BIBFRAME and Schema.org New Models for Resource Description and Access

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Espley and Robert Pillow ALA New Orleans 26 June 2011 The RDA Sandbox and RDA Implementation Scenario One.
Advertisements

Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
Aligning BIBFRAME with The Schema/Bib Extend model
Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations Pt. 2.
Bibliographic Framework Initiative Approach for MARC Data as Linked Data Sally McCallum Library of Congress.
Linked Data, Discovery and Discoverability John McCullough Senior Product Manager, OCLC December 3, 2014 UCL Discovery and Discoverability.
Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations pt.1a.
FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records it is the Final Report of the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic.
Developing an Eye for Resemblances: FRBR and Relevancy Ranking in WorldCat Local Greg Matthews & Jon Scott WorldCat Discovery Day 30 July 2010.
RDA Terminology: A Summary Atoma Batoma. RDA Terminology RDA Vocabularies: Controlled Vocabularies -Closed – Open –
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Structures and Standards for Our Bibliographic Future Diane I. Hillmann Research Librarian Cornell University Library.
1 CS 502: Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Lecture 17 Descriptive Metadata: Dublin Core.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Networked Resources and Metadata Interest Group Diane I. Hillmann Research Librarian Cornell University Library.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA and Linked Data Steve Henry University of Maryland March 2, 2013.
8/28/97Organization of Information in Collections Introduction to Description: Dublin Core and History University of California, Berkeley School of Information.
Moving Cataloguing into the 21 st Century Presentation given at the CLA pre-conference Shaping Tomorrow’s Metadata with RDA June 2, 2010 by Tom Delsey.
1 On the Record Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Diane Boehr Head of Cataloging, NLM
Bibliographic Framework and Future Scenarios for RDA Records Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy & Standards Division, Library of Congress & Chair, Joint.
7/14/09. Robert L. Maxwell RDA Lecture Series National Library of South Africa 22 July /14/09 Cataloging: Still a Professional Asset to Become Excited.
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
RDA : Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
What users want & how FRBR can help Diane Vizine-Goetz Research Scientist OCLC Research.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
Linked Data by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress For Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
The Semantic Web and expert metadata: pull apart then bring together Presented at 12.seminar Arhivi, Knjižnice, Muzeji Nov 2008, Pore č, Croatia.
Cataloguing standards are evolving … still Renate Beilharz ALIA National Library and Information Technician’s Symposium 2015.
Evidence from Metadata INST 734 Doug Oard Module 8.
11 ALCTS RDA Forum American Library Association Annual Conference Anaheim, California, June 23, 2012 U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee Update Beacher.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data Module 1 - Unit 2 The Semantic Web and Linked Data Concepts 1-1 Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot Training.
Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
THE BIBFRAME EDITOR AND THE LC PILOT Module 3 – Unit 1 The Semantic Web and Linked Data : a Recap of the Key Concepts Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot.
Future of Cataloguing: how RDA positions us for the future for RDA Workshop June, 2010.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
BIBFRAME Update Session  Library of Congress pilot and development  Beacher Wiggins – Pilot project  Sally McCallum – Vocabulary development  A supplier’s.
Sally McCallum Library of Congress
Jeanne Piascik Principal Cataloger University of Central Florida Technical Services Member Group FLA 2014 Annual Conference.
FROM AACR2 to RDA (and a few things in between) The history and context of RDA development Jenny Stephens, National Library of Australia, October 2010.
23 rd Annual Innovative Users Group Conference April 13 th – 16 th 2015.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
OCLC and RDA Karen Calhoun Jean Godby Ted Fons Glenn Patton October 2009 Webinar.
Setting the stage: linked data concepts Moving-Away-From-MARC-a-thon.
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Subjects in the FR family
RSC Strategy Gordon Dunsire, Chair, RDA Steering Committee
Xiaoli Li Co-head of Content Support Services
The UC Davis BIBFLOW Project
Summit Presentation BIBFRAME Editor Working Group
Module 8: “Top Twelve” Now we come to reminders of things we want to be sure to take with you from today’s session. We have selected a “top twelve”
From the old to the new… Towards better resource discoverability
Linked Data and Libraries
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
NLA/NSLA Joint Annual Conference 2016
Introduction to Metadata
BIBFRAME at the Library of Congress
Metadata - Catalogues and Digitised works
PREMIS Tools and Services
RDA Community and linked data
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

BIBFRAME and Schema.org New Models for Resource Description and Access Marlene van Ballegooie September 23, 2015

Outline Introducing BIBFRAME The road to BIBFRAME Overview of the BIBFRAME model Schema.org - A BIBFRAME alternative? Relationship between BIBFRAME and Schema.org

What is BIBFRAME? BIBFRAME (Bibliographic Framework) is a data model for bibliographic description. BIBFRAME was designed to replace the MARC standards, and to use linked data principles to make bibliographic data more useful both within and outside the library community.

