A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Advertisements

R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Simulating cloud-microphysical processes in CRCM5 Ping Du, Éric Girard, Jean-Pierre Blanchet.
A comparison between observed and simulated hydrometeor size distributions in MCS using the AMMA 2006 microphysical data set V. Giraud, C. Duroure and.
3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.
Evaluation of ECHAM5 General Circulation Model using ISCCP simulator Swati Gehlot & Johannes Quaas Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Hamburg, Germany.
Wesley Berg, Tristan L’Ecuyer, and Sue van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Evaluating the impact of aerosols on.
1. The problem of mixed-phase clouds All models except DWD underestimate mid-level cloud –Some have separate “radiatively inactive” snow (ECMWF, DWD) –Met.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
UQAM/EC Canadian Contribution to MAP D-PHASE R. McTaggart-Cowan, M. Desgagne, J. Cote, S. Gravel, C. Girard, A. Erfani, J. Milbrandt, C. Jones University.
Initial 3D isotropic fractal field An initial fractal cloud-like field can be generated by essentially performing an inverse 3D Fourier Transform on the.
A new approach to parameterize ice-phase cloud microphysics The Predicted Particle Properties (P3) Scheme WWOSC 2014 Montreal, Canada August 17, 2014 Hugh.
1 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April 2007 Science Question 3: Science Question 3: Numerical Weather Prediction Aspects of Forecasting Alberta Thunderstorms.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
Photo by Dave Fratello. Focus To evaluate CAM5/CARMA at 1x1 degree resolution with aircraft observations. - Improve cirrus cloud representation in the.
1 Une description statistique multi-variable des nuages au dessus de l’océan tropical à partir des observations de jour de l’A-train en haute résolution.
High-resolution Mesoscale Modeling and Diagnosing of a Severe Fog Event 1 Meteorological Service of Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada 2 Meteorological.
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
In this work we present results of cloud electrification obtained with the RAMS model that includes the process of charge separation between ice particles.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 1 J. Teixeira(1), C. A.
Hurricane Microphysics: Ice vs Water A presenation of papers by Willoughby et al. (1984) and Heymsfield et al. (2005) Derek Ortt April 17, 2007.
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the inner Core of Hurricane Norbert. Part Ⅲ : Water Budget Gamache, J. F., R. A. Houze, Jr., and F. D. Marks, Jr., 1993:
Page 1© Crown copyright A comparison of CRM simulations of trade wind cumulus with aircraft observations taken during RICO Steve Abel and Ben Shipway 21.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
Mesoscale Simulation of a Convective Frontal Passage Travis Swaggerty, Dorothea Ivanova and Melanie Wetzel Department of Applied Aviation Sciences Embry-Riddle.
Comparing GEM 15 km, GEM-LAM 2.5 km and RUC 13 km Model Simulations of Mesoscale Features over Southern Ontario 2010 Great Lakes Op Met Workshop Toronto,
WMO Cloud Modeling workshop, Warsaw, July 2012 WMO Cloud Modeling workshop, Warsaw, July 2012 Idealized Oklahoma squall Line 20 june 2007, reflectivity.
OVERVIEW OF THE DATA OBTAINED DURING ASTAR 2007 (ARCTIC MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS) & CIRCLE-2 (MID-LATITUDE CIRRUS) Alfons Schwarzenboeck, Guillaume Mioche, Christophe.
DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University Annual Review March 8-9, Mixed-phase clouds and icing research. Part.
A comparison of cloud microphysics in deep tropical convection forming over the continent and over the ocean Emmanuel Fontaine 1, Elise Drigeard 1, Wolfram.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
Active and passive microwave remote sensing of precipitation at high latitudes R. Bennartz - M. Kulie - C. O’Dell (1) S. Pinori – A. Mugnai (2) (1) University.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Southern Ocean Clouds Characterization.
Development of cloud resolving model with microphysical bin model and parameterizations to predict the initial cloud droplet size distribution KUBA, Naomi.
Development of a detailed ice melting scheme within bin microphysics in a 3D cloud model: An analysis based on an idealized simulation case C. Planche.
© Crown copyright Met Office Systematic Biases in Microphysics: observations and parametrization Ian Boutle, Steven Abel, Peter Hill, Cyril Morcrette QJ.
Satellite Meteorology Laboratory (METSAT) 위성관측에서 본 한반도 강수 메카니즘의 특성 서울대학교 지구환경과학부 손병주, 유근혁, 송환진.
B3. Microphysical Processes
Diagnosing latent heating rates from model and in-situ microphysics data: Some (very) early results Chris Dearden University of Manchester DIAMET Project.
Using microphysical observations during
W. Smith, D. Spangenberg, S. Sun-Mack, P.Minnis
An accurate, efficient method for calculating hydrometeor advection in multi-moment bulk and bin microphysics schemes Hugh Morrison (NCAR*) Thanks to:
Investigating Cloud Inhomogeneity using CRM simulations.
Parameterization of Cloud Microphysics Based on the Prediction of Bulk Ice Particle Properties. Part II: Case Study Comparisons with Observations and Other.
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
Clouds and Large Model Grid Boxes
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
Verification of dynamically downscaled results around Japan Islands
How do models work? METR 2021: Spring 2009 Lab 10.
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
OBR: Cloud Physics Research
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms
A LATENT HEAT RETRIEVAL IN A RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING HURRICANE
Studying Hector: meteorology and tracer transport
Junhua Zhang and Wanmin Gong
Sensitivity of WRF microphysics to aerosol concentration
A CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY WAVE GENERATION BY HECTOR CONVECTION
Concurrent Sensitivities of an Idealized Deep Convective Storm to Parameterization of Microphysics, Horizontal Grid Resolution, and Environmental Static.
The radiative properties of inhomogeneous cirrus clouds
Effects of 3D radiation on cloud evolution
Validating Satellite Products and WRF Model Microphysics with CloudSat
Sensitivity of idealized squall-line simulations to the level of complexity used in two-moment bulk microphysics schemes. Speaker: Huan Chen Professor:
Kurowski, M .J., K. Suselj, W. W. Grabowski, and J. Teixeira, 2018
Betsy Berry and Jay Mace University of Utah
Comparison of Simulated Top of Atmosphere Radiance Datasets
Presentation transcript:

