Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
05/31/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, NuInt '07 1 Charged Current Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/XXX Teppei Katori for the MiniBooNE.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Near detectors and systematics IDS-NF plenary meeting at TIFR, Mumbai October 13, 2009 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF: AAAAA.
H. Ray, University of Florida1 MINIBOONE  e e .
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Near Detector Working Group for ISS Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 24 January 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
1 Latest CC analysis developments New selection efficiencies: –Based on C++ reco + PDFs rather than old (Fortran+reco_minos) cuts –Attempt to optimise.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
1 Updated Anti-neutrino Oscillation Results from MiniBooNE Byron Roe University of Michigan For the MiniBooNE Collaboration.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE LLWI, 25 Feb 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
1 PHYSICS IN THE NuMI BEAM with a ~10 kiloton LARTPC prototype ASH RIVER or SOUDAN J.Schneps PRELIMINARY,UNFINISHED, & ROUGH Sept. 27, 2007.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
How to extract Neutrino Factory flux from IMD and neutrino elastic scattering? Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, Oct. 05 Data/MC Comparisons and Estimating the ND Flux with QE Events ● Update on QE event selection.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
1 Study of physics impacts of putting a far detector in Korea with GLoBES - work in progress - Eun-Ju Jeon Seoul National University Nov. 18, 2005 International.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Neutrino DIS measurements in CHORUS DIS2004 Strbske Pleso Alfredo G. Cocco INFN – Napoli.
Inclusive charm cross-section and charm hadrons production fractions F. Di Capua.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
1 Translation from Near to Far at K2K T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK for K2K beam monitor group (K.Nishikawa, T.Hasegawa, T.Inagaki, T.Maruyama, T.Nakaya,....)
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Near Detector Tasks EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Paul Soler.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Recent Results from the T2K ND280 detector Jonathan Perkin on behalf of the T2K collaboration KAMIOKA TOKAI 295 km.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
NNN 2011: The d Experiment Joshua Albert Duke University For the T2K Collaboration November 8, 2011.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
F.Sánchez for the K2K collaboration UAB/IFAE
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
First Anti-neutrino results!
Fine-Grained Near Detector(s) at JHF: Purpose and Thoughts
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Neutrino interaction measurements in K2K SciBar
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Improvements in Sin2qW
Presentation transcript:

Systematics Sanghoon Jeon

# of systematic parameters used for fitting : 24 NCpi+ : 1 non-QE fraction : 4 matter density : 1 intrinsic and NCpi0 background : 4 nue cross section : 4 extrapolation : 4 energy scale : 2 SK detector error : 4 systematics (# of parameters) error source corr. det. NCpi+(1) 0.30 T2K - ? o non-QE farction(4) 0.20 -1.0 (XsecMode) matter density(1) 0.06 intrinsic & NCpi0 background(4) 0.05 0.36 (intrinsic<->NCpi0) nue cross section(4) 0.0283 -0.5 (FluxMode) assumed extrapolation(4) 0.0275~ 0.0337 0.77/0.80 (PolarityMode) energy scale(2) 0.024 no corr. x SK detector error(4) 0.0208, 0.0260

NC pi+ value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 1.0 0.30 0.0 10.0 111111 100 10 11 error : “Based on the approach taken by T2K, a 30% error is applied here.”– white paper

non-QE fraction CCnQE anti-correlated param.(CCQE) value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 1.0 0.2 0.0 10.0 010101 010 11 -1.0 0.0927 001 101010 0.0952 error : “In T2K near detector fits, the normalization of the non-quasielastic 2p-2h component of the cross section is fitted with a 20% error. Here a 20% error is applied to the normalization of the non-quasielastic interactions. An anti-correlated parameter is applied to the quasielastic interactions, and its error is chosen such that the normalization of the unoscillated event rate is conserved for variations of these parameters.”– white paper correlations - anti-correlated between CCQE and CCnQE backgrounds - uncorrelated between neutrinos and antineutrinos - fully correlated between the detectors

matter density value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 3.0 0.18 0.0 10.0 111111 111 11 10 3 1.0 error : “An uncertainty of 6% is assigned based on previous estimates.”– white paper

intrinsic and NCpi0 background value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 1.0 0.05 0.0 001100 011 11 01 0.36 111111 100 10.0 10 error : “Studies of this measurement with the NuPRISM detector show an expected statistical error of 3%. A total error of 5% is considered to account for uncertainties in the different efficiency and fluxes between the near and far detectors.” – white paper correlations - correlated(0.36) between intrinsic and NCpi0 backgrounds - uncorrelated between the neutrino and antineutrino beam modes - fully correlated between the detectors

nue cross section value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 1.0 0.0283 0.0 010100 011 11 -0.5 101000 10.0 error : “Here the T2K approach based on the work of Day & Mc-Farland is taken.” – white paper correlations : “The correlation between these parameters is assigned assuming there is a 2% systematic effect that is uncorrelated between neutrinos and antineutrinos and an additional 2% systematic effect with anti-correlation between neutrinos and antineutrinos.” – white paper - uncorrelated for energy range(0.0~1.0[GeV] <-> 1.0~10.0[GeV]) - anti-correlated(-0.5) between neutrinos and antineutrinos - fully correlated between the detectors

extrapolation value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 1.0 0.0278 0.0 10.0 111111 011 10 01 11 0.80 0.0275 0.0286 0.77 0.0337 error : “To model this uncertainty, the T2K errors are applied as an overall uncertainty on the charged current event rate.”– white paper correlations - uncorrelated between the 1Re and 1Rmu samples - correlated(1Re-0.80, 1Rmu-0.77) between the neutrino and antineutrino beam modes - fully correlated between the detectors

energy scale value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 1.0 0.024 0.0 10.0 111111 111 11 01 2 10 error : “The energy scale at Super-K is calibrated using samples of Michel electrons, pi0s and stopping cosmic muons. In T2K oscillation analyses, the energy scale error is found to be 2.4%.” – white paper correlations - fully correlated between the 1Re and 1Rmu samples - uncorrelated between the detectors

SK detector error value error Emin Emax Flux Mode Xsec PID Type Polarity Detectors Correlations 1.0 0.0260 0.0 10.0 111111 111 10 11 01 0.0208 error : “This uncertainty is estimated based on the uncertainty evaluated for T2K.”– white paper correlations - uncorrelated between the 1Re and 1Rmu samples - uncorrelated between the detectors