Challenges of Every Student Succeeds Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School & Community Collaboration Through McKinney-Vento.
Advertisements

Educational Stability for Children Placed in Resource Homes.
Jamey Bell CT Voices for Children Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Symposium April 7, 2010.
Which of the following is not a duty of the local liaison? a)Identifying homeless children and youth b)Coordinating with community agencies c)Assisting.
THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED…. HOPEFULLY!! Dispute Resolution.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Homeless Children and Youth: All Working Together Alabama School Transportation Association (ASTA) June 10,
McKinney Vento BIE McKinney Vento Local Liaison Training: McKinney Vento May 13, 2014, 11:00 am (MDT) Facilitator: Valerie Todacheene, Ed.D. Review: Homeless.
Christina Endres Get to Know NCHE… NCHE has: A comprehensive website: A free helpline: Call
Michigan State Overview Homeless Children and Youth Foster Care Summit November, 2011 Washington, D.C.
School Stability and Transportation Coordination for Children in Out of Home Placement Philadelphia Department of Human Services and School District of.
Supporting Foster Care Students. Improving Outcomes for Foster care Students Nationally, less than half of youth in foster care complete a regular high.
Educating Children and Youth Experiencing Homelessness January, 2013 CESA 10.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Educating Children and Youth Experiencing Homelessness October 20, 2011 CESA 10.
McKinney-Vento Key Provisions Madison Metropolitan School District Transition Education Program (TEP)
Connecting the Dots: Collaborations Required Under Federal Law.
WELCOME BACK Federal Programs/Student Services Overview Paula Wax, Director of Federal Programs.
The McKinney-Vento Act: A Brief Overview What Schools and Education Service Centers Need to Know Prepared by the Texas Education Agency, Region 10 Education.
McKinney-Vento Act Subtitle VII-B Education of Homeless Children and Youth Program NCLB Title X.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
MCKINNEY – VENTO TRANSPORTATION Hands Across Michigan Brenda M Greenhoe November 16, 2015.
Coordinating Title I Services with Homeless Programs Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator Division of Federal Programs, PDE Sheldon Winnick State Coordinator.
McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Assistance Act Title X Part C No Child Left Behind Act
McKinney-Vento Act Implications under ESSA for Title I.
Proposed ESSA Regulations: Impact on Students Experiencing Homelessness and in Foster Care Barbara Duffield, Patricia Julianelle,
Overview of McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Under ESSA Office for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth March 2016.
ED/HHS June 2016 Guidance on Children in Foster Care Barbara Duffield, Patricia Julianelle, July 2016.
Ensuring Educational Stability for Children in Foster Care: An Overview of the ED/HHS Joint Guidance July 27, 2016.
Ensuring Educational Stability for Children in Foster Care: An Overview of the ED/HHS Joint Guidance August 2016.
FOSTER CARE PROVISIONS IN ESSA
Transportation for special Education
Christopher Lyddy, MSW State Representative
McKinney –Vento Act: “Anchoring Children and Youth Who Are Homeless”
Homeless and Neglected/Delinquent Programs
School Stability and Transportation Coordination for Children in Out of Home Placement Philadelphia Department of Human Services and School District of.
Best Practices for Helping Foster Youth
Carmen M. Sanchez Education Program Specialist
National Center for Homeless Education (NCHE)
McKinney-Vento Program (MVP) Department of Safe Schools
Homeless Children and Youth in ESEA Reauthorization
A Guided Tour of Two Programs: Title III & Homeless, McKinney-Vento
Homeless Education McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Act Title X, Part C No Child Left Behind Act
Guidelines for Students Identified as Homeless
McKinney-Vento Liaison Training
K-12 Supports for Students in Foster Care
Federal School Stability Protections for Children in Foster Care
Ensuring Educational Stability for Foster Care Children in SC
Education for Homeless Youth
Collaborating for the Education of Youth in Care
Special Education Directors
ESSA and Fostering Connections
Foster Care Updates and Issues
Educational Stability for Students in Foster Care
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Ensuring Education Stability and Success for Foster Youth 101 Subtitle.
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
ED/HHS June 2016 Guidance on Children in Foster Care
WELCOME BACK Federal Programs/Student Services Overview
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Ensuring Education Stability and Success for Foster Youth 101 Subtitle.
National Center for Homeless Education (NCHE)
CLAIBORNE COUNTY SCHOOLS
Aligning ESSA Foster Care Provisions with special education
Creating Connections for Highly Mobile Students
ESSA FC Data.
Education & Foster Care: Stability for Students—It’s the Law!
Kristen McKinnon and Christine Cowen
Education of Homeless Children & Youth: McKinney-Vento 101
Transportation for Students in Foster Care ESSA Guidance
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Justin Singleton| McKinney-Vento Coordinator| CPM| Sept. 14, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Challenges of Every Student Succeeds Act Launi Harden Challenges of Every Student Succeeds Act

Outline Provide an overview & expectations of ESSA. Time frame for ensuring educational stability. ESSA’s provisions for transportation. FLDOE’s memo “Foster Care Requirements in the ESSA”. (LEA) checklist “Related to Ensuring Educational Stability”. FLDOE’s” Frequently Asked Questions dated Nov. 28, 2016”. Transportation options. Brainstorm out of the box solutions.