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California Assessing a high-resolution NWP model’s ability to predict high ice water content conditions using data from A-Train satellites and in situ aircraft Zhipeng Qu (1), Alexei Korolev(1), Howard Barker(1), Jason Milbrandt(2), Mengistu Wolde(3), Alfons Schwarzenboeck(4), Delphine Leroy(4), J. Walter Strapp(5), Stephane Belair(2), and Jason Cole(1) Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada Environment and Climate Change Canada, Dorval, QC, Canada (3) National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada (4) Laboratoire de Meteorologie Physique, CNRS/Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France (5) Met Analytics Inc., Aurora, Canada, A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California Objectives: Assessment of the performance of Environment and Climate Change Canada’s hi-res Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model; Potentiality of predicting high ice water content conditions in high altitude for aviation safety; Understanding of the secondary ice process. Microphysics scheme: Predicted Particle Properties (P3) scheme (Morrison and Milbrandt, 2015); Bulk scheme, single ice categories with 4 degrees of freedom. Simulation: 0.25 km horizontal grid-spacing; 57 vertical levels; 300 km x 300 km domain. Case: Cayenne, French Guiana (May 16, 2015); Tropical deep convective cloud; Aircraft in situ measure; A-train overpasses. A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 1. High Resolution NWP model simulation Domains of the simulation: LAM-2.5 (km) domain Cayenne 2 Aircraft A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 2. Aircraft in situ measure CloudSat Canadian Convair-580 aircraft: Altitude: ~7 km; T: -5 °C to -15 °C French Falcon-20 aircraft: Altitude: ~7 to 12 km; T: -10 ° to - 40 ° C Measured variables: Temperature; Pressure; Ice water content; Extinction Coefficient; Mean cube/mass diameters; Size distribution; Particle 2D imagery; X-band radar reflectivity; W-band radar reflectivity. A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 3. Results and Comparisons GEM - 3D RT(0.25 km -> 1 km GOES) GOES images (Visible) CloudSat Aircraft Storm motion: E to W A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 3. Results and Comparisons Convair-580 at altitude: 6.6 km. CloudSat: Cloud Water Content Product (2B-CWC-RO). Overpass location A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 3. Results and Comparisons Falcon-20 at altitude of 10.7 km. CloudSat: Cloud Water Content Product (2B-CWC-RO). Overpass location A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 4. Discussions (1). Dynamics ? Underestimation of the IWC at ~11 km: the simulated heading cells didn't rise to the altitude as high as those shown by the GOES image? GEM simulation GOES L2 product CloudSat Aircraft Storm motion: E to W A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 4. Discussions (2). Ice multiplication? Current approach: Hallett and Mossop, 1974 N of splintering depends on rime mass & T; -3°C<T<-8°C. New approach: Lawson et al., 2015 N depends on droplet size, N of frizzing droplet & T; -5°C < T < -15°C. Lawson et al., 2015 A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 4. Discussions (2). Ice multiplication? Implementation of the new IM parameterization in P3 microphysics scheme. Test of the scheme in a 1D model. g/m3 #/m3 g/m3 cm g/m3 #/m3 Higher IWC & N Quicker depletion of rain A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 4. Discussions (2). Ice multiplication? g/m3 #/m3 g/m3 cm g/m3 #/m3 More ice at ~11 km Less ice at ~7 km A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 4. Discussions (2). Ice multiplication? Next step: 3D full simulation with new IM parametrization. More complicated and need more efforts to look into the results. A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California

A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California 5. Conclusion In the studied case, the CloudSat IWC retrievals (2B-CWC-RO) are close to the in situ observation, some differences are observed with high IWC (>1g/m3); The hi-res GEM model shows the potentiality to predict the tropical deep convective clouds; At ~ 7 km, the IWC is slightly overestimated by the model with P3 scheme; At ~ 11 km, the IWC is underestimated; Two directions are currently under study for explaining the underestimation of IWC at high altitude with the P3 microphysics scheme: dynamics & secondary ice process. A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California