Contact: Patrick Phillips,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol Development.
Advertisements

Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Authors and affiliation Research, University of Sheffield, 3 East Midlands Ambulance Service Study flow Conclusion In addition to measures relating to.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination An overview of development and progress May 2013 PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
Systematic review of the ‘added value’ for well-being of physical activity in outdoor natural environments Ruth Garside Senior Lecturer in Evidence Synthesis.
Background Information : Projected prevalence of arthritis is expected to increase from 2.9 million to 6.5 million Canadians, a rise of 124% (Badley.
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
A systematic review of school-based skills building behavioural interventions for preventing sexually transmitted infections in young people Jonathan Shepherd.
Results  81 papers were reviewed 55 papers psychoeducational interventions 19 papers educational interventions 14 papers multicomponent interventions.
O Type 2 diabetes has traditionally been managed as a single chronic disease state but it can commonly exist with co-morbidities such as depression. o.
What is the Evidence for Social Care Intervention in the Emergency Department? Introduction  The current health and social care delivery system is not.
Systematic Reviews.
Registering and analyzing malaria clinical trials in Africa: the PACT registry initiative Vittoria Lutje*^, Annette Gerritsen**, Nandi Siegfried***. Paul.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Pre-hospital Outcomes for Evidence-Based Evaluation (PhOEBE) – A Systematic Review Viet-Hai Phung, Research Assistant, Community and Health Research Unit.
Core Outcome Domains for Eczema – Results of a Delphi Consensus Project Introduction Eczema is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disorder that affects.
Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland
Determining Acceptable Waiting Times for the Surgical Treatment of Solid Organ Malignancies - A Systematic Review CIHR Grant: Toward Canadian Benchmarks.
Background Information Audience Response Systems (ARS) are a technology used in classrooms that consist of an input device controlled by the learner, a.
ITU Journal Club: Dr. Clinton Jones. ST4 Anaesthetics.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
Review Characteristics This review protocol was prospectively registered with BEME (see flow diagram). Total number of participants involved in the included.
1 Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, U. K. 2 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, U. K.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Systematic Review Krit Pongpirul, MD, MPH. Johns Hopkins University.
Selenium supplementation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a Cochrane review Clinical
Adverse Effects of Single Dose Gentamicin in Adults - A Systematic Review Hayward R S, Harding J, Molloy R, Land L, Longcroft-Neal K, Moore D, Ross J D.
Effectiveness of yoga for hypertension: Systematic review and meta-analysis Marshall Hagins, PT, PhD1, Rebecca States,
Effects of Uric acid- lowering therapy on renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nephrol Dial Transplant (2014) 29: Vaughan Washco.
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
Evidence Synthesis/Systematic Reviews of Eyewitness Accuracy
The Research Design Continuum
Interprofessional Online Learning for Primary Health Care:
The Need for Competing Risks
iHEA Boston 2017 Congress, Boston Massachusetts, USA 8-11 July 2017
Complex abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of contamination and active infection: a systematic review of fistula and hernia recurrence rates.
School Of Health And Related Research
HEALTH PROMOTION, INTEGRAL CARE AND SOCIAL INCLUSION
Rachel Morell1, Simon Rosenbaum1,2 and Belinda J Parmenter1
Figure 5. Treatment of the checkpoint inhibitor related toxicity
A Meta Analysis of the Impact of SBI on Healthcare Utilization
Living with vascular disease: A qualitative study.
Alessandro Andreucci, Paul Campbell, Kate Dunn
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Contact: Patrick Phillips,
Development of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire to capture the impact of living with a vascular condition: ePAQ-VAS Patrick Phillips, Elizabeth.
Systematic Reviews: Hints and tips
Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal injury identified through medical screening and training load monitoring in professional football (soccer): a systematic.
Foroutan N1,2, Muratov S1,2, Levine M1,2
Performance Measurement and Rural Primary Care: A scoping review
Health-care interactions and placebo effects:
PROMs in Carotid Artery Revascularisation
The efficacy of using CAD for detection of
Pearls Presentation Use of N-Acetylcysteine For prophylaxis of Radiocontrast Nephrotoxicity.
