Recommendations/Requirements for Molecular Proficiency Testing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical background: Patient RM, YoB 1966 Her family were originally referred because of a history of breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA testing found a missense.
Advertisements

N EXT G ENERATION S EQUENCING (B IG D ATA ), IT AND T HE C LINICAL P RACTICE Che Martin Ph.D | PMP Katrina Fox-O’Malley Bulent Oral.
Gene 210 Cancer Genomics May 5, Key events in investigating the cancer genome M R Stratton Science 2011;331:
Molecular Testing of lung cancer in routine practice
Molecular & Genomic Pathology in the Management of Cancer: Teaching...Who, When, What and How Antonia R. Sepulveda MD., PhD Columbia University, NY, NY.
APPLICATIONS OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
About these slides SPEC – Short Presentation in Emerging Concepts Provided by the CAP as an aid to pathologists to facilitate discussion on the topic.
Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) to Identify Genetic Changes in Fine Needle Biopsy of Lung Lesions Prepared by Jin Jen NCI.
CAP Accreditation of Genetics Testing Laboratories Genetic Alliance May 16, 2007 Gail Vance, MD, FCAP College of American Pathologists.
Assay Development Breakout (red) Who was in the room? About half of attendees are active NGS users N=1 doing whole genome analyses Everyone else doing.
The Application of Validation and Proficiency Testing Concepts From Current Clinical Genetic Diagnostics For the Implementation of New Genetic Technologies.
Draft Observables Concept Model for Deployment of Anatomic/Molecular Pathology.
The world leader in serving science Andy Felton Ph.D. Vice President Marketing & Product Management Clinical Sequencing Division Personalized Medicine.
CtDNA NGS testing identified a high-level MET amplification (copy number of 53.6 in circulation) (Figure 1A). The test was repeated on a second tube of.
The Center for Personalized Diagnostics: Past, Present, and FUTURE
Use cases for molecular pathology/genetics
Hereditary Cancer Predisposition: Updates in Genetic Testing
Managing Colon cancer in the era of molecular markers
Use cases for molecular pathology/genetics
Ultra-Deep Sequencing of Multiplex-PCR Enriched Hotspot and
Monogenic Disorders Genetic Counselling
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) of high grade serous ovarian tumors from the NOVA Phase III clinical study Keith Wilcoxen,1 Christopher Neff,2.
Delivering a Pharmacogenomics NGS service in 5 working days
Synthetic Circulating Cell-free DNA as Quality Control Materials for Somatic Mutation Detection in Liquid Biopsy for Cancer R. Zhang, R. Peng, Z. Li, P.
Acquired Resistance to Crizotinib from a Mutation in CD74-ROS1 Mark M
What is Useful? Publishing Support for Precision Medicine
NGS tests and algorithms in (hemato)-oncology ComPerMed
Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Wendy Kohlmann, MS, CGC
Techniques for measuring minimal residual disease in leukemia
Comparison of Clinical Targeted Next-Generation Sequence Data from Formalin-Fixed and Fresh-Frozen Tissue Specimens  David H. Spencer, Jennifer K. Sehn,
Molecular Diagnostic Profiling of Lung Cancer Specimens with a Semiconductor-Based Massive Parallel Sequencing Approach  Volker Endris, Roland Penzel,
Crystal digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating EGFR mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer Cécile Jovelet Postdocoral fellow.
Unità Clinica di Diagnostica Istopatologica e Molecolare
DNA Extraction of Lung Cancer Samples for Advanced Diagnostic Testing
Yes, Patient #1 Yes, Patient #3 EGFR sequencing chromatograms
Content and Labeling of Tests Marketed as Clinical “Whole-Exome Sequencing” Perspectives from a cancer genetics clinician and clinical lab director Allen.
A Targeted High-Throughput Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Clinical Screening of Mutations, Gene Amplifications, and Fusions in Solid Tumors  Rajyalakshmi.
