumentation + suitable modifications due to different intensity and bunch structure: Beam Position Monitors (BPM): Exchange electronics Add two high precision BPM (50 mm) around the plasma cell to check the pointing precision (±100 mm and ±20 mrad, plasma and proton beam coaxial over the full length of the plasma cell)  interlock to stop extraction from the SPS if beyond tolerances 2 Optical Transition Radiation (OTR) screens around plasma cell for p+ beam setup (out when TW laser on!) Cable lengths and signal filtering optimisation for Beam Current Transformers (BCT) Present Beam Loss Monitors (BLMs) Ok. 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Electron Beam Line: Geometry 12.2 m long e- beam line from RF gun to plasma cell (tunnel for e-beam) e- beam impinging perpendicularly w.r.t. plasma cell window RF Gun Plasma Cell e- beam 7.16 % Line design based on Fermi@ELTTRA magnets MAD-X conversion of CERN Coordinate System 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Electron Beam Line: Geometry 12.2 m long e- beam line from RF gun to plasma cell (tunnel for e-beam) e- beam impinging perpendicularly w.r.t. plasma cell window V bends e- beam 7.16 % H bends Line design based on Fermi@ELTTRA magnets MAD-X conversion of CERN Coordinate System 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Electron Beam Line: Geometry 12.2 m long e- beam line from RF gun to plasma cell (tunnel for e-beam) e- beam impinging perpendicularly w.r.t. plasma cell window H bends e- beam 7.16 % Line design based on Fermi@ELTTRA magnets MAD-X conversion of CERN Coordinate System 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Electrons Merging Point Energy [MeV] 10-20* Bunch population 1.25 × 109 Normalised emittance [mm mrad] 0.5** Bunch length [ps] 0.3 – 10*** Ideally possible to move merging point (2-5 m) and angle (5-20 mrad)  movable dipoles ? 30 cm max. aperture !! ~13 G m (1 m long dipoles, for 20 mrad) To be studied! Plasma cell Diagnostics * Studies shown in the following refer to 16 MeV ** Emittance blowup in plasma 2 mm mrad @ merging point *** Bunch compression option to be studied 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Electron Beam Optics Experiment requirements: V bends H bends Quads Experiment requirements: Round beam, Beam size 1 s < 250 mm, Dp/p < 1% Achieved @ merging point*: sx = 126 mm sy = 126 mm (0.5 mm mrad norm. emittance) sx = 251 mm sy = 253 mm (2 mm mrad norm. emittance) Plasma cell * 5 m from plasma cell entrance, no merging dipole (several optics to be studied) 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Space Charge Studies: Assumptions Tracking simulations: Code: PTC-ORBIT Initial distribution: Transverse plane: Gaussian (1 s cut) x-x’, y-y’ Longitudinal plane: uniform in Df and Gaussian in Dp/p 200 000 Macroparticles Assumed RF frequency wRF = 3 GHz: 10 ps ~ Df = 188.5 mrad 0.3 ps ~ Df = 5.7 mrad Filled bucket area Df×Dp/p = constant (Dp/p = 1% @ 0.3 ps) Df = 2p for full bucket  Dt ~ 1 ns f p Dp Df 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Preliminary results Space Charge Effects Beam distribution @ merging point (5 m from beginning of plasma cell) Preliminary results 10 ps, 0.3‰ Dp/p 0.3 ps, 1% Dp/p 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Preliminary results Space Charge Effects Beam distribution @ merging point (5 m from beginning of plasma cell) Is this physical? Preliminary results 10 ps, 0.3‰ Dp/p 0.3 ps, 1% Dp/p 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Expected emittance growth when increasing e- beam intensity Space Charge Effects Beam distribution @ merging point (5 m from beginning of plasma cell) Is this physical? Expected emittance growth when increasing e- beam intensity Preliminary results 10 ps, 0.3‰ Dp/p 0.3 ps, 1% Dp/p 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

Conclusions AWAKE p+ beam line: AWAKE e- beam line Experiment at the end of CNGS beam line Minor modifications of existing lattice to fit plasma cell and fulfill geometric and optics requirements Existing magnet hardware and beam instrumentation can be used (suitable changes due to different intensity and bunch structure) AWAKE e- beam line Geometric layout defined Optics requirements fulfilled (matching for different optics needed) New hardware needed + dedicated studies for magnets around plasma cell (feasible changing merging point and angle? precision?) Very preliminary studies for space charge effects  need experts input for next steps: Other codes for benchmarking (TRACE-3D?) Bunch compression.... 4/06/2013 EAAC2013

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

FFT Method for SC Calculations in Orbit 4/06/2013 EAAC2013