„Emission & Regeneration“ Unified Field Theory Osvaldo Domann The model An approach where Subatomic Particles (SPs) are represented as focal points of rays of Fundamental Particles (FPs) that extend from infinite to infinite. The energy of SPs is distributed over the whole space about their FPs and interactions between SPs are the product of the interactions of their FPs. The actual state of our Standard Model Our SM is saturated with fictitious entities that were introduced to explain experimental data that didn’t fit with the actually accepted model, resulting in a monumental Patchwork. All efforts to remove the fictitious entities are rejected with the argument that they are “Experimentally proven”, simply ignoring that the argument is a fallacy.

Motivation and Methodology Postulated

Particles as focal points Subatomic Particles represented as Focal Points of rays of Fundamental Particles (FPs)

Particles as focal points Distribution in space of the relativistic energy of a BSP with v c Fundamental particle Focal point FP Opposed angular momenta

Particles as focal points Linear momentum out of opposed angular momentum

Characteristics of the introduced fundamental particles (FPs) Particles as focal points Definition of field magnitudes dH based on Energy and angular momenta of FPs Longitudinal emitted field Longitudinal regenerating field Transversal regenerating field Characteristics of the introduced fundamental particles (FPs) Fundamental Particles are postulated. FPs move with light speed relative to the focal point. FPs store energy as rotations in moving and transversal directions FPs interact through their angular momenta or dH fields. Pairs of FPs with opposed transversal angular momenta generate linear momenta on subatomic particles.

Interactions between particles Interaction laws between two SPs (electrons and positrons) 1) Interaction between two static SPs (Coulomb) 2) Interaction between two moving SPs (Ampere, Lorentz, Bragg, Gravitation) 3) Interaction between a moving and a static SP ( Induction, Maxwell, Gravitation) These three interactions between SPs correspond to the three following interactions between the longitudinal and transversal dH fields of the Interacting SPs. 1) Longitudinal X longitudinal (Coulomb) 2) Transversal X transversal (Ampere) 3) Transversal * longitudinal (Induction) The three following slides show each interaction in detail.

Interactions between particles 1) Interaction law between two static SPs (Coulomb)

Interactions between particles 2) Interaction law between two moving SPs (Ampere, Lorentz , Bragg and gravitation)

Interactions between particles 3) Interaction law between a moving and a static SP (Maxwell, Gravitation) „Induction law“

Motivation and Methodology Postulated

12 Coulomb at atomic distances Linear momentum as a function of the distance between static BSPs Nuclei core Coulomb Electrons and positrons that migrate outsite the nucleus core are reintegrated or expulsed. Reintegration generates the gravitation forces while expulsion radioactivity. 12

Newton and Ampere gravitation forces Gravitation between two neutrons due to parallel and aligned reintegration of migrated BSPs Neutrons composed of electrons and positrons Nuclei core Nuclei core Newton component Ampere component

Newton and Ampere gravitation forces Total gravitation force due to the reintegration of BSPs Ampere component Newton component For galactic distances the Newton component can be neglected and explains: with a positive sign the flattening of galaxie‘s speed curve without the need of dark matter with a negative sign the expansion of galaxies without the need of dark energy.

Proposed approach for Relativity Galilean relativity is only valid for v<<c. SR ist valid for the whole speed range but violates time and space principles. The new approach defines relativity exclusively as a speed problem with absolute time and space. v The result is the Extended Galilean relativity, valid for the whole range of speed, which includes the Lorentz factor and absolute time and space. The proposed approach is also based on emission theory where photons are emitted with c relative to its source and move relative to another frame with , where they are reflected and refracted with c at mirrors, optical lenses and antennas of the measuring Instruments, what explains why always c is measured in the frame of the instruments. Interfaces are mirrors, optical lenses and electric antennas of measuring instruments. Interface

Equations for particles with 1) Relativistic linear momentum The results of the approach are Galilean relativity Equations for particles with 1) Relativistic linear momentum 2) Relativistic acceleration 3) Energy density current 4) Relativistic energy Equations for electromagnetic waves (particles with ) For or we get No transversal Doppler effect exists 16

Conclusion about relativity The Classic Galilean relativity was a first incomplete approach to relativity only valid for v<<c. A second approach is Special Relativity valid for the whole range of speeds but with an unacceptable violation of the principle of universal validity of time and space units. An approach valid for the whole range of speeds and with universal validity of time and space units is the Extended Galilean relativity which includes the Lorentz factor. GR is a first approach to gravitation based on the unphysical SR and has therefore the same flaws as SR. A new proposed model for gravitation is based on the Reintegration of Electrons and Positrons to their Nuclei. The model doesn’t require the introduction of fictitious entities like gluons, dark matter and dark energy. Message Now that the mistake made in the deduction of SR and GR was found, namely, that the interaction between light and the measuring equipment was not considered, we should not burden younger generations with these flawed theories, irrespective of the interests of affected persons and institutions. The argument that the existence of time dilation and length contraction are experimentally proven is a fallacy. 17

18 Fallacy used to conclude that the existence of fictitious entities is experimentally proven Special Relativity as example 1. Detection of experimental data that don‘t fit with the SM v Light speed is equal in all relative moving frames 2. v Definition of fictious entities based on the experimental data that don´t fit Time dilation and length contraction Declaring that emission theories are wrong because they are not compatible with SR 3. Making the SM consistent with new fictious entities as good as possible v 4. Inventing justifications for remaining contradictions v Camouflaging contradictions as paradoxes Closing all doors to theories that don’t accept the fictitious entities Declare fictious entities and contradic- tions as the new Standard v 5. Biggest impediment for scientific progress v Glorifying and idolizing the fictious entities and ist creators 6. Detecting additional experimental data that can be explained with the fictiotius entities v 7. Increase of Life time of moving muons Right Wrong Prove that fictious entities really exist More fictitious entities are: Gluons, gravitons, dark matter, dark energy, Higgs particle, Axion, etc. v 18

Thank you for your attention, The complete work is available at www.odomann.com Osvaldo Domann odomann@yahoo.com