Introduction to Philosophy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmological Argument What is it?. Cosmological Argument The simple starting point is that we know the universe exists (a posteriori) The simple starting.
Advertisements

DOES GOD EXIST? Click Above. UNIT QUESTIONS WWhat does “God” mean? HHow does science correlate with the existence of God? WWhat proof do we have.
PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD Arguments for the Justification of Theism: Cosmological, Moral, Design (Teleological) and Ontological.
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
The God Stuff II. Background What makes this a table? Material Causes: The table is made of wood. Efficient Causes: The carpenter made it a table. Formal.
“… if (the best philosophy) doesn ’ t seem peculiar you haven ’ t understood it ” Edward Craig.
Aquinas’s First Way – highlights It’s impossible for something to put itself into motion. Therefore, anything in motion is put into motion by something.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 4 Thomas Aquinas & an Intro to Philosophy of Religion By David Kelsey.
The Philosophy of Christianity Scholasticism. Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274)  Dominican Monk  Primary work was Summa Theologica  Wanted to make a science.
The Cosmological Argument. Aquinas’s Cosmological Argument Cosmological Argument is ‘a posteriori’ Attempts to prove the existence of God There are three.
The Cosmological Argument The idea that there is a first cause behind the existence of the universe.
Skepticism The Causal Argument. God A nd now I seem to discover a path that will conduct us from the contemplation of the true God, in whom are contained.
The Cosmological argument
Cosmological arguments from causation Michael Lacewing
The Cosmological Argument.
Cosmological argument
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
The Cosmological and Teleological Arguments for God.
Cosmological arguments from contingency Michael Lacewing
History of Philosophy Lecture 12 Thomas Aquinas
And what do these phrases from Aquinas’ argument mean? Things lacking cognition The governance of things Tend toward a goal The way things are controlled,
1225 – 1274 (Aquinas notes created by Kevin Vallier) Dominican monk, born to Italian nobility. Worked ~150 years after Anselm. Student of Albert the Great.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways.
Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category
PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
EXISTENCE OF GOD. Does God Exist?  Philosophical Question: whether God exists or not (reason alone)  The answer is not self-evident, that is, not known.
Saint Thomas Aquinas ( ) What is the proper relation between faith and reason? What is the distinction between philosophy and theology? What is.
Arguments for God’s existence.  What are we arguing for?
1.Everything which begins to exist has a cause. 2.The Universe exists so it must have a cause. 3.You cannot have infinite regress (i.e. An infinite number.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence or how come we all exist? Is there a rational basis for belief in God?
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
Notes - Proofs for God’s Existence
St. Thomas AquinasSt. Thomas Aquinas  CE  Naples, Italy  Benedictine then Dominican monk  Primary Works:  Summa contra Gentiles  Summa.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
Arguments for The Existence of God St. Thomas Aquinas’ 5 Proofs.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
Thomas Aquinas and the Existence of God * The Five Ways (or Proofs) of St. Thomas Aquinas. * We can come to know God through reason. * Consistent with.
Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Mr M Banner 2016 Grade 12 th May 2016 Starter: What does Cosmology mean to you? Title:
Introduction to Humanities Lecture 11 Anselm & Aquinas By David Kelsey.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways. Thomas Aquinas ( ) Joined Dominican order against the wishes of his family; led peripatetic existence thereafter.
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence
Cosmological arguments from contingency
Arguments based on observation Arguments based on reason
Saint Thomas Aquinas.
Arguments and Conclusions
Arguments relating to the existence of God
Aquinas’ Five Proofs.
Cosmological Argument
Pioneers of Critical Thinking (Socrates, Plato Aristotle) / Thomas Aquinas and Critical Thinking Objectives: To trace the intellectual legacy of the pioneers.
The Cosmological Argument
St. Thomas Aquinas. Contents  1. Biography  II. Philosophy and Theology  III. Proofs of God’s Existence  IV. Knowledge of God’s Nature  V. Creation.
Explore the use of inductive reasoning in the cosmological argument
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Cosmological Argument Essay planning
The Cosmological argument
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Saint Thomas Aquinas.
The First Cause (Cosmological) Argument
The Cosmological Argument
The Origin Of The Universe The Cosmological Argument
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 4 Thomas Aquinas & an Intro to Philosophy of Religion By David Kelsey.
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
Explore the key ideas of the cosmological argument. (8 marks)
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways

Introduction to Philosophy Aristotle/Christianity Aquinas The Five Ways Saint Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274 Italian Dominican friar natural theology Aristotle/Christianity

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways The three main types of arguments for the existence of God: cosmological (“first cause”) the bare fact that there is a universe, that things exist teleological (”design”) the fact that many things in the universe have purpose or order ontological the idea/definition of “God”

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes Premise Nothing exists without efficient cause Premise Nothing is the efficient cause of itself Premise You can’t trace back the efficient cause idefinitely Premise There must be an originator of the first cause Conclusion God exists as the first originator

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes In the natural world (i.e the world of physical objects in space and time), events occur. (an event = thing(s) undergoing change). Every natural event has a cause. Since a cause must exist before its effect, nothing can be its own cause, because nothing can exist before it exists. A chain of causes and effects extending into the past to infinity is an impossibility. --------- 5. There is a first uncaused cause of the first natural event(s) (the Big Bang?), which is not itself a natural event or natural thing. 6. This “supernatural” thing is God.