Every Student Succeeds Act , 2015 (ESSA) Non-Regulatory Guidance Was Released June 23, 2016 Purpose: Ensuring Educational Stability for Children in Foster Care Transportation is mentioned 100 times in this document. Pages 21-32 How will we keep Ralph in his school of origin? I can do it! I am trained to keep Ralph safe & deliver him on time. Yes Don’t worry! Bye

MCKINNEY-VENTO The phrase “awaiting foster care placement” will be removed from the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act’s definition of homeless children and youth. For covered states--this change is effective 12/10/17. After the effective date, youth “awaiting foster care placement” must be served under ESSA. Some children in foster care may still be eligible for McKinney- Vento services (e.g., youth who are living in transitional shelters or motels)

Provisions in ESSA take place Dec. 2017 Ensuring Educational Stability for Children in Foster Care. Children in foster care remain in the school of origin, unless it is determined that it is not in his or her best interest. If it is not in the child’s best interest to remain in the school of origin, the child must be immediately enrolled in the new school. Data must be submitted stating why it isn’t in the best interest of the child to remain in the school of origin. A child must remain in his or her school of origin while any disputes regarding transportation costs are being resolved. The school system, state,, child welfare services must have designated points of contact.

The challenge is…Transport the child to the school of origin, unless it is not in the child’s best interest? What determines the best interest? It must include these factors: appropriateness of the current educational setting and proximity to the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of placement. Other factors can be considered as long as they are in the best interest of the child. Transportation costs should not be a factor. To the extent feasible and appropriate, a child must remain in his or her school of origin while awaiting a decision to reduce the number of school moves.

Best Interest can be driven by: Duration Time of placement change Type of transportation available Impact of extracurricular activities on transportation options Maturity and behavioral capacity Traffic patterns Flexibility in school schedule

Work Funding Costs Out Ahead Of Time. Develop and implement clear written procedures governing how to provide transportation to maintain children in foster care in their school of origin when in their best interest will be provided, arranged and funded for the duration of the time in foster care. If there are additional costs in providing transportation to the school of origin. LEAs will provide transportation if: DCS agrees to reimburse the LEA; the LEA agrees to pay the cost; or the LEA and DCS agree to share the cost.

Memorandum of Understanding Title IV-E is an allowable funding source for children in foster care. Not all children in foster care are eligible: Tribal foster children may be eligible; State child welfare agencies are responsible for nonfederal portion; Title I is an allowable funding source, although funds reserved for comparable services for homeless children & youth may not be used for transportation. All federal funding sources should be maximized to ensure costs are not unduly burdensome on one agency.

MOU Continued Transportation must be provided in a “cost-effective” manner, so low-cost/no-cost options should be explored. Even if other students aren’t transported, you must ensure that transportation is provided to children in foster care consistent with procedures developed in the MOU. Transportation is an allowable use of federal funds, both under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act and Title I of the ESEA. MOU should include a dispute resolution process if parties can’t come to agreement.

Examples: One state passed legislation that requires the child welfare system and the school to collaborate on developing and implementing transportation plans. The child welfare agency is responsible for any additional or extraordinary costs of the transportation and must maximize federal reimbursements under Title IV-E. The child welfare agency and school consider cost-effective, reliable, and safe transportation options.

A child welfare agency, LEA, and court system developed these joint protocols: If the child’s new placement is located within a 1.5 mile radius of the school, the foster parent or group home staff person is responsible for transportation. If the child is placed outside of the 1.5 miles radius, the LEA implements an expedited process to address the transportation needs of children in foster care so that they do not experience disruptions in their education.

EXPLORING TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS The following factors should be considered when deciding on an appropriate mode of transportation: The child’s safety and best interests; The length and distance of the commute; All available transportation options. No-cost and low-cost transportation options are explored first, such as: Public transportation; Working with foster parents or caregiver; Community resources.

How Do We Get Kids To School Of Origin? School bus – Existing routes Special education-related service Reimbursement to caregivers (or Foster Family Agencies) via Title IV-E funds Group Home/Foster Family Agency contract requirements New routes Route-to-route hand-offs District-to-district boundary hand-offs No cost/low cost services Contracted services

Contracted Services Taxi companies Student transport companies Car services Uber/Lyft/Via etc. Carpools/Ride Share School/District staff Public transportation Bus/Trolley passes Board policies & Admin. Regulations?

Thank you FAPT for your participation and attention! Resources & Slides Used: Thank you FAPT for your participation and attention! U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.naehcy.org/ Florida Department of Education