Methods & Materials (continued)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short-range, high-LET recoil tracks in CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector E. R. Benton 1, C. E. Johnson 1, J. DeWitt 1, N. Yasuda 2, and E. V. Benton.
Advertisements

Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Interaction of radiation with matter - 5
Esteban Fabián Boggio 1 Lucas Provenzano 2 Sara Gonzalez 2,3 Sara Gonzalez 2,3 Juan Manuel Longhino 1 1 Bariloche Atomic Center, Atomic Energy National.
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
A.Lagoyannis I.N.P.P. NCSR “Demokritos” Nuclear Physics Applications at the Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics A. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear.
Evaluation of the characteristics of TLD LiF:Mg.Ti-100 Powder: A Measure of Consistency Between Multiple Batches of Powder Paola Alvarez,Jose Francisco.
Experimental Determination of Neutron Cross Sections of Yttrium by Activation Method by Barbara Geier Supervisors: Assoc. Prof Dr. Wolfgang Sprengel RNDr.
Study of sputtering on thin films due to ionic implantations F. C. Ceoni, M. A. Rizzutto, M. H. Tabacniks, N. Added, M. A. P. Carmignotto, C.C.P. Nunes,
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Dose. Energy Gained Particles lose energy in matter. Eventually energy loss is due to ionization. An important measure is the amount of energy gained.
Introduction Radioactive nuclei decay in numerous ways: emitting electrons, protons, neutrons, alpha particles, gamma rays, x-rays, or some combination.
Radiation Dosimetry Dose Calculations D, LET & H can frequently be obtained reliably by calculations: Alpha & low – Energy Beta Emitters Distributed in.
Cross section measurements for analysis of D and T in thicker films Liqun Shi Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, , People’s.
Theoretical calculations and simulations of interaction of X-rays with high-Z nanomoities for use in cancer radiotherapy Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan,
Results The measured-to-predicted dose ratio criteria used by the RPC to credential institutions is , however for this work, a criteria of
Joint IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies Student’s presentation Calculation of correction factors for neutron.
Targeted Gold Nanoparticles as Vascular Disrupting Agents during Radiation Therapy RI Berbeco 1, H Korideck 1, S Kunjachan 1, R Kumar 2, S Sridhar 2, A.
Mandi Murph1, Tamotsu Tanaka1, Jihai Pang2, Edward Felix2, James Thompson3 and Gordon Mills1 1Department of Systems Biology, 2Department of Experimental.
Evaluation of the Performance of the Fast Scanning Platform of an OCT System Malcolm Heard 1, Miguel Herrera 1, Geoffrey Ibbott 1 1 Department of Radiation.
Applications of Geant4 in Proton Radiotherapy at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Jerimy C. Polf Assistant Professor Department of Radiation.
Complex Approach to Study Physical Features of Uranium Multiple Recycling in Light Water Reactors A.A. Dudnikov, V.A. Nevinitsa, A.V. Chibinyaev, V.N.
G. Bartesaghi, 11° ICATPP, Como, 5-9 October 2009 MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS ON NEUTRON TRANSPORT AND ABSORBED DOSE IN TISSUE-EQUIVALENT PHANTOMS EXPOSED.
Radiation Processing Irradiation consists in exposing a product to ionizing radiation in order to preserve, modify or improve its characteristics. The.
Daria K. Tuchina, 1,2 Rui Shi, 1 Alexey N. Bashkatov, 2 Elina A. Genina, 2 Dan Zhu, 1 Qingming Luo, 1 Valery V. Tuchin Britton Chance Center for.

Validation of inner shell ionization cross sections for electron transport Sung Hun, Kim Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Passive detectors (nuclear track detectors) – part 2: Applications for neutrons This research project has been supported by the Marie Curie Initial Training.
N. Gubanova 1, V. Kanygin 2, A. Kichigin 3, S. Taskaev 4 1 Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia 2 Novosibirsk State Medical University,
Basic Biologic Interactions of Radiation IONIZATION.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Introduction The Radiological Physics Center (RPC) anthropomorphic quality assurance (QA) phantom program is one tool the RPC uses to remotely audit institutions.
Basics of Ion Beam Analysis
NASA 2001 Mars Odyssey page 1 Workshop HEND Russian Aviation and Space Agency Institute for Space Research Present knowledge of HEND efficiency.
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
ESTRO, Geneva 2003 The importance of nuclear interactions for dose calculations in proton therapy M.Soukup 1, M.Fippel 2, F. Nuesslin 2 1 Department of.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
(DPD 09) Physics 2: EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF FREE RADICAL GENERATION IN NANOPARTICLE-AIDED HDR BRACHYTHERAPY 1,3 Nava Paudel, 1 Diana Shvydka, 2 Eric.
Presentation of Master of medical and imagery physics Rajaa Cherkaoui El Moursli, Mohammed V – Agdal University, Rabat, Morocco Hassan II Academy of Sciences.
Calculation of efficiency for a high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometer used for environmental radioactivity measurements Ileana Radulescu, Marian Romeo.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
5.5 Medical Applications Using Radioactivity
Investigation of the proton-induced reactions on natural molybdenum.
Characterization of proton-activated implantable markers for proton range verification using PET J. Cho1, G. Ibbott1, M. Kerr1, R. A. Amos2, F. Stingo1,
J Cho, G Ibbott, M Kerr, R Amos, and O Mawlawi
J Cho, G Ibbott, M Gillin, C Gonzalez-Lepera, U Titt and O Mawlawi
Proton beam range verification using proton activated fiducials and off-site PET AAPM Best in Physics, Indianapolis, August 7, 2013 Cho J1, Ibbott G1,
M.I. Abbas - Alexandria University - EGYPT.
Proton range verification with PET: 68Zn, Cu and polycarbonate activation SNMMI Young Investigator Symposium, Vancouver, June 9, 2013 Cho J1, Ibbott.
Low Energy Target Irradiation at LERF
P. Buffa, S. Rizzo, E. Tomarchio
Very High Energy Electron for Radiotherapy Studies
at TSL high energy neutron facility
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
S3 Physics Radioactivity
International Workshop on radiosensitization
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
AAPM Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California July 13, 2015
Electron probe microanalysis EPMA
25.4 Radiation in Your Life In a smoke detector, radiation from the Americum nuclei ionizes the nitrogen and oxygen in smoke-free air, allowing a current.
Tips for Inserting Graphs or Images Tips for Title/Headers Bar Color
Feasibility of using O-18 for PET proton range verification
Electron probe microanalysis EPMA
Chemistry 25.4.
Department of Physics, Fudan University
Chemistry 25.4.
CHAPTER 22 Nuclear Chemistry
Nanoparticles for enhancing the effectiveness of proton therapy
Investigation of a Dynamic Measurement Methodology for Fast Detection
Presentation transcript:

Methods & Materials (continued) Measurements of gold nanoparticle-mediated proton dose enhancement due to particle-induced x-ray emission and activation products using radiochromic films and HPGe detector J. Cho1, N. Manohar1,2, C. Gonzalez-Lepera3, M. Kerr1, S. Krishnan4, and S. H. Cho1 1 Dept of Radiatio 1 Department of Radiation Physics, 3 Nuclear Medicine, 4 Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 2 Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA Purpose There have been several reports of enhanced cell-killing and tumor regression when tumor cells and mouse tumors were loaded with gold nanoparticles (GNPs) prior to proton irradiation. While Particle-induced x-ray/gamma-ray emission (PIXE/PIGE) from GNPs, Secondary electrons from GNPs due to proton-Au interactions, Particle-induced nuclear activation products, Reactive oxygen species (or free radicals), and Pharmaco-biological effects have been suggested as potential mechanisms responsible for the observed GNP-mediated dose enhancement/radiosensitization, there is a lack of quantitative analysis regarding the contribution from each mechanism. Here, we report our experimental effort to quantify some of these effects. Results Methods & Materials (continued) Fig. 3: After proton irradiation, EBT2 films were removed from vials, wiped clean of residual GNPs and dried. Films were digitized for OD and dose calculation. For each tested dose and vial location, dose enhancement due to GNPs was calculated by taking the ratio of the dose measured in films immersed in the GNP solution to that in water only. Fig. 6: Ratio of delivered dose between films immersed in GNP solutions (0.3 mg Au/g) and water. Samples receiving 6 Gy were located at 3 different depths (COM, COM ± 3 cm), while samples receiving other doses were located at COM only. No significant dose enhancement was observed, considering the statistical uncertainty (± 2%) of film dosimetry. The average dose enhancement and standard deviation were 1.001 and 0.020, respectively. Methods & Materials (a) (b) Fig. 1: (a) EBT2 films (bottom) were immersed in 1.8-mL vials containing: (left) water and GNPs (0.3 mg Au/g) and (right) water only. (b) Schematic diagram of vials with immersed EBT2 films. Fig. 4: Schematic diagram of EBT2 film immersed in vials with GNPs. The active substrate layer is separated from the GNPs by 80 and 175 µm. The dose enhancement recorded in active substrate layer is from PIXE/PIGE-related photo/Auger electrons and other secondary electrons created from GNPs with ranges >80 µm. Shorter-ranged electrons are absorbed in the outer layers. Fig. 7: Gamma counting performed for 45 hr after 1-hr post-irradiation delay. Spectral peaks from multiple radioisotopes created from proton-water (511 keV only) and proton-Au nuclear interactions were identified. Although only gamma and x-rays were counted, simultaneous electron emission was accounted for, when calculating dose enhancement due to activation products. Dose enhancement due to Au-originated activation products was minimal (<0.1%) when both proton-Au and secondary neutron-Au interactions were considered. Dose enhancement due to PIGE from GNPs was also found to be less than 0.1%, based on cross-section data. Conclusion In the current experiments, photons originating from GNPs due to PIXE/PIGE contributed minimally to dose enhancement. The secondary electrons from proton-Au interactions appeared to have made insignificant contributions to dose enhancement beyond 80 µm. This observation is in agreement with the latest Monte Carlo results demonstrating a highly localized (<100 nm) dose enhancement due to proton irradiation. The current investigation also suggests negligible dose enhancement due to activation products. Fig. 2: The EBT2 film-containing vials were located at COM, COM + 3 cm, and COM - 3 cm and irradiated with 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. 10 cm SOBP 160 MeV proton beam was used. A concentration of 0.3 mg Au/g was used to compare with in-vitro and animal experiments performed using the same concentration. A separate vial with a higher concentration of GNPs (20 mg Au/g) was irradiated at COM using 10 Gy to measure activation products (radioisotopes) from proton-Au nuclear interactions. Fig. 5: Proton-irradiated GNP solution (20 mg Au/g) were pipetted to a clean vial that was not irradiated. The GNPs in the clean vial were placed in a 4π wall-type HPGe (high-purity germanium) detector for gamma spectrometry. Counting was started 9 min post-irradiation and performed for 5, 5, 10, 20 min and 45 hr in a consecutive order. Supported in part by NIH/NCI grant R01CA155446