Assessing Copy Number Alterations in Targeted, Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Data  Catherine Grasso, Timothy Butler, Katherine Rhodes, Michael.
Tissue Acquisition and Reflex Testing How do we Prioritize?
Comprehensive Screening of Gene Copy Number Aberrations in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Solid Tumors Using Molecular Inversion Probe–Based Single-
Hendrikus J. Dubbink, Peggy N. Atmodimedjo, Ronald van Marion, Niels M
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Targeted, High-Depth, Next-Generation Sequencing of Cancer Genes in Formalin- Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded and Fine-Needle Aspiration Tumor Specimens  Andrew.
Tissue acquisition and reflex testing. How do we prioritize?
Modeling Complex Workflow in Molecular Diagnostics
Clinical Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Genomic Oncology Panel via Cross-Platform Benchmarking against Established Amplicon Sequencing Assays 
Plasmid-Based Materials as Multiplex Quality Controls and Calibrators for Clinical Next- Generation Sequencing Assays  David J. Sims, Robin D. Harrington,
European Urology Oncology
Donavan T. Cheng, Talia N. Mitchell, Ahmet Zehir, Ronak H
CRISPR/Cas9 Technology–Based Xenograft Tumors as Candidate Reference Materials for Multiple EML4-ALK Rearrangements Testing  Rongxue Peng, Rui Zhang,
Molecular Diagnosis in Ewing Family Tumors
Molecular Analysis of Gene Fusions in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors by Anchored Multiplex PCR–Based Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing  Suk Wai Lam, Anne-Marie.
DKTK MASTER is an example of whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing-based precision oncology programme. DKTK MASTER is an example of whole-exome and.
黃其晟1 塗昭江1 張景年1 黃清水2 1天主教輔仁大學附設醫院 乳房外科 2國泰綜合醫院 外科部
Clinical Validation and Implementation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay to Detect Somatic Variants in Non-Small Cell Lung, Melanoma, and.
Optimization of Routine Testing for MET Exon 14 Splice Site Mutations in NSCLC Patients  Clotilde Descarpentries, PharmD, Frédéric Leprêtre, PhD, Fabienne.
How I Do It—Optimal Methodology for Multidirectional Analysis of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Samples  Takahiro Nakajima,
Comprehensive Diagnostic Testing for Stereocilin
A Novel Mass Spectrometry–Based Assay for Diagnosis of EML4-ALK–Positive Non– Small Cell Lung Cancer  Kazuko Sakai, PhD, Isamu Okamoto, MD, PhD, Ken Takezawa,
Deciphering TB Lab Reports
Cancer WGS Analytical Pipeline Validation
Coexistence of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Sensitizing and Resistant EGFR Mutations in an Untreated Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient and Response to Erlotinib 
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Malignant Effusions in Patients with Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma  Soo-Ryum Yang, Chieh-Yu Lin, Henning Stehr, Steven.
A Platform for Rapid Detection of Multiple Oncogenic Mutations With Relevance to Targeted Therapy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer  Zengliu Su, Dora Dias-Santagata,
Clinical Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Screen for Mutational Hotspots in 46 Cancer-Related Genes  Rajesh R. Singh, Keyur P. Patel, Mark J.
TS Tumor Panel (15 Genes) Overview
Session 3: Coverage and Reimbursement for Genetic Testing
Practical Bioinformatic DNA-Sequencing Pipeline for Detecting Oncogene Amplification and EGFRvIII Mutational Status in Clinical Glioblastoma Samples 
Development of a Novel Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Carrier Screening in Old Order Amish and Mennonite Populations of Pennsylvania  Erin L. Crowgey,
Preanalytic Variables and Tissue Stewardship for Reliable Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Clinical Analysis  Paolo A. Ascierto, Carlo Bifulco, Giuseppe.
Presentation transcript:

Recommendations/Requirements for Molecular Proficiency Testing Published Date: 9/7/17

Legend of Terms EBV = Epstein-Barr virus FISH = Fluorescence in situ hybridization FFPE = Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded GIST = Gastrointestinal stromal tumor H&E = Hematoxylin and eosin stain HPV = Human papillomavirus ISH = In situ hybridization NGS = Next-generation sequencing PET = Paraffin-embedded tissue PT = Proficiency testing SNV = Single nucleotide variant

Additional Information Regarding CAP Survey Programs For additional information regarding the PT programs mentioned throughout these flow charts, please refer to the Surveys Catalog by clicking on the Catalog and Ordering Information link under the Laboratory Improvement header at www.cap.org.

PT Requirements for Laboratories Accredited by the CAP Participation in PT is integral to the CAP’s accreditation program and is required for most tests for which the laboratory reports results. For analytes that require PT, each laboratory must enroll and participate in a CAP-accepted PT program. In the following flow charts, required programs/analytes will be indicated by an asterisk (*). For tests that do not require enrollment in a CAP-accepted PT program, the laboratory must perform an alternative assessment semiannually to determine the reliability of testing. The most common way to do this is by purchasing an external PT product, if available. Other acceptable alternative assessment procedures are split sample analysis with reference or other laboratories, split samples with an established in-house method, assayed materials or other suitable and documented means. It is the responsibility of the director to define such alternative assessment procedures and the criteria for successful performance. Any program without an asterisk (*) in the following flow charts is not a required PT program and may be used to satisfy alternative assessment requirements. For a full list of required programs/analyte(s), please refer to the Analyte/Procedure Index in the Surveys Catalog.

PT Referral The NGSST, NGSHM, and NGS programs can be used to fulfill alternative assessment requirements for laboratories performing both wet bench and bioinformatic components of the assay. If a distributive testing model is used (eg, different parts of the NGS assay are performed by laboratories with different CLIA numbers), laboratories cannot use these programs for alternative assessment. To do so, laboratories would be subject to sanctions for PT referral. In cases where a laboratory is only performing bioinformatics analysis for the Illumina TruSeq Amplicon Cancer panel or for the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot v2 panel, NGSB1 and NGSB2 may respectively be used for alternative assessment. Laboratories using any other distributive testing approach must use alternative approaches to fulfill the requirement for alternative assessment. Please note that distributive testing laboratories can use PT materials for part of their laboratory quality management program; laboratories should contact CAP for additional details.

Germline Molecular Flow Chart Does your lab do NGS panels, which include reporting/interpreting of specific genes (eg, CFTR associated mutations as part of a large NGS carrier panel)? ▲ Does your lab do Sanger sequencing on specific genes (eg, cystic fibrosis CFTR screening)? Does your lab do whole genome or exome sequencing via NGS? Are your labs activities gene-specific (eg, cystic fibrosis CFTR screening)? Start Yes Yes Is the analyte(s) required by the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program? Yes Yes Your lab may enroll in the methods-based NGS program to satisfy alternative assessment requirements If gene-specific PT is not available or not required, your lab may enroll in a methods-based Sanger sequencing (SEC or SEC1) program to satisfy alternative assessment requirements Yes No Then your lab must enroll in gene-specific PT such as the MGL2* or MGL5* Survey Then your lab may enroll in gene-specific PT (such as PGX ) to satisfy alternative assessment requirements. Otherwise, an alternative assessment scheme, approved by the laboratory director, must be performed Stop ▲A panel is defined as the reporting/interpreting of specific genes on a consistent, ongoing basis, regardless of technical approach (eg, performing exome sequencing on a preselect group of genes would be considered a panel). NOTE: A panel may contain required and non-required analytes; labs must enroll in gene-specific PT for required analytes and may use current PT programs to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for non-required analytes. Additional gene-specific PT programs: AAT*, APOE*, BRCA*, HGM*, IMD*, MGL1-5*, PGX, RETT*, and TPM* *CAP Accreditation Program required program/analyte. Any program without an asterisk (*) reflected in this flow chart is not a required PT program and may be used to fulfill alternative assessment requirements.

Germline Molecular FAQs Q:  My laboratory performs a hearing loss panel by NGS in which we report findings for 100 genes, including GJB2 (Connexin 26). What PT should I enroll in? A:  Your laboratory must enroll in gene-specific PT for Connexin 26 (MGL3* Survey) if it is accredited by the CAP. If there is no gene-specific PT for the remaining genes, your laboratory may enroll in the NGS program to satisfy alternative assessment requirements. Participation in MGL3* for Connexin 26 (GJB2 gene) will not satisfy alternative assessment requirements for the entire hearing loss panel. Q:  My laboratory tests for rare disorders (eg, Aarskog-Scott syndrome, Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome) by sequencing. What CAP PT is available to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for this assay? A:  Since there is not gene-specific PT available, your laboratory can enroll in the SEC or SEC1 Survey to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for Sanger sequencing and the NGS Survey to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for NGS. All three Surveys are considered methods-based programs. Q:  My laboratory does whole genome sequencing on diagnostic odyssey specimens. We report pathogenic/likely pathogenic and variants of uncertain significance that are present in any gene that fits the phenotype. What CAP PT is available to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for this assay? A:  In a case like this, laboratories may enroll in the NGS Survey to satisfy alternative assessment requirements. *CAP Accreditation Program required program/analyte.

