Discussion of Tasks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Phase B Exit Criteria Issues Resolved or Addressed Technical Reviews / Readiness Reviews, Audits Initiate Milestone C Program Review Planning Process Initiate.

Advertisements

Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 8 th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology Heidelberg, Germany 01–

January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.

Plans For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Conference Call May 17, 2000 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:

Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.

Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.

Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.

March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Page 1 of 5 Thermal power management TWG direction and plans ARIES Project Meeting 13 December 2007 M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.

September 6-7, 2007/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: Status and Documentation A. René Raffray Mark Tillack University of California, San.

Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.

Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 9 th International Symposium on Fusion.

Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Requirements and Designs for IFE and MFE First Wall and Blankets Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 2nd Japan/US Workshop on Laser-driven Inertial Fusion Energy.

Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,

From ITER to Demo -- Technology Towards Fusion Power Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center for Energy Research.

Progress in ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies 8-9 March 2012 US.

Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego US-Japan Workshop on Power Plants Study and Related Advanced Technologies with.

1 Formal Models for Expert Finding on DBLP Bibliography Data Presented by: Hongbo Deng Co-worked with: Irwin King and Michael R. Lyu Department of Computer.

From ITER to Demo -- Technology Towards Fusion Power Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center for Energy Research.

Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory K-DEMO Project Meeting 26 June 2013 NFRI-PPPL K-DEMO Project Status and Plans Overview.

* Backup materials can be found at

AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.

ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:

Some Thoughts on Phase II for Target fabrication, injection, and tracking presented by Dan Goodin Georgia Institute of Technology February 5th & 6th, 2004.

1 Subprojects of IFERC K.Lackner (as Chair of IFERC Project Committee) Garching – 14 Apr 2011.

Thoughts on Fusion Competitiveness Initiative Farrokh Najmabadi, George Tynan UC San Diego University Fusion Initiatives Meeting, MIT 14-15, February 2008.

1 Lane Carlson 1, Mark Tillack 1, Farrokh Najmabadi 1, Charles Kessel 2 1 University of California, San Diego & 2 Princeton Plasma Physics Lab US/Japan.

Page 1 of 11 Progress developing an evaluation methodology for fusion R&D ARIES Project Meeting March 4, 2008 M. S. Tillack.

Page 1 of 16 ARIES Issues and R&D Needs – Technology Readiness for Fusion Energy – M. S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting 28 May 2008.

Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC.

Final Year Project 2 Systems and Networking Department.

EU Public Procurement Learning Lab “Proposal for a Working Plan” Rome, November 28 th 2003.

February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Chamber Tasks Coordination Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from J. Blanchard and the HAPL.

Page 1 of 9 Power Management Technical Working Group Structure and Goals ARIES Project Meeting June 2007 M. S. Tillack and A. R. Raffray.

ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, Dec 2007 Page 1 Summary of Plant Operations TWG L. Waganer December 2007 ARIES Project Meeting at GT.

045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.

Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.

Advanced Design Activities in US Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants & Related Technologies.

Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.

2014 Workshop and Plenary Brenda Byers, I.S.P., ITCP, PMP, TOGAF9 CIPS – Canada’s IT Professional Organization.

Creating the environment for business Streamlining industrial emissions legislation Caspar Corden (Entec) Andrew Farmer (IEEP) IPPC Review Advisory Group.

Task 9:Fusion Power Plant Studies Status & Planned Activities

EC Training and Tutoring Second Coordination Meeting The Capacity Building Service ETReS Education and Training Review Service M. Moracho Ramirez.

Short Contribution Title Goes Here

August ICA Agenda Time Topic 8:00 – 8:15

Review of proposed outline for handbook

Pilot Plant Study Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting 19 May 2010.

Literature Review: Conception to Completion

Debriefing/New Results of ReNeW Themes III/IV (HFP) Workshop

Improvements to power flow modeling in the ARIES system code

DA Task Report Data Integration and Analysis System

Manage Project Integrative Processes Introduction to Project Integration Management Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507.

The Application of Technology Readiness Levels in Planning the Fusion Energy Sciences Program M. S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting 4–5 September2008.

Short Contribution Title Goes Here

Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program

For Excellence in Accreditation… “Moorpark it”

Advanced Design Activities in US

The Past, Present and Future of TRL’s in ARIES

Near-term plan for the current ARIES project

Status of the ARIES Program

VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005

Review of Project Goals

US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies

TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime

TWG goals, approach and outputs

Analysis of Technical and Programmatic Tradeoffs with Systems Code

Process Wind Tunnel for Improving Business Processes

Presentation transcript:

Discussion of Tasks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego

Mid-term ARIES Pathway Project Goals Define top-level Requirements (qualitative and quantitative) of the next step facility (fusion power technology demonstration and certification facility). System Code: Understand trade-offs to provide a range of embodiments for fusion power plants (and thus Demos) Trade-offs (visualization) Develop costing model/object functions for the next-step facility. Operate in optimizer mode. Interim report Top-level requirements Systems code trade-off studies (of power plants) What is new in our approach!

Working Groups Identifying the technical issues that has to be addressed Report of Working groups (Use Mark’s format). Use TRLs to identify gaps Outlines due Dec. 23 (in sufficient depth so that we can ensure all issues are covered among working groups). Outline should also include issues/systems for appraisal by TRL. Draft reports Jan. 30, final reports Feb. 15. Do we need an integrated burning plasma working group? Can we produce a figure similar to shown regularly by EU people? (This can be used to define top-level requirements for the next-step facility) How can we fold in “certification” issues?

Report Draft Outline 1 Report Draft Outline 2 Preface (Tillack) I. Introduction (Tillack) II. Program Goals (Steiner) (what level of knowledge and performance is needed to proceed to Demo? What are the key metrics for power management?) III. Current state of knowledge a. Plasma power distribution (Turnbull) b. High heat flux handling (Raffray) c. Materials compatibility (Tillack) d. Systems integration (Malang) e. Development and fabrication (Waganer) IV. R&D Needs (gaps in knowledge) V. Development Paths (TBD) (how can we close these gaps, i.e., with experiments and modeling?) Report Draft Outline 2 Preface (Tillack) I. Introduction (Tillack) II. Issues, metrics and milestones a, b, c, d, e III. Current state of knowledge IV. R&D Needs (gaps in knowledge) V. Evaluations (TBD) (application of the methodology to evaluate various R&D proposals) a. Plasma power distribution (Turnbull) b. High heat flux handling (Raffray) c. Materials compatibility (Tillack) d. Systems integration (Malang) e. Development and fabrication (Waganer)

Example: EU Issue list

Mid-term ARIES Pathway Project Goals System Code: Understand trade-offs to provide a range of embodiments for fusion power plants (and thus Demos) Trade-offs (visualization) Magnet model Need to expand physics data base Visualization and/or data mining (We need to think this through). Benchmark, ARIES-I’, ARIES-RS, and ARIES-AT When can we have results? Develop costing model/object functions for the next-step facility. Operate in optimizer mode.

Mid-term ARIES Pathway Project Goals Define top-level Requirements (qualitative and quantitative) of the next step facility (fusion power technology demonstration and certification facility). System Code: Understand trade-offs to provide a range of embodiments for fusion power plants (and thus Demos) Trade-offs (visualization) Develop costing model/object functions for the next-step facility. Operate in optimizer mode. Interim report Top-level requirements Systems code trade-off studies (of power plants) What is new in our approach!