About BIBFRAME BIBFRAME Initiative is being led by the Library of Congress Requirements for the model Content model agnostic Description and management of all types of library holdings, traditional and born-digital Provision for all library data: bibliographic, authority, holdings, classification Replace MARC Extensive community input in development

Why Do We Need BIBFRAME? Limitations of MARC Does not work well on the web Not designed for direct comprehension by a computer Having a web-based OPAC does not mean your data is on the web. Does not work well with the RDA Cannot adequately represent relationships between or within records MARC is static and inflexible Only libraries use MARC

The Road to BIBFRAME 2002. October. MARC must die (Roy Tennant) The very nature of the MARC (machine-readable cataloging) record is, to some degree, an anachronism. It was developed in an age when memory, storage, and processing power were all rare and expensive commodities. Now they are ubiquitous and cheap.

2006. Tim Berners Lee's Linked Data: Design Issues. MARC is “no longer fit for the purpose” Recommendations Develop a more flexible, extensible metadata carrier Integrate library standards into web environment Extend use of standard identifiers 2008. January. On the Record (LC report).

2011. June. Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee.   “Most felt any benefits of RDA would be largely unrealized in a MARC environment.”

2011. October. A Bibliographic Framework for the Digital Age. “The Library of Congress is committed to developing, in collaboration with librarians, standards experts, and technologists a new bibliographic framework that will serve the associated communities well into the future.”

2012. May. LC begins work with Zepheira on model. Eric Miller and the BIBFRAME Model 2015. LC pilot project to use BIBFRAME in production. Intention to formalize data model and vocabulary by end of 2015. 2014. Stabilization of BIBFRAME model and experimentation. and others…

BIBFRAME Model Core Classes Authorities Work Instance

BIBFRAME Model Annotations

Differences between MARC and BIBFRAME Aggregates information in a single record Uses strings for identifiers Flat record format Non-dynamic content Primarily at the manifestation level Much duplication of information across records Records isolated in data silo (Sirsi) Relationship based, NOT record based Work-to-Work Work-to-Instance Work-to-Authority Annotation-to-Instance Uses controlled identifiers (URIs) to establish relationships Links are paramount! Data is woven into the greater web of data

From Strings…

To Things… Pride and Prejudice Austen, Jane (OCoLC)881025115 title same_as author Graphic novels England genre geographic term Social classes subject adapted_by King, Stacy subject isbn Courtship 9781927925171 subject subject subject Bennet, Elizabeth (Fictitious character) Sisters Darcy, Fitzwilliam (Fictitious character)

FRBR - Tillett presentation, March 4, 2009 Incorporation of FRBR Thinking Disaggregation of the components of the bibliographic record Focus on relationships between entities, elements and attributes Separation of the intellectual from the physical Work Manifestation Person Expression Item Concept Corporate body Source: www.rda-jsc.org/docs/Georgia-FRBR-review-12august2011.ppt‎ 16 16

Relationship between FRBR and BIBFRAME Models Work = Work Expression Manifestation = Instance = Item Annotation

What BIBFRAME Will Achieve Stronger support for RDA A move away from manifestation-based cataloguing Movement towards the creation of data, not records (greater reliance on identifiers) The integration of library data into the fabric of the web.

BIBFRAME is not the only game in town

What is Schema.org? Schema.org is a vocabulary used to describe things on the web. Aims to improve the web by creating a structured data markup schema supported by major search engines. Primary usage is for annotating existing Web content. Schema.org can be considered an approach to Linked Data.

What is Schema.org? Launched in June 2011 Collaborative effort between: Designed for extremely mainstream, mass market adoption.

Book Name Author Publisher Pub Date Language ISBN

Schema Bib Extend Community Group The mission of this group is to discuss and prepare proposal(s) for extending Schema.org schemas for the improved representation of bibliographic information markup and sharing. The group will seek consensus around, and support for, proposal(s) to the W3C WebSchemas Group. This Community Group will not, itself, produce technical specifications.

BIBFRAME and Schema.org Friend of Foe?

BIBFRAME and Schema.org Complimentary relationship between the two linked data approaches BIBFRAME of description, curation and data exchange Schema.org for discovery via common search engines

Convergence Between BIBFRAME and Schema.org Breadth of Coverage BibExtensions http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2013/2013-05.pdf Depth of Description

What should UTL do with these new models for resource description and access?