General Molecular Oncology Flow Chart Does your lab perform molecular testing on PET? Does your lab perform molecular testing on hematologic malignancies? Does your lab perform molecular testing on solid tumors? No Start Stop No Yes Yes Yes Does your lab want challenges in DNA extraction of PET? Refer to “Hematologic Malignancy Flow Chart” Refer to “Solid Tumor Flow Chart” Order MHO5 Yes Does your lab want challenges in tumor cellularity by H&E? Order NEO Yes No  The testing reflected in this flow chart requires alternative performance assessment. The PT programs listed are not required but may be used to fulfill alternative assessment requirements.

Solid Tumor Flow Chart Does your lab want challenges in micro-satellite instability? Does your lab test for sarcoma translocations? Does your lab test for GIST associated mutations by non-NGS methods? Does your lab test for other DNA based mutations? Does your lab test gliomas? Stop Start No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Does your lab want additional bioinformatic challenges? Order MSI Order GLI Order SARC Order KIT Does your lab test for BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR, regardless of methodology? Does your lab test for genes other than BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR using NGS? Order NGSST♦ Yes Yes Order MTP♦ No Yes Does your lab use the Illumina TruSeq Amplicon Cancer panel? Does your lab use the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot v2 panel? No Stop Order individual gene Surveys (eg, BRAF*, KRAS*, EGFR*) OR MTP* Yes Yes Order NGSB1 Order NGSB2 *BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR are CAP Accreditation Program required analytes. Labs must enroll in the MTP Survey or the individual gene Survey programs (EGFR, KRAS and BRAF). Any program without an asterisk (*) reflected in this flow chart is not a required PT program and may be used to fulfill alternative assessment requirements. ♦NOTE: If there are alternative assays used to confirm NGS findings, these should also have appropriate alternative assessment performed. Alternative assessment options can include participation in CAP PT programs.

Hematologic Malignancy Flow Chart Does your lab perform qualitative testing for CEBFB/MYH11, RUNX1/RUNX1T1, PML/RARA, and other mutations (JAK2 V617F, FLT3 ITD and/or FLT3 TKD, NPM1)? Does your lab perform qualitative and/or quantitative testing for BCR/ABL1? Does your lab perform DNA testing for IGH, IGK, TRB or TRG rearrange-ments? Does your lab perform quantitative testing for PML/RARA? Start Yes Yes Yes Yes Order MHO or MHO1■ p210: order MRD p190: order MRD1 Order MRD2 Order MHO2 or MHO3■ Does your lab perform testing for SNVs and small indels found in hematologic/ lymphoid malignancies by NGS? Stop No ■Contains specimens in duplicate. ♦NOTE: If there are alternative assays used to confirm NGS findings, these should also have appropriate alternative assessment performed. Alternative assessment options can include participation in CAP PT programs. Yes Order NGSHM♦  The testing reflected in this flow chart requires alternative performance assessment. The PT programs listed are not required but may be used to fulfill alternative assessment requirements.

Molecular Oncology FAQs Q: My laboratory performs a 50 gene NGS-based assay designed to detect somatic SNVs and small indels observed in solid tumors. What CAP PT is available to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for this assay? A: BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR are CAP Accreditation Program required analytes and laboratories must enroll in the MTP Survey or the individual gene Survey programs (EGFR, KRAS or BRAF), regardless of the methodology used. The laboratory may enroll in the NGSST Survey to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for the remaining genes in their NGS-based assay. Q: My laboratory performs a 50 gene NGS-based assay designed to detect somatic SNVs and small indels observed in solid tumors. In addition, we have individual Sanger sequencing-based assays for KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR. Can we use the NGSST Survey to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for all of these analytes/genes? A: In this case, the laboratory may order the NGSST Survey for their NGS-based solid tumor assay to satisfy alternative assessment requirements and must order either MTP or the individual gene Surveys for KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR. Q: My laboratory performs a 50 gene NGS-based assay designed to detect somatic SNVs and small indels observed in hematologic malignancies. What CAP PT is available to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for this assay? A: The laboratory may enroll in the NGSHM Survey. It is not necessary to also enroll in MHO Survey for this assay.

Molecular Oncology FAQs (continued) Q: My laboratory performs a 50 gene NGS-based assay designed to detect somatic SNVs and small indels observed in hematologic malignancies. In addition, we have individual PCR-based assays for JAK2, FLT3, and NPM1. Can we use the NGSHM Survey to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for all of these analytes/genes? A: In this case, the laboratory may order the NGSHM Survey for their NGS-based hematologic malignancy assay and MHO2 or MHO3 for the individual PCR-based assays if your laboratory chooses to use CAP PT programs to satisfy alternative assessment requirements. Q: Our laboratory performs NGS-based testing for the detection of somatic copy number variants and structural variants in solid tumors. What CAP PT is available to satisfy alternative assessment requirements for these assays? A: Currently, there are no CAP Survey programs for NGS-based detection of copy number variants and structural variants. An alternative assessment scheme, approved by the laboratory director, must be performed (Sample Exchange Registry, etc). Q: Our laboratory performs NGS-based testing and would like additional bioinformatic challenges in addition to wet-bench challenges. Is there a PT program available for this that may be used to satisfy alternative assessment requirements? A: Yes, the laboratory may enroll in either NGSB1 if they are using the Illumina TruSeq Amplicon Cancer panel or NGSB2 if they are using the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot v2 panel. At this time, we do not suggest that laboratories performing other panel-based tests use these Surveys. CAP is looking into expanding bioinformatics challenges to accommodate additional NGS-based panels.

ISH/FISH Flow Chart Does your lab test FFPE samples? Does your lab test non – FFPE samples (fixed cell suspensions^)? Constitutional/ neoplastic disorders? Urothelial carcinoma? Start Yes Yes Yes HER2 gene Amplification? Brightfield FISH Yes Order CYI* Order CYF Yes Yes Kappa/ Lambda, EBV, and/or HPV? Yes Order ISH2* Order CYH* Order ISH* Stop Glioma (1p/19q)? Yes Order CYJ *CAP Accreditation Program required program/analyte. Any program without an asterisk (*) reflected in this flow chart is not a required PT program and may be used to fulfill alternative assessment requirements. **Challenges rotate between sarcomas, neuroblastomas, gastric carcinoma (HER2), and lung (ALK) cancer/carcinoma. ^ Other preparations (touch preparations, smears, etc.) –alternative assessment required. ISH/FISH interpretation only – alternative assessment required (split sample exchange, etc.). Solid Tumor?** Yes Order CYK Lymphoma? Yes Order CYL

Microarray Testing Flow Chart  Does your lab do cytogenomic microarray analysis? Does your lab do expression arrays? Start Yes Yes Constitutional testing ?● An alternative assessment scheme, approved by the laboratory director, must be performed Yes Order CYCGH Stop Oncology testing? Yes Order CYCMA ●CYCGH PT is not applicable to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) or exon-level array testing. For PGD, alternative assessment is required. For exon-level arrays, gene-specific duplication/deletion PT may be available (eg, DMD, MECP2) to fulfill alternative assessment requirements or laboratories must identify another form of alternative assessment.  The testing reflected in this flow chart requires alternative performance assessment. The PT programs listed are not required but may be used to fulfill alternative assessment requirements.

Additional Information for Microbiology and Histocompatibility: If performing patient testing on specimens by molecular methods only, labs must meet the regulatory requirements of testing 5 specimens in three mailings for each subspecialty, as appropriate. Subspecialties include Bacteriology, Mycology, Virology, and Parasitolology. The Mycobacteriology requirement is 5 specimens tested in each of the two mailings. If performing molecular testing on patient specimens, in addition to traditional culture methods, alternative assessment is required. Alternative assessment can be met through enrollment in PT Surveys. Histocompatibility: Regardless of methodology, laboratories should enroll in the appropriate HLA program(s) to meet testing needs.