Introduction to Systematic Reviews
Title The NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility was established by the Wellcome Trust and the Department of Health in The NIHR Southampton.
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Manual Thrombectomy in ST elevation myocardial infarction Investigators: Ashraf Alazzoni,
A Meta Analysis of the Impact of SBI on Healthcare Utilization
Is performing a scoping review useful after recent Cochrane review?
Dr. Maryam Tajvar Department of Health Management and Economics
Social prescribing: Less rhetoric and more reality
PROMs in Carotid Artery Revascularisation
Google Scholar: 8,554 publications Systematic search:
Does cinnamon reduce fasting blood glucose in Type II diabetics?
Effectiveness of Systemic Treatments for Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies & Clinical Trials ACR Partridge1, JW Bai1,
Surgical re-excision versus observation for histologically dysplastic nevi: a systematic review of associated clinical outcomes K.T. Vuong1, J. Walker2,
Dr. Charmayne Dubé Dr. Beverley Temple
Dr. Charmayne Dubé Dr. Beverley Temple
Trent Regional SAPC Conference 19 March 2019
Introduction to Systematic Reviews
Presentation transcript:

Contact: Patrick Phillips, Patrick.phillips@sheffield.ac.uk School Of And Health Related Research Volume-outcome relationships in the treatment of AAA in Europe: a systematic review. Phillips, P; Poku, E; Essat, M; Woods, HB; Goka, EA; Kaltenthaler, EC; Shackley, P; Michaels, JA. School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK Background: Searches for evidence of a relationship between the volume of patients treated for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and outcomes identified nine relevant systematic reviews which were generally supportive of an inverse relationship for mortality. However the evidence base was low quality, dated and more relevant to the context of the USA than Europe. Subsequent scoping searches identified a number of relevant primary studies from Europe which were not included in the identified reviews, thus establishing a need for a new systematic review in this area. The objective of this review was to evaluate the relationship between the volume of AAA surgery undertaken by individual clinicians or hospitals and outcomes (primary outcome mortality). A publicly available and pre-registered protocol is available at: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014014850 Literature Searching: Comprehensive electronic searches were conducted in multiple databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE to March 2015, using MESH and free text terms, these searches were supplemented by reference list and citation searches. Inclusion criteria: studies, published in the last ten years, of European populations of adults undergoing elective or emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment where the effect of hospital or operator volume on outcomes is reported. Data Extraction was conducted independently by two authors, quality assessment was conducted using a modified version of ACROBAT-NRSI. Synthesis by meta-analysis was planned in the event that there was sufficient clinical, methodological and statistical homogeneity in included studies; alternatively a narrative synthesis was planned. 14,486 individual references identified following de-duplication 14,038 records excluded after title and abstract screening 417 papers excluded following full text scrutiny 31 potentially eligible full text papers 17 excluded as carotid or lower limb vascular populations 14 studies included in the AAA review Results: fourteen eligible studies (n =200,506 participants) were included; 10 from the UK, 3 from Germany and 1 from Norway. All the included studies were observational using a combination of prospective, retrospective, administrative and clinical data. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of clinical and procedural groups investigated which is compounded by; variety in the methods used to define volume groups, in the analysis of outcomes and by different studies using overlapping data sources making meta-analyses inappropriate. Overall, included studies were of low methodological quality, particularly in relation to the risk of selection bias. Preliminary synthesis of adjusted and unadjusted data suggests a relationship between high volumes of procedures conducted in hospitals and reduced mortality. The relationship between surgeon volume and mortality and other relevant outcomes could not be established due to insufficient evidence. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests the existence of an inverse relationship between the volume of AAA procedures conducted in hospital and mortality, though this conclusion is tentative based on the relatively low quality of the evidence. There is insufficient evidence to reach conclusions regarding other outcomes and relationships. Funding and disclaimer: This poster presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Programme Grants for Applied Research programme (RP-PG-1210-12009). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health Contact: Patrick Phillips, Patrick.phillips@sheffield.ac.uk School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK www.facebook.com/scharrsheffield ruth.wong@sheffield.ac.uk