1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Advertisements

Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Meditations on First Philosophy
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Philosophy 024: Big Ideas Prof. Robert DiSalle Talbot College 408, x85763 Office Hours: Monday and Wednesday.
Meditation One What is the objective of the Meditations? Hint: look at second sentence of Med. I.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
The Evil Demon Argument
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum. Cogito #1 Cogito as Inference □ (Ti→Ei). Not: □ (Ei)
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
Descartes’ First Meditation
In sum, 3 Arguments for God’s Existence are used by Descartes in Meditations: 1. The argument for the existence of God from the fact that I have an idea.
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Descartes’ Meditations
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp ) Revised, 8/20/15.
L ECTURE 6: D ESCARTES. L ECTURE O UTLINE In today’s lecture we will: 1.Become introduced to Rene Descartes 2.Begin our investigation into Descartes’
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
“Cogito, ergo sum.” “I think, therefore I am.”.  chief architect of 17 th C intellectual revolution  laid foundations of ‘modern scientific age’
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
COGITO ERGO SUM.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
The essence of material things and the ontological argument.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Descartes’ Meditations
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
The Ontological Argument
Descartes’ Ontological Argument
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
The Evil Demon Argument
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Aim: To explore Descartes support of the Ontological Argument.
Descartes -- Meditations Four
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy b. March in La Haye France wrote Meditations in 1641 d. February
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Descartes -- Meditations Two
Dualism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Descartes
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Quiz 1 At the beginning of the Second Meditation, what statement is it that Descartes knows to be necessarily true (or at least necessarily true whenever.
¶1 – Intro “I have seen what to do and what to avoid in order to reach the truth” Namely, separate what’s clear from what’s obscure, trust my clear and.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error
Presentation transcript:

1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3 1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3. Whatever I perceive clearly and distinctly to be true is really true. . 4. I know God exists as the source of my idea of perfection. 5. In God His essence includes existence. 6. We are more certain of God’s existence than of all the objects of the senses. 7. I know that material objects exist, but this knowledge is dependent on knowledge of God.

1. I exist, because I think. (Cogito ergo Sum) (This is best seen not as an inference, but as a self-evident truth that I see clearly and distinctly to be true. (Meditation II)

2. I am a thinking thing (res cogitans), since I can conceive myself existing without a body, but I cannot conceive myself without thought. . (Meditation II)

3. I take it as a general principle that whatever I perceive clearly and distinctly to be true is really true. . (Meditation V)

4. I know God exists as the source of my idea of perfection and of ideas I am too imperfect to be the source of. (Mediation III)

5. Ontological Argument for God’s existence: When I conceive clearly and distinctly of the essence of mathematical ideas, I can see their truth without knowing thereby that the objects they represent actually exist in the real world. Essence and existence are distinct in most objects. In God His essence includes existence. (Meditation V)

6. Skeptical doubts about objects of senses: We are more certain of God’s existence than of all the objects of the senses. The existence of the objects of these perceptions might not exist as they do not in dreams. (Meditation I, II)

7. Resolution of these doubts: My rule that what I perceive clearly and distinctly to be true is in fact so, is certain only because I know God exists and is not a deceiver. Hence I know that material objects exist, but this knowledge is dependent on knowledge of God, which doesn’t come from the senses. (Meditation V)

1. I exist, because I think. (Cogito ergo Sum) (This is best seen not as an inference, but as a self-evident truth that I see clearly and distinctly to be true. (Meditation II) 2. I am a thinking thing (res cogitans), since I can conceive myself existing without a body, but I cannot conceive myself without thought. . (Meditation II) 3. I take it as a general principle that whatever I perceive clearly and distinctly to be true is really true. . (Meditation V) 4. I know God exists as the source of my idea of perfection and of ideas I am too imperfect to be the source of. (Mediation III) 5. Ontological Argument for God’s existence: When I conceive clearly and distinctly of the essence of mathematical ideas, I can see their truth without knowing thereby that the objects they represent actually exist in the real world. Essence and existence are distinct in most objects. In God His essence includes existence. (Meditation V) 6. Skeptical doubts about objects of senses: We are more certain of God’s existence than of all the objects of the senses. The existence of the objects of these perceptions might not exist as they do not in dreams. (Meditation I) 7. Resolution of these doubts: My rule that what I perceive clearly and distinctly to be true is in fact so, is certain only because I know God exists and is not a deceiver. Hence I know that material objects exist, but this knowledge is dependent on knowledge of God, which doesn’t come from the senses. (Meditation V)