DNA Barcoding of Shinnecock Bay Crabs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Insect DNA Barcoding. Agenda DNA Bug Barcoding at FLCC Finger Lakes Invertebrate Biodiversity Study (FLIBS) Introduction to Biology (for majors), Research.
Advertisements

Sequencing of the 1 st Intron: 30 DNA samples: (15 from 1997 & 15 from 2004) Amplified 3 B. rapa FLC genes of the 1 st intron using PCR Visualized DNA.
Effects of Genetic Diversity on the Plant Communities of the Peconic River Robert Biersach 1, Maximilian Carson 1, Michael Pizzichemi 1 Mentors: Mr. Bolen.
Examining Lichen Biodiversity in Fire Island through DNA Barcoding Authors: Urooba Abid, Samuel Croes, Danielle Hofmann, and Hamza Malick Mentor: Lorie.
Shinnecock Bay Crabs and Biodiversity Abstract: The birth of this project of an exploration in biodiversity began on an excursion to the Shinnecock Bay.
Introduction Biodiversity is important in an ecosystem because it allows the species living in that ecosystem to adapt to changes made in the environment.
Introduction Biodiversity, in the simplest terms, means variation in living systems and that is extremely important to any habitat that wants to continue.
Using DNA Barcoding to Identify Freshwater Algae in Two Bodies of Water Lauren Cottral, Shweta Karmakar, Janalyce Torres Islip High School Results We were.
Dragon Fly Larvae Genetic Barcoding References 1.What is DNA barcoding? (2015) Retrieved from barcoding(n.d.).
Introduction In the Peconic River, biodiversity is a vital aspect of the environment which eminently contributes to the net productivity of the ecosystem.
Unidentified Flora of the Upper Peconic River Authors: Angela Blangiforti, Theresa Blangiforti Sabrina Sauerwald, Edward Spagnuolo Teachers: Robert Bolen,
Plant Biodiversity in the Peconic River Methods ●First, 20 leaf samples from the Peconic River Otis Pike Preserve were collected. All the samples are from.
Genetic Diversity Of Freshwater Snails in The Peconic River Using the DNA Barcoding Method ●Biodiversity refers to the amount of genetic diversity in ecosystems.
Biodiversity of the Peconic River Estuary
Saltwater Algae vs Freshwater Algae
Measuring Dragonfly Biodiversity in the Peconic River
Humanity’s Effects on the Biodiversity of the Peconic River
Testing the Biodiversity of Terrestrial Earthworms around Argyle
Biodiversity of Seaweed on Long Island
Evidence of Two Invasive Aquatic Species in Lake Ronkonkoma
Human Impact on Peconic River Biodiversity
Abstract Tables & Figures Introduction Materials & Methods Results
Mackenzie Damon, Nita George, Amy Tomko – *Sayville High School
Biodiversity of Macroinvertebrates at Argyle Lake
Identifying Species In The Peconic River Using DNA Barcoding Method
Authors: Danish Farooq, Gregory Kowalczyk, Michael Steffanetta
Species Biodiversity in the Peconic River
Fungus Among Us at Brookside County Park
Damselfly Biodiversity in the Peconic River
Comparison of Plant Species in Big Egg Marsh in Jamaica Bay, NY
Coding the Surface: Examining the Composition of a Recurring Unknown Culture of Organisms in Van Cortlandt Lake Ryan Conard,1 David Goldberg,1 Zander Harpel,1.
Biodiversity in a Nitrogen Loaded Bay System
Biodiversity in Oyster Reefs: A DNA Barcoding Approach
Diversity of Damselflies: The Damselflies of Van Cortlandt Park
Species Diversity of Moriches Bay
The extraction of microorganisms in the Great South Bay
FIGURE 2: SAMPLES COLLECTED FIGURE 1: STEPS OF DNA BARCODING
By: Jason Massry and Joey Cohen
Ants as Indicators of Salt
The Biodiversity of Snails in Van Cortlandt Park
DNA Barcoding of Damselfly Nymphs
Biodiversity of Ants: DNA Barcode of Formicidae Collected in Two Different Locations Relative to Pollution Funded by the Thompson Family Foundation Authors:
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of DNA extracted
Figure 7(above): Map of where samples were collected in Staten Island
Identifying a Novel Species Through DNA Barcoding
Aquatic Plant Life Biodiversity in Long Island’s Rivers
Terrestrial Species of the Peconic River
Are Those Beetles Eating Our Trees?
Effects of Pollution on Biodiversity of Algae in Bodies
Ants Effect on Soil Composition
Authors: Danish Farooq, Gregory Kowalczyk, Michael Steffanetta
Results Abstract Introduction Discussion Materials & Methods
Collected Species Examining the Biodiversity of Plankton in a High Nutrient Load Coastal Bay System Alyscia Batista, Paige Carpenter, Aleisha Degillo,
Authors: Lauren Aslami3 and Sabrina Li3
Identification of New Invasive Species in the Peconic River
Alexi Flores, Olivia Reid, Ethan Young, Adriana Zarcone
Biodiversity in the Forge River
Amphipod Diversity in Two Bay Estuaries in Mattituck:
Testing Marine Copepod Diversity Throughout the Connetquot River
Biodiversity in the Peconic and Forge River
Impacts of Water Pollution on Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity
The Effect of Humans in The Environment
Biodiversity in Aquatic Ecosystems
Biodiversity of Long Island Macroinvertebrate In the Connetquot River
Abstract Materials & Methods Results Acknowledgements References
Identification of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates in a Pond on Long Island
. . Using DNA Barcoding To Measure The Biodiversity in Ants in Residential Areas And Park Areas Authors: Emily Augulis1, Paige Dreher1, Sarah Hussain1.
Effect of Forge River Organisms on the Health of Humans and Biodiversity Gabrielle Freund, Olivia Lindquist, Thomas Michel, Anatolii Vakaryuk.
DNA Barcoding of Ground Plants in Prospect Park
Authors: Heather Abbene and Stephanie Ross Mentor: Frederick Feraco 1
Presentation transcript:

DNA Barcoding of Shinnecock Bay Crabs Authors: Cassandra Shore, Haley Minnear, Liam McGevna, Thomas Cassar Teacher: Robert Bolen, James Ostensen Eastport South Manor Junior-Senior High School Abstract Genetic variation is the differences in genes in a species. This project planned to measure the genetic variation of Shinnecock bay crabs.It is vital for these crab species to have gnetic variation because they play a key role in the Shinecock bay ecosystem. These crabs eat decaying organisms in the bay, which in turn helps to keep the bay “clean”. Of the samples we collected, It was discovered that the Dyspanopeus sayi samples are 98.4% similar in the CO1 gene. This leads to the conclusion that the species has little genetic variation. But it is difficult to tell with one gene and future studies may include the use of the ITS gene. Discussion If the desired results are not achieved with the CO1 gene, the ITS gene may also be used in this project. It was discovered that there is little genetic variation between the crab species that was barcoded. This means that the gene that was selected has little variation: however in future studies, if there was an additional gene selected for sequencing, one would be able to determine if there was another overlooked variation within the species. When the DNA was first sent back from sequencing after PCR, many of the the sequences were not acceptable or were not crab DNA. The samples were sent back for resequencing. When the sequences came back, it was discovered that the species of crabs were Dyspanopeus sayi. After analysing the results, there was little to no genetic variation among the crab samples in the Shinnecock Bay area. Results Introduction Genetic variation is vital to every ecosystem and species because it makes them stable and prosperous. Without genetic variation one simple change to the environment could destroy a whole population. Crabs are necessary to most aquatic ecosystems. They feed on decomposing plants, algae and bacteria which keeps the water quality in a healthy range. In this experiment, the question that is being asked is: What is the genetic variation of the crab samples that were extracted from Shinnecock Bay? During the past couple of years the Shinnecock Bay has had multiple issues with water quality. These issues are caused by multiple occurrences such as nutrient loading and algal blooms. DNA Barcoding is used to determine the DNA sequences in an organism. With the information from DNA Barcoding it is possible to compare the biodiversity of different organisms in a population accurately. Figures 1 & 2: Gel Results of PCR. The most prominent sample are numbers: 2, 3, 9, 15, 18. These samples were then sent to DNA subway to be sequenced. References "NOAA'sNational Ocean Service." NOAA's National Ocean Service. National Ocean Service, 3 Sept. 2014. Web. 12 Nov. 2015. Jaffe, D., & McDonough, C. (2012). Indicator species. Retrieved from -http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/153801 inbreeding. (n.d.). The American Heritage® Science Dictionary. Retrieved November 12, 2015, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/inbreeding About the Brown Tide." NY Sea Grant. N.p., n.d. Web -www.seagrant.sunysb.edu/articles/r/1118 Identifying Species with DNA Barcoding « Barcode of Life." Identifying Species with DNA Barcoding « Barcode of Life. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2015. -http://barcoding.si.edu/whatis.html "NOAA's National Ocean Service." NOAA's National Ocean Service. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2015.-www.oceanservice.noaa.gov "What Is DNA Barcoding?" « Barcode of Life. N.p., n.d. Web. Oct.-Nov. 2015. http://www.barcodeoflife.org/content/about/what-dna-barcoding Figure 3: These pins represent the areas where the samples were collected (40.8521244935°N,72.4887371063°W) Figure 4: Similarities of DNA sequences for listed species in Figure 7. Methods Twenty crab samples were collected from the Shinnecock Bay estuary in October of 2015. The samples were obtained by trolling, or pulling a large fish net behind a boat. The samples were stored in freezers at ESM for a few weeks. In January of 2016, standard DNA extraction protocol was conducted with procedure and equipment provided by CSHL. In order to amplify a specific gene sequence, PCR was performed at BNL, using protocol by CSHL, in March of 2016. After sequencing, the five crab crab samples that had the best sequencing were uploaded onto DNA subway and were compared to one another to indicate the species of the crabs and if there was any genetic diversity. Figure 5: Results revealed a lack of genetic variation in this species, Dyspanopeus sayi, in the Shinnecock bay area. Acknowledgments Dr. Sharon Pepenella at Cold Spring Harbor Lab for guidance during the entire process; Dr. Aleida Perez and Mr. Daniel Williams for support at the BNL Open Labs; Dr. Daniel Moloney at SUNY Stony Brook for his support at the Open Labs; Mr. Michael Doyle for printing our posters at the school, Our teacher mentors: Mr. Bolen, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Ostensen, Dr. Spata Figure 6: The species DNA are about 98% similar to local Dragonfly and Mayfly species in the area. Figure 7: Dyspanopeus sayi