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes In the natural world (i.e the world of physical objects in space and time), events occur. (an event = thing(s) undergoing change). Every natural event has a cause. Since a cause must exist before its effect, nothing can be its own cause, because nothing can exist before it exists. A chain of causes and effects extending into the past to infinity is an impossibility. --------- 5. There is a first uncaused cause of the first natural event(s) (the Big Bang?), which is not itself a natural event or natural thing. 6. This “supernatural” thing is God. Objection 1: 6 doesn’t follow from 5.

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes In the natural world (i.e the world of physical objects in space and time), events occur. (an event = thing(s) undergoing change). Every natural event has a cause. Since a cause must exist before its effect, nothing can be its own cause, because nothing can exist before it exists. A chain of causes and effects extending into the past to infinity is an impossibility. --------- 5. There is a first uncaused cause of the first natural event(s) (the Big Bang?), which is not itself a natural event or natural thing. 6. This “supernatural” thing is God. Objection 2: 4 is not obviously true.

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes In the natural world (i.e the world of physical objects in space and time), events occur. (an event = thing(s) undergoing change). Every natural event has a cause. Since a cause must exist before its effect, nothing can be its own cause, because nothing can exist before it exists. A chain of causes and effects extending into the past to infinity is an impossibility. --------- 5. There is a first uncaused cause of the first natural event(s) (the Big Bang?), which is not itself a natural event or natural thing. 6. This “supernatural” thing is God. Objection 3: “Every natural event” instead of “Everything” in 2 has to be justified.

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes In the natural world (i.e the world of physical objects in space and time), events occur. (an event = thing(s) undergoing change). Every natural event has a cause. Since a cause must exist before its effect, nothing can be its own cause, because nothing can exist before it exists. A chain of causes and effects extending into the past to infinity is an impossibility. --------- 5. There is a first uncaused cause of the first natural event(s) (the Big Bang?), which is not itself a natural event or natural thing. 6. This “supernatural” thing is God. Objection 4: The inference from 1-4 to 5 commits the “birthday fallacy.”

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The First Way: Argument from Motion Premise Conclusion

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The First Way: Argument from Motion Our senses prove that some things are in motion. Things move when potential motion becomes actual motion. Only an actual motion can convert a potential motion into an actual motion. Nothing can be at once in both actuality and potentiality in the same respect (i.e., if both actual and potential, it is actual in one respect and potential in another). Therefore nothing can move itself. Therefore each thing in motion is moved by something else. The sequence of motion cannot extend ad infinitum. Conclusion: Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The Third Way: Argument from Possibility and Necessity (Reductio argument) Premise Conclusion

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The Third Way: Argument from Possibility and Necessity (Reductio argument) We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, that come into being and go out of being i.e., contingent beings. Assume that every being is a contingent being. For each contingent being, there is a time it does not exist. Therefore it is impossible for these always to exist. Therefore there could have been a time when no things existed. Therefore at that time there would have been nothing to bring the currently existing contingent beings into existence. Therefore, nothing would be in existence now. We have reached an absurd result from assuming that every being is a contingent being. Therefore not every being is a contingent being. Conclusion: Therefore some being exists of its own necessity, and does not receive its existence from another being, but rather causes them. This all men speak of as God.

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The Fourth Way: Argument from Gradation of Being Premise Conclusion

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The Fourth Way: Argument from Gradation of Being There is a gradation to be found in things: some are better or worse than others. Predications of degree require reference to the “uttermost” case (e.g., a thing is said to be hotter according as it more nearly resembles that which is hottest). The maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus. Conclusion: Therefore there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God.

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The Fifth Way: Argument from Design Premise Conclusion

Introduction to Philosophy Aquinas The Five Ways  © 2016 Theodore Gracyk The Fifth Way: Argument from Design We see that natural bodies work toward some goal, and do not do so by chance. Most natural things lack knowledge.   But as an arrow reaches its target because it is directed by an archer, what lacks intelligence achieves goals by being directed by something intelligent. Conclusion